Diabetic FootNEWfeetNCT02841969
Management of the Diabetic Foot Using Electrolysed Water
A study testing Electrolysed water and Prontosan in people with Diabetic Foot, run by NHS Lanarkshire at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
More patients with diabetes mellitus have led to increasing rates of chronic non-healing wounds. These wounds are colonised with pathogens, including multi-drug resistant organisms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Foot
- What is being tested?
- Electrolysed water and Prontosan
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 28 Feb 2017to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult diabetic patients (18-65 years) with chronic (>6 weeks) non-healing wounds(>2cm2) identified and counselled by study clinicians, along with additional information supplied by the Patient Information leaflet.
- -
Who cannot join
- Patients with underlying terminal disease will be excluded from this trial along with those with severe co-morbidities, e.g. morbidly obese; uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 97 mmol/mol); gangrene; chronic leg oedema/venous disease; end-stage renal disease; untreatable ischaemic heart disease; HIV; etc. Patients with ongoing infection at trial entry will be treated and then reassessed. Any previous documented allergy to either Prontosan™ or electrolysed water will also exclude the patient. Any adverse effects thought to be due to either irrigant will necessitate study withdrawal and investigation. If there is doubt over the continuation of the correctly assigned irrigant for a specific patient, then that patient's data will be labelled as such and noted for the final analysis. This will also be the case and/or if there are lapses of more than 4 treatment sessions during therapy.
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Hairmyres Hospital
East Kilbride, Lanarkshire, G75 8RG
About this study
Official title: Randomised Double Blind Controlled Trial of Neutral Electrolysed Water vs Conventional Management of Non-healing Diabetic Feet (NEWfeet)
More patients with diabetes mellitus have led to increasing rates of chronic non-healing wounds. These wounds are colonised with pathogens, including multi-drug resistant organisms. Despite repeated courses of antibiotics subsequent management is difficult due to devascularisation of surrounding tissues and healing failures. Ultimately, patients may require amputation. Electrolysed water is a novel antiseptic produced by passing an electric current through a mixture of tap water and salt. Microbiocidal activity is due to the presence of hypochlorous acid at neutral Ph. Irrigation of chronic wounds with electrolysed water reduces bacterial load and appears to encourage wound healing. Following an encouraging pilot study, we propose to compare electrolysed water against conventional management for diabetic patients with non-healing foot ulcers. Adult diabetics with chronic ulcers attending podiatry at Hairmyres Hospital will be recruited to receive regular debridement and irrigation of wounds using either in-use product (Prontosan™) or electrolysed water as part of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Strict enrolment criteria will be applied, with regular clinical assessment and microbiological screening. Lesions present for >6 weeks and >2cm will be photographed at trial entry and graded using standardised criteria. Wounds will be monitored for at least 12 weeks (max. 20), with primary composite end-point defined as complete healing; >50% healing of initial lesion; and/or avoidance of surgical intervention. Secondary endpoints are surgical intervention, including debridement or amputation; antibiotic therapy; and/or patient death. The main objective is to compare rapidity of wound healing using either in-use product or electrolysed water. Improved healing could potentially benefit patients who might otherwise progress to amputation. We will also monitor antimicrobial consumption in study patients throughout the trial. A final objective is to cost the use of electrolysed water vs cost of Prontosan in the routine management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Read the detailed description
Study design: The entrance criteria specify adult diabetic patients (18-65 years) with chronic (>6 weeks) non-healing wounds(>2cm2) identified by study clinicians and counselled by aid of a Participant Information sheet (PIS). Having considered the PIS for >24hrs, patients who wish to participate will provide signed formal consent and will be entered into the trial. Relevant demographic and clinical data will be recorded with baseline microbiology, blood tests and classification of wound and pain score. Wounds will be graded according to the Texas classification and photographed. Pain score at entry will be measured by modified McGill questionnaire and graded from 0(no pain) to 5(severe pain). Study patients will be randomly assigned to receive either in-use product or electrolysed water according to predetermined statistical protocol and will be given a code for continued identification. The patient's notes will be tagged with study and code information, with copies sent to the patient's GP.
The wound will be inspected, debrided, cleaned and irrigated twice a week using electrolysed water or in-use product (Prontosan™). In-patients may receive more frequent application (e.g. daily) depending upon wound status. This will be performed by ward nurses for in-patients and for outpatients by podiatrists in the Diabetic clinic. Patients will be assessed by podiatrists weekly (<=20wks) or until an agreed end-point is reached; research assessments will coincide with routine outpatient clinic attendance or in-patient review to minimise patient inconvenience.
Release of electrolysed water will be coordinated by the research scientist. Supplies will be decanted into identical containers in order to blind staff as to product identity. The bottles will be labelled 'A' or 'B. Patients randomised to receive study or in-use irrigant will continue with the same product, to which they were initially assigned.
