AzTrials
AzTrials

Botulinum Toxin, Rejuvenation, Neck, TherapyNCT02864511

Botulinum Toxin for Neck Rejuvenation

A study testing Nefertiti lift in people with Botulinum Toxin, Rejuvenation, Neck, Therapy, run by St Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon at 1 site in Lebanon.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to describe a safe and consistent technique for neck rejuvenation using botulinum toxin. This study will also evaluate the efficiency of the intervention and determine the patients that would benefit most. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Nefertiti lift
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteLebanon
Study dates
Aug 2016to Oct 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female patients presenting to our clinic for neck rejuvenation who:
  • Were deemed nonsurgical candidates for neck rejuvenation
  • Were not willing to undergo invasive surgical procedures
  • Had a medical contraindication to surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patients with lower face botulinum toxin injection in the past 12 months
  • Patients with resorbable lower face fillers injection in the past 12 months
  • Patients with previous permanent lower face fillers injection
  • Pregnant patients
  • Lactating patients
  • Patients with preexisting neuromuscular conditions (myasthenia gravis, Eaton Lambert syndrome)
  • Patients using medication that could potentiate the effect of botulinum (ex: aminoglycoside antibiotics)
  • Patients with sensitivity to botulinum toxin or human albumin

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Lebanon1 site
  • Hotel Dieu De France

    Beirut, Aschrafieh, 00961

Other trials in Lebanon

About this study

Official title: Nefertiti Lift for Neck Rejuvenation: Assessing Efficiency and Re-defining Patient Selection

The purpose of this study is to describe a safe and consistent technique for neck rejuvenation using botulinum toxin. This study will also evaluate the efficiency of the intervention and determine the patients that would benefit most.

Read the detailed description

The abobotulinumtoxinA will be used for the Nefertiti lift The abobotulinumtoxinA will be prepared by adding 2.5 cc of normal saline to a 500-unit Dysport© (Ipsen Ltd, Berks, UK) vial Preinjection frontal, oblique and lateral patient pictures will be taken (at rest and with contraction)

Injection points:

  • A series of 4 injection points 1-2 cm apart on a horizontal line under the mandible posterior to the hypothetical line were the nasolabial fold meets the mandible
  • If present, injection of each platysmal band every 2 cm with 2 to 4 injection points per band (Injection of platysmal band will be done by holding the band between 2 fingers and injecting intramuscularly) For all injection points 5 units per point of abobotulinumtoxinA will be used

A maximum of 125 units of abobotulinumtoxinA will be allowed for the global neck treatment

Follow up will be done at 15 days for retouching or for post op pictures if no retouching is needed. if retouching is needed post injection pictures will be taken 10 days post retouching

Retouching: each residual platysmal band will be reinjected every 2 cm with 2 to 4 injection points per band (Injection of platysmal band will be done by holding the band between 2 fingers and injecting intramuscularly) (5 units per point of abobotulinumtoxinA will be used)

A total of 30 patients will be recruited

Being tested
Nefertiti lift

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nefertiti liftProcedure or surgery

    Also called neck rejuvenation

Study groups in NCT02864511
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Nefertiti lift

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neck volume using a validated scale from the Summit Scale II (1)

    The assessment will be done by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist. Pre and post injection scores will be calculated by the independent evaluators based on the photographic scale . The 3 evaluators will be blinded to the pre or post injection status of the photos

    No Sagging

    Mild Sagging

    Moderate Sagging

    Severe Sagging

    Very Severe Sagging

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  2. Jowls at rest using a validated scale from the Summit Scale II (2)

    The assessment will be done by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist. Pre and post injection scores will be calculated by the independent evaluators based on the photographic scale . The 3 evaluators will be blinded to the pre or post injection status of the photos

    No Sagging

    Mild Sagging

    Moderate Sagging

    Severe Sagging

    Very Severe Sagging

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  3. Marionette lines at rest using a validated scale from the Summit Scale II (3)

    The assessment will be done by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist. Pre and post injection scores will be calculated by the independent evaluators based on the photographic scale . The 3 evaluators will be blinded to the pre or post injection status of the photos

    No visible folds: continuous skin lines

    Shallow but visible folds with slight indentation

    Moderately deep folds, clear feature at normal appearance, but not when stretched

    Very long and deep folds, prominent facial feature

    Extremely long and deep folds; detrimental facial appearance

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  4. Oral commissures at rest using a validated scale from the Summit Scale II (2)

    The assessment will be done by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist. Pre and post injection scores will be calculated by the independent evaluators based on the photographic scale . The 3 evaluators will be blinded to the pre or post injection status of the photos

    No Downturn

    Mild Downturn

    Moderate Downturn

    Severe Downturn

    Very Severe Downturn

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  5. Platysmal bands at maximal contraction using a validated scale (4)

    The assessment will be done by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist. Pre and post injection scores will be calculated by the independent evaluators based on the photographic scale . The 3 evaluators will be blinded to the pre or post injection status of the photos

    No relevant prominence of platysmal bands

    Mild prominence of platysmal bands

    Moderate prominence of platysmal bands

    Severe prominence of platysmal bands

    Very severe prominence of platysmal bands

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  6. Platysmal bands at rest using a validated scale (5)

    The assessment will be done by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist. Pre and post injection scores will be calculated by the independent evaluators based on the photographic scale . The 3 evaluators will be blinded to the pre or post injection status of the photos

    No platsymal bands visible at rest

    Mild platysmal bands evident at rest. Bands do not appear along the full length of the neck.

