GastrostomyPhase 4ANTALGIPNCT02869321
Analgesic Efficacy of Transmucosal Fentanyl for Breakthrough Pain Caused by Interventional Gastrostomy
A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl, Morphine Sulfate and Gastrostomy in people with Gastrostomy and Breakthrough Pain, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Patients with Head \& Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma often need a gastrostomy. It can be performed with a radiological approach. This procedure is usually not performed under general anesthesia, but local anesthesia is not sufficient to counteract pain due to gastric insufflation and incision of the abdominal wall. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastrostomy, Breakthrough Pain, Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Fentanyl, Morphine Sulfate and Gastrostomy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- May 2015to May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient care for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract (except sinonasal)
- > 18, all weights, all sexes
- Under balanced background opioid treatment since longer than 7 days (VAS < 5)
- Needing a radiologic gastrostomy under local anesthesia
- Informed consent
- Affiliation to social security plan
- Preliminary medical examination
Who cannot join
- Non balanced morphinic treatment : modification of analgesic treatment during 7 previous days
- Radiotherapy of nasal fossae/sinus
- Technical impossibility or contraindication to PECFENT®, ORAMORPH® and associated drugs
- Impossibility of pain evaluation by patient
- Belonging to protected class: pregnant or breastfeeding woman, person deprived of liberty for judiciary or administrative decision, under-18, person under legal protection or incapable of giving consent, person in life-and-death emergency incapable of giving a preliminary consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Transmucosal Fentanyl for Breakthrough Pain Caused by Interventional Gastrostomy
Patients with Head \& Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma often need a gastrostomy. It can be performed with a radiological approach. This procedure is usually not performed under general anesthesia, but local anesthesia is not sufficient to counteract pain due to gastric insufflation and incision of the abdominal wall. Standard analgesic treatments are usually not well-fitted due to onset of action or route of administration. An alternative solution could be fentanyl nasal spray, a treatment with a fast onset of action and with easy use allowing repetition if needed, during the procedure.
The purpose of this study is to compare analgesic efficacy of nasal instillation of PECFENT® to usually administered morphinic analgesic treatment with fast onset of action (ORAMORPH®), in radiologic percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement:
Read more
- during the procedure
- following the procedure (measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain at 15 min, 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 12 hours after procedure).
Secondary purposes are to compare easiness of 2 treatments and their adverse effects.
- Being tested
- Fentanyl, Morphine Sulfate, Fentanyl placebo, Morphine Sulfate placebo, Gastrostomy
- Medical subject headings
- Breakthrough Pain, Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FentanylDrug
Also called PECFENT®
Morphine SulfateDrug
Also called ORAMORPH®
Fentanyl placeboDrug
Morphine Sulfate placeboDrug
GastrostomyProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl | Experimental | Administration of Morphine Sulfate Placebo and Fentanyl
1. Morphine Sulfate Placebo: oral solution administered through nasogastric tube, 10% of daily dose of morphine of background treatment, 1 hour before gastrostomy
+
2. Fentanyl: nasal spray solution, 100 µg pulverisation, 15 min before gastrostomy, if not efficacy second dose after 15 min during gastrostomy
Administration 1+2 if pain after 4 hours from gastrostomy Receives: Drug: Fentanyl; Drug: Morphine Sulfate placebo; Procedure: Gastrostomy |
| Morphine Sulfate | Placebo comparator | Administration of Morphine Sulfate and Fentanyl Placebo
1. Morphine Sulfate: oral solution administered through nasogastric tube, 10% of daily dose of morphine of background treatment, 1 hour before gastrostomy
+
2. Fentanyl Placebo: nasal spray solution, 100 µg pulverisation, 15 min before gastrostomy, if not efficacy second dose after 15 min during gastrostomy
Administration 1+2 if pain after 4 hours from gastrostomy Receives: Drug: Morphine Sulfate; Drug: Fentanyl placebo; Procedure: Gastrostomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intensity of breakthrough pain during the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: during gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 15 min after gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 30 min after gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 1 hour after gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 2 hours after gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 3 hours after gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 4 hours after gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 6 hours after gastrostomy
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Measured: 12 hours after gastrostomy
Necessity of a second analgesic treatment after gastrostomy
in case of Pain VAS >4
Measured: up to 12 hours from gastrostomy
Secondary outcomes (4)
Evaluation of satisfaction of patient with analgesic efficacy
Questionnaire
Measured: up to 1 day from gastrostomy
Evaluation of satisfaction of staff with analgesic efficacy and easiness to use of treatments
Questionnaire
Measured: up to 1 day from gastrostomy
Compliance of times of administration of treatments with the procedure
Measured: day 0
Comparison of adverse effects of administered drugs
Measured: up to 24 hours post gastrostomy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionMay 2018
- Study completionMay 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GastrostomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, France
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Patrice GALLET, Principal investigator, Service ORL - CHU NANCY - France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02869321
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-003352-32
- Other IDs
- 2014
- Acronym
- ANTALGIP
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 13 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Transmucosal Fentanyl for Breakthrough Pain Caused by Interventional Gastrostomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02869321
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ANTALGIP / 2014-003352-32
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with Head \& Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma often need a gastrostomy. It can be performed with a radiological approach. This procedure is usually not performed under general anesthesia, but local anesthesia is not sufficient to counteract pain due to gastric insufflation and incision of the abdominal wall. Standard analgesic treatments are usually not well-fitted due to onset of action or route of administration. An alternative solution could be fentanyl nasal spray, a treatment with a fast onset of action and with easy use allowing repetition if needed, during the procedure.
