Age-related Macular DegenerationPhase 2NCT02873351
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Carbidopa-levodopa in Patients With Macular Degeneration
A Phase 2 study testing carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg in people with Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Snyder, Robert W., M.D., Ph.D., P.C. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
From 3 large patient databases, patients diagnosed with AMD who have never taken levodopa(L-DOPA) containing medications have a mean age of diagnosis at 71 years. Patients who have been treated with L-DOPA containing medications have a mean age of diagnosis of AMD at 79 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Age-related Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2019to Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
- Inclusion Criteria:
- - A diagnosis of intermediate or advanced dry AMD in at least one eye. The other eye may be normal or have any stage of AMD.
- - If the participant is taking AREDS vitamin supplements, these supplements must be continued for the duration of the study. If the participant is not taking AREDS vitamin supplements, these supplements must not be started during the study.
- Exclusion Criteria:
- - Any previous prescription for L-DOPA or dopamine agonist medications, or any planned use of any of these agents, except for study medication, during the study;
- - Concurrent use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors;
- - With the exception of AMD or cataract or previous cataract operation; any eye condition, disease, history of surgery, or trauma in either eye, which can impair vision;
- - Neurologic conditions which can impair vision;
- - Parkinson's Disease;
- - Dark adaptation rod intercept < 6.5 minutes;
- - Significant orthostatic hypotension, defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure, immediately upon changing from the supine to standing position, of >19 mmHg, or a symptomatic drop in systolic blood pressure, immediately upon changing from the supine to standing position;
- - Significant ECG abnormalities, as judged by the Investigator;
- - Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min;
- - Liver enzymes >3 X the upper limit of normal;
- - HbA1C >9.0;
- - Any other significant lab abnormalities, as judged by the Investigator.
- - Women with childbearing potential;
- -Subjects who are not fluent in English.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study of L-DOPA Safety and Tolerability in Patients With AMD, and Proof of Concept That L-DOPA Improves Surrogate Biomarkers in Patients With Moderate to Advanced AMD
From 3 large patient databases, patients diagnosed with AMD who have never taken levodopa(L-DOPA) containing medications have a mean age of diagnosis at 71 years. Patients who have been treated with L-DOPA containing medications have a mean age of diagnosis of AMD at 79 years.
L-DOPA binds to GPR143 in the retinal pigment epithelium, and releases PEDF, which protects the retina and downregulates VEGF, which is the cause of neovascularization.
The Investigators will evaluate the safety and tolerability of carbidopa-levodopa in patients with AMD, and measure the effects on surrogate functional biomarkers of AMD.
Read the detailed description
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness, in individuals over the age of 50, in the developed world(1,2). AMD becomes more common as people age, and is more common in lightly pigmented individuals(3). AMD appears more common in patients with Parkinson's Disease, than in those without(4). The AREDS nutritional supplements are effective in slowing the progress of intermediate AMD(5). Most AMD is "dry AMD", which progresses relatively slowly and may impair vision, but usually does not lead to legal blindness. There are two forms of AMD, "wet AMD" and geographic atrophy (GA), that can cause more profound vision loss. In aggregate they occur in about 25% patients with AMD(5). Wet AMD is due to new growth of abnormal blood vessels under the retina. The new blood vessels are believed to be due to an excessive release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by the retinal pigment epithelium(RPE) cells(6). Wet AMD is now effectively treated with intraocular injections of VEGF inhibitors(2). Geographic Atrophy, the other form of advanced AMD, represents focal death of the RPE cells and overlying neurosensory retina. There is no current treatment for GA. It is suspected that GA is due in part to a localized inflammatory response, damage to RPE cells and loss of RPE cell function(7). It may also be speculated that stimulation of RPE cells to release a potent neurotrophic factor, pigment epithelium derived factor (PEDF) may slow progression of GA.
