Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornBio-NAVANCT02860325
NIV-NAVA Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) or Non Synchronized NIPPV
A study testing NIV-NAVA and Conventional in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn and Apnea of Prematurity, run by Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Mechanical respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and/or apnoea of prematurity (AOP) might be associated with adverse effects due to positive pressure (barotrauma), excessive gas delivery (volutrauma) or inadequate volume (atelectrauma). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Apnea of Prematurity
- What is being tested?
- NIV-NAVA and Conventional
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2016to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newborns < 32 weeks GA with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, diagnosed by clinical and radiological findings who need invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
- Newborns < 29 weeks of gestation (GA) with non-invasive mechanical ventilation at admission indicated as per protocol.
- Previous parent or legal guardian authorization (informed consent).
Who cannot join
- Major congenital malformation or chromosomal abnormality.
- Absence of informed consent.
- Outborn patients.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, 35016
About this study
Official title: Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus nCPAP or Non Synchronized NIPPV in Preterm Infants Under 32 Weeks Gestational Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Mechanical respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and/or apnoea of prematurity (AOP) might be associated with adverse effects due to positive pressure (barotrauma), excessive gas delivery (volutrauma) or inadequate volume (atelectrauma). Asynchrony between patient efforts and ventilator support increases patient discomfort, favouring "fighting" the machine, and increases the risk of air trapping and lung overdistension even in patients with non-invasive ventilation (NIV).
Recently, a new modality of synchronization has been available for pediatric and neonatal use: the neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), which uses the diaphragmatic electrical activity (Edi) as a signal to start the rise in pressure of the ventilator, and to adjust the tidal volume and the inspiratory time (cycling off) to the patient needs, breath by breath.
The aims of this study are to know whether NIV-NAVA compared to unsynchronized modalities (nCPAP/nIPPV), in infants born < 32 weeks GA with respiratory distress syndrome or requiring prophylactic NIV (immaturity, apnoea) reduces systemic inflammation, measured by serum cytokines concentration, reduces the need for oxygen and respiratory support, and if it increases the probabilities of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).
Read the detailed description
Introduction. Mechanical respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and/or apnoea of prematurity (AOP) might be associated with adverse effects as a consequence of positive pressure use (barotrauma), excessive gas delivery (volutrauma) or inadequate volume (atelectrauma). All these factors could give rise to an increase in the alveolo-capillary membrane permeability, alveoli oedema, hyaline membrane formation and epithelial cells desquamation. These phenomena eventually could lead to activation of inflammatory mediators (biotrauma) with local and systemic noxious effects.
During assisted ventilation, the lack of synchrony between patient efforts and ventilator support increases patient discomfort, favouring "fighting" the machine, and increases the risk of air trapping and lung overdistension. Even in patients with non-invasive ventilation (NIV), uneasiness and respiratory distress would cause air hunger, developing intrapleural negative pressure with risk of lung overinflation despite using low airway positive pressures. The use of neuromuscular blockade in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been associated with a decrease in serum cytokine levels and 90 days adjusted mortality.
NAVA uses the diaphragmatic electrical activity (Edi) as a signal to start the rise in pressure of the ventilator. Likewise, it allows automatic adjustment of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) to the patient's effort, providing variable tidal volume according to his/her needs. Finally, the system allows the inspiratory cycling off with Edi decline (normally set at 70% of Edi Peak), that is, with diaphragmatic relaxation. NAVA has shown a faster response time and a better level of synchronization than traditional flow or pressure systems, achieving greater comfort levels in adults and paediatric patients. Some paediatric and neonatal studies have shown a reduction in PIP, without changes in mean airway pressure (MAP), and a reduction in oxygen requirement (FiO2). These changes were not associated with major complications (intraventricular haemorrhage, pneumothorax, or necrotizing enterocolitis).
