Pregnancy ComplicationsNCT02866058
Outcomes of Cesarean Section vs Vaginal Delivery: Instrumental Variable Adjusted Analysis
An observational study of Pregnancy Complications and Cesarean Section, run by Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Trial summary
This study will examine the effect of cesarean section on perinatal mortality, using data provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Complications, Cesarean Section
- What is being tested?
- Cesarean Section
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 836,755 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2011to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All obstetrical deliveries in Canada (except the province of Quebec) between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2009
Who may be able to join
- Infants born within the study period at Canadian hospitals outside of the province of Quebec.
Who cannot join
- Infant record not linkable to maternal record.
- Birthweight < 500 gm.
- Gestational age at delivery < 20 weeks.
- Deliveries at hospitals with less than 20 cesarean deliveries during study period.
- Records with missing data for important covariates
About this study
Official title: Substantial Variability Between Traditional and Instrumental Variable Estimates of the Risk of Caesarean Section in Canada: a Population-based Cohort Study
This study will examine the effect of cesarean section on perinatal mortality, using data provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.
Read the detailed description
This study will examine administrative data provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Maternal obstetrical delivery and neonatal hospitalization records provided by CIHI will be linked before analysis. The primary outcome is in-hospital perinatal mortality. The data will be analyzed by traditional multi-variate logistic regression, and the results from this analysis will be compared to the results from instrumental variable adjusted regression using the Generalized Method of Moments. The instrumental variable is the rate of cesarean delivery among women living within the same hospital catchment area. All analyses will be adjusted for maternal, infant, delivery provider, and hospital factors, as well as for clustering at the level of the delivery hospital.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Complications, Cesarean Section
- Being tested
- Cesarean Section
- Medical subject headings
- Pregnancy Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cesarean SectionProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cesarean | Infants delivered by cesarean section Receives: Procedure: Cesarean Section | |
| Vaginal | Infants delivered by vaginal delivery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Perinatal Mortality
Infant death during the Outcome Measure Time Frame.
Measured: Newborn infants were followed for 7 days after birth or until discharge from the hospitalization at which birth occurred, whichever was longer. If infants were continuously hospitalized, they were followed to end of study period for a maximum of 3 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionJul 2013
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Pregnancy ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 836,755 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial University of Newfoundland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Foundation - Memorial University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Memorial University of Newfoundland
- Investigators
- Kris Aubrey-Bassler, MD, Principal investigator, Memorial University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02866058
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MRFCoxAwardAubrey2
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The data provider does not allow sharing of investigator data, but data can be requested directly from them.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Substantial Variability Between Traditional and Instrumental Variable Estimates of the Risk of Caesarean Section in Canada: a Population-based Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02866058
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MRFCoxAwardAubrey2
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Complications, Cesarean Section
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 836,755 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical Research Foundation - Memorial University
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Oct 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will examine the effect of cesarean section on perinatal mortality, using data provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.
Detailed description
This study will examine administrative data provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Maternal obstetrical delivery and neonatal hospitalization records provided by CIHI will be linked before analysis. The primary outcome is in-hospital perinatal mortality. The data will be analyzed by traditional multi-variate logistic regression, and the results from this analysis will be compared to the results from instrumental variable adjusted regression using the Generalized Method of Moments. The instrumental variable is the rate of cesarean delivery among women living within the same hospital catchment area. All analyses will be adjusted for maternal, infant, delivery provider, and hospital factors, as well as for clustering at the level of the delivery hospital.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cesarean | – | Procedure: Cesarean SectionInfants delivered by cesarean section |
| Vaginal | – | –Infants delivered by vaginal delivery |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All obstetrical deliveries in Canada (except the province of Quebec) between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2009
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Infants born within the study period at Canadian hospitals outside of the province of Quebec.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Infant record not linkable to maternal record.
- Birthweight < 500 gm.
- Gestational age at delivery < 20 weeks.
- Deliveries at hospitals with less than 20 cesarean deliveries during study period.
- Records with missing data for important covariates
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cesarean Section | Procedure or surgery | Cesarean |
Primary outcome
Perinatal Mortality
Time frame: Newborn infants were followed for 7 days after birth or until discharge from the hospitalization at which birth occurred, whichever was longer. If infants were continuously hospitalized, they were followed to end of study period for a maximum of 3 years.
Infant death during the Outcome Measure Time Frame.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The data provider does not allow sharing of investigator data, but data can be requested directly from them.
Related trials for Pregnancy Complications
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kris Aubrey-Bassler, MD principal investigator
Memorial University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pregnancy Complications and Cesarean Section, run by Memorial University of Newfoundland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Perinatal Mortality (time frame: Newborn infants were followed for 7 days after birth or until discharge from the hospitalization at which birth occurred, whichever was longer. If infants were continuously hospitalized, they were followed to end of study period for a maximum of 3 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2026.