In 2008, Dr. Brian McKay identified a receptor, G protein coupled receptor #143(GPR143), on the surface of RPE cells and discovered that L-DOPA was the natural ligand or stimulator of GPR143(8). Dr McKay showed that treatment of RPE cells with exogenous L-DOPA resulted in the release of additional PEDF. In subsequent work Dr McKay's group also showed that L-DOPA stimulation of PEDF in RPE cells was also associated with a decrease in VEGF(9). Thus, Dr McKay hypothesized that exogenous L-DOPA may prevent the onset of AMD or progression to wet AMD.
In 2015, Dr McKay and his associates published a paper that showed that patients, who had been treated with L-DOPA, had a delay in the onset of AMD by 8 years, compared to patients who had not been treated with L-DOPA(10). In addition, those who had AMD and went on to develop wet AMD, did so 5 years later than those with no history of L-DOPA treatment(10). L-DOPA is an intermediate in the pigmentation pathway. Dr McKay and his associates suggested that the reason darkly pigmented races do not get AMD nearly as frequently as lighter pigmented races, is that they produce more pigment, and thus more L-DOPA to stimulate GPR143 on RPE cells. According to this hypothesis, the stimulated RPE cells release PEDF and decrease VEGF, which together are responsible for the protective effect.
Since there are no established animal models for AMD, and L-DOPA has a good safety profile in healthy volunteers and patients with Parkinson's disease(11), the Investigators propose a prospective experiment to determine the safety and tolerability of L-DOPA, in a population of patients with AMD. The participants will be made aware of potential side effects of L-DOPA, which are listed in the Informed Consent, during the consent process. Adverse events will be elicited by questioning the participants at each visit. The participants will also be advised to call the site, if they have any medical problem between visits.
The Investigators will also use this safety study to examine whether L-DOPA has a positive effect on surrogate biomarkers of AMD. The surrogate markers to be evaluated are dark adaptation(12,13), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity(LLVA)(14), and the size and numbers of drusen(15) and reticular pseudodrusen(16). A previous trial, with retinol in 104 patients, significantly improved dark adaptation in 30 days.(17) Therefore, the Investigators expect to see improvement with L-DOPA in a relatively short time. This study will also help the Investigators prepare for a Phase 3 study of L-DOPA in AMD.
Pharmacology of L-DOPA and carbidopa
L-DOPA is formed by 3-hydroxylation of tyrosine by tyrosine-3-monooxygenase (tyrosinase).(18) The primary metabolic pathway of L-DOPA is decarboxylation by amino acid decarboxylase to dopamine, which is responsible for most, but not all, of its pharmacologic effects and toxicity. When carbidopa is administered with L-DOPA, systemic levels of L-DOPA double and central nervous system (CNS) L-DOPA increases from about 1% of the administered dose to about 4%. Levodopa freely passes from the systemic circulation into the retina and brain, but dopamine and carbidopa do not. Adverse events are markedly decreased when carbidopa is administered with L-DOPA, because systemic levels of the toxic metabolite of L-DOPA, dopamine, are markedly reduced. In most patients, 25 mg of carbidopa is sufficient to control side effects of 100 mg of L-DOPA, primarily nausea(18), by 90%. However, some patients require additional supplemental carbidopa. Carbidopa has very limited side effects when given alone(18). Therefore, the Investigators plan to use 35 mg of carbidopa with each 100 mg of levodopa, in order to control adverse events in almost all participants.
L-DOPA is the natural ligand for GPR143 in the RPE cells(8). The Investigators' intent is to increase the L-DOPA available to RPE surface receptors (GPR 143) while minimizing peripheral toxicity. This concept is unique, because all other uses of L-DOPA rely on CNS conversion of L-DOPA to dopamine, in order to produce the desired effect(19).
Treatments:
- Carbidopa-levodopa 35-100 mg dosed hs for 45 days, followed by carbidopa-levodopa 35-100 mg dosed in the morning, with supper and hs for 45 days. The second dosing period is the equivalent of a moderate dose of carbidopa-levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease (maximum daily dose 200-800 mg).
- Placebo dosed hs for 45 days, followed by placebo dosed in the morning, with supper and hs for 45 days.
Placebo and active medication will be dosed as capsules, identical in appearance.
