Lung CancerMILDNCT02837809
Early Lung Cancer Detection in High Risk Individuals
A study testing Low dose CT in people with Lung Cancer, run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The MILD project is a randomized lung cancer screening trial whose primary aim is to evaluate the impact on mortality of early lung cancer detection through LDCT (low-dose computed tomography) in 2 groups: a control group undergoing a program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation and a group… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 49 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Low dose CT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4,099 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 49 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Current or former smokers, age ≥50 years or older with a minimum of 20 pack-years smoking history, no history of malignant disease, and adequate performance status (assessed on the basis of the patient's eligibility to undergo thoracic surgery).
Who cannot join
- History of malignant disease in the previous years and not adequate performance status (assessed on the basis of the patient's eligibility to undergo thoracic surgery).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Early Lung Cancer Detection With Spiral Computed Tomography (CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Biomarkers: Randomized Trial in High Risk Individuals
The MILD project is a randomized lung cancer screening trial whose primary aim is to evaluate the impact on mortality of early lung cancer detection through LDCT (low-dose computed tomography) in 2 groups: a control group undergoing a program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation and a group undergoing a periodic spiral CT associated with primary prevention and pulmonary function test evaluation. This last one is also randomized in two arms: yearly low-dose CT vs CT every 2 years.
MILD trial comprehensive design combines for the first time primary prevention (smoking cessation) with early detection, and molecular risk profile through assessing the value of blood and tissue biomarkers.
Read the detailed description
The preliminary results of the pilot study on early lung cancer detection by spiral CT and PET launched in Milan in 2000 and published in the Lancet in 2003 showed a positive outcome, confirming the essential safety of spiral CT and a high proportion (95%) of complete resections and stage I disease (77%). However, the results at six years revealed a different picture, with an increasing number of advanced lung cancers being detected from the third to the fifth year, and no evidence of significant mortality reduction for lung cancer by annual CT monitoring of our cohort of heavy smokers. These data were confirmed by a meta-analysis conducted by two senior epidemiologists of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Peter Bach and Colin Begg, of the three concurrent single arms studies: IEO/INT, Mayo Clinic and Lee Moffitt Cancer Center trials. Such a meta-analysis demonstrated that annual CT increases by 3-4 fold the number of detected lung cancers but does not reduce the incidence of advanced and potentially lethal disease. These data strengthen the validity of the plan to continue clinical research on early lung cancer detection by a randomized controlled study in 2005. In fact there is an overwhelming consensus in the International scientific community that uncontrolled observational studies will not be able to provide further knowledge in this field. Only large randomised controlled clinical trial will hopefully provide convincing evidence on the magnitude of the benefit achievable by early detection programmes with spiral CT in heavy smokers.
In 2005, with the support of AIRC (Italian Association for Cancer Research) and the Ministry of Health, the investigators launched the new INT (National Institute of Tumors) randomized controlled study, named Multicentric Italian Lung Detection trial (MILD), combining smoking cessation with early diagnosis and biologic assessment of individual risk of lung cancer.
The initial goal at INT was to recruit 10,000 subjects from 10 different Italian centres by the end of 2008. This task has proven unfeasible for a number of reasons, including the lack of available institutions with sufficient experience and logistic facilities to run large long-term trials, and the strong campaign in the media in favor of early detection programmes, which has made the randomisation in a control arm unacceptable for a large proportion of volunteers. As a matter of fact, despite the formal collaboration of Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS Rome), signed in February 2006, and the acceptance of the protocol by the Ethics Committee of many Italian centres, only two other Institutions have started active accrual by July 2007.
As a consequence, the INT has decided to increase its target for the MILD trial to 4000 subjects, with the aim of joining the other two Italian randomized studies (DANTE and ITALUNG) to provide a strong Italian meta-analysis of at least 10,000 subjects, that might in the future be compared with the two large on-going randomised trials, the NCI trial in the United States and the Nelson trial in northern Europe (Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark), providing concurrent data on the southern European population.
MILD study recruits subjects randomized in 2 groups: a control group undergoes to a program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation and a group to periodic spiral CT associated with primary prevention and pulmonary function test evaluation. The last one is randomized in two arms: yearly low-dose CT vs CT every 2 years. MILD trial comprehensive design combines for the first time primary prevention with early detection and molecular risk profiling representing an innovative research against lung cancer.