If a patient develops an infection, then they will receive clinical review and microbiological screening. These patients will continue with trial irrigants but will be offered appropriate antibiotics according to laboratory data. They will be encouraged to complete the trial but their data will be analysed separately on final analysis.
Patients with underlying terminal disease will be excluded from this trial along with patients with severe co-morbidities, e.g. morbidly obese; uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 97 mmol/mol); gangrene; chronic leg oedema/venous disease; end-stage renal disease; untreatable ischaemic heart disease; HIV; etc. Patients with ongoing infection at trial entry will be treated and then reassessed. Any previous documented allergy to either Prontosan™ or electrolysed water will also necessitate exclusion. Any adverse effects thought to be due to either irrigant will prompt study withdrawal and investigation. If there is doubt over the continuation of the correctly assigned irrigant for a specific patient, then that patient's data will be labelled as such and noted for the final analysis. This will also be the case and/or if there are lapses of more than 4 treatment sessions during therapy. All data will be retained for the final project report.
The primary composite end-points are: complete healing; >50% healing of initial lesion; and/or avoidance of surgical intervention including amputation. Secondary endpoints are: surgical debridement including amputation; antibiotic consumption; and patient death. Each patient lesion will be photographed at the agreed end-point.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot
- Being tested
- Electrolysed water, Prontosan
- Keywords
- Ulcer, Electrolysed, Water
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Foot, Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Electrolysed waterOther
Also called Aqualution Salvesan
Irrigation of wound using electrolysed water
ProntosanOther
Irrigation of wound using Prontosan
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Normal care - Prontosan | Active comparator | Patient wounds will be irrigated using the in-use product (Prontosan) Receives: Other: Prontosan |
| Investigational arm - Electrolysed water | Experimental | Patient wounds will be irrigated using electrolysed water Receives: Other: Electrolysed water |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of complete wound healing
Compare the use of neutral electrolysed water in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers against routine NHS management, which uses Prontosan for antiseptic irrigation.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study start28 Feb 2017
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Following consultation, neutral electrolysed water was deemed to be a medical device. A study amendment will re-submitted to NHS Ethics and the UK regulator (MHRA). These actions delayed due to the pandemic - expected to take place in June 2022.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic FootStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Lanarkshire
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Aqualution Systems Ltd
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephanie Dancer (MBBS, FRCP), MD, Principal investigator, NHS Lanarkshire
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02841969
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEWfeet_01
- Other IDs
- L16077
- Acronym
- NEWfeet
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Double Blind Controlled Trial of Neutral Electrolysed Water vs Conventional Management of Non-healing Diabetic Feet (NEWfeet)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02841969
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEWfeet / NEWfeet_01
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot
- Keywords
- Ulcer, Electrolysed, Water
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- SuspendedReason stopped: Following consultation, neutral electrolysed water was deemed to be a medical device. A study amendment will re-submitted to NHS Ethics and the UK regulator (MHRA). These actions delayed due to the pandemic - expected to take place in June 2022.
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS LanarkshireOther government
- Collaborators
- Aqualution Systems Ltd
- Study start
- 28 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
More patients with diabetes mellitus have led to increasing rates of chronic non-healing wounds. These wounds are colonised with pathogens, including multi-drug resistant organisms. Despite repeated courses of antibiotics subsequent management is difficult due to devascularisation of surrounding tissues and healing failures. Ultimately, patients may require amputation. Electrolysed water is a novel antiseptic produced by passing an electric current through a mixture of tap water and salt. Microbiocidal activity is due to the presence of hypochlorous acid at neutral Ph. Irrigation of chronic wounds with electrolysed water reduces bacterial load and appears to encourage wound healing. Following an encouraging pilot study, we propose to compare electrolysed water against conventional management for diabetic patients with non-healing foot ulcers. Adult diabetics with chronic ulcers attending podiatry at Hairmyres Hospital will be recruited to receive regular debridement and irrigation of wounds using either in-use product (Prontosan™) or electrolysed water as part of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Strict enrolment criteria will be applied, with regular clinical assessment and microbiological screening. Lesions present for >6 weeks and >2cm will be photographed at trial entry and graded using standardised criteria. Wounds will be monitored for at least 12 weeks (max. 20), with primary composite end-point defined as complete healing; >50% healing of initial lesion; and/or avoidance of surgical intervention. Secondary endpoints are surgical intervention, including debridement or amputation; antibiotic therapy; and/or patient death. The main objective is to compare rapidity of wound healing using either in-use product or electrolysed water. Improved healing could potentially benefit patients who might otherwise progress to amputation. We will also monitor antimicrobial consumption in study patients throughout the trial. A final objective is to cost the use of electrolysed water vs cost of Prontosan in the routine management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Detailed description
Study design: The entrance criteria specify adult diabetic patients (18-65 years) with chronic (>6 weeks) non-healing wounds(>2cm2) identified by study clinicians and counselled by aid of a Participant Information sheet (PIS). Having considered the PIS for >24hrs, patients who wish to participate will provide signed formal consent and will be entered into the trial. Relevant demographic and clinical data will be recorded with baseline microbiology, blood tests and classification of wound and pain score. Wounds will be graded according to the Texas classification and photographed. Pain score at entry will be measured by modified McGill questionnaire and graded from 0(no pain) to 5(severe pain). Study patients will be randomly assigned to receive either in-use product or electrolysed water according to predetermined statistical protocol and will be given a code for continued identification. The patient's notes will be tagged with study and code information, with copies sent to the patient's GP.
