Breast CancerNCT02858934
Feasibility Study of Accelerated Preoperative Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer
A study testing Tomotherapy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Andre Nazac at 3 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
The standard treatment for women with a relatively small breast cancer without arguments for involvement of the axillary lymph nodes, is breast conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy of the whole breast, often with a complementary dose to the operated area (boost). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Tomotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 8 Mar 2017to 3 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Histological diagnosis of unifocal invasive breast carcinoma, no special type (ductal carcinoma)
- Tumor Staging: cT1-2N0M0
- Luminal A or B
- Candidate for breast conserving surgery
- N0-status confirmed by lymph node cytology
Who cannot join
- Multifocal/multicentric disease
- Prior thoracic radiotherapy
- Pregnancy
- SBR3 grading
- Triple negative status which benefit neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Belgium3 sites
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020
UZ Brussel
Brussels, 1090
AZ Sint Blasius
Dendermonde, 9200
About this study
The standard treatment for women with a relatively small breast cancer without arguments for involvement of the axillary lymph nodes, is breast conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy of the whole breast, often with a complementary dose to the operated area (boost). A delay of 3-4 weeks after surgery is advisable for allowing wound healing before the start of radiotherapy. Historically, whole breast radiotherapy plus boost are delivered in 6-7 weeks. This treatment can be associated with temporary fatigue and decrease in quality of life. Randomized trials have shown that shorter schedules, delivering slightly more dose per day during 3 weeks, are equal to the long schedules. In an earlier clinical study, the investigators have tested such a short schedule and shown that it is equally safe and equally well tolerated as the conventional schemes. Other hospitals have examined (and still are examining) the safety and tolerance of even shorter schedules, delivering radiotherapy in 1 week.
This clinical study involves delivering radiotherapy in 1 week and before the surgery in stead of following surgery. In the postoperative setting, it is often debatable which volume should be included in the boost. Often boost-volumes remain large because of uncertainties in delineation. Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the tumor is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes. The surgery will follow shortly after termination of the radiotherapy, resulting in a very short treatment period.
This study is an open study investigating the effect on quality of life of a very short preoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
Women with early breast cancer are treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI) and a complementary dose to the lumpectomy cavity (boost). A delay of 3-4 weeks after surgery is advisable for allowing wound healing before the start of radiotherapy. Historically, WBI plus boost are delivered in 6-7 weeks. This treatment is associated with fatigue and a decreased quality of life. Randomized trials have shown that shorter hypofractionated schedules, delivering radiotherapy in 3 weeks, are equal to the long schedules. The investigators have shown that a hypofractionated tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost is oncologically safe, well tolerated and has less impact on quality of life than the conventional schemes.
In the postoperative setting, it is often debatable which volume should be included in the boost. Surgical clips can help to decrease inter-observer variability, but often boost-volumes remain large because of uncertainties in delineation. Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the gross tumor volume (GTV) is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes.
The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of a short preoperative tomotherapy. The potential benefits are
- a decrease in overall treatment time
- a positive effect on quality of life
- a more precise target delineation
- profitable health economics.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Tomotherapy
- Keywords
- Short preoperative tomotherapy, Radiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TomotherapyRadiation
Dose prescription:
Whole breast irradiation: 25 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 5 Gy Boost: 30 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 6 Gy The boost will be delivered as a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB).
Target volumes:
Clinical target volume (CTV) breast: defined by the soft tissue of the breast down to the pectoralis fascia, but excluding the skin and the underlying muscle, ribs, lung and heart.
Gross tumor volume (GTV) boost: includes all gross tumor volume, as visible on computer tomography, mammography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI imaging is preferentially performed in treatment position.
CTV boost: includes the primary tumor, with a margin of 1.0 cm in all directions to encompass potential microscopic disease extension. The CTV boost excludes the skin, pectoralis muscle, ribs, lung and heart.