The investigators recruited volunteers through a newspaper and television campaign, that provided information about the study design and eligibility criteria. The participants were asked to sign written informed consent to randomization in one of the two groups. Upon arrival, subjects were given a questionnaire to be completed and returned before leaving the centre. It includes a brief personal and family medical history, smoking details and information about attempts and assistance to stop smoking. A blood sample is collected from each subject at baseline and every two years follow-up. A basic spirometry is performed on each occasion.
Randomization:
- Control group protocol Control group undergo a program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation and blood collection. Each participant is contacted annually to collect relevant data on health status, hospital admission, and diagnosis or treatment of any concurrent disease, with particular emphasis on respiratory disorders and interval cancers. The study database is updated in real time with all such information.
- CT scan group protocol Baseline and annual single-slice spiral CT are performed without contrast material, with a low-dose protocol, and reconstruction with lung algorithm at every 1 and 5 mm. The CT scanner is a 16 slice. Effective radiation dose is equivalent to 1.54 mSv (milliSievert). Examinations are independently reported by two radiologists within 6 days, on a dedicated workstation and standard lung and mediastinum windows and maximum projection visual resolution reconstruction, for between-observer variability testing. A sophisticate algorithm for volumetric reconstruction and CAD (Computer-Aided Detection) software are used. Investigators deem calcified nodules or lesions with a maximum diameter of 5 mm (measured on lung window) non-suspicious and schedule repeat low-dose CT at next year, as per the protocol. Spiral thin-section CT limited to the area of interest and further examinations for growth assessment are completed within 3 months of baseline CT in every case of non-calcified lesion larger than 5 mm. Non-calcified lesions of 7 mm or larger, are tested with fluorine-18-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose PET(positron emission tomography) and calculation of standardised uptake value. For each patient, the metabolic activity of the lung nodule is assessed by standardised uptake values, measured with regions of interest manually drawn around the nodule on transaxial images.
Blood sample and plasma collection In both groups a sample of peripheral blood is collected during the first evaluation. Five aliquots of 1 millilitre of whole blood are frozen at -80°C.
The aim of biomarker and proteomic analysis and evaluation of individual genetic lung cancer risk is to assess whether this analysis can identify individuals at higher risk of cancer, improve the sensitivity and specificity of imaging techniques, such as low-dose CT scan and PET scan, or both. A team of research nurses, a data manager, and the study coordinator have maintained continuous contact with the enrolled volunteers to guarantee an appropriate follow-up. Each participant is recalled at least twice yearly to collect relevant data on health status, hospital admission, and diagnosis or treatment of any concurrent disease, with particular emphasis on respiratory disorders and interval cancers. The study database is updated in real time with all such information.
In both groups, pulmonary function tests is evaluated with a spirometer connected to a computer for the analysis of data. The following parameters are registered: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV), the amount of air you exhale may be measured at 1 second (FEV1), forced expiratory flow 25% to 75%, peak expiratory flow (PEF).
People who have even a brief counselling session with a health care professional are more likely to quit smoking. The ASK, ADVISE, ASSESS, ASSIST, and ARRANGE model was developed to help health care professionals with their patients who smoke. The physician asks the patient about their smoking status at every visit; advises the patient to stop smoking; assesses the patient's willingness to quit; assists the patient by setting a date to quit smoking, provides self-help materials, and recommends use of nicotine replacement therapy (such as the nicotine patch); and arranges for follow-up visits.
At present, blood sample aliquots have been collected and stored in the MILD tissue bank, as well as the cancer and healthy tissue samples from all surgically resected cases.
