Partial Coverage RestorationNCT02861729
Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Partial Coverage Crowns Compared to Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Crowns
A study testing Vita Suprinity and IPS e.max in people with Partial Coverage Restoration, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Partial Coverage Restorations fabricated with zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic system compared to partial coverage restorations fabricated with lithium disilicate ceramic system. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Partial Coverage Restoration
- What is being tested?
- Vita Suprinity and IPS e.max
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 May 2017to 18 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants:
- Good oral hygiene, papillary bleeding index (PBI) < 35%.
- Positive patient acceptance to participate in the trial.
- Teeth:
- Carious class II or MOD lesions
- Vital upper or lower posterior teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis.
- Normal occlusion
- Single tooth restoration (no edentulous space that requires fixed prosthesis)
Who cannot join
- Participants
- Pregnancy.
- Disabilities.
- Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
- Bad oral hygiene
- Heavy smoking.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Xerostomia.
- Lack of compliance.
- Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching, or temporomandibular disorders.
- Teeth:
- Deep carious defects (close to pulp, less than 1 mm distance).
- Periapical pathology or signs of pulpal pathology.
- Tooth hypersensitivity.
- Rampant caries.
- Non-vital or endodontically treated teeth.
- Sever periodontal affection.
- Tooth mobility
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Partial Coverage Crowns Compared to Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Partial Coverage Restorations fabricated with zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic system compared to partial coverage restorations fabricated with lithium disilicate ceramic system.
Read the detailed description
This study is constructed to assess in patients with carious vital posterior teeth whether the use of Vita Suprinity® (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH \& Co.KG- Germany) Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate partial coverage restorations will result in higher survival rates and better patient related outcome scores compared to IPS-e.max® CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan - Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate partial coverage restorations.
- Conditions
- Partial Coverage Restoration
- Being tested
- Vita Suprinity, IPS e.max
- Keywords
- Partial coverage restoration, Crown, Posterior teeth, All ceramic, Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate, Lithium disilicate, CAD/CAM
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vita SuprinityOther
zirconia reinforced lithium silicate partial coverage restorations
IPS e.maxOther
lithium disilicate partial coverage restorations
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Suprinity | Experimental | Vita Suprinity® (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH \& Co.KG- Germany) Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate PCRs Receives: Other: Vita Suprinity |
| e.max | Active comparator | IPS-e.max® CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan - Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate PCRs Receives: Other: IPS e.max |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survival rate
Absolute failure is defined by clinical unacceptable fracture and crack development which required a replacement of the entire restoration, and/or secondary caries as well as endodontic complications
Measured: 12 month
Secondary outcomes (5)
Restorations with Marginal gap as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
restorations with visually detectable margin, catch or penetration of explorer at baseline or a change from baseline on visual analogue scale at 12 month
Measured: 12 month
Restorations with Marginal discoloration as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
restorations with visually detectable discoloration along margin at baseline or a change from baseline on visual analogue scale at 12 month
Measured: 12 month
Restorations with color mismatch with adjacent teeth as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
restorations with visually detectable color mismatch with adjacent teeth at baseline or a change from baseline on visual analogue scale at 12 month
Measured: 12 month
Restorations with surface roughness as assessed tactilely by US public health service criteria
restorations with tactilely detectable rough surface at baseline or a change from baseline on visual analogue scale at 12 month
Measured: 12 month
Restorations developed secondary caries as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
restorations with visually detectable secondary caries at baseline or a change from baseline on visual analogue scale at 12 month
Measured: 12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 May 2017
- Primary completion18 Jun 2018
- Study completion18 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Partial Coverage RestorationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- split-mouth design
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hanaa Sayed abdo Hassan Nassar, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Hesham Katamish, PHD, Study chair, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02861729
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEBD-CU-2016-08-177
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Guess PC, Strub JR, Steinhart N, Wolkewitz M, Stappert CF. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations--midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study. J Dent. 2009 Aug;37(8):627-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 3.
PubMed 19477570Stappert CF, Guess PC, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Am J Dent. 2007 Feb;20(1):21-6.
PubMed 17380803Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater. 2008 Jun;24(6):804-13. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
PubMed 18006051Rinke S, Pabel AK, Rodiger M, Ziebolz D. Chairside Fabrication of an All-Ceramic Partial Crown Using a Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:1354186. doi: 10.1155/2016/1354186. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
PubMed 27042362McDonald A. Preparation guidelines for full and partial coverage ceramic restorations. Dent Update. 2001 Mar;28(2):84-90. doi: 10.12968/denu.2001.28.2.84.
PubMed 11819962Signore A, Benedicenti S, Covani U, Ravera G. A 4- to 6-year retrospective clinical study of cracked teeth restored with bonded indirect resin composite onlays. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Nov-Dec;20(6):609-16.
PubMed 18069370Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Jun;22(3):241-9.
