AzTrials
AzTrials

HysteroscopyNCT02853695

Implementation of Hysteroscopy in Flanders and the Netherlands

An observational study of Hysteroscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, run by University Ghent.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

By means of a questionnaire the investigators will study the implementation of hysteroscopy in Flanders and the Netherlands Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
How many people
249 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2016to Jun 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Recognized gynaecologists (members of the Flemisch Society of Obstetricians and Gyneacologists (VVOG) and members of the Dutch Society of Obstetricians and Gyneacologists (NVOG))

Who may be able to join

  • gynaecologist

Who cannot join

  • residents in training for gynaecology/obstetrics

About this study

By means of a questionnaire the investigators will study the implementation of hysteroscopy in Flanders and the Netherlands

Read the detailed description

Hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive method for diagnosis and treatment of intra-uterine abnormalities. Complication and failure rates are low because of the direct visualisation of the treated abnormality. Moreover, hysteroscopic procedures replaced 'blind' (curettage) and more invasive interventions (hysterectomy).

The field of hysteroscopy has developed over the years. Changes occurred in hysteroscopic instruments and in the use of energy sources. An important development is the smaller diameter of the hysteroscopic system which makes it suitable for an outpatient setting. Not every gynaecologist, however, has the appropriate hysteroscopic skills or setting to carry out these procedures.

The incorporation of hysteroscopic procedures into daily practice in Flanders is unclear. In the Netherlands 2 surveys were conducted in the past to question the treatment options for polypectomy in an outpatient setting on the one hand and the diffusion of hysteroscopy on the other hand.

The investigators want to study the diffusion of hysteroscopy in Flanders and the Netherlands. Moreover the investigators want to provide an overview of the hysteroscopic procedures implemented, as well as the setting they are performed in.

An electronic questionnaire (LimeService) will be sent to all gynaecologists in Flanders and the Netherlands. Participation is voluntary and anonymous. After informed consent all gynaecologists are asked to complete the first part of the questionnaire containing general information. The second part is specific for gynaecologists performing hysteroscopy themselves, and inquires about the procedures they carry out.

Keywords
Hysteroscopy, Diffusion, Implementation, Diagnostic hysteroscopy, Operative hysteroscopy
Medical subject headings
Polyps, Myoma, Septate Uterus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Questionnaire: Implementation of hysteroscopy

    the amount of gynaecologists performing hysteroscopy in relation to the total of gynaecologists participating in the questionnaire

    Measured: August 2016, questionnaire will be sent once at the start of the study

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Questionnaire: setting for performing diagnostic hysteroscopy

    in which setting (office/operating room) diagnostic hysteroscopies are performed in relation to the total amount of diagnostic hysteroscopies performed

    Measured: August 2016, questionnaire will be sent once at the start of the study

  2. Questionnaire:Instrumentation used for hysteroscopy

    which instrumentation is used for specific hysteroscopic procedures.

    Measured: August 2016, questionnaire will be sent once at the start of the study

  3. Questionnaire: Diagnostic and techniques in the treatment of intrauterine pathology

    which diagnostics and techniques are used in the treatment of intrauterine pathology

    Measured: August 2016, questionnaire will be sent once at the start of the study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2016
  3. Primary completionJun 2017
  4. Study completionJun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
249 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02853695
Sponsor's protocol ID
B670201628466
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
19 Jul 2016
Last updated
22 Jul 2019
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Siristatidis C, Chrelias C, Salamalekis G, Kassanos D. Office hysteroscopy: current trends and potential applications: a critical review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Oct;282(4):383-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1437-x. Epub 2010 Mar 27.

    PubMed 20349076
  • Valle RF. Development of hysteroscopy: from a dream to a reality, and its linkage to the present and future. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):407-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.03.002.

    PubMed 17630157
  • Timmermans A, van Dongen H, Mol BW, Veersema S, Jansen FW. Hysteroscopy and removal of endometrial polyps: a Dutch survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 May;138(1):76-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.05.016. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

    PubMed 17629392
  • van Dongen H, Kolkman W, Jansen FW. Implementation of hysteroscopic surgery in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Jun;132(2):232-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 5.

    PubMed 16737769
  • Pascual-Pedreno A, Perez-Medina T, Brouard Urkiaga I, Fernandez-Parra J, Sobreviela-Laserrada M. Practice of endoscopic gynecologic surgery: a survey of Spanish gynecologists. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.01.017. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

    PubMed 23434402

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hysteroscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, run by University Ghent.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Questionnaire: Implementation of hysteroscopy (time frame: August 2016, questionnaire will be sent once at the start of the study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02853695, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in