Delayed Graft FunctionXi'anCriNCT02876692
Prediction and Management of Delayed Graft Function Based on Donor Criteria and LifePort Platform
An observational study of Delayed Graft Function, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This is a prospective cohort study: 1. First step: to establish a new scoring system for predication of delayed graft function(DGF) following kidney transplantation based on previous and new study data. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Delayed Graft Function
- What is being tested?
- Machine perfusion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Dec 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients assigned the deceased donor kidney to transplant in the waiting list.
Who may be able to join
- Donor
- 1. Comply with the national donation after citizen death guideline
- 2. No high risk activities: such as history of drug abuse, history of intravenous drug use and risky sexual behavior
- 3. No malignant melanoma, metastatic cancer, or incurable cancer; some of the early stages of cancer after a successful treatment can also be considered
- 4. No activity of untreated systemic bacterial, viral or fungal infection;
- 5. Patients definitely identified
Show all 12Show fewer
- Recipient:
- 1. 65 y old ≥Age> = 18 years old, male or female
- 2. BMI<26
- 3. Renal transplantation first time
- 4. Not in pregnancy or lactation, pregnancy test was negative, and promise not to be pregnant during treatment.
- 5. Before the clinical trial, Patient sign informed consent voluntarily
Who cannot join
- Donor
- 1. Older than 65 years old
- 2.Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV positive
- 3.Donor kidney cold storage time over 30 hours
- 4.Warm ischemia time over 20 minutes
- 5.Other reagents are added perfusion for regulation of donor renal function
Show all 10Show fewer
- Recipient:
- 1.Involved in other study.
- 2.Double organ or multi-organ transplant
- 3.A,B,O blood type-incompatible
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061
Chenguang Ding, PhD, doctor_ding@126.com
About this study
This is a prospective cohort study:
- First step: to establish a new scoring system for predication of delayed graft function(DGF) following kidney transplantation based on previous and new study data. The new scoring system is comprised of two parts: Xi'an Criteria of donor scoring system and kidney evaluation System based on Lifeport platform ).
- Second step: validate the new scoring system through prospective cohort study in our transplantation center and modify the scoring system if needed. Recruiting 300 patients, follow up at day 3, week 1, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12. Patients will be followed for Cr30cl, DGF,primary non-function (PNF), acute rejection (AR), graft survival and patient survival
- Step 3: Further validate the new scoring system in six other transplantation centers and developing a software in the end. Recruiting 300 patients, follow up at day 3, week 1, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12. Patients will be followed for Cr30cl, DGF, PGF, AR, graft survival and patient survival
Read the detailed description
Subjects are enrolled to collect the data of donors and recipients. Investigators also collect the data of recipients or donated organs as following: physiological and biochemical indexes, machine perfusion parameters, and the other factors effected on renal transplant outcomes. A Cox proportional hazards model and multiple linear regression analysis will be applied to examine the correlation among the univariate and multivariate. Based on the above analysis to improve the new scoring system, Lifeport work platform evaluation system and donor kidney quality evaluation system. Then, a multi-center clinical trial will be started to improve and verify the new scoring system. Finally, a donor kidney evaluation APP will be developed based on the scoring system and the database of clinical trials. An applicaiotion (APP) will be popularized the national transplant surgeons.
- Conditions
- Delayed Graft Function
- Being tested
- Machine perfusion
- Medical subject headings
- Delayed Graft Function
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Machine perfusionDevice
Deceased donor kidneys were preserved by hypothermic machine perfusion
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
delayed graft function
Measured: 7 days after renal transplant
Transplant nephrectomy
Measured: 1 year after reanl transplant
Secondary outcomes (4)
Abnormal serum creatinine
Measured: Serum creatinine did not return to the normal range within the first 30 days
Renal dysfunction caused by the acute rejection
Measured: within the first 3 months
lung infection lead to death
Measured: within the first 1 year
Renal dysfunction caused by Surgical complications
Measured: within the first 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Delayed Graft FunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ding Xiaoming, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
- Investigators
- xiaoming D Ding, PhD, Principal investigator, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02876692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XAC-01
- Acronym
- Xi'anCri
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Allen AM, Kim WR, Xiong H, Liu J, Stock PG, Lake JR, Chinnakotla S, Snyder JJ, Israni AK, Kasiske BL. Survival of recipients of livers from donation after circulatory death who are relisted and undergo retransplant for graft failure. Am J Transplant. 2014 May;14(5):1120-8. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12700. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
PubMed 24731165Huang J, Millis JM, Mao Y, Millis MA, Sang X, Zhong S. A pilot programme of organ donation after cardiac death in China. Lancet. 2012 Mar 3;379(9818):862-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61086-6. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
PubMed 22078722Huang J, Wang H, Fan ST, Zhao B, Zhang Z, Hao L, Huo F, Liu Y. The national program for deceased organ donation in China. Transplantation. 2013 Jul 15;96(1):5-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182985491.
PubMed 23743728World Health Organization. WHO guiding principles on human cell, tissue and organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2010 Aug 15;90(3):229-33. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ec29f0. No abstract available.