Planning target volume (PTV): CTV plus a margin of 5 mm in all directions, but limited at 5 mm below the skin surface.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| preoperative tomotherapy | Experimental | This study is an open study investigating the effect on quality of life of a very short preoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer, including approximately 24 women. Radiotherapy will be performed in 1 week and before the surgery in stead of following surgery.Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the tumor is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes. The surgery will follow shortly after termination of the radiotherapy, resulting in a very short treatment period. Receives: Radiation: Tomotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of the surgical procedure
Duration of the breast conserving surgery (lumpectomy + sentinel lymph node procedure)
Measured: from 2 to 8 days after the last radiotherapy session.
Quantity of blood lost
Quantity of blood that has been lost during the breast conservation surgery, performed 2 to 8 days after the last radiotherapy session.
Measured: from 2 to 8 days after the last radiotherapy session.
Dindo score
Post operative morbidity assessment according to Dindo, Demartines et al.
Measured: Week 6 after radiotherapy start
Wound disruption (yes/no)
Presence of wound disruption defined as skin dehiscence from any cause including seroma or hematoma.
Measured: up to 30 days post operative
Wound infection (yes/no)
Presence of wound infection, defined as: purulent drainage, cellulitis, abscess or wound requiring drainage, debriding, and antibiotics associated with a clinical diagnosis of infection.
Measured: up to 30 days post operative
Number of adverse events
Acute radiation toxicity measure
Measured: up to three months after radiotherapy start
Secondary outcomes (6)
QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Assessment of the quality of life, according to the QLQC30 questionnaire
Measured: week 3 after radiotherapy start
QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Assessment of the quality of life, according to the QLQC30 questionnaire
Measured: week 6 after radiotherapy start
EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire
Assessment of the quality of life, according to the EORTC BR23 questionnaire
Measured: week 3 after radiotherapy start
EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire
Assessment of the quality of life, according to the EORTC BR23 questionnaire
Measured: week 6 after radiotherapy start
Number of adverse events
Late toxicity measure
Measured: from three months after radiotherapy start till end of study (up to 1 years)
Local recurrence (yes/no)
Local control: presence of local cancer recurrence
Measured: up till the end of study (1 year)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study start8 Mar 2017
- Primary completion3 Mar 2022
- Study completion3 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Andre Nazac
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Andre Nazac, Brugmann University Hospital
- Investigators
- Mark De Ridder, MD, Principal investigator, CHU Brugmann/UZ Brussel
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02858934
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUB-Preop-Breast
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, Zackrisson S, Cardoso F; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v8-30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298. No abstract available.
PubMed 26314782Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, Struikmans H, Van den Bogaert W, Fourquet A, Jager JJ, Hoogenraad WJ, Oei SB, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Pierart M, Collette L. Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 1;25(22):3259-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.4991. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
PubMed 17577015Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN, Julian JA, MacKenzie R, Parpia S, Shelley W, Grimard L, Bowen J, Lukka H, Perera F, Fyles A, Schneider K, Gulavita S, Freeman C. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):513-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906260.
PubMed 20147717Haviland JS, Owen JR, Dewar JA, Agrawal RK, Barrett J, Barrett-Lee PJ, Dobbs HJ, Hopwood P, Lawton PA, Magee BJ, Mills J, Simmons S, Sydenham MA, Venables K, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR; START Trialists' Group. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1086-1094. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70386-3. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
PubMed 24055415Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Vinh-Hung V, Verbanck S, Adriaenssens N, Kerkhove D, Reynders T, Schuermans D, Leysen K, Hanon S, Van Camp G, Vincken W, Storme G, Verellen D, De Ridder M. Short course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage I-II breast cancer, early toxicities of a randomized clinical trial. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;7:80. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-80.
PubMed 22656865Versmessen H, Vinh-Hung V, Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Voordeckers M, Adriaenssens N, Storme G, De Ridder M. Health-related quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer: randomized trial of post-operative conventional radiotherapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2012 Oct 25;12:495. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-495.
PubMed 23098579van Mourik AM, Elkhuizen PH, Minkema D, Duppen JC; Dutch Young Boost Study Group; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Mar;94(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
PubMed 20199818Kirby AN, Jena R, Harris EJ, Evans PM, Crowley C, Gregory DL, Coles CE. Tumour bed delineation for partial breast/breast boost radiotherapy: what is the optimal number of implanted markers? Radiother Oncol. 2013 Feb;106(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PubMed 23490269Nichols EM, Dhople AA, Mohiuddin MM, Flannery TW, Yu CX, Regine WF. Comparative analysis of the post-lumpectomy target volume versus the use of pre-lumpectomy tumor volume for early-stage breast cancer: implications for the future. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.063.