Also the strong commitment to biological research is been boosted by increasing the spectrum of MILD-related studies, covering proteomic and micro-arrays analysis, and launching a new research initiative aimed at evaluation of the role of COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in lung cancer development, with particular interest to the structural, morphologic and proteomic inflammatory damages related to lung cancer.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Low dose CT
- Keywords
- low-dose computed tomography, lung, randomized controlled trial, neoplasms, screening, smoking
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Smoking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low dose CTRadiation
Also called LDCT
annual CT vs biennial CT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Low Dose CT, annual or biennial, associated with primary prevention and pulmonary function test evaluation. Receives: Radiation: Low dose CT |
| Control | No intervention | Program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lung cancer mortality
evaluate the impact on mortality of early lung cancer detection through LDCT at annual or biennial intervals versus no screening
Measured: 10 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Smoking cessation
evaluate the impact on smoking cessation of early lung cancer detection through LDCT at annual or biennial intervals versus no screening
Measured: 10 years
Molecular risk profile through assessing the value of circulating DNA in blood samples
Circulating DNA, quantified through a real-time quantitative PCR approach based on the 5' nucleotide method: Correlation of results of qPCR DNA levels, epidemiological data on smoking exposition and level of functional impairment (spirometry and DLCO) to define a map of individual biological damage and define a quantitative score of individual risk of lung cancer, possibly related to preneoplastic lung lesions.
Measured: 10 years
Molecular risk profile through assessing the value of microRNA in blood and tissue samples
MicroRNA expression profile, using TaqMan microfluidic cards: Association with aggressiveness of the disease and poor survival in tumors and in normal lung tissue and the critical influence of a smoking related lung microenvironment on tumor progression
Measured: 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Primary completionJan 2011
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4,099 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Ministry of Health, Italy
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ugo Pastorino, MD, Principal investigator, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02837809
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INT 53/05
- Acronym
- MILD
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Sozzi G, Roz L, Conte D, Mariani L, Andriani F, Lo Vullo S, Verri C, Pastorino U. Plasma DNA quantification in lung cancer computed tomography screening: five-year results of a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan 1;179(1):69-74. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200807-1068OC. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
PubMed 18787214Sozzi G, Pastorino U, Croce CM. MicroRNAs and lung cancer: from markers to targets. Cell Cycle. 2011 Jul 1;10(13):2045-6. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.13.15712. No abstract available.
PubMed 21623159Boeri M, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. Role of microRNAs in lung cancer: microRNA signatures in cancer prognosis. Cancer J. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):268-74. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318258b743.
PubMed 22647364Marchiano A, Calabro E, Civelli E, Di Tolla G, Frigerio LF, Morosi C, Tafaro F, Ferri E, Sverzellati N, Camerini T, Mariani L, Lo Vullo S, Pastorino U. Pulmonary nodules: volume repeatability at multidetector CT lung cancer screening. Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):919-25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2513081313. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
PubMed 19380692Roz L, Verri C, Conte D, Miceli R, Mariani L, Calabro' E, Andriani F, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. Plasma DNA levels in spiral CT-detected and clinically detected lung cancer patients: a validation analysis. Lung Cancer. 2009 Nov;66(2):270-1. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Sep 9. No abstract available.
PubMed 19744743Sverzellati N, Ingegnoli A, Calabro E, Randi G, La Vecchia C, Marchiano A, Kuhnigk JM, Hansell DM, Zompatori M, Pastorino U. Bronchial diverticula in smokers on thin-section CT. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan;20(1):88-94. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1515-2. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
PubMed 19597819Boeri M, Verri C, Conte D, Roz L, Modena P, Facchinetti F, Calabro E, Croce CM, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3713-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100048108. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
PubMed 21300873Pastorino U, Rossi M, Rosato V, Marchiano A, Sverzellati N, Morosi C, Fabbri A, Galeone C, Negri E, Sozzi G, Pelosi G, La Vecchia C. Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012 May;21(3):308-15. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328351e1b6.
PubMed 22465911Pastorino U. Current status of lung cancer screening. Thorac Surg Clin. 2013 May;23(2):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2013.01.018.
PubMed 23566965Field JK, van Klaveren R, Pedersen JH, Pastorino U, Paci E, Becker N, Infante M, Oudkerk M, de Koning HJ; European Randomized Screening Trial Group. European randomized lung cancer screening trials: Post NLST. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;108(5):280-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.23383. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PubMed 23893464Pastorino U, Sverzellati N. Lung cancer: CT screening for lung cancer--do we have an answer? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec;10(12):672-3. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.198. Epub 2013 Nov 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 24189470Fortunato O, Boeri M, Verri C, Conte D, Mensah M, Suatoni P, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. Assessment of circulating microRNAs in plasma of lung cancer patients. Molecules. 2014 Mar 10;19(3):3038-54. doi: 10.3390/molecules19033038.
