AzTrials
AzTrials

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestEMERGENCT02876458

EMERGEncy Versus Delayed Coronary Angiogram in Survivors of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

A study testing Immediate coronary angiogram and Delayed coronary angiogram in people with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major public health issue with a low survival rate. The most common cause of SCD is acute coronary artery occlusion. Several registry based studies suggest that coronary angiography (CA) performed at admission followed if necessary by coronary angioplasty improves in-hospital and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
What is being tested?
Immediate coronary angiogram and Delayed coronary angiogram
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
336 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jan 2017to 23 Nov 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Out-of-hospital SCD with return of spontaneous circulation
  • Age ≥ 18 years of age
  • No obvious non-cardiac cause of arrest
  • Admitted to a center with an intensive care unit and a 24 hours a day, 7 days a week interventional cardiology department
  • Affiliation to the French Social Security Health Care plan

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years of age
  • In-hospital SCD
  • No return of spontaneous circulation
  • Presence of ST segment elevation
  • Suspected non-cardiac aetiology (trauma, respiratory, neurological, etc.)
  • Presence of co-morbidities with life expectancy of less than a year
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Pregnancy
  • Adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship or tutelage measure)
  • Participation in another interventional trial

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • European Georges Pompidou Hospital

    Paris, 75015

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: EMERGEncy Versus Delayed Coronary Angiogram in Survivors of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest With no Obvious Non Cardiac Cause of Arrest

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major public health issue with a low survival rate. The most common cause of SCD is acute coronary artery occlusion. Several registry based studies suggest that coronary angiography (CA) performed at admission followed if necessary by coronary angioplasty improves in-hospital and long term survival. Recent guidelines recommend performing an immediate CA in all survivors of SCD with no obvious non cardiac cause of arrest. However there is a lack of randomized data on this topic.

Several retrospective studies have shown that if the post-resuscitation electrocardiogram (ECG) shows ST segment elevation, the probability of finding an acute coronary artery lesion during the CA is high (70-80%). In contrast, if no ST segment elevation is present the probability is low (15-20%).

Performing an immediate CA in all survivors of SCD can be challenging. It requires admitting these patients to centers with an intensive care unit and facilities allowing 24/24 7/7 CA. It may increase the delay of performing other therapeutic modalities such as CT brain or thorax scan to determine the cause of SCD. Performing the CA 48 to 96 hours after admission would facilitate the management of these difficult patients. However if the cause of the arrest is a coronary artery occlusion and there is a delay in reperfusion, the rate of post-arrest shock and the mortality may increase. Therefore a randomized study comparing immediate versus delayed (between 48 to 96 hours) CA in survivors of SCD with no obvious non-cardiac cause of arrest is warranted.

Read the detailed description

The design consists in a multicenter national randomized open parallel group trial.

All eligible patients with SCD will be included and randomized by the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) to one of the 2 following arms: immediate CA vs delayed CA. Patients randomized in the immediate CA group will be admitted directly to the catheterization laboratory. Patients randomized in the delayed CA will be admitted to the intensive care unit and a CA will be planned 48 to 96 hours after admission. Investigators can perform the CA in the delayed group < 48 hours if the following events appear:

  • ST segment elevation or new left bundle branch block on the ECG
  • Shock unresponsive to inotropes
  • "Electrical storm" (repeated Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)/Ventricular Fibrillation (VF))
  • Segmental hypokinesia or akinesia on an echocardiogram

Echocardiography and assessment of neurological status are done at discharge form the Intensive Care Unit, at hospital discharge and during the follow-up visits (90 and 180 days).

Being tested
Immediate coronary angiogram, Delayed coronary angiogram
Keywords
Coronary angiogram, Survival rate, Neurological sequel
Medical subject headings
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Immediate coronary angiogramOther

    An immediate coronary angiogram will be performed

  • Delayed coronary angiogramOther

    A delayed coronary angiogram (between 48 to 96 hours) will be performed

Study groups in NCT02876458
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immediate coronary angiogramOtherAn immediate coronary angiogram will be performed
Receives: Other: Immediate coronary angiogram
Delayed coronary angiogramOtherA delayed coronary angiogram (between 48 to 96 hours) will be performed
Receives: Other: Delayed coronary angiogram

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival with no or minimal neurological sequel

    Survival rate with no or minimal neurological sequel (CPC (cerebral performance category) 1 or 2) at 6 months after inclusion

    Measured: 180 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Shock

    The rate of shock during the first 48 hours between immediate and delayed CA

    Measured: 48 hours

  2. Arrhythmia

    The rate of VT/VF during the first 48 hours between immediate and delayed CA

    Measured: 48 hours

  3. The evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction evolution

    Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction between baseline and 180 days assessed by echocardiogram between immediate and delayed CA

    Measured: 180 days

  4. CPC score

    The rate of neurological sequel assessed by the CPC score between immediate and delayed CA

    Measured: 180 days

  5. Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score (GOSE)

    The rate of neurological sequel assessed by the GOSE between immediate and delayed CA

    Measured: 180 days

  6. Overall survival rate

    The overall survival rate between immediate and delayed CA

    Measured: 180 days

  7. Hospital stay length

    The length of hospital stay between immediate and delayed CA

    Measured: 180 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completion23 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion23 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
336 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02876458
Sponsor's protocol ID
P150914
Other IDs
2016-A00413-48, PHRC-15-15-0570
Acronym
EMERGE
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
31 Jul 2016
Last updated
12 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hauw-Berlemont C, Lamhaut L, Diehl JL, Andreotti C, Varenne O, Leroux P, Lascarrou JB, Guerin P, Loeb T, Roupie E, Daubin C, Beygui F, Boissier F, Marjanovic N, Christiaens L, Vilfaillot A, Glippa S, Prat JD, Chatellier G, Cariou A, Spaulding C; EMERGE Investigators. Emergency vs Delayed Coronary Angiogram in Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Results of the Randomized, Multicentric EMERGE Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jul 1;7(7):700-707. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1416.

    PubMed 35675081

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Immediate coronary angiogram and Delayed coronary angiogram in people with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival with no or minimal neurological sequel (time frame: 180 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02876458, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in