The wound will be inspected, debrided, cleaned and irrigated twice a week using electrolysed water or in-use product (Prontosan™). In-patients may receive more frequent application (e.g. daily) depending upon wound status. This will be performed by ward nurses for in-patients and for outpatients by podiatrists in the Diabetic clinic. Patients will be assessed by podiatrists weekly (<=20wks) or until an agreed end-point is reached; research assessments will coincide with routine outpatient clinic attendance or in-patient review to minimise patient inconvenience.
Release of electrolysed water will be coordinated by the research scientist. Supplies will be decanted into identical containers in order to blind staff as to product identity. The bottles will be labelled 'A' or 'B. Patients randomised to receive study or in-use irrigant will continue with the same product, to which they were initially assigned.
If a patient develops an infection, then they will receive clinical review and microbiological screening. These patients will continue with trial irrigants but will be offered appropriate antibiotics according to laboratory data. They will be encouraged to complete the trial but their data will be analysed separately on final analysis.
Patients with underlying terminal disease will be excluded from this trial along with patients with severe co-morbidities, e.g. morbidly obese; uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 97 mmol/mol); gangrene; chronic leg oedema/venous disease; end-stage renal disease; untreatable ischaemic heart disease; HIV; etc. Patients with ongoing infection at trial entry will be treated and then reassessed. Any previous documented allergy to either Prontosan™ or electrolysed water will also necessitate exclusion. Any adverse effects thought to be due to either irrigant will prompt study withdrawal and investigation. If there is doubt over the continuation of the correctly assigned irrigant for a specific patient, then that patient's data will be labelled as such and noted for the final analysis. This will also be the case and/or if there are lapses of more than 4 treatment sessions during therapy. All data will be retained for the final project report.
The primary composite end-points are: complete healing; >50% healing of initial lesion; and/or avoidance of surgical intervention including amputation. Secondary endpoints are: surgical debridement including amputation; antibiotic consumption; and patient death. Each patient lesion will be photographed at the agreed end-point.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Normal care - Prontosan | Active comparator | Other: ProntosanPatient wounds will be irrigated using the in-use product (Prontosan) |
| Investigational arm - Electrolysed water | Experimental | Other: Electrolysed waterPatient wounds will be irrigated using electrolysed water |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult diabetic patients (18-65 years) with chronic (>6 weeks) non-healing wounds(>2cm2) identified and counselled by study clinicians, along with additional information supplied by the Patient Information leaflet.
- -
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with underlying terminal disease will be excluded from this trial along with those with severe co-morbidities, e.g. morbidly obese; uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 97 mmol/mol); gangrene; chronic leg oedema/venous disease; end-stage renal disease; untreatable ischaemic heart disease; HIV; etc. Patients with ongoing infection at trial entry will be treated and then reassessed. Any previous documented allergy to either Prontosan™ or electrolysed water will also exclude the patient. Any adverse effects thought to be due to either irrigant will necessitate study withdrawal and investigation. If there is doubt over the continuation of the correctly assigned irrigant for a specific patient, then that patient's data will be labelled as such and noted for the final analysis. This will also be the case and/or if there are lapses of more than 4 treatment sessions during therapy.
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Electrolysed waterAlso: Aqualution SalvesanIrrigation of wound using electrolysed water | Other | Investigational arm - Electrolysed water |
| ProntosanIrrigation of wound using Prontosan | Other | Normal care - Prontosan |
Primary outcome
Rate of complete wound healing
Time frame: 12 weeks
Compare the use of neutral electrolysed water in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers against routine NHS management, which uses Prontosan for antiseptic irrigation.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Foot
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy Evaluation of Turmeric-Derived Nanoparticle Hydrogel for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Wounds
Diabete Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Better Care Closer to Home: Enhancing Primary and Community Care
Diabetic Foot Disease, Recurrence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephanie Dancer (MBBS, FRCP), MD principal investigator
NHS Lanarkshire
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Electrolysed water and Prontosan in people with Diabetic Foot, run by NHS Lanarkshire at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of complete wound healing (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2022.