PubMed 20664493Moers C, Leuvenink HG, Ploeg RJ. Non-heart beating organ donation: overview and future perspectives. Transpl Int. 2007 Jul;20(7):567-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00455.x. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
PubMed 17263786Kokkinos C, Antcliffe D, Nanidis T, Darzi AW, Tekkis P, Papalois V. Outcome of kidney transplantation from nonheart-beating versus heart-beating cadaveric donors. Transplantation. 2007 May 15;83(9):1193-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000261710.53848.51.
PubMed 17496535Jochmans I, Darius T, Kuypers D, Monbaliu D, Goffin E, Mourad M, Ledinh H, Weekers L, Peeters P, Randon C, Bosmans JL, Roeyen G, Abramowicz D, Hoang AD, De Pauw L, Rahmel A, Squifflet JP, Pirenne J. Kidney donation after circulatory death in a country with a high number of brain dead donors: 10-year experience in Belgium. Transpl Int. 2012 Aug;25(8):857-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01510.x. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PubMed 22694305Chamorro C, Falcon JA, Michelena JC. Controversial points in organ donor management. Transplant Proc. 2009 Oct;41(8):3473-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.09.004.
PubMed 19857774Gelb AW, Robertson KM. Anaesthetic management of the brain dead for organ donation. Can J Anaesth. 1990 Oct;37(7):806-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03006543.
PubMed 2225301Xue W, Tian P, Ding X, Pan X, Yan H, Hou J, Feng X, Xiang H, Tian X, Ren L, Zheng J, Li S. Clinical research and social status investigation for donor and recipient of living-related kidney transplant. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Feb;45(1):239-49. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0259-0. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
PubMed 22893495Wadei HM, Heckman MG, Rawal B, Taner CB, Farahat W, Nur L, Mai ML, Prendergast M, Gonwa TA. Comparison of kidney function between donation after cardiac death and donation after brain death kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2013 Aug 15;96(3):274-81. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31829807d1.
PubMed 23778649Singh RP, Farney AC, Rogers J, Zuckerman J, Reeves-Daniel A, Hartmann E, Iskandar S, Adams P, Stratta RJ. Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post-transplant outcomes. Clin Transplant. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):255-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01241.x.
PubMed 20331689Mallon DH, Summers DM, Bradley JA, Pettigrew GJ. Defining delayed graft function after renal transplantation: simplest is best. Transplantation. 2013 Nov 27;96(10):885-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a19348.
PubMed 24056620Nagaraja P, Roberts GW, Stephens M, Horvath S, Fialova J, Chavez R, Asderakis A, Kaposztas Z. Influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on outcomes after kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death. Transplantation. 2012 Dec 27;94(12):1218-23. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182708e30.
PubMed 23154212Lodhi SA, Lamb KE, Uddin I, Meier-Kriesche HU. Pulsatile pump decreases risk of delayed graft function in kidneys donated after cardiac death. Am J Transplant. 2012 Oct;12(10):2774-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04179.x. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
PubMed 22823748
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prediction and Management of Delayed Graft Function Based on Donor Criteria and LifePort Platform
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02876692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Xi'anCri / XAC-01
- Conditions
- Delayed Graft Function
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective cohort study:
- First step: to establish a new scoring system for predication of delayed graft function(DGF) following kidney transplantation based on previous and new study data. The new scoring system is comprised of two parts: Xi'an Criteria of donor scoring system and kidney evaluation System based on Lifeport platform ).
- Second step: validate the new scoring system through prospective cohort study in our transplantation center and modify the scoring system if needed. Recruiting 300 patients, follow up at day 3, week 1, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12. Patients will be followed for Cr30cl, DGF,primary non-function (PNF), acute rejection (AR), graft survival and patient survival
- Step 3: Further validate the new scoring system in six other transplantation centers and developing a software in the end. Recruiting 300 patients, follow up at day 3, week 1, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12. Patients will be followed for Cr30cl, DGF, PGF, AR, graft survival and patient survival
Detailed description
Subjects are enrolled to collect the data of donors and recipients. Investigators also collect the data of recipients or donated organs as following: physiological and biochemical indexes, machine perfusion parameters, and the other factors effected on renal transplant outcomes. A Cox proportional hazards model and multiple linear regression analysis will be applied to examine the correlation among the univariate and multivariate. Based on the above analysis to improve the new scoring system, Lifeport work platform evaluation system and donor kidney quality evaluation system. Then, a multi-center clinical trial will be started to improve and verify the new scoring system. Finally, a donor kidney evaluation APP will be developed based on the scoring system and the database of clinical trials. An applicaiotion (APP) will be popularized the national transplant surgeons.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients assigned the deceased donor kidney to transplant in the waiting list.
