Pulmonary EmphysemaCYCLONENCT02879331
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Exercise Capacity in Patients With Severe Emphysema Treated With Coils
A study testing 10 coils in upper lobes, 15 coils in upper and lower lobes and cycloergometry in people with Pulmonary Emphysema, run by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The study hypothesis is that patients with homogeneous emphysema behave differently compared to heterogeneous emphysema with respect to exercise capacity. A better understanding of this difference will allow the investigators to choose the best treatment for each type of patient. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Emphysema
- What is being tested?
- 10 coils in upper lobes, 15 coils in upper and lower lobes and cycloergometry
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Nov 2016to Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Emphysematous patient
- FEV1 < 50%
- RV > 200%
- Diffusion <60% >20%
- PSP <55 mmHg
Who cannot join
- Anticoagulants/antiplatelets
- Giant bullae (> 8 cm , 1/3 hemithorax)
- More tan three moderate/severe exacerbation per year
- Negative to sign informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fundación Jiménez Díaz
Madrid, 28040
Iker Fernandez-Navamuel, MD, PhD, 915504800 ext. 3543, iferbas@fjd.es
Javier Flandes, MD, PhD, 915504800 ext. 3543, jflandes@fjd.es
About this study
The study hypothesis is that patients with homogeneous emphysema behave differently compared to heterogeneous emphysema with respect to exercise capacity. A better understanding of this difference will allow the investigators to choose the best treatment for each type of patient.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in exercise capacity measured by cycle ergometry in patients with severe emphysema after endoscopic lung volume reduction with coils (eLVR).
As a secondary purpose, the investigators want to perform an exploratory, randomized study to compare the results of two different therapeutic approaches in a small sample of patients with homogeneous emphysema.
Read the detailed description
The study plans to include patients with severe emphysema candidates to go through eLVR with coils that fulfill all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Patients with both homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema will be included.
The main study intervention is the performance of a cyclo ergometry (not included in daily clinical practice) before (basal) and 6 months after going through the eLVR with coils.
The subgroup of patients with homogeneous emphysema will be randomly assigned to the following therapeutic approaches:
- Group A: treatment with 10 coils in upper lobes
- Group B: treatment with 15 coils spared in upper and lower lobes
Thus, the study includes:
- for all patients, the performance of two cycloergometries, before and 6 months after the eLVR
- Also, for the subset of homogeneous emphysema patients, an open label, randomized, parallel, two arm exploratory clinical trial.
Sample size has not been formally calculated as there are no previous available data for the primary endpoint (change inspiratory capacity). Thus, 35 patients will be included according to the expected number of patients. Recruitment period will be 24 months and patient follow up will be 6 months.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Emphysema
- Being tested
- 10 coils in upper lobes, 15 coils in upper and lower lobes, cycloergometry
- Keywords
- pulmonary emphysema, coils, cycloergometry, lung volume reduction
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Emphysema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
10 coils in upper lobesProcedure or surgery
15 coils in upper and lower lobesProcedure or surgery
cycloergometryProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 10 coils in upper lobes | Active comparator | 10 coils in upper lobes Receives: Procedure: 10 coils in upper lobes; Procedure: cycloergometry |
| 15 coils in upper and lower lobes | Experimental | 15 coils in upper and lower lobes Receives: Procedure: 15 coils in upper and lower lobes; Procedure: cycloergometry |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Inspiratory Capacity (L)
Change in Inspiratory Capacity (L) at 6 months from baseline
Measured: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
Secondary outcomes (7)
RV (L)
Residual Volume (L)
Measured: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
6-MWT (m)
Six minute walk test (m)
Measured: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
SGQLT (measured in points)
Saint George quality of life test (points)
Measured: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
FEV1(measured in liters)
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (L)
Measured: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
FVC (measured in liters)
Forced Vital Capacity (L)
Measured: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
Endoscopic Volume Reduction-Associated Complications Rate
Endoscopic Volume Reduction Complications Rate
Measured: 6 months
Cycloergometry-associated Complications Rate
Cycloergometry-associated Complications Rate
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2016
- Primary completionSep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary EmphysemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Iker Fernandez-Navamuel, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, FJD
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879331
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC 33-16/IIS-FJD
- Acronym