Number of participants: Not yet recruiting, stratified by non-study eye being normal, dry AMD or wet AMD and randomized using a table of random numbers. Estimated screen failure rate is 50%. The sample size is based on a successful study treating patients with impaired dark adaptation with retinol, which showed significant improvement in 30 days with 52 patients per study arm.
Duration: 87-114 days (80-100 days of treatment). Visits 1 (screening) and 2(randomization) can be scheduled within 1 week. The first visit after Randomization, Visit 3, will occur 40-50 days after Visit 2. Visit 4 (end of study) will occur 40-50 days after Visit 3. This schedule allows a 10 day window for study visits, for logistic reasons and patient convenience.
Overall trial duration for enrollment and treatment, screening 5 patients per week, will be approximately 10 months.
Primary Endpoint: A statistically significant improvement by carbidopa-levodopa treatment in any of: dark adaptation; BCVA; LLVA; drusen or reticular pseudodrusen measured by spectral domain(SD) optical coherence tomography(OCT)
Measurements:
- Demographics at Visit 1;
- Medical History and Physical Examination at Visit 1;
- Electrocardiogram(ECG), complete blood count(CBC), Chem 20 and HbA1C at Visit 1;
- Vital signs at Visits 1,3,4,5 and 6;
- Non-directed assessment of adverse events at Visits 1,2, 3 and 4;
- Ophthalmic history and comprehensive eye examination, including dark adaptation and SD OCT at Visit 2 (Baseline);
- Low luminance questionnaire at visits 2, 3 and 4;
- Pill count at Visits 3 and 4;
- Re-measurement of dark adaptation, visual acuity under normal and low light conditions and SD OCT at Visits 3 and 4 (End of Study);
Statistics: Analysis of Variance with Independent Variables:
- Active Drug vs Placebo;
- Logarithm of daily dose of active drug;
- Duration of treatment (measurements at Visits 3, 4, 5 and 6.
- Conditions
- Age-related Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg, placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg
- Keywords
- L-DOPA, GPR143, PEDF, VEGF
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mgDrug
included in arm description
placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mgDrug
included in arm description
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg | Experimental | Treatment with carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablets dosed once daily at bedtime for 45 +/- 5 days followed by carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablets dosed 3 times daily for 45 +/- 5 days. Receives: Drug: carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg |
| Placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg | Placebo comparator | Treatment with placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg in identical tablets dosed once daily at bedtime for 45 +/- 5 days followed by placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablets dosed 3 times daily for 45 +/- 5 days. Receives: Drug: placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) will be assessed at each visit. These will be classified as mild, moderate or severe and by body organ system. All AEs will be specifically reassessed at each subsequent visit. Serious AEs will be reported to the institutional Review Board(IRB). All AEs will be aggregated by treatment arm.
Measured: 90 +- 10 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change from Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity
After refraction to ascertain that the participant has the optimum correction for refractive error, standard visual acuity testing will be performed with an ETDRS chart. Results will be ascertained at 45 +/-5 and 90 +/- 10 days, due to different dosing during the first and second 45 day periods. Results will be aggregated by treatment arm and treatment period.
Measured: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Low Light Visual Acuity
Using lenses for optimum correction for refractive error, Standard visual acuity testing will be performed using an ETDRS chart under standardized low light conditions. Results will be ascertained at 45 +/- 5 and 90 +/- 10 days, due to different dosing during the first and second 45 day periods. Results will be aggregated by treatment arm and treatment period.
Measured: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Dark Adaptation
Using an AdaptDX machine, using standardized intensity and duration of bright light, measurement of the time after bright light exposure required to adapt to dim light will be measured using rod intercept as the measurement. Results will be ascertained at 45 +/- 5 and 90 +/- 10 days, due to different dosing during the first and second 45 day periods. Results will be aggregated by treatment arm and treatment period.
Measured: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Low Luminance Questionnaire Scores
This will be measured using a standard questionaire evaluating ability to function in low light conditions. Results will be tabulated by all correct answers and by number of correct answers on each subscale. Results will be ascertained at 45 +/- 5 and 90 +/- 10 days, due to different dosing during the first and second 45 day periods. Results will be aggregated by treatment arm and treatment period.