PubMed 24619302Sozzi G, Boeri M, Rossi M, Verri C, Suatoni P, Bravi F, Roz L, Conte D, Grassi M, Sverzellati N, Marchiano A, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Pastorino U. Clinical utility of a plasma-based miRNA signature classifier within computed tomography lung cancer screening: a correlative MILD trial study. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):768-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.4357. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
PubMed 24419137Boeri M, Sestini S, Fortunato O, Verri C, Suatoni P, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. Recent advances of microRNA-based molecular diagnostics to reduce false-positive lung cancer imaging. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015 Jun;15(6):801-13. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2015.1041377. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
PubMed 25924864Hu J, Boeri M, Sozzi G, Liu D, Marchiano A, Roz L, Pelosi G, Gatter K, Pastorino U, Pezzella F. Gene Signatures Stratify Computed Tomography Screening Detected Lung Cancer in High-Risk Populations. EBioMedicine. 2015 Jul 8;2(8):831-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.07.001. eCollection 2015 Aug.
PubMed 26425689
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Lung Cancer Detection With Spiral Computed Tomography (CT), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Biomarkers: Randomized Trial in High Risk Individuals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02837809
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MILD / INT 53/05
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- low-dose computed tomography, lung, randomized controlled trial, neoplasms, screening, smoking
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4,099 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Ministry of Health, Italy
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Primary completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The MILD project is a randomized lung cancer screening trial whose primary aim is to evaluate the impact on mortality of early lung cancer detection through LDCT (low-dose computed tomography) in 2 groups: a control group undergoing a program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation and a group undergoing a periodic spiral CT associated with primary prevention and pulmonary function test evaluation. This last one is also randomized in two arms: yearly low-dose CT vs CT every 2 years.
MILD trial comprehensive design combines for the first time primary prevention (smoking cessation) with early detection, and molecular risk profile through assessing the value of blood and tissue biomarkers.
Detailed description
The preliminary results of the pilot study on early lung cancer detection by spiral CT and PET launched in Milan in 2000 and published in the Lancet in 2003 showed a positive outcome, confirming the essential safety of spiral CT and a high proportion (95%) of complete resections and stage I disease (77%). However, the results at six years revealed a different picture, with an increasing number of advanced lung cancers being detected from the third to the fifth year, and no evidence of significant mortality reduction for lung cancer by annual CT monitoring of our cohort of heavy smokers. These data were confirmed by a meta-analysis conducted by two senior epidemiologists of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Peter Bach and Colin Begg, of the three concurrent single arms studies: IEO/INT, Mayo Clinic and Lee Moffitt Cancer Center trials. Such a meta-analysis demonstrated that annual CT increases by 3-4 fold the number of detected lung cancers but does not reduce the incidence of advanced and potentially lethal disease. These data strengthen the validity of the plan to continue clinical research on early lung cancer detection by a randomized controlled study in 2005. In fact there is an overwhelming consensus in the International scientific community that uncontrolled observational studies will not be able to provide further knowledge in this field. Only large randomised controlled clinical trial will hopefully provide convincing evidence on the magnitude of the benefit achievable by early detection programmes with spiral CT in heavy smokers.
In 2005, with the support of AIRC (Italian Association for Cancer Research) and the Ministry of Health, the investigators launched the new INT (National Institute of Tumors) randomized controlled study, named Multicentric Italian Lung Detection trial (MILD), combining smoking cessation with early diagnosis and biologic assessment of individual risk of lung cancer.
The initial goal at INT was to recruit 10,000 subjects from 10 different Italian centres by the end of 2008. This task has proven unfeasible for a number of reasons, including the lack of available institutions with sufficient experience and logistic facilities to run large long-term trials, and the strong campaign in the media in favor of early detection programmes, which has made the randomisation in a control arm unacceptable for a large proportion of volunteers. As a matter of fact, despite the formal collaboration of Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS Rome), signed in February 2006, and the acceptance of the protocol by the Ethics Committee of many Italian centres, only two other Institutions have started active accrual by July 2007.
As a consequence, the INT has decided to increase its target for the MILD trial to 4000 subjects, with the aim of joining the other two Italian randomized studies (DANTE and ITALUNG) to provide a strong Italian meta-analysis of at least 10,000 subjects, that might in the future be compared with the two large on-going randomised trials, the NCI trial in the United States and the Nelson trial in northern Europe (Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark), providing concurrent data on the southern European population.
