Cesarean SectionNCT02871713
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intrathecal Morphine With Quadratus Lumborum Block for Post-cesarean Delivery Analgesia
A study testing Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine and Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine in people with Cesarean Section, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Pain after caesarean delivery (CD) can interfere with the moms' ability to look after her baby and may contribute to developing long term pain and disability. Women having a CD receive pain medication (morphine) as part of their spinal anesthetic to help with pain relief after surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section
- What is being tested?
- Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine and Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 May 2017to 27 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-emergent CD with planned spinal anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesia physical status class I \& II;
- Age ≥18 years;
- Term gestational age (≥37 weeks);
- Singleton pregnancy;
- English-speaking.
Who cannot join
- Morbid Obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2);
- Subjects with significant obstetric or neonatal co-morbidities;
- Patient enrollment in another study involving medication within 30 days of CD;
- Any other condition, which may impair patients ability to co-operate with data collection;
- Patient height less than 152 cm (5'0");
- History of opioid tolerance or sensitivity;
- Intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs);
- Women with a history of illicit drug use or prescribed opioids or benzodiazepines.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intrathecal Morphine With Quadratus Lumborum Block as Part of a Multimodal Analgesia Strategy for Post-cesarean Delivery Analgesia
Pain after caesarean delivery (CD) can interfere with the moms' ability to look after her baby and may contribute to developing long term pain and disability. Women having a CD receive pain medication (morphine) as part of their spinal anesthetic to help with pain relief after surgery. Morphine works well however has several side effects such as nausea, vomiting and itching which may be severe enough to make it difficult to care for herself and her new baby. In some cases, morphine causes difficulty in passing urine within first 24-hours of the CD requiring catheterization and thus restricting mobilization. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a newer nerve block that uses local anaesthetic solution to numb the nerves carrying pain sensation from surgical incision site. QLB may be able to provide effective pain control without the side-effects associated with the spinal morphine. This study is to determine if women receiving QLB have as good pain control with fewer side effects than those who do receive the spinal morphine. Adequate pain control will be assessed by their pain scores and recovery in the 24 to 48 hours after CD. The side effect profile of the two techniques, quality of recovery and long term impact will also be compared during this study.
In addition, we would like to compare the patients who received both analgesic regimens (ITM and QLB) with patients who received only one analgesic intervention (i.e. either ITM or QLB). Further, the study will help us answer if combining the two analgesic interventions if beneficial or not.
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section
- Being tested
- Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine, Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine
- Keywords
- quadratus lumborum block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaineOther
Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine
Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphineOther
Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intrathecal morphine | Active comparator | Intrathecal morphine 100 mcg Receives: Other: Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine |
| Quadratus lumborum block | Experimental | Bilateral QLB with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine per side (maximum total dose 3 mg/kg) Receives: Other: Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine |
| Intrathecal morphine + Quadratus lumborum block | Experimental | Bilateral QLB with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine per side (maximum total dose 3 mg/kg) + Intrathecal morphine 100 mcg Receives: Other: Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine; Other: Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of recovery (QoR) score
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (6)
Morphine equivalent consumption
morphine equivalent consumption in the 24-h and 48-h period after spinal insertion
Measured: 24 hours and 48 hours
Quality of recovery (QoR) score
Measured: 48 hours
Incidence of nausea/vomiting needing treatment
Measured: 24 hours
Incidence of itching needing treatment.
Measured: 24 hours
Incidence of respiratory depression needing treatment.
Measured: 24 hours
Worst pain scores
The primary outcome will be highest pain intensity during first 24-h as measured
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study start30 May 2017
- Primary completion27 Oct 2023
- Study completion27 Apr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cesarean SectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nova Scotia Health AuthorityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IWK Health Centre, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vishal Uppal, Nova Scotia Health Authority
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02871713
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1021219
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
PubMed 18818022Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1919-27. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00045. No abstract available.
PubMed 10598635Carvalho B. Respiratory depression after neuraxial opioids in the obstetric setting. Anesth Analg. 2008 Sep;107(3):956-61. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b443.
PubMed 18713913Loane H, Preston R, Douglas MJ, Massey S, Papsdorf M, Tyler J. A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
PubMed 22410586McKeen DM, George RB, Boyd JC, Allen VM, Pink A. Transversus abdominis plane block does not improve early or late pain outcomes after Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;61(7):631-40. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0162-5. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
PubMed 24764186Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):721-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet214. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
PubMed 23811424Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Nov;32(11):812-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000299.