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Donor
- 1. Comply with the national donation after citizen death guideline
- 2. No high risk activities: such as history of drug abuse, history of intravenous drug use and risky sexual behavior
- 3. No malignant melanoma, metastatic cancer, or incurable cancer; some of the early stages of cancer after a successful treatment can also be considered
- 4. No activity of untreated systemic bacterial, viral or fungal infection;
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Donor
- 1. Older than 65 years old
- 2.Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV positive
- 3.Donor kidney cold storage time over 30 hours
- 4.Warm ischemia time over 20 minutes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Machine perfusionDeceased donor kidneys were preserved by hypothermic machine perfusion | Device | – |
Primary outcome
delayed graft function
Time frame: 7 days after renal transplant
Transplant nephrectomy
Time frame: 1 year after reanl transplant
4 secondary outcomes
Abnormal serum creatinine
Time frame: Serum creatinine did not return to the normal range within the first 30 days
Renal dysfunction caused by the acute rejection
Time frame: within the first 3 months
lung infection lead to death
Time frame: within the first 1 year
Renal dysfunction caused by Surgical complications
Time frame: within the first 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2016.
- Background: PubMed 24731165Allen AM, Kim WR, Xiong H, Liu J, Stock PG, Lake JR, Chinnakotla S, Snyder JJ, Israni AK, Kasiske BL. Survival of recipients of livers from donation after circulatory death who are relisted and undergo retransplant for graft failure. Am J Transplant. 2014 May;14(5):1120-8. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12700. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
- Background: PubMed 22078722Huang J, Millis JM, Mao Y, Millis MA, Sang X, Zhong S. A pilot programme of organ donation after cardiac death in China. Lancet. 2012 Mar 3;379(9818):862-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61086-6. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 23743728Huang J, Wang H, Fan ST, Zhao B, Zhang Z, Hao L, Huo F, Liu Y. The national program for deceased organ donation in China. Transplantation. 2013 Jul 15;96(1):5-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182985491.
- Background: PubMed 20664493World Health Organization. WHO guiding principles on human cell, tissue and organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2010 Aug 15;90(3):229-33. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ec29f0. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17263786Moers C, Leuvenink HG, Ploeg RJ. Non-heart beating organ donation: overview and future perspectives. Transpl Int. 2007 Jul;20(7):567-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00455.x. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 17496535Kokkinos C, Antcliffe D, Nanidis T, Darzi AW, Tekkis P, Papalois V. Outcome of kidney transplantation from nonheart-beating versus heart-beating cadaveric donors. Transplantation. 2007 May 15;83(9):1193-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000261710.53848.51.
- Background: PubMed 22694305Jochmans I, Darius T, Kuypers D, Monbaliu D, Goffin E, Mourad M, Ledinh H, Weekers L, Peeters P, Randon C, Bosmans JL, Roeyen G, Abramowicz D, Hoang AD, De Pauw L, Rahmel A, Squifflet JP, Pirenne J. Kidney donation after circulatory death in a country with a high number of brain dead donors: 10-year experience in Belgium. Transpl Int. 2012 Aug;25(8):857-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01510.x. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 19857774Chamorro C, Falcon JA, Michelena JC. Controversial points in organ donor management. Transplant Proc. 2009 Oct;41(8):3473-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.09.004.
- Background: PubMed 2225301Gelb AW, Robertson KM. Anaesthetic management of the brain dead for organ donation. Can J Anaesth. 1990 Oct;37(7):806-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03006543.
- Results publication: PubMed 22893495Xue W, Tian P, Ding X, Pan X, Yan H, Hou J, Feng X, Xiang H, Tian X, Ren L, Zheng J, Li S. Clinical research and social status investigation for donor and recipient of living-related kidney transplant. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Feb;45(1):239-49. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0259-0. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 23778649Wadei HM, Heckman MG, Rawal B, Taner CB, Farahat W, Nur L, Mai ML, Prendergast M, Gonwa TA. Comparison of kidney function between donation after cardiac death and donation after brain death kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2013 Aug 15;96(3):274-81. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31829807d1.
- Results publication: PubMed 20331689Singh RP, Farney AC, Rogers J, Zuckerman J, Reeves-Daniel A, Hartmann E, Iskandar S, Adams P, Stratta RJ. Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: lack of impact of delayed graft function on post-transplant outcomes. Clin Transplant. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):255-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01241.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Delayed Graft Function
Not yet recruiting
Bioimpedance and Multiparametric Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Management After Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplantation, Delayed Graft Function
Enrolling by invitation
Feasibility of Physical Prehabilitation for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Sternotomy
Prehabilitation, Cardiac Surgery
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
ARGX-117 in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients at Risk for Delayed Graft Function
Delayed Graft Function
Not yet recruiting
Drone Transport of Deceased-Donor Kidney Grafts Between Two French Hospitals Before Transplantation: a Pilot Safety Study
Kidney Failure, Chronic, Kidney Transplantation
Recruiting
The Impact of Intraoperative Diuretic Use on Delayed Graft Function Following Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation
Delayed Graft Function, Kidney Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
xiaoming D Ding, PhD principal investigator
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Delayed Graft Function, run by First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chenguang D Ding, PhD (8602985323721, doctor_ding@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
delayed graft function (time frame: 7 days after renal transplant). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02876692, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2016.