Anterior Open BiteNCT02865213
Molar Intrusion in Open Bite Treatment
A study testing OBA, Miniplates and Miniscrews in people with Anterior Open Bite, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.
Trial summary
This experimental study will evaluate the effect of different methods for the molar intrusion (compared with the control group) in adolescent and adult patients with open bite malocclusion. The study sample will consist of 45 patients with anterior open bite. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Open Bite
- What is being tested?
- OBA, Miniplates and Miniscrews
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSyria
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with skeletal open bite determined by an increased B angle (angle between the maxillary plane and mandibular plane), the Sum of Bjork and the mandibular plane angle (angle between SN plane and mandibular plane).
- Patients between 12 and 18 years old in permanent dentition stage.
- Negative over-bite of more than a mm
- Class I or Class II skeletal anteroposterior relationship.
Who cannot join
- Previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities.
- Class III skeletal anteroposterior relationship.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes Resulting From Posterior Teeth Intrusion in Treatment of the Anterior Open Bite - a Randomized Controlled Trial
This experimental study will evaluate the effect of different methods for the molar intrusion (compared with the control group) in adolescent and adult patients with open bite malocclusion. The study sample will consist of 45 patients with anterior open bite. The sample will be randomly allocated into two experimental groups, in addition to a control group.
The investigators will apply a modified version of the Open Bite Appliance (OBA), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth. For this purpose, miniplates will be used in the first treatment group, while miniscrews will be used in the second treatment group. In the control group, only OBA will be used. The skeletal and dentoalveolar changes occurring after intrusion of posterior teeth will be assessed by using posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiographs. Pre- and post- treatment changes for each group will be evaluated, in addition to the comparison of the post-treatment skeletal and dental changes that occurs between groups.
Read the detailed description
Open bite malocclusion is considered one of the most difficult orthodontic problems to correct because it appears as a result of the interaction of numerous etiological factors (genetic, dental, skeletal, functional, soft tissue, and habit) that contribute to its development. Various therapeutic approaches have been proposed for the treatment of an anterior open bite. These approaches vary depending on the causative factors and involve myotherapy, preventive treatment, functional therapy, orthognathic surgery, and orthodontic treatment using anterior teeth extrusion or posterior teeth intrusion. Among the non-surgical orthodontic treatment methods are the temporary anchorage devices (TADs) including miniplates and miniscrew or micro-screw implants. The intrusion of posterior teeth with temporary anchorage devices was suggested to lead to decreased lower facial height by a counterclockwise rotation of the mandible; this may resemble the orthognathic surgery outcomes for any open bite patients. To the best of the investigators current knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of molar intrusion in adolescence and adult patients in the permanent dentition stage.
- Conditions
- Anterior Open Bite
- Being tested
- OBA, Miniplates, Miniscrews
- Keywords
- Open bite, Molar intrusion, Temporary anchorage devices
- Medical subject headings
- Open Bite
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OBADevice
The intrusion of posterior teeth using removable appliance "OBA".
MiniplatesDevice
The intrusion of posterior teeth using temporary anchorage "Miniplates".
MiniscrewsDevice
The intrusion of posterior teeth using temporary anchorage "Miniscrews".
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Miniplates + OBA | Experimental | The intrusion of posterior teeth using Miniplates + OBA will be performed. The investigators will apply a modified version of the OBA (Open Bite Appliance), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth and miniplates.
The miniplates are for Jeil Dual top® anchor system, Jeil medical corporation, #702,kolon science valley 2nd, 811, Guro-Dong, Guro-Gu, Seoul, 152-050, Korea. Tel: 82.2.850.3500. Fax: 82.2.850.3537. homepage: www.jeilmed.co.kr/ E-mail: mktg@jeilmed.co.kr Receives: Device: OBA; Device: Miniplates |
| Miniscrews + OBA | Experimental | The intrusion of posterior teeth using Miniscrews + OBA will be performed. The investigators will apply a modified version of the OBA (Open Bite Appliance), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth and miniscrews.
The miniscrews are for Denxy ® dental orthodontic products, Denxy technology co, limited . 404,Lihuabuilding,Furongroad, Changsha, Hunan, China. Tel: 0086-731-89717339. Fax: 0086-731-82237315. Homepage: www.denxy-orthodontic.com/email: DENXYDENTALBOSS@126.COM Receives: Device: OBA; Device: Miniscrews |
| Only OBA | Experimental | The intrusion of posterior teeth using OBA only will be performed. The investigators will apply a modified version of the OBA (Open Bite Appliance), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth only. Receives: Device: OBA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overbite
The distance between the incisal edges of upper incisors and the incisal edges of the lower incisors, measured in mm
Measured: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Molar intrusion
The vertical distance between upper molars and the true horizontal plane (measured in mm).
