Health Care Quality Management (no Condition).ImpactFANCT02869711
Impact of a Training-action About Projects Leading for the Improvement of Care Quality in Managing Practice of Health Executive
An observational study of Health Care Quality Management (no Condition)., run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The present study focuses on the quality of care and how the health executives can bring it to a central place in their management. A training-action has been set-up at the Health Executive training institute (University Hospital Grenoble) to improve care quality. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Care Quality Management (no Condition).
- What is being tested?
- Health care quality management
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Health Executive volunteers
Who may be able to join
- The volunteers are health executives with diploma
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pierre-Philippe DUJARDIN contact
Tinaig LE COSTAOUEC contact
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Grenoble
Grenoble
Pierre-Philippe DUJARDIN
Tinaig LE COSTAOUEC, tlecostaouec@chu-grenoble.fr
About this study
The present study focuses on the quality of care and how the health executives can bring it to a central place in their management. A training-action has been set-up at the Health Executive training institute (University Hospital Grenoble) to improve care quality. Reports prepared by students (tutored projects) related to operational diagnosis and action plans about care quality improvement are given to health executives. The objective is to evaluate how the health executive will use the tutored project to improve care quality and set-up actions.The hypothesis is that the health executive will use the tutored project to improve project management.
Read the detailed description
Every year, 9 voluntary health executives will be included and followed during 1 year. The experience will be done 3 times (3 years).
It is a qualitative study using 3 forms to recover data: group focus, individual interviews, project monographs. Speeches coding will enable to test the hypothesis from 2 analysis points: place of health executive and place of tutored project.
The study will be resulting in recommendations to health executives for their management methods and taken into account to define training.
- Being tested
- Health care quality management
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Health care quality managementOther
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the managerial practices of health executives about health care quality management after tutored projects.
The subjects are not patients but health executive managers. The study foccuses on their management pratices and changes after tutored projects. There are 2 analysis criteria: place of health executive and place of tutored project.
Measured: 1 year for each volunteer.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionSep 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Health Care Quality Management (no Condition).Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pierre-Philippe DUJARDIN, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Grenoble
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02869711
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 38RC11.244
- Acronym
- ImpactFA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of a Training-action About Projects Leading for the Improvement of Care Quality in Managing Practice of Health Executive
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02869711
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ImpactFA / 38RC11.244
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study focuses on the quality of care and how the health executives can bring it to a central place in their management. A training-action has been set-up at the Health Executive training institute (University Hospital Grenoble) to improve care quality. Reports prepared by students (tutored projects) related to operational diagnosis and action plans about care quality improvement are given to health executives. The objective is to evaluate how the health executive will use the tutored project to improve care quality and set-up actions.The hypothesis is that the health executive will use the tutored project to improve project management.
Detailed description
Every year, 9 voluntary health executives will be included and followed during 1 year. The experience will be done 3 times (3 years).
It is a qualitative study using 3 forms to recover data: group focus, individual interviews, project monographs. Speeches coding will enable to test the hypothesis from 2 analysis points: place of health executive and place of tutored project.
The study will be resulting in recommendations to health executives for their management methods and taken into account to define training.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Health Executive volunteers
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The volunteers are health executives with diploma
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Health care quality management | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Change in the managerial practices of health executives about health care quality management after tutored projects.
Time frame: 1 year for each volunteer.
The subjects are not patients but health executive managers. The study foccuses on their management pratices and changes after tutored projects. There are 2 analysis criteria: place of health executive and place of tutored project.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2016.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pierre-Philippe DUJARDIN contact
Tinaig LE COSTAOUEC contact
Pierre-Philippe DUJARDIN principal investigator
University Hospital, Grenoble
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Health Care Quality Management (no Condition)., run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Pierre-Philippe DUJARDIN (tlecostaouec@chu-grenoble.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the managerial practices of health executives about health care quality management after tutored projects. (time frame: 1 year for each volunteer.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2016.