AzTrials
AzTrials

SCCHNQDV2bNCT02878655

Evaluation of the Overall Quality of Life After the Neck Dissection Retro-spinal Sector (IIb), in Squamous Cell Carcinomas Clinical and Radiological N0 VADS

An observational study of SCCHN, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The nodal involvement in squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract (VADS) is one of the main factors of poor prognosis, justifying the surgical management of neck dissection as a reference treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
SCCHN
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Feb 2015to Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with SCCHN, N0 clinical and radiological, enjoying a dissection IIb sector

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with SCCHN histologically proven N0 clinical and radiological
  • Neoplastic Location: oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx
  • Patient candidate for a neck dissection fonctonnel
  • Life expectancy> 3 months
  • Stable patient not exhibiting at the time of recurrence sign of examination or other scalable neoplasia
  • Age over 18 ans
  • Patient was informed of the study
  • Patient fluent French

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a history of malignancy, outside a basal cell cancer or cancer of the neck treated and cured
  • Patient has at the time of examination of recurrence of signs or other scalable neoplasia
  • Uncontrolled Infectious diseases
  • Neoadjuvant radiotherapy
  • Patient nursing or pregnant or lack of contraception during their reproductive
  • Intercurrent pathology involving life-threatening
  • Any medical or psychological condition associated that could compromise the patient's ability to participate in the study
  • Inability to submit to medical follow-up study for geographical, social or psychic

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Roger VIVIEN, MD contact

babin-e@chu-caen.fr

Emmanuel BABIN contact

babin-e@chu-caen.fr

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Caen University Hospital

    Caen, 14000

    Emmanuel BABIN, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

The nodal involvement in squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract (VADS) is one of the main factors of poor prognosis, justifying the surgical management of neck dissection as a reference treatment.

Under the influence of the American Hayes Martin, it was considered until the 1960s that "over the intervention was, the greater the chance of recovery was". But has since been developed by the Argentine Osvaldo Suarez the concept of functional course, which consists of resection of lymph node tissue while retaining the main structures (muscles, nerves, vessels), as opposed to the recess radical which is reserved for the invasive metastasis.

In addition to these notions, our job is to evaluate the quality of life of patients with SCCHN, N0 clinical and radiological, enjoying a functional neck dissection including IIb sector to support the approach which would be to stop the systematic inclusion of this territory.

Conditions
SCCHN
Keywords
N0 clinical and radiological, dissection IIb sector

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Annalogue Scale for Global Quality of Life

    (rate between 0 and 10)

    Measured: change over baseline and month 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02878655
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-059
Acronym
QDV2b
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
27 May 2016
Last updated
18 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of SCCHN, run by University Hospital, Caen at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Roger VIVIEN, MD (babin-e@chu-caen.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Annalogue Scale for Global Quality of Life (time frame: change over baseline and month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in