MILD study recruits subjects randomized in 2 groups: a control group undergoes to a program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation and a group to periodic spiral CT associated with primary prevention and pulmonary function test evaluation. The last one is randomized in two arms: yearly low-dose CT vs CT every 2 years. MILD trial comprehensive design combines for the first time primary prevention with early detection and molecular risk profiling representing an innovative research against lung cancer.
The investigators recruited volunteers through a newspaper and television campaign, that provided information about the study design and eligibility criteria. The participants were asked to sign written informed consent to randomization in one of the two groups. Upon arrival, subjects were given a questionnaire to be completed and returned before leaving the centre. It includes a brief personal and family medical history, smoking details and information about attempts and assistance to stop smoking. A blood sample is collected from each subject at baseline and every two years follow-up. A basic spirometry is performed on each occasion.
Randomization:
- Control group protocol Control group undergo a program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation and blood collection. Each participant is contacted annually to collect relevant data on health status, hospital admission, and diagnosis or treatment of any concurrent disease, with particular emphasis on respiratory disorders and interval cancers. The study database is updated in real time with all such information.
- CT scan group protocol Baseline and annual single-slice spiral CT are performed without contrast material, with a low-dose protocol, and reconstruction with lung algorithm at every 1 and 5 mm. The CT scanner is a 16 slice. Effective radiation dose is equivalent to 1.54 mSv (milliSievert). Examinations are independently reported by two radiologists within 6 days, on a dedicated workstation and standard lung and mediastinum windows and maximum projection visual resolution reconstruction, for between-observer variability testing. A sophisticate algorithm for volumetric reconstruction and CAD (Computer-Aided Detection) software are used. Investigators deem calcified nodules or lesions with a maximum diameter of 5 mm (measured on lung window) non-suspicious and schedule repeat low-dose CT at next year, as per the protocol. Spiral thin-section CT limited to the area of interest and further examinations for growth assessment are completed within 3 months of baseline CT in every case of non-calcified lesion larger than 5 mm. Non-calcified lesions of 7 mm or larger, are tested with fluorine-18-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose PET(positron emission tomography) and calculation of standardised uptake value. For each patient, the metabolic activity of the lung nodule is assessed by standardised uptake values, measured with regions of interest manually drawn around the nodule on transaxial images.
Blood sample and plasma collection In both groups a sample of peripheral blood is collected during the first evaluation. Five aliquots of 1 millilitre of whole blood are frozen at -80°C.
The aim of biomarker and proteomic analysis and evaluation of individual genetic lung cancer risk is to assess whether this analysis can identify individuals at higher risk of cancer, improve the sensitivity and specificity of imaging techniques, such as low-dose CT scan and PET scan, or both. A team of research nurses, a data manager, and the study coordinator have maintained continuous contact with the enrolled volunteers to guarantee an appropriate follow-up. Each participant is recalled at least twice yearly to collect relevant data on health status, hospital admission, and diagnosis or treatment of any concurrent disease, with particular emphasis on respiratory disorders and interval cancers. The study database is updated in real time with all such information.
In both groups, pulmonary function tests is evaluated with a spirometer connected to a computer for the analysis of data. The following parameters are registered: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume (FEV), the amount of air you exhale may be measured at 1 second (FEV1), forced expiratory flow 25% to 75%, peak expiratory flow (PEF).
People who have even a brief counselling session with a health care professional are more likely to quit smoking. The ASK, ADVISE, ASSESS, ASSIST, and ARRANGE model was developed to help health care professionals with their patients who smoke. The physician asks the patient about their smoking status at every visit; advises the patient to stop smoking; assesses the patient's willingness to quit; assists the patient by setting a date to quit smoking, provides self-help materials, and recommends use of nicotine replacement therapy (such as the nicotine patch); and arranges for follow-up visits.
At present, blood sample aliquots have been collected and stored in the MILD tissue bank, as well as the cancer and healthy tissue samples from all surgically resected cases.