Measured: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Mandibular autorotation
This variable will be measured by superimposition of the anterior cranial base.
Measured: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Anterior facial height
The distance between the point "N" and the point "Me"
Measured: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Change in the anteroposterior position of the point "B"
The horizontal distance between point "B" and the true vertical plane.
Measured: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionAug 2017
- Study completionNov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anterior Open BiteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Damascus University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mohamad Yousef, DDS MSc PhD, Study chair, Damascus University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02865213
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UDDS-Ortho-01-2016
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: No Individual participant data will be only available to the researchers in the department of Orthodontics, Damascus University
Publications
Ng J, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. True molar intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Dec;130(6):709-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.049.
PubMed 17169732Sugawara J, Baik UB, Umemori M, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H, Mitani H. Treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar changes following intrusion of mandibular molars with application of a skeletal anchorage system (SAS) for open bite correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002;17(4):243-53.
PubMed 12592995Deguchi T, Kurosaka H, Oikawa H, Kuroda S, Takahashi I, Yamashiro T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.029.
PubMed 21435540Akan S, Kocadereli I, Aktas A, Tasar F. Effects of maxillary molar intrusion with zygomatic anchorage on the stomatognathic system in anterior open bite patients. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):93-102. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr081. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
PubMed 21828357Xun C, Zeng X, Wang X. Microscrew anchorage in skeletal anterior open-bite treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007 Jan;77(1):47-56. doi: 10.2319/010906-14R.1.
PubMed 17029531Erverdi N, Keles A, Nanda R. The use of skeletal anchorage in open bite treatment: a cephalometric evaluation. Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):381-90. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)0742.0.CO;2.
PubMed 15264651Hart TR, Cousley RR, Fishman LS, Tallents RH. Dentoskeletal changes following mini-implant molar intrusion in anterior open bite patients. Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov;85(6):941-8. doi: 10.2319/090514-625.1. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
PubMed 25531420Kuroda S, Katayama A, Takano-Yamamoto T. Severe anterior open-bite case treated using titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2004 Aug;74(4):558-67. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)0742.0.CO;2.
PubMed 15387036
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes Resulting From Posterior Teeth Intrusion in Treatment of the Anterior Open Bite - a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02865213
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UDDS-Ortho-01-2016
- Conditions
- Anterior Open Bite
- Keywords
- Open bite, Molar intrusion, Temporary anchorage devices
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Damascus UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This experimental study will evaluate the effect of different methods for the molar intrusion (compared with the control group) in adolescent and adult patients with open bite malocclusion. The study sample will consist of 45 patients with anterior open bite. The sample will be randomly allocated into two experimental groups, in addition to a control group.
The investigators will apply a modified version of the Open Bite Appliance (OBA), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth. For this purpose, miniplates will be used in the first treatment group, while miniscrews will be used in the second treatment group. In the control group, only OBA will be used. The skeletal and dentoalveolar changes occurring after intrusion of posterior teeth will be assessed by using posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiographs. Pre- and post- treatment changes for each group will be evaluated, in addition to the comparison of the post-treatment skeletal and dental changes that occurs between groups.
Detailed description
Open bite malocclusion is considered one of the most difficult orthodontic problems to correct because it appears as a result of the interaction of numerous etiological factors (genetic, dental, skeletal, functional, soft tissue, and habit) that contribute to its development. Various therapeutic approaches have been proposed for the treatment of an anterior open bite. These approaches vary depending on the causative factors and involve myotherapy, preventive treatment, functional therapy, orthognathic surgery, and orthodontic treatment using anterior teeth extrusion or posterior teeth intrusion. Among the non-surgical orthodontic treatment methods are the temporary anchorage devices (TADs) including miniplates and miniscrew or micro-screw implants. The intrusion of posterior teeth with temporary anchorage devices was suggested to lead to decreased lower facial height by a counterclockwise rotation of the mandible; this may resemble the orthognathic surgery outcomes for any open bite patients. To the best of the investigators current knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of molar intrusion in adolescence and adult patients in the permanent dentition stage.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Miniplates + OBA | Experimental | Device: OBA, Device: MiniplatesThe intrusion of posterior teeth using Miniplates + OBA will be performed. The investigators will apply a modified version of the OBA (Open Bite Appliance), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth and miniplates. The miniplates are for Jeil Dual top® anchor system, Jeil medical corporation, #702,kolon science valley 2nd, 811, Guro-Dong, Guro-Gu, Seoul, 152-050, Korea. Tel: 82.2.850.3500. Fax: 82.2.850.3537. homepage: www.jeilmed.co.kr/ E-mail: mktg@jeilmed.co.kr |
| Miniscrews + OBA | Experimental | Device: OBA, Device: MiniscrewsThe intrusion of posterior teeth using Miniscrews + OBA will be performed. The investigators will apply a modified version of the OBA (Open Bite Appliance), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth and miniscrews. The miniscrews are for Denxy ® dental orthodontic products, Denxy technology co, limited . 404,Lihuabuilding,Furongroad, Changsha, Hunan, China. Tel: 0086-731-89717339. Fax: 0086-731-82237315. Homepage: www.denxy-orthodontic.com/email: DENXYDENTALBOSS@126.COM |
| Only OBA | Experimental | Device: OBAThe intrusion of posterior teeth using OBA only will be performed. The investigators will apply a modified version of the OBA (Open Bite Appliance), by Erverdi and Usumez, for all patients in upper posterior teeth only. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with skeletal open bite determined by an increased B angle (angle between the maxillary plane and mandibular plane), the Sum of Bjork and the mandibular plane angle (angle between SN plane and mandibular plane).