Measured: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Optical Coherence Tomography
Evaluating retinal structure, including drusen and reticular pseudodrusen using a standard scanning laser device. Results will be ascertained at 45 +/- 5 and 90 +/- 10 days, due to different dosing during the first and second 45 day periods. Results will be aggregated by treatment arm and treatment period.
Measured: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Decided to do studies in patients with AMD
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Age-related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Snyder, Robert W., M.D., Ph.D., P.C.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert W Snyder, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Robert W Snyder, MD, PhD, PCTimothy C Fagan, MD, Study director, Robert W Snyder, MD, PhD, PC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02873351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0000
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):844-51. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
PubMed 15640920Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2606-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0801537. No abstract available.
PubMed 18550876Bressler SB, Munoz B, Solomon SD, West SK; Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Study Team. Racial differences in the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Project. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;126(2):241-5. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.53.
PubMed 18268216Nowacka B, Lubinski W, Honczarenko K, Potemkowski A, Safranow K. Ophthalmological features of Parkinson disease. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Nov 11;20:2243-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890861.
PubMed 25387009Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor and age-related macular degeneration: from basic science to therapy. Nat Med. 2010 Oct;16(10):1107-11. doi: 10.1038/nm1010-1107. No abstract available.
PubMed 20930754Kauppinen A, Paterno JJ, Blasiak J, Salminen A, Kaarniranta K. Inflammation and its role in age-related macular degeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016 May;73(9):1765-86. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2147-8. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
PubMed 26852158Lopez VM, Decatur CL, Stamer WD, Lynch RM, McKay BS. L-DOPA is an endogenous ligand for OA1. PLoS Biol. 2008 Sep 30;6(9):e236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060236.
PubMed 18828673Falk T, Congrove NR, Zhang S, McCourt AD, Sherman SJ, McKay BS. PEDF and VEGF-A output from human retinal pigment epithelial cells grown on novel microcarriers. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:278932. doi: 10.1155/2012/278932. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
PubMed 22547925Brilliant MH, Vaziri K, Connor TB Jr, Schwartz SG, Carroll JJ, McCarty CA, Schrodi SJ, Hebbring SJ, Kishor KS, Flynn HW Jr, Moshfeghi AA, Moshfeghi DM, Fini ME, McKay BS. Mining Retrospective Data for Virtual Prospective Drug Repurposing: L-DOPA and Age-related Macular Degeneration. Am J Med. 2016 Mar;129(3):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
PubMed 26524704Sinemet package insert (FDA approved).
Chandramohan A, Stinnett SS, Petrowski JT, Schuman SG, Toth CA, Cousins SW, Lad EM. VISUAL FUNCTION MEASURES IN EARLY AND INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina. 2016 May;36(5):1021-31. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001002.
PubMed 26925551Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Clark ME, Jackson GR, Callahan MA, Kline LB, Witherspoon CD, Curcio CA. Delayed Rod-Mediated Dark Adaptation Is a Functional Biomarker for Incident Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
PubMed 26522707Wu Z, Ayton LN, Luu CD, Guymer RH. Longitudinal changes in microperimetry and low luminance visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):442-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5963.
PubMed 25632841Hongyang Zhang; Nizar Saleh Abdelfattah; David S Boyer; Srinivas R Sadda, Longitudinal Quantitative OCT Analysis of Drusen in the Fellow Eye of Patients with Unilateral Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract, 2015.
Finger RP, Chong E, McGuinness MB, Robman LD, Aung KZ, Giles G, Baird PN, Guymer RH. Reticular Pseudodrusen and Their Association with Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar;123(3):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.029. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
PubMed 26681391
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study of L-DOPA Safety and Tolerability in Patients With AMD, and Proof of Concept That L-DOPA Improves Surrogate Biomarkers in Patients With Moderate to Advanced AMD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02873351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0000
- Conditions
- Age-related Macular Degeneration
- Keywords
- L-DOPA, GPR143, PEDF, VEGF
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Decided to do studies in patients with AMD
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Snyder, Robert W., M.D., Ph.D., P.C.