- CYCLONE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hartman JE, Klooster K, Ten Hacken NH, Slebos DJ. Treatment of emphysema using bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil technology: an update on efficacy and safety. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2015 Oct;9(5):251-9. doi: 10.1177/1753465815589904. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
PubMed 26113524Deslee G, Klooster K, Hetzel M, Stanzel F, Kessler R, Marquette CH, Witt C, Blaas S, Gesierich W, Herth FJ, Hetzel J, van Rikxoort EM, Slebos DJ. Lung volume reduction coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema: a European multicentre trial. Thorax. 2014 Nov;69(11):980-6. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205221. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
PubMed 24891327Boutou AK, Zoumot Z, Nair A, Davey C, Hansell DM, Jamurtas A, Polkey MI, Hopkinson NS. The Impact of Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Emphysema on Dynamic Hyperinflation in Patients With Severe COPD Assessed for Lung Volume Reduction. COPD. 2015;12(6):598-605. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1020149. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
PubMed 26398112Aros F, Boraita A, Alegria E, Alonso AM, Bardaji A, Lamiel R, Luengo E, Rabadan M, Alijarde M, Aznar J, Bano A, Cabanero M, Calderon C, Camprubi M, Candell J, Crespo M, de la Morena G, Fernandez A, Ferrero JA, Gayan R, Bolao IG, Hernandez M, Maceira A, Marin E, Muela de Lara A, Placer L, San Roman JA, Serratosa L, Sosa V, Subirana MT, Wilke M. [Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology for clinical practice in exercise testing]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2000 Aug;53(8):1063-94. Spanish.
PubMed 10956604
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Study to Evaluate the Exercise Capacity in Patients With Severe Emphysema Treated With Coils
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879331
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CYCLONE / EC 33-16/IIS-FJD
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Emphysema
- Keywords
- pulmonary emphysema, coils, cycloergometry, lung volume reduction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez DíazUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study hypothesis is that patients with homogeneous emphysema behave differently compared to heterogeneous emphysema with respect to exercise capacity. A better understanding of this difference will allow the investigators to choose the best treatment for each type of patient.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in exercise capacity measured by cycle ergometry in patients with severe emphysema after endoscopic lung volume reduction with coils (eLVR).
As a secondary purpose, the investigators want to perform an exploratory, randomized study to compare the results of two different therapeutic approaches in a small sample of patients with homogeneous emphysema.
Detailed description
The study plans to include patients with severe emphysema candidates to go through eLVR with coils that fulfill all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Patients with both homogeneous and heterogeneous emphysema will be included.
The main study intervention is the performance of a cyclo ergometry (not included in daily clinical practice) before (basal) and 6 months after going through the eLVR with coils.
The subgroup of patients with homogeneous emphysema will be randomly assigned to the following therapeutic approaches:
- Group A: treatment with 10 coils in upper lobes
- Group B: treatment with 15 coils spared in upper and lower lobes
Thus, the study includes:
- for all patients, the performance of two cycloergometries, before and 6 months after the eLVR
- Also, for the subset of homogeneous emphysema patients, an open label, randomized, parallel, two arm exploratory clinical trial.
Sample size has not been formally calculated as there are no previous available data for the primary endpoint (change inspiratory capacity). Thus, 35 patients will be included according to the expected number of patients. Recruitment period will be 24 months and patient follow up will be 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 10 coils in upper lobes | Active comparator | Procedure: 10 coils in upper lobes, Procedure: cycloergometry10 coils in upper lobes |
| 15 coils in upper and lower lobes | Experimental | Procedure: 15 coils in upper and lower lobes, Procedure: cycloergometry15 coils in upper and lower lobes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Emphysematous patient
- FEV1 < 50%
- RV > 200%
- Diffusion <60% >20%
- PSP <55 mmHg
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Anticoagulants/antiplatelets
- Giant bullae (> 8 cm , 1/3 hemithorax)
- More tan three moderate/severe exacerbation per year
- Negative to sign informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 10 coils in upper lobes | Procedure or surgery | 10 coils in upper lobes |
| 15 coils in upper and lower lobes | Procedure or surgery | 15 coils in upper and lower lobes |
| cycloergometry | Procedure or surgery | 10 coils in upper lobes, 15 coils in upper and lower lobes |
Primary outcome
Change in Inspiratory Capacity (L)
Time frame: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
Change in Inspiratory Capacity (L) at 6 months from baseline
7 secondary outcomes
RV (L)
Time frame: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
6-MWT (m)
Time frame: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
SGQLT (measured in points)
Time frame: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
FEV1(measured in liters)
Time frame: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
FVC