PubMed 26225500Uppal V, Zaphiratos V, Allen VM, Sjaus A, Shephard A, Clairoux A, Issa R, Richebe P, McKeen DM. Comparison of intrathecal morphine, lateral quadratus lumborum block, and their combination for analgesia and quality of recovery after Caesarean delivery: a randomised, double-blind, two-centre clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2026 Jul 9:S0007-0912(26)00410-1. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2026.04.081. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42425793
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intrathecal Morphine With Quadratus Lumborum Block as Part of a Multimodal Analgesia Strategy for Post-cesarean Delivery Analgesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02871713
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1021219
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section
- Keywords
- quadratus lumborum block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IWK Health Centre, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
- Study start
- 30 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain after caesarean delivery (CD) can interfere with the moms' ability to look after her baby and may contribute to developing long term pain and disability. Women having a CD receive pain medication (morphine) as part of their spinal anesthetic to help with pain relief after surgery. Morphine works well however has several side effects such as nausea, vomiting and itching which may be severe enough to make it difficult to care for herself and her new baby. In some cases, morphine causes difficulty in passing urine within first 24-hours of the CD requiring catheterization and thus restricting mobilization. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a newer nerve block that uses local anaesthetic solution to numb the nerves carrying pain sensation from surgical incision site. QLB may be able to provide effective pain control without the side-effects associated with the spinal morphine. This study is to determine if women receiving QLB have as good pain control with fewer side effects than those who do receive the spinal morphine. Adequate pain control will be assessed by their pain scores and recovery in the 24 to 48 hours after CD. The side effect profile of the two techniques, quality of recovery and long term impact will also be compared during this study.
In addition, we would like to compare the patients who received both analgesic regimens (ITM and QLB) with patients who received only one analgesic intervention (i.e. either ITM or QLB). Further, the study will help us answer if combining the two analgesic interventions if beneficial or not.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intrathecal morphine | Active comparator | Other: Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphineIntrathecal morphine 100 mcg |
| Quadratus lumborum block | Experimental | Other: Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaineBilateral QLB with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine per side (maximum total dose 3 mg/kg) |
| Intrathecal morphine + Quadratus lumborum block | Experimental | Other: Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine, Other: Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphineBilateral QLB with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine per side (maximum total dose 3 mg/kg) + Intrathecal morphine 100 mcg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Non-emergent CD with planned spinal anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesia physical status class I \& II;
- Age ≥18 years;
- Term gestational age (≥37 weeks);
- Singleton pregnancy;
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Morbid Obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2);
- Subjects with significant obstetric or neonatal co-morbidities;
- Patient enrollment in another study involving medication within 30 days of CD;
- Any other condition, which may impair patients ability to co-operate with data collection;
- Patient height less than 152 cm (5'0");
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaineBilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine | Other | Intrathecal morphine + Quadratus lumborum block, Quadratus lumborum block |
| Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphineIntrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine | Other | Intrathecal morphine, Intrathecal morphine + Quadratus lumborum block |
Primary outcome
Quality of recovery (QoR) score
Time frame: 24 hours
6 secondary outcomes
Morphine equivalent consumption
Time frame: 24 hours and 48 hours
Quality of recovery (QoR) score
Time frame: 48 hours
Incidence of nausea/vomiting needing treatment
Time frame: 24 hours
Incidence of itching needing treatment.
Time frame: 24 hours
Incidence of respiratory depression needing treatment.
Time frame: 24 hours
Worst pain scores
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 18818022Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 10598635Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1919-27. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00045. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 18713913Carvalho B. Respiratory depression after neuraxial opioids in the obstetric setting. Anesth Analg. 2008 Sep;107(3):956-61. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b443.
- Results publication: PubMed 22410586Loane H, Preston R, Douglas MJ, Massey S, Papsdorf M, Tyler J. A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 24764186McKeen DM, George RB, Boyd JC, Allen VM, Pink A. Transversus abdominis plane block does not improve early or late pain outcomes after Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;61(7):631-40. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0162-5. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 23811424Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):721-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet214. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 26225500Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Nov;32(11):812-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000299.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42425793Uppal V, Zaphiratos V, Allen VM, Sjaus A, Shephard A, Clairoux A, Issa R, Richebe P, McKeen DM. Comparison of intrathecal morphine, lateral quadratus lumborum block, and their combination for analgesia and quality of recovery after Caesarean delivery: a randomised, double-blind, two-centre clinical trial. Br J Anaesth. 2026 Jul 9:S0007-0912(26)00410-1. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2026.04.081. Online ahead of print.
Related trials for Cesarean Section
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Heart Rate Variability and Sleep and Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Delivery
Recovery of Function, Postoperative Period
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality for Anxiety and Birth Satisfaction During Elective Cesarean Section
Anxiety, Cesarean Section
RecruitingPhase 4
Adding Dexmedetomidine or Clonidine to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean Delivery, Cesarean Delivery; Neuraxial Opioids
Recruiting
Reducing Chronic Pain Following Cesarean Delivery
Chronic Pain, Cesarean Section Complications
Not yet recruiting
Dural Puncture Epidural With 27G vs 26G Needles Versus Standard Epidural for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bilateral Quadratus lumborum block with 0.5% ropivacaine and Intrathecal Morphine with 100 mcg morphine in people with Cesarean Section, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of recovery (QoR) score (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02871713, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.