Thoracic Epidural InjectionNCT02865512
Thoracic Epidurography Different Position
A study testing thoracic epidural catheterization in people with Thoracic Epidural Injection, run by Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
It is known that postoperative pain after thoracotomy or lobectomy is very severe, therefore, intraoperative or postoperative pain management using continuous thoracic epidural catheterization is suggested good option to prevent this complication. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Thoracic Epidural Injection
- What is being tested?
- thoracic epidural catheterization
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to Jun 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- lung cancer
- liver cancer
- stomach cancer
- pancreas cancer
Who cannot join
- coagulopathy
- infection
- previous spine fusion at thoracic level
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: An Analysis of Thoracic Epidurography Contrast Patterns According to Two Different Position of Patient
It is known that postoperative pain after thoracotomy or lobectomy is very severe, therefore, intraoperative or postoperative pain management using continuous thoracic epidural catheterization is suggested good option to prevent this complication.
The spread of local anesthetics is influenced by various factors including volume, location of needle insertion, speed of injection, patient position, age, weight and height. However, there are few studies about the effect of different patient position during thoracic epidural catheterization.
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different patient position affecting thoracic epidurography.
Read the detailed description
It is known that postoperative pain after thoracotomy or lobectomy is very severe, therefore, intraoperative or postoperative pain management using continuous thoracic epidural catheterization is suggested good option to prevent this complication.
The spread of local anesthetics is influenced by various factors including volume, location of needle insertion, speed of injection, patient position, age, weight and height. However, there are few studies about the effect of different patient position during thoracic epidural catheterization.
Studies of lumbar epidural blockade have shown that lateral position can produce 0-3 segment more to the dependent position compared to the supine position. When the same amount of local anesthetic was injected in supine of sitting position, the most cephalad level of spread was indifferent.
Recent studies showed that neck flexion demonstrated significant cephalad spread of contrast dye in high thoracic epidural blockade.
The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the contrast dye spread between different patient position
- Conditions
- Thoracic Epidural Injection
- Being tested
- thoracic epidural catheterization
- Keywords
- thoracic epidural injection, patient position
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
thoracic epidural catheterizationProcedure or surgery
thoracic epidural catheterization for the management of postoperative pain
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| supine position | Active comparator | thoracic epidural catheterization with supine position Receives: Procedure: thoracic epidural catheterization |
| flexed lateral position | Active comparator | thoracic epidural catheterization with flexed lateral position Receives: Procedure: thoracic epidural catheterization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of segment convered by contrast dye assessed through fluoroscopic image
Measured: 1 minutes after the completion of the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completionMay 2017
- Study completionJun 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Thoracic Epidural InjectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ji Hee Hong, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
- Investigators
- Ji Hee Hong, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02865512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-05-036
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hong JH, Jung SW, Park JH. Posture Influences the Extent of Spread of Contrast Medium During Thoracic Epidurography: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):501-508.
PubMed 28934781
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Analysis of Thoracic Epidurography Contrast Patterns According to Two Different Position of Patient
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02865512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016-05-036
- Conditions
- Thoracic Epidural Injection
- Keywords
- thoracic epidural injection, patient position
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Keimyung University Dongsan Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It is known that postoperative pain after thoracotomy or lobectomy is very severe, therefore, intraoperative or postoperative pain management using continuous thoracic epidural catheterization is suggested good option to prevent this complication.
The spread of local anesthetics is influenced by various factors including volume, location of needle insertion, speed of injection, patient position, age, weight and height. However, there are few studies about the effect of different patient position during thoracic epidural catheterization.
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different patient position affecting thoracic epidurography.
Detailed description
It is known that postoperative pain after thoracotomy or lobectomy is very severe, therefore, intraoperative or postoperative pain management using continuous thoracic epidural catheterization is suggested good option to prevent this complication.
The spread of local anesthetics is influenced by various factors including volume, location of needle insertion, speed of injection, patient position, age, weight and height. However, there are few studies about the effect of different patient position during thoracic epidural catheterization.
Studies of lumbar epidural blockade have shown that lateral position can produce 0-3 segment more to the dependent position compared to the supine position. When the same amount of local anesthetic was injected in supine of sitting position, the most cephalad level of spread was indifferent.
Recent studies showed that neck flexion demonstrated significant cephalad spread of contrast dye in high thoracic epidural blockade.
The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the contrast dye spread between different patient position
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| supine position | Active comparator | Procedure: thoracic epidural catheterizationthoracic epidural catheterization with supine position |
| flexed lateral position | Active comparator | Procedure: thoracic epidural catheterizationthoracic epidural catheterization with flexed lateral position |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- lung cancer
- liver cancer
- stomach cancer
- pancreas cancer
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- coagulopathy
- infection
- previous spine fusion at thoracic level
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| thoracic epidural catheterizationthoracic epidural catheterization for the management of postoperative pain | Procedure or surgery | flexed lateral position, supine position |
Primary outcome
Number of segment convered by contrast dye assessed through fluoroscopic image
Time frame: 1 minutes after the completion of the intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28934781Hong JH, Jung SW, Park JH. Posture Influences the Extent of Spread of Contrast Medium During Thoracic Epidurography: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):501-508.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Thoracic Epidural Injection
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality to Reduce Anxiety During Thoracic Epidural Placement.
Preoperative Anxiety Score
RecruitingPhase 4
INTERCOSTAL NERVE BLOCK: Efficacy of CINB for Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures
Rib Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension
Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Erector Spinae Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for the Prevention of Chronic Pain Following Thoracotomy: a Retrospective Study
Thoracic Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Paravertebral Versus Epidural Block for Post-thoracotomy Pain Control
Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ji Hee Hong, MD, PhD principal investigator
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing thoracic epidural catheterization in people with Thoracic Epidural Injection, run by Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of segment convered by contrast dye assessed through fluoroscopic image (time frame: 1 minutes after the completion of the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02865512, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2017.