- Patients between 12 and 18 years old in permanent dentition stage.
- Negative over-bite of more than a mm
- Class I or Class II skeletal anteroposterior relationship.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with syndromes, clefts, or craniofacial abnormalities.
- Class III skeletal anteroposterior relationship.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OBAThe intrusion of posterior teeth using removable appliance "OBA". | Device | Miniplates + OBA, Miniscrews + OBA, Only OBA |
| MiniplatesThe intrusion of posterior teeth using temporary anchorage "Miniplates". | Device | Miniplates + OBA |
| MiniscrewsThe intrusion of posterior teeth using temporary anchorage "Miniscrews". | Device | Miniscrews + OBA |
Primary outcome
Overbite
Time frame: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
The distance between the incisal edges of upper incisors and the incisal edges of the lower incisors, measured in mm
4 secondary outcomes
Molar intrusion
Time frame: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Mandibular autorotation
Time frame: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Anterior facial height
Time frame: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Change in the anteroposterior position of the point "B"
Time frame: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2018.
- Background: PubMed 17169732Ng J, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. True molar intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Dec;130(6):709-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.049.
- Background: PubMed 12592995Sugawara J, Baik UB, Umemori M, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H, Mitani H. Treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar changes following intrusion of mandibular molars with application of a skeletal anchorage system (SAS) for open bite correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002;17(4):243-53.
- Background: PubMed 21435540Deguchi T, Kurosaka H, Oikawa H, Kuroda S, Takahashi I, Yamashiro T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.029.
- Background: PubMed 21828357Akan S, Kocadereli I, Aktas A, Tasar F. Effects of maxillary molar intrusion with zygomatic anchorage on the stomatognathic system in anterior open bite patients. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):93-102. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr081. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
- Background: PubMed 17029531Xun C, Zeng X, Wang X. Microscrew anchorage in skeletal anterior open-bite treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007 Jan;77(1):47-56. doi: 10.2319/010906-14R.1.
- Background: PubMed 15264651Erverdi N, Keles A, Nanda R. The use of skeletal anchorage in open bite treatment: a cephalometric evaluation. Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):381-90. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)0742.0.CO;2.
- Background: PubMed 25531420Hart TR, Cousley RR, Fishman LS, Tallents RH. Dentoskeletal changes following mini-implant molar intrusion in anterior open bite patients. Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov;85(6):941-8. doi: 10.2319/090514-625.1. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
- Background: PubMed 15387036Kuroda S, Katayama A, Takano-Yamamoto T. Severe anterior open-bite case treated using titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2004 Aug;74(4):558-67. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)0742.0.CO;2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No Individual participant data will be only available to the researchers in the department of Orthodontics, Damascus University
Related trials for Anterior Open Bite
RecruitingPhase 3
Tenecteplase or Reteplase as Bridging Thrombolysis Before Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Large Vessel Occlusion
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy
Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Head of Bed After Ischemic Stroke Thrombectomy (HoBIT)
Large Vessel Occlusion, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Comparison of Clear Aligners and Fixed Appliances in Dental Anterior Open Bite
Open Bite, Malocclusion Class I
Recruiting
Investigate the Effectiveness of 3D-printed Shape Memory Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Open Bite
Open Bite
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohamad Yousef, DDS MSc PhD study chair
Damascus University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing OBA, Miniplates and Miniscrews in people with Anterior Open Bite, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Syria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overbite (time frame: This variable will be evaluated twice; T0 before treatment, and T1 at the end of molar intrusion which will be approximately after 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02865213, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2018.