PubMed 20394853Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PubMed 15273542
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Study of Accelerated Preoperative Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02858934
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHUB-Preop-Breast
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Short preoperative tomotherapy, Radiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Andre NazacUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The standard treatment for women with a relatively small breast cancer without arguments for involvement of the axillary lymph nodes, is breast conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy of the whole breast, often with a complementary dose to the operated area (boost). A delay of 3-4 weeks after surgery is advisable for allowing wound healing before the start of radiotherapy. Historically, whole breast radiotherapy plus boost are delivered in 6-7 weeks. This treatment can be associated with temporary fatigue and decrease in quality of life. Randomized trials have shown that shorter schedules, delivering slightly more dose per day during 3 weeks, are equal to the long schedules. In an earlier clinical study, the investigators have tested such a short schedule and shown that it is equally safe and equally well tolerated as the conventional schemes. Other hospitals have examined (and still are examining) the safety and tolerance of even shorter schedules, delivering radiotherapy in 1 week.
This clinical study involves delivering radiotherapy in 1 week and before the surgery in stead of following surgery. In the postoperative setting, it is often debatable which volume should be included in the boost. Often boost-volumes remain large because of uncertainties in delineation. Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the tumor is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes. The surgery will follow shortly after termination of the radiotherapy, resulting in a very short treatment period.
This study is an open study investigating the effect on quality of life of a very short preoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer.
Detailed description
Women with early breast cancer are treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI) and a complementary dose to the lumpectomy cavity (boost). A delay of 3-4 weeks after surgery is advisable for allowing wound healing before the start of radiotherapy. Historically, WBI plus boost are delivered in 6-7 weeks. This treatment is associated with fatigue and a decreased quality of life. Randomized trials have shown that shorter hypofractionated schedules, delivering radiotherapy in 3 weeks, are equal to the long schedules. The investigators have shown that a hypofractionated tomotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost is oncologically safe, well tolerated and has less impact on quality of life than the conventional schemes.
In the postoperative setting, it is often debatable which volume should be included in the boost. Surgical clips can help to decrease inter-observer variability, but often boost-volumes remain large because of uncertainties in delineation. Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the gross tumor volume (GTV) is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes.
The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of a short preoperative tomotherapy. The potential benefits are
- a decrease in overall treatment time
- a positive effect on quality of life
- a more precise target delineation
- profitable health economics.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| preoperative tomotherapy | Experimental | Radiation: TomotherapyThis study is an open study investigating the effect on quality of life of a very short preoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer, including approximately 24 women. Radiotherapy will be performed in 1 week and before the surgery in stead of following surgery.Preoperative radiotherapy has the advantage that the tumor is visible on imaging. This can result in smaller boost volumes. The surgery will follow shortly after termination of the radiotherapy, resulting in a very short treatment period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Histological diagnosis of unifocal invasive breast carcinoma, no special type (ductal carcinoma)
- Tumor Staging: cT1-2N0M0
- Luminal A or B
- Candidate for breast conserving surgery
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Multifocal/multicentric disease
- Prior thoracic radiotherapy
- Pregnancy
- SBR3 grading
- Triple negative status which benefit neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TomotherapyDose prescription: Whole breast irradiation: 25 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 5 Gy Boost: 30 Gy in 5 daily fractions of 6 Gy The boost will be delivered as a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Target volumes: Clinical target volume (CTV) breast: defined by the soft tissue of the breast down to the pectoralis fascia, but excluding the skin and the underlying muscle, ribs, lung and heart. Gross tumor volume (GTV) boost: includes all gross tumor volume, as visible on computer tomography, mammography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI imaging is preferentially performed in treatment position. CTV boost: includes the primary tumor, with a margin of 1.0 cm in all directions to encompass potential microscopic disease extension. The CTV boost excludes the skin, pectoralis muscle, ribs, lung and heart. Planning target volume (PTV): CTV plus a margin of 5 mm in all directions, but limited at 5 mm below the skin surface. | Radiation | preoperative tomotherapy |
Primary outcome
Duration of the surgical procedure
Time frame: from 2 to 8 days after the last radiotherapy session.