    Mild platysmal bands evident along the full length of the neck at rest, less than 5 mm of elevation from the surrounding tissue.

    Moderate platsymal bandsvisible at rest along the full length of the neck, elevation at least 5 mm from the surrounding tissue.

    Severe platsymal bands along the full length of the neck at rest, elevation at least 5 mm from the surrounding tissue, with additional soft tissue ptotic banding present laterally

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  7. Mandibular definition change with maximal contraction will be assessed by a 2-point scale

    The assessment of the pre-injection photos will be done by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist

    Mandibular contour does not worsen with platysmal contraction

    Mandibular contour worsen with platysmal contraction

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Investigators Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale

    Improvement in Overall appearance (global neck, jowls, skin laxity, platysmal bands, mandibular contour), as assessed by the investigators using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). GAIS will be completed based on photographic assessment comparing post-treatment photos taken at day 15-25 post intervention to baseline photos, to assess overall aesthetic improvement. The GAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5) as follows:

    1. Very Much Improved: optimal cosmetic results
    2. Much Improved: marked improvement in appearance from initial condition but not completely optimal
    3. Improved: obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition but additional treatments are advised
    4. No Change: the appearance is the same as the original condition
    5. Worse: the appearance is worse from the original condition

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  2. Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale

    Improvement in Overall appearance (global neck, jowls, skin laxity, platysmal bands, mandibular contour), as assessed by the subject using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). GAIS will be completed based on a live assessment of the subject with a mirror in hand for real time assessment and and a photographic assessment comparing post-treatment photos taken at day 15-25 post intervention to baseline photos, to assess overall aesthetic improvement. The GAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5) as follows:

    1. Very Much Improved: optimal cosmetic results
    2. Much Improved: marked improvement in appearance from initial condition but not completely optimal
    3. Improved: obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition but additional treatments are advised
    4. No Change: the appearance is the same as the original condition
    5. Worse: the appearance is worse from the original condition

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  3. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be determined by a questionnaire completed at 15-25 days post-treatment. Subjects will indicate how satisfied they are on a 4-point scale (1-4) as follow:

    1. Very Satisfied
    2. Satisfied
    3. Dissatisfied
    4. Very Dissatisfied.

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  4. Patient willingness to repeat the procedure

    Patient willingness to repeat the procedure will be assessed by a simple question with a Yes or No response

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  5. Patient willingness to recommend the procedure

    Patient willingness to recommend the procedure to a friend will be assessed by a simple question with a Yes or No response

    Measured: 15-25 days post treatment

  6. Assessment of Pain during treatment

    Subjects' pain during the treatment will be recorded using a validated Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible

    Measured: At the day of the procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2016
  3. Primary completionOct 2016
  4. Study completionOct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02864511
Sponsor's protocol ID
USJ-01
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
9 Aug 2016
Last updated
11 Oct 2016
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Sattler G, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Gortelmeyer R, Hardas B, Himmrich S, Jones D, Kerscher M, Mohrmann C, Narins RS, Pooth R, Rzany B, Buchner L, Benter U, Breitscheidel L, de Maio M. Validated assessment scale for neck volume. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2 Spec No.):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02253.x.

    PubMed 22316190
  • Narins RS, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Gortelmeyer R, Hardas B, Himmrich S, Jones D, Kerscher M, de Maio M, Mohrmann C, Pooth R, Rzany B, Sattler G, Buchner L, Benter U, Breitscheidel L, Carruthers A. Validated assessment scales for the lower face. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2 Spec No.):333-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02247.x.

    PubMed 22316189
  • Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B, Kaur M, Goertelmeyer R, Jones D, Rzany B, Cohen J, Kerscher M, Flynn TC, Maas C, Sattler G, Gebauer A, Pooth R, McClure K, Simone-Korbel U, Buchner L. A validated grading scale for marionette lines. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Nov;34 Suppl 2:S167-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34366.x.

    PubMed 19021675
  • Geister TL, Blessmann-Gurk B, Rzany B, Harrington L, Gortelmeyer R, Pooth R. Validated assessment scale for platysmal bands. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Aug;39(8):1217-25. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12240. Epub 2013 May 7.

    PubMed 23650974
  • Gupta S, Biskup N, Mattison G, Leis A. Development and Validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool for Platysmal Banding in Cervicomental Aesthetics of the Female Neck. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Aug;35(6):NP141-6. doi: 10.1093/asj/sju160.

    PubMed 26229133

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nefertiti lift in people with Botulinum Toxin, Rejuvenation, Neck, Therapy, run by St Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon at 1 site in Lebanon.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Lebanon. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neck volume using a validated scale from the Summit Scale II (1) (time frame: 15-25 days post treatment). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02864511, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in