- Study start
- Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
From 3 large patient databases, patients diagnosed with AMD who have never taken levodopa(L-DOPA) containing medications have a mean age of diagnosis at 71 years. Patients who have been treated with L-DOPA containing medications have a mean age of diagnosis of AMD at 79 years.
L-DOPA binds to GPR143 in the retinal pigment epithelium, and releases PEDF, which protects the retina and downregulates VEGF, which is the cause of neovascularization.
The Investigators will evaluate the safety and tolerability of carbidopa-levodopa in patients with AMD, and measure the effects on surrogate functional biomarkers of AMD.
Detailed description
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness, in individuals over the age of 50, in the developed world(1,2). AMD becomes more common as people age, and is more common in lightly pigmented individuals(3). AMD appears more common in patients with Parkinson's Disease, than in those without(4). The AREDS nutritional supplements are effective in slowing the progress of intermediate AMD(5). Most AMD is "dry AMD", which progresses relatively slowly and may impair vision, but usually does not lead to legal blindness. There are two forms of AMD, "wet AMD" and geographic atrophy (GA), that can cause more profound vision loss. In aggregate they occur in about 25% patients with AMD(5). Wet AMD is due to new growth of abnormal blood vessels under the retina. The new blood vessels are believed to be due to an excessive release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by the retinal pigment epithelium(RPE) cells(6). Wet AMD is now effectively treated with intraocular injections of VEGF inhibitors(2). Geographic Atrophy, the other form of advanced AMD, represents focal death of the RPE cells and overlying neurosensory retina. There is no current treatment for GA. It is suspected that GA is due in part to a localized inflammatory response, damage to RPE cells and loss of RPE cell function(7). It may also be speculated that stimulation of RPE cells to release a potent neurotrophic factor, pigment epithelium derived factor (PEDF) may slow progression of GA.
In 2008, Dr. Brian McKay identified a receptor, G protein coupled receptor #143(GPR143), on the surface of RPE cells and discovered that L-DOPA was the natural ligand or stimulator of GPR143(8). Dr McKay showed that treatment of RPE cells with exogenous L-DOPA resulted in the release of additional PEDF. In subsequent work Dr McKay's group also showed that L-DOPA stimulation of PEDF in RPE cells was also associated with a decrease in VEGF(9). Thus, Dr McKay hypothesized that exogenous L-DOPA may prevent the onset of AMD or progression to wet AMD.
In 2015, Dr McKay and his associates published a paper that showed that patients, who had been treated with L-DOPA, had a delay in the onset of AMD by 8 years, compared to patients who had not been treated with L-DOPA(10). In addition, those who had AMD and went on to develop wet AMD, did so 5 years later than those with no history of L-DOPA treatment(10). L-DOPA is an intermediate in the pigmentation pathway. Dr McKay and his associates suggested that the reason darkly pigmented races do not get AMD nearly as frequently as lighter pigmented races, is that they produce more pigment, and thus more L-DOPA to stimulate GPR143 on RPE cells. According to this hypothesis, the stimulated RPE cells release PEDF and decrease VEGF, which together are responsible for the protective effect.
Since there are no established animal models for AMD, and L-DOPA has a good safety profile in healthy volunteers and patients with Parkinson's disease(11), the Investigators propose a prospective experiment to determine the safety and tolerability of L-DOPA, in a population of patients with AMD. The participants will be made aware of potential side effects of L-DOPA, which are listed in the Informed Consent, during the consent process. Adverse events will be elicited by questioning the participants at each visit. The participants will also be advised to call the site, if they have any medical problem between visits.
The Investigators will also use this safety study to examine whether L-DOPA has a positive effect on surrogate biomarkers of AMD. The surrogate markers to be evaluated are dark adaptation(12,13), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity(LLVA)(14), and the size and numbers of drusen(15) and reticular pseudodrusen(16). A previous trial, with retinol in 104 patients, significantly improved dark adaptation in 30 days.(17) Therefore, the Investigators expect to see improvement with L-DOPA in a relatively short time. This study will also help the Investigators prepare for a Phase 3 study of L-DOPA in AMD.