Also the strong commitment to biological research is been boosted by increasing the spectrum of MILD-related studies, covering proteomic and micro-arrays analysis, and launching a new research initiative aimed at evaluation of the role of COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in lung cancer development, with particular interest to the structural, morphologic and proteomic inflammatory damages related to lung cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Radiation: Low dose CTLow Dose CT, annual or biennial, associated with primary prevention and pulmonary function test evaluation. |
| Control | No intervention | –Program of primary prevention with pulmonary function test evaluation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 49 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Current or former smokers, age ≥50 years or older with a minimum of 20 pack-years smoking history, no history of malignant disease, and adequate performance status (assessed on the basis of the patient's eligibility to undergo thoracic surgery).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- History of malignant disease in the previous years and not adequate performance status (assessed on the basis of the patient's eligibility to undergo thoracic surgery).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low dose CTAlso: LDCTannual CT vs biennial CT | Radiation | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Lung cancer mortality
Time frame: 10 years
evaluate the impact on mortality of early lung cancer detection through LDCT at annual or biennial intervals versus no screening
3 secondary outcomes
Smoking cessation
Time frame: 10 years
Molecular risk profile through assessing the value of circulating DNA in blood samples
Time frame: 10 years
Molecular risk profile through assessing the value of microRNA in blood and tissue samples
Time frame: 10 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 18787214Sozzi G, Roz L, Conte D, Mariani L, Andriani F, Lo Vullo S, Verri C, Pastorino U. Plasma DNA quantification in lung cancer computed tomography screening: five-year results of a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan 1;179(1):69-74. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200807-1068OC. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
- Background: PubMed 21623159Sozzi G, Pastorino U, Croce CM. MicroRNAs and lung cancer: from markers to targets. Cell Cycle. 2011 Jul 1;10(13):2045-6. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.13.15712. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22647364Boeri M, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. Role of microRNAs in lung cancer: microRNA signatures in cancer prognosis. Cancer J. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):268-74. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318258b743.
- Results publication: PubMed 19380692Marchiano A, Calabro E, Civelli E, Di Tolla G, Frigerio LF, Morosi C, Tafaro F, Ferri E, Sverzellati N, Camerini T, Mariani L, Lo Vullo S, Pastorino U. Pulmonary nodules: volume repeatability at multidetector CT lung cancer screening. Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):919-25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2513081313. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 19744743Roz L, Verri C, Conte D, Miceli R, Mariani L, Calabro' E, Andriani F, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. Plasma DNA levels in spiral CT-detected and clinically detected lung cancer patients: a validation analysis. Lung Cancer. 2009 Nov;66(2):270-1. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Sep 9. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 19597819Sverzellati N, Ingegnoli A, Calabro E, Randi G, La Vecchia C, Marchiano A, Kuhnigk JM, Hansell DM, Zompatori M, Pastorino U. Bronchial diverticula in smokers on thin-section CT. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan;20(1):88-94. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1515-2. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 21300873Boeri M, Verri C, Conte D, Roz L, Modena P, Facchinetti F, Calabro E, Croce CM, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3713-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100048108. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 22465911Pastorino U, Rossi M, Rosato V, Marchiano A, Sverzellati N, Morosi C, Fabbri A, Galeone C, Negri E, Sozzi G, Pelosi G, La Vecchia C. Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012 May;21(3):308-15. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328351e1b6.
- Results publication: PubMed 23566965Pastorino U. Current status of lung cancer screening. Thorac Surg Clin. 2013 May;23(2):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2013.01.018.
- Results publication: PubMed 23893464Field JK, van Klaveren R, Pedersen JH, Pastorino U, Paci E, Becker N, Infante M, Oudkerk M, de Koning HJ; European Randomized Screening Trial Group. European randomized lung cancer screening trials: Post NLST. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;108(5):280-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.23383. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 24189470Pastorino U, Sverzellati N. Lung cancer: CT screening for lung cancer--do we have an answer? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec;10(12):672-3. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.198. Epub 2013 Nov 5. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 24619302Fortunato O, Boeri M, Verri C, Conte D, Mensah M, Suatoni P, Pastorino U, Sozzi G. Assessment of circulating microRNAs in plasma of lung cancer patients. Molecules. 2014 Mar 10;19(3):3038-54. doi: 10.3390/molecules19033038.
- clinical trial websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ugo Pastorino, MD principal investigator
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low dose CT in people with Lung Cancer, run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lung cancer mortality (time frame: 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02837809, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2024.