A relevant target in neonatal ventilatory support is to minimize the aggression to the lungs and respiratory system using NIV whenever possible, and/or extubating patients as soon as possible. For this reason, profound sedation, analgesia, or neuromuscular blockade are rarely indicated in the newborn period. NAVA synchronization might improve patient comfort, preventing patient-ventilator fighting, and lung overinflation episodes (volutrauma), ultimately reducing biotrauma. To the knowledge of the investigators, studies evaluating this new ventilatory modality (NAVA) in the newborn period are still scarce, and its potential to reduce inflammation has not been tested.
Objectives.
To determine if NIV-NAVA compared to unsynchronized modalities (nCPAP/nIPPV), in infants born < 32 weeks GA with respiratory distress syndrome or requiring prophylactic NIV (immaturity, apnoea):
- Reduces systemic inflammation, measured by serum cytokines concentration.
- Reduces the need for oxygen and respiratory support.
- Increases the probabilities of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).
Design. Single centre, prospective and controlled randomized clinical trial.
Setting. Tertiary Hospital with near 6000 births per year and a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with 15 beds and approximately 250 admissions per year.
Methods. Informed consent (IC) will be obtained before birth, during mothers' admission with threatened preterm labour. Once the IC is obtained and after the infant's birth, patients will be randomized by a random numbers table, kept in sealed envelops, to "Group A" (NAVA) or "Group B" (conventional strategies).
In all cases meeting inclusion criteria, a cord blood sample will be collected to determine the level of cytokines: Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF - α), interleukin (IL) 1 beta (IL-1ß), IL-6, and IL-8.
The decision to intubate in delivery room or to provide NIV will be carried out by the attending neonatologist at time of birth based on clinical criteria. In our unit, standard care is intubation and prophylactic surfactant administration in delivery room in neonates < 25 weeks GA, or older babies that did not received antenatal steroid and need intubation during resuscitation. Neonates 26 - 29 weeks GA with adequate respiratory effort are resuscitated and transferred to NICU with NIV (Neo-puff ®). Preterm babies > 29 weeks GA receive respiratory support (invasive or NIV) only when clinically indicated.
After admission to NICU, patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will be supported according to theirs needs and the criteria of the attending neonatologist. In our unit, modes with volume guarantee (VG) or volume control are currently used: Assist/Control+VG, Synchronized - Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (S-IMV)+VG, and Pressure Regulated Volume Control (PRVC). After extubation and in patients supported non-invasively since the beginning, NIV will be provided according to randomization group:
Group A: With the ventilator SERVO-n (Maquet, Solna, Sweden), in NIV-NAVA mode. The ventilation parameters (PEEP, FiO2, NAVA level, etc.) will be established and adjusted by the attending clinician according to the patient's needs.
Group B: With the Infant Flow device (CareFusion) in nCPAP or non-synchronised Biphasic mode. The ventilation parameters (Flow, PEEP, FiO2, PIP level, etc.) will be established and adjusted by the attending clinician according to the patient's needs.
Surfactant (Curosurf ®, 100 mg/kg) will be administered according to clinical indications following the Unit's protocol. In general, if the patient did not receive it in delivery room, it is administered as soon as possible in the NICU when the patient needs FiO2 >0.3. Intubated patients will receive surfactant through a double lumen tube, and those with NIV by a minimally invasive method, or by the Insure (intubate, surfactant, and extubated) method.
Quantitative cytokine determination will be carried out simultaneously in all samples by X-MAP technology using the Bioplex cytometer (Biorad) which allows the simultaneous measure of multiple analytes.
- Being tested
- NIV-NAVA, Conventional
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Apnea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NIV-NAVADevice
Non-invasive ventilatory support by means of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (SERVO-n, Maquet, Solna, Sweden)
ConventionalDevice
Non-invasive ventilatory support by means of nCPAP or non-synchronized nIPPV (Infant Flow, CareFusion)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NIV-NAVA | Experimental | Patients allocated to non-invasive NAVA Receives: Device: NIV-NAVA |
| Conventional | Active comparator | Patients allocated to nasal CPAP or non-synchronized nasal IPPV Receives: Device: Conventional |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survival without moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
Moderate or severe BPD: dependency on supplemental oxygen and/or ventilatory support at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) or at hospital discharge (what happens first).
Measured: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Secondary outcomes (5)
Blood level of cytokines: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL) 1 beta (IL-1ß), IL-6, and IL-8.
Level of the different cytokines in blood
Measured: T-0: cord blood or immediately after admission; T-1: 48 to 72 h.; T-2: 5th to 7th day of life; and T-3: 28th day of life.
Total time of ventilatory support (in days)
Number of days with invasive and/or non-invasive ventilatory support
Measured: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Intervention failure
Need for intubation
Measured: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Total time of oxygen therapy (in days)
Numer of days with supplementary oxygen
Measured: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Length of stay (in days)
Number of days in hospital until first discharge
Measured: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Aug 2016
- Primary completion30 Nov 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fermín García-Muñoz Rodrigo, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil
- Investigators
- Fermín García-Muñoz Rodrigo, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Head of Neonatal Unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02860325
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEIC-CHUIMI-2014/761
- Acronym
- Bio-NAVA
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced injury: from barotrauma to biotrauma. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1998 Nov-Dec;110(6):482-8.
PubMed 9824530Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.
PubMed 24283226Stein H, Firestone K, Rimensberger PC. Synchronized mechanical ventilation using electrical activity of the diaphragm in neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2012 Sep;39(3):525-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.06.004.
PubMed 22954267Forel JM, Roch A, Marin V, Michelet P, Demory D, Blache JL, Perrin G, Gainnier M, Bongrand P, Papazian L. Neuromuscular blocking agents decrease inflammatory response in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2749-57. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239435.87433.0D.
PubMed 16932229Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
PubMed 20843245de la Oliva P, Schuffelmann C, Gomez-Zamora A, Villar J, Kacmarek RM. Asynchrony, neural drive, ventilatory variability and COMFORT: NAVA versus pressure support in pediatric patients. A non-randomized cross-over trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):838-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2535-y. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
PubMed 22481227Breatnach C, Conlon NP, Stack M, Healy M, O'Hare BP. A prospective crossover comparison of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure-support ventilation in a pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit population. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;11(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b0630f.
PubMed 19593246Stein H, Howard D. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates weighing <1500 grams: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr. 2012 May;160(5):786-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
PubMed 22137670
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus nCPAP or Non Synchronized NIPPV in Preterm Infants Under 32 Weeks Gestational Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02860325
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Bio-NAVA / CEIC-CHUIMI-2014/761
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno InfantilUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mechanical respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and/or apnoea of prematurity (AOP) might be associated with adverse effects due to positive pressure (barotrauma), excessive gas delivery (volutrauma) or inadequate volume (atelectrauma). Asynchrony between patient efforts and ventilator support increases patient discomfort, favouring "fighting" the machine, and increases the risk of air trapping and lung overdistension even in patients with non-invasive ventilation (NIV).
Recently, a new modality of synchronization has been available for pediatric and neonatal use: the neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), which uses the diaphragmatic electrical activity (Edi) as a signal to start the rise in pressure of the ventilator, and to adjust the tidal volume and the inspiratory time (cycling off) to the patient needs, breath by breath.
The aims of this study are to know whether NIV-NAVA compared to unsynchronized modalities (nCPAP/nIPPV), in infants born < 32 weeks GA with respiratory distress syndrome or requiring prophylactic NIV (immaturity, apnoea) reduces systemic inflammation, measured by serum cytokines concentration, reduces the need for oxygen and respiratory support, and if it increases the probabilities of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).
Detailed description
Introduction. Mechanical respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and/or apnoea of prematurity (AOP) might be associated with adverse effects as a consequence of positive pressure use (barotrauma), excessive gas delivery (volutrauma) or inadequate volume (atelectrauma). All these factors could give rise to an increase in the alveolo-capillary membrane permeability, alveoli oedema, hyaline membrane formation and epithelial cells desquamation. These phenomena eventually could lead to activation of inflammatory mediators (biotrauma) with local and systemic noxious effects.
During assisted ventilation, the lack of synchrony between patient efforts and ventilator support increases patient discomfort, favouring "fighting" the machine, and increases the risk of air trapping and lung overdistension. Even in patients with non-invasive ventilation (NIV), uneasiness and respiratory distress would cause air hunger, developing intrapleural negative pressure with risk of lung overinflation despite using low airway positive pressures. The use of neuromuscular blockade in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been associated with a decrease in serum cytokine levels and 90 days adjusted mortality.
NAVA uses the diaphragmatic electrical activity (Edi) as a signal to start the rise in pressure of the ventilator. Likewise, it allows automatic adjustment of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) to the patient's effort, providing variable tidal volume according to his/her needs. Finally, the system allows the inspiratory cycling off with Edi decline (normally set at 70% of Edi Peak), that is, with diaphragmatic relaxation. NAVA has shown a faster response time and a better level of synchronization than traditional flow or pressure systems, achieving greater comfort levels in adults and paediatric patients. Some paediatric and neonatal studies have shown a reduction in PIP, without changes in mean airway pressure (MAP), and a reduction in oxygen requirement (FiO2). These changes were not associated with major complications (intraventricular haemorrhage, pneumothorax, or necrotizing enterocolitis).
A relevant target in neonatal ventilatory support is to minimize the aggression to the lungs and respiratory system using NIV whenever possible, and/or extubating patients as soon as possible. For this reason, profound sedation, analgesia, or neuromuscular blockade are rarely indicated in the newborn period. NAVA synchronization might improve patient comfort, preventing patient-ventilator fighting, and lung overinflation episodes (volutrauma), ultimately reducing biotrauma. To the knowledge of the investigators, studies evaluating this new ventilatory modality (NAVA) in the newborn period are still scarce, and its potential to reduce inflammation has not been tested.
Objectives.
To determine if NIV-NAVA compared to unsynchronized modalities (nCPAP/nIPPV), in infants born < 32 weeks GA with respiratory distress syndrome or requiring prophylactic NIV (immaturity, apnoea):
- Reduces systemic inflammation, measured by serum cytokines concentration.
- Reduces the need for oxygen and respiratory support.
- Increases the probabilities of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).
Design. Single centre, prospective and controlled randomized clinical trial.
Setting. Tertiary Hospital with near 6000 births per year and a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with 15 beds and approximately 250 admissions per year.
Methods. Informed consent (IC) will be obtained before birth, during mothers' admission with threatened preterm labour. Once the IC is obtained and after the infant's birth, patients will be randomized by a random numbers table, kept in sealed envelops, to "Group A" (NAVA) or "Group B" (conventional strategies).
In all cases meeting inclusion criteria, a cord blood sample will be collected to determine the level of cytokines: Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF - α), interleukin (IL) 1 beta (IL-1ß), IL-6, and IL-8.
The decision to intubate in delivery room or to provide NIV will be carried out by the attending neonatologist at time of birth based on clinical criteria. In our unit, standard care is intubation and prophylactic surfactant administration in delivery room in neonates < 25 weeks GA, or older babies that did not received antenatal steroid and need intubation during resuscitation. Neonates 26 - 29 weeks GA with adequate respiratory effort are resuscitated and transferred to NICU with NIV (Neo-puff ®). Preterm babies > 29 weeks GA receive respiratory support (invasive or NIV) only when clinically indicated.
After admission to NICU, patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will be supported according to theirs needs and the criteria of the attending neonatologist. In our unit, modes with volume guarantee (VG) or volume control are currently used: Assist/Control+VG, Synchronized - Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (S-IMV)+VG, and Pressure Regulated Volume Control (PRVC). After extubation and in patients supported non-invasively since the beginning, NIV will be provided according to randomization group:
Group A: With the ventilator SERVO-n (Maquet, Solna, Sweden), in NIV-NAVA mode. The ventilation parameters (PEEP, FiO2, NAVA level, etc.) will be established and adjusted by the attending clinician according to the patient's needs.
Group B: With the Infant Flow device (CareFusion) in nCPAP or non-synchronised Biphasic mode. The ventilation parameters (Flow, PEEP, FiO2, PIP level, etc.) will be established and adjusted by the attending clinician according to the patient's needs.
Surfactant (Curosurf ®, 100 mg/kg) will be administered according to clinical indications following the Unit's protocol. In general, if the patient did not receive it in delivery room, it is administered as soon as possible in the NICU when the patient needs FiO2 >0.3. Intubated patients will receive surfactant through a double lumen tube, and those with NIV by a minimally invasive method, or by the Insure (intubate, surfactant, and extubated) method.
Quantitative cytokine determination will be carried out simultaneously in all samples by X-MAP technology using the Bioplex cytometer (Biorad) which allows the simultaneous measure of multiple analytes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NIV-NAVA | Experimental | Device: NIV-NAVAPatients allocated to non-invasive NAVA |
| Conventional | Active comparator | Device: ConventionalPatients allocated to nasal CPAP or non-synchronized nasal IPPV |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Newborns < 32 weeks GA with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, diagnosed by clinical and radiological findings who need invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
- Newborns < 29 weeks of gestation (GA) with non-invasive mechanical ventilation at admission indicated as per protocol.
- Previous parent or legal guardian authorization (informed consent).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Major congenital malformation or chromosomal abnormality.
- Absence of informed consent.
- Outborn patients.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NIV-NAVANon-invasive ventilatory support by means of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (SERVO-n, Maquet, Solna, Sweden) | Device | NIV-NAVA |
| ConventionalNon-invasive ventilatory support by means of nCPAP or non-synchronized nIPPV (Infant Flow, CareFusion) | Device | Conventional |
Primary outcome
Survival without moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
Time frame: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Moderate or severe BPD: dependency on supplemental oxygen and/or ventilatory support at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) or at hospital discharge (what happens first).
5 secondary outcomes
Blood level of cytokines: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL) 1 beta (IL-1ß), IL-6, and IL-8.
Time frame: T-0: cord blood or immediately after admission; T-1: 48 to 72 h.; T-2: 5th to 7th day of life; and T-3: 28th day of life.
Total time of ventilatory support (in days)
Time frame: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Intervention failure
Time frame: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Total time of oxygen therapy (in days)
Time frame: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Length of stay (in days)
Time frame: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2017.
- Background: PubMed 9824530Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced injury: from barotrauma to biotrauma. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1998 Nov-Dec;110(6):482-8.
- Background: PubMed 24283226Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22954267Stein H, Firestone K, Rimensberger PC. Synchronized mechanical ventilation using electrical activity of the diaphragm in neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2012 Sep;39(3):525-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.06.004.
- Results publication: PubMed 16932229Forel JM, Roch A, Marin V, Michelet P, Demory D, Blache JL, Perrin G, Gainnier M, Bongrand P, Papazian L. Neuromuscular blocking agents decrease inflammatory response in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2749-57. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239435.87433.0D.
- Results publication: PubMed 20843245Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
- Results publication: PubMed 22481227de la Oliva P, Schuffelmann C, Gomez-Zamora A, Villar J, Kacmarek RM. Asynchrony, neural drive, ventilatory variability and COMFORT: NAVA versus pressure support in pediatric patients. A non-randomized cross-over trial. Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):838-46. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2535-y. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 19593246Breatnach C, Conlon NP, Stack M, Healy M, O'Hare BP. A prospective crossover comparison of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure-support ventilation in a pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit population. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;11(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b0630f.
- Results publication: PubMed 22137670Stein H, Howard D. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates weighing <1500 grams: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr. 2012 May;160(5):786-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
REspiratory MEchanics for Delivering Individualised Exogenous Surfactant
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fermín García-Muñoz Rodrigo, Ph.D principal investigator
Head of Neonatal Unit
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NIV-NAVA and Conventional in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn and Apnea of Prematurity, run by Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survival without moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (time frame: From admission to first discharge from hospital, assessed up to 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02860325, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2017.