Pharmacology of L-DOPA and carbidopa
L-DOPA is formed by 3-hydroxylation of tyrosine by tyrosine-3-monooxygenase (tyrosinase).(18) The primary metabolic pathway of L-DOPA is decarboxylation by amino acid decarboxylase to dopamine, which is responsible for most, but not all, of its pharmacologic effects and toxicity. When carbidopa is administered with L-DOPA, systemic levels of L-DOPA double and central nervous system (CNS) L-DOPA increases from about 1% of the administered dose to about 4%. Levodopa freely passes from the systemic circulation into the retina and brain, but dopamine and carbidopa do not. Adverse events are markedly decreased when carbidopa is administered with L-DOPA, because systemic levels of the toxic metabolite of L-DOPA, dopamine, are markedly reduced. In most patients, 25 mg of carbidopa is sufficient to control side effects of 100 mg of L-DOPA, primarily nausea(18), by 90%. However, some patients require additional supplemental carbidopa. Carbidopa has very limited side effects when given alone(18). Therefore, the Investigators plan to use 35 mg of carbidopa with each 100 mg of levodopa, in order to control adverse events in almost all participants.
L-DOPA is the natural ligand for GPR143 in the RPE cells(8). The Investigators' intent is to increase the L-DOPA available to RPE surface receptors (GPR 143) while minimizing peripheral toxicity. This concept is unique, because all other uses of L-DOPA rely on CNS conversion of L-DOPA to dopamine, in order to produce the desired effect(19).
Treatments:
- Carbidopa-levodopa 35-100 mg dosed hs for 45 days, followed by carbidopa-levodopa 35-100 mg dosed in the morning, with supper and hs for 45 days. The second dosing period is the equivalent of a moderate dose of carbidopa-levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease (maximum daily dose 200-800 mg).
- Placebo dosed hs for 45 days, followed by placebo dosed in the morning, with supper and hs for 45 days.
Placebo and active medication will be dosed as capsules, identical in appearance.
Number of participants: Not yet recruiting, stratified by non-study eye being normal, dry AMD or wet AMD and randomized using a table of random numbers. Estimated screen failure rate is 50%. The sample size is based on a successful study treating patients with impaired dark adaptation with retinol, which showed significant improvement in 30 days with 52 patients per study arm.
Duration: 87-114 days (80-100 days of treatment). Visits 1 (screening) and 2(randomization) can be scheduled within 1 week. The first visit after Randomization, Visit 3, will occur 40-50 days after Visit 2. Visit 4 (end of study) will occur 40-50 days after Visit 3. This schedule allows a 10 day window for study visits, for logistic reasons and patient convenience.
Overall trial duration for enrollment and treatment, screening 5 patients per week, will be approximately 10 months.
Primary Endpoint: A statistically significant improvement by carbidopa-levodopa treatment in any of: dark adaptation; BCVA; LLVA; drusen or reticular pseudodrusen measured by spectral domain(SD) optical coherence tomography(OCT)
Measurements:
- Demographics at Visit 1;
- Medical History and Physical Examination at Visit 1;
- Electrocardiogram(ECG), complete blood count(CBC), Chem 20 and HbA1C at Visit 1;
- Vital signs at Visits 1,3,4,5 and 6;
- Non-directed assessment of adverse events at Visits 1,2, 3 and 4;
- Ophthalmic history and comprehensive eye examination, including dark adaptation and SD OCT at Visit 2 (Baseline);
- Low luminance questionnaire at visits 2, 3 and 4;
- Pill count at Visits 3 and 4;
- Re-measurement of dark adaptation, visual acuity under normal and low light conditions and SD OCT at Visits 3 and 4 (End of Study);
Statistics: Analysis of Variance with Independent Variables:
- Active Drug vs Placebo;
- Logarithm of daily dose of active drug;
- Duration of treatment (measurements at Visits 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg | Experimental | Drug: carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mgTreatment with carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablets dosed once daily at bedtime for 45 +/- 5 days followed by carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablets dosed 3 times daily for 45 +/- 5 days. |
| Placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mgTreatment with placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg in identical tablets dosed once daily at bedtime for 45 +/- 5 days followed by placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablets dosed 3 times daily for 45 +/- 5 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mgincluded in arm description | Drug | carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg |
| placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mgincluded in arm description | Drug | Placebo for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg |
Primary outcome
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame: 90 +- 10 days
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) will be assessed at each visit. These will be classified as mild, moderate or severe and by body organ system. All AEs will be specifically reassessed at each subsequent visit. Serious AEs will be reported to the institutional Review Board(IRB). All AEs will be aggregated by treatment arm.