Duration of the breast conserving surgery (lumpectomy + sentinel lymph node procedure)
Quantity of blood lost
Time frame: from 2 to 8 days after the last radiotherapy session.
Quantity of blood that has been lost during the breast conservation surgery, performed 2 to 8 days after the last radiotherapy session.
Dindo score
Time frame: Week 6 after radiotherapy start
Post operative morbidity assessment according to Dindo, Demartines et al.
Wound disruption (yes/no)
Time frame: up to 30 days post operative
Presence of wound disruption defined as skin dehiscence from any cause including seroma or hematoma.
Wound infection (yes/no)
Time frame: up to 30 days post operative
Presence of wound infection, defined as: purulent drainage, cellulitis, abscess or wound requiring drainage, debriding, and antibiotics associated with a clinical diagnosis of infection.
Number of adverse events
Time frame: up to three months after radiotherapy start
Acute radiation toxicity measure
6 secondary outcomes
QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Time frame: week 3 after radiotherapy start
QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Time frame: week 6 after radiotherapy start
EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire
Time frame: week 3 after radiotherapy start
EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire
Time frame: week 6 after radiotherapy start
Number of adverse events
Time frame: from three months after radiotherapy start till end of study (up to 1 years)
Local recurrence (yes/no)
Time frame: up till the end of study (1 year)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2022.
- Background: PubMed 26314782Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, Zackrisson S, Cardoso F; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v8-30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17577015Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans PM, Struikmans H, Van den Bogaert W, Fourquet A, Jager JJ, Hoogenraad WJ, Oei SB, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Pierart M, Collette L. Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 1;25(22):3259-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.4991. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
- Background: PubMed 20147717Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN, Julian JA, MacKenzie R, Parpia S, Shelley W, Grimard L, Bowen J, Lukka H, Perera F, Fyles A, Schneider K, Gulavita S, Freeman C. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):513-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906260.
- Background: PubMed 24055415Haviland JS, Owen JR, Dewar JA, Agrawal RK, Barrett J, Barrett-Lee PJ, Dobbs HJ, Hopwood P, Lawton PA, Magee BJ, Mills J, Simmons S, Sydenham MA, Venables K, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR; START Trialists' Group. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1086-1094. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70386-3. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
- Background: PubMed 22656865Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Vinh-Hung V, Verbanck S, Adriaenssens N, Kerkhove D, Reynders T, Schuermans D, Leysen K, Hanon S, Van Camp G, Vincken W, Storme G, Verellen D, De Ridder M. Short course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage I-II breast cancer, early toxicities of a randomized clinical trial. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;7:80. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-80.
- Background: PubMed 23098579Versmessen H, Vinh-Hung V, Van Parijs H, Miedema G, Voordeckers M, Adriaenssens N, Storme G, De Ridder M. Health-related quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer: randomized trial of post-operative conventional radiotherapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2012 Oct 25;12:495. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-495.
- Background: PubMed 20199818van Mourik AM, Elkhuizen PH, Minkema D, Duppen JC; Dutch Young Boost Study Group; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Mar;94(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
- Background: PubMed 23490269Kirby AN, Jena R, Harris EJ, Evans PM, Crowley C, Gregory DL, Coles CE. Tumour bed delineation for partial breast/breast boost radiotherapy: what is the optimal number of implanted markers? Radiother Oncol. 2013 Feb;106(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
- Background: PubMed 20394853Nichols EM, Dhople AA, Mohiuddin MM, Flannery TW, Yu CX, Regine WF. Comparative analysis of the post-lumpectomy target volume versus the use of pre-lumpectomy tumor volume for early-stage breast cancer: implications for the future. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 May 1;77(1):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.063.
- Background: PubMed 15273542Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark De Ridder, MD principal investigator
CHU Brugmann/UZ Brussel
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tomotherapy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Andre Nazac at 3 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of the surgical procedure (time frame: from 2 to 8 days after the last radiotherapy session.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02858934, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2022.