The purpose of this study is to compare analgesic efficacy of nasal instillation of PECFENT® to usually administered morphinic analgesic treatment with fast onset of action (ORAMORPH®), in radiologic percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement:
- during the procedure
- following the procedure (measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain at 15 min, 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 12 hours after procedure).
Secondary purposes are to compare easiness of 2 treatments and their adverse effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl | Experimental | Drug: Fentanyl, Drug: Morphine Sulfate placebo, Procedure: GastrostomyAdministration of Morphine Sulfate Placebo and Fentanyl 1. Morphine Sulfate Placebo: oral solution administered through nasogastric tube, 10% of daily dose of morphine of background treatment, 1 hour before gastrostomy + 2. Fentanyl: nasal spray solution, 100 µg pulverisation, 15 min before gastrostomy, if not efficacy second dose after 15 min during gastrostomy Administration 1+2 if pain after 4 hours from gastrostomy |
| Morphine Sulfate | Placebo comparator | Drug: Morphine Sulfate, Drug: Fentanyl placebo, Procedure: GastrostomyAdministration of Morphine Sulfate and Fentanyl Placebo 1. Morphine Sulfate: oral solution administered through nasogastric tube, 10% of daily dose of morphine of background treatment, 1 hour before gastrostomy + 2. Fentanyl Placebo: nasal spray solution, 100 µg pulverisation, 15 min before gastrostomy, if not efficacy second dose after 15 min during gastrostomy Administration 1+2 if pain after 4 hours from gastrostomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient care for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract (except sinonasal)
- > 18, all weights, all sexes
- Under balanced background opioid treatment since longer than 7 days (VAS < 5)
- Needing a radiologic gastrostomy under local anesthesia
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non balanced morphinic treatment : modification of analgesic treatment during 7 previous days
- Radiotherapy of nasal fossae/sinus
- Technical impossibility or contraindication to PECFENT®, ORAMORPH® and associated drugs
- Impossibility of pain evaluation by patient
- Belonging to protected class: pregnant or breastfeeding woman, person deprived of liberty for judiciary or administrative decision, under-18, person under legal protection or incapable of giving consent, person in life-and-death emergency incapable of giving a preliminary consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FentanylAlso: PECFENT® | Drug | Fentanyl |
| Morphine SulfateAlso: ORAMORPH® | Drug | Morphine Sulfate |
| Fentanyl placebo | Drug | Morphine Sulfate |
| Morphine Sulfate placebo | Drug | Fentanyl |
| Gastrostomy | Procedure or surgery | Fentanyl, Morphine Sulfate |
Primary outcome
Intensity of breakthrough pain during the gastrostomy
Time frame: during gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 15 min after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 30 min after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 1 hour after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 2 hours after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 3 hours after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 4 hours after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 6 hours after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Intensity of pain following the gastrostomy
Time frame: 12 hours after gastrostomy
Pain measured by VAS
Necessity of a second analgesic treatment after gastrostomy
Time frame: up to 12 hours from gastrostomy
in case of Pain VAS >4
4 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of satisfaction of patient with analgesic efficacy
Time frame: up to 1 day from gastrostomy
Evaluation of satisfaction of staff with analgesic efficacy and easiness to use of treatments
Time frame: up to 1 day from gastrostomy
Compliance of times of administration of treatments with the procedure
Time frame: day 0
Comparison of adverse effects of administered drugs
Time frame: up to 24 hours post gastrostomy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastrostomy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Soylent in Reducing Gastrostomy Tube Rates in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy
Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
Enrolling by invitation
No DIET Trial: Dogmatic Interruption of Enteral nuTrition
Gastrostomy, Tracheostomy
RecruitingObservational study
Gut Microbiota Changes in Children Receiving Exclusive Enteral Nutrition With Compleat® Paediatric
Feeding and Eating Disorders of Childhood, Enteral Nutrition Dependence
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Sedated and Unsedated PEG in Elderly ASA IV Patients
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, Enteral Nutrition Feeding
Not yet recruiting
We Need to FEED: Facilitating Enteral Education for Discharge
Enteral Nutrition Feeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrice GALLET principal investigator
Service ORL - CHU NANCY - France
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl, Morphine Sulfate and Gastrostomy in people with Gastrostomy and Breakthrough Pain, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intensity of breakthrough pain during the gastrostomy (time frame: during gastrostomy). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2019.