5 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Time frame: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Low Light Visual Acuity
Time frame: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Dark Adaptation
Time frame: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Low Luminance Questionnaire Scores
Time frame: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Change from Baseline in Optical Coherence Tomography
Time frame: 45 +/- 5 days and 90 +/- 10 days
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 15640920Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):844-51. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
- Background: PubMed 18550876Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2606-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0801537. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18268216Bressler SB, Munoz B, Solomon SD, West SK; Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Study Team. Racial differences in the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Project. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;126(2):241-5. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.53.
- Background: PubMed 25387009Nowacka B, Lubinski W, Honczarenko K, Potemkowski A, Safranow K. Ophthalmological features of Parkinson disease. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Nov 11;20:2243-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890861.
- Background: PubMed 20930754Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor and age-related macular degeneration: from basic science to therapy. Nat Med. 2010 Oct;16(10):1107-11. doi: 10.1038/nm1010-1107. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26852158Kauppinen A, Paterno JJ, Blasiak J, Salminen A, Kaarniranta K. Inflammation and its role in age-related macular degeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016 May;73(9):1765-86. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2147-8. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
- Background: PubMed 18828673Lopez VM, Decatur CL, Stamer WD, Lynch RM, McKay BS. L-DOPA is an endogenous ligand for OA1. PLoS Biol. 2008 Sep 30;6(9):e236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060236.
- Background: PubMed 22547925Falk T, Congrove NR, Zhang S, McCourt AD, Sherman SJ, McKay BS. PEDF and VEGF-A output from human retinal pigment epithelial cells grown on novel microcarriers. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:278932. doi: 10.1155/2012/278932. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
- Background: PubMed 26524704Brilliant MH, Vaziri K, Connor TB Jr, Schwartz SG, Carroll JJ, McCarty CA, Schrodi SJ, Hebbring SJ, Kishor KS, Flynn HW Jr, Moshfeghi AA, Moshfeghi DM, Fini ME, McKay BS. Mining Retrospective Data for Virtual Prospective Drug Repurposing: L-DOPA and Age-related Macular Degeneration. Am J Med. 2016 Mar;129(3):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
- BackgroundSinemet package insert (FDA approved).
- Background: PubMed 26925551Chandramohan A, Stinnett SS, Petrowski JT, Schuman SG, Toth CA, Cousins SW, Lad EM. VISUAL FUNCTION MEASURES IN EARLY AND INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina. 2016 May;36(5):1021-31. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001002.
- Background: PubMed 26522707Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Clark ME, Jackson GR, Callahan MA, Kline LB, Witherspoon CD, Curcio CA. Delayed Rod-Mediated Dark Adaptation Is a Functional Biomarker for Incident Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.041. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of 36-Week Refill Exchanges of Port Delivery System (PDS) With Ranibizumab in nAMD
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Trial of an Automated AI-based System for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Late Age-related Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Safety Study For Patients In B4711001
Age Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
National Ophthalmic Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (Registered Trademark)), Stage 3 - Expansion of DNA and Data Repositories for Rare Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases
Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases, Hypopigmentation Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert W Snyder, MD, PhD principal investigator
Robert W Snyder, MD, PhD, PC
Timothy C Fagan, MD study director
Robert W Snyder, MD, PhD, PC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg in people with Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Snyder, Robert W., M.D., Ph.D., P.C. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (time frame: 90 +- 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02873351, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2019.