PubMed 12186346Stappert CF, Chitmongkolsuk S, Silva NR, Att W, Strub JR. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials. Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1248-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
PubMed 18395785Murgueitio R, Bernal G. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns. J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul;21(5):340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00837.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
PubMed 22372380Kois DE, Isvilanonda V, Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Apr;25(2):110-22. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12018. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
PubMed 23617385Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2481-2492. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1779-2. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
PubMed 26971352
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Partial Coverage Crowns Compared to Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Crowns: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02861729
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEBD-CU-2016-08-177
- Conditions
- Partial Coverage Restoration
- Keywords
- Partial coverage restoration, Crown, Posterior teeth, All ceramic, Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate, Lithium disilicate, CAD/CAM
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Partial Coverage Restorations fabricated with zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic system compared to partial coverage restorations fabricated with lithium disilicate ceramic system.
Detailed description
This study is constructed to assess in patients with carious vital posterior teeth whether the use of Vita Suprinity® (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH \& Co.KG- Germany) Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate partial coverage restorations will result in higher survival rates and better patient related outcome scores compared to IPS-e.max® CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan - Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate partial coverage restorations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- split-mouth design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Suprinity | Experimental | Other: Vita SuprinityVita Suprinity® (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH \& Co.KG- Germany) Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate PCRs |
| e.max | Active comparator | Other: IPS e.maxIPS-e.max® CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan - Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate PCRs |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participants:
- Good oral hygiene, papillary bleeding index (PBI) < 35%.
- Positive patient acceptance to participate in the trial.
- Carious class II or MOD lesions
- Vital upper or lower posterior teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Participants
- Pregnancy.
- Disabilities.
- Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
- Bad oral hygiene
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vita Suprinityzirconia reinforced lithium silicate partial coverage restorations | Other | Suprinity |
| IPS e.maxlithium disilicate partial coverage restorations | Other | e.max |
Primary outcome
Survival rate
Time frame: 12 month
Absolute failure is defined by clinical unacceptable fracture and crack development which required a replacement of the entire restoration, and/or secondary caries as well as endodontic complications
5 secondary outcomes
Restorations with Marginal gap as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
Time frame: 12 month
Restorations with Marginal discoloration as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
Time frame: 12 month
Restorations with color mismatch with adjacent teeth as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
Time frame: 12 month
Restorations with surface roughness as assessed tactilely by US public health service criteria
Time frame: 12 month
Restorations developed secondary caries as assessed visually by US public health service criteria
Time frame: 12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 19477570Guess PC, Strub JR, Steinhart N, Wolkewitz M, Stappert CF. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations--midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study. J Dent. 2009 Aug;37(8):627-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 3.
- Background: PubMed 17380803Stappert CF, Guess PC, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Am J Dent. 2007 Feb;20(1):21-6.
- Background: PubMed 18006051Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater. 2008 Jun;24(6):804-13. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
- Background: PubMed 27042362Rinke S, Pabel AK, Rodiger M, Ziebolz D. Chairside Fabrication of an All-Ceramic Partial Crown Using a Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:1354186. doi: 10.1155/2016/1354186. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 11819962McDonald A. Preparation guidelines for full and partial coverage ceramic restorations. Dent Update. 2001 Mar;28(2):84-90. doi: 10.12968/denu.2001.28.2.84.
- Background: PubMed 18069370Signore A, Benedicenti S, Covani U, Ravera G. A 4- to 6-year retrospective clinical study of cracked teeth restored with bonded indirect resin composite onlays. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Nov-Dec;20(6):609-16.
- Background: PubMed 12186346Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Jun;22(3):241-9.
- Background: PubMed 18395785Stappert CF, Chitmongkolsuk S, Silva NR, Att W, Strub JR. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials. Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1248-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
- Background: PubMed 22372380Murgueitio R, Bernal G. Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced ips empress onlays and partial veneer crowns. J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul;21(5):340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00837.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 23617385Kois DE, Isvilanonda V, Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Apr;25(2):110-22. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12018. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
- Background: PubMed 26971352Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2481-2492. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1779-2. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Partial Coverage Restoration
Recruiting
Evaluation of Ceramic Dental Crown Clinical Performance After Conventional Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Gaseous Plasma Pretreatment
Prosthodontics, Dental Adhesives/Restorations Performance
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars
Clinical Performance
Recruiting
Milled vs 3D-Printed Partial-Coverage Restorations in Endodontically Treated Molars
Endodontically Treated Teeth
Recruiting
The Performance of Posterior Partial Coverage Coronal Restorations Luted With Two Differrent Systems.
Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth
Active, not recruiting
Marginal Evaluation of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Restoration of Egyptian Posterior Teeth.
Carious Teeth, Adaptation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hesham Katamish, PHD study chair
Cairo University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vita Suprinity and IPS e.max in people with Partial Coverage Restoration, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survival rate (time frame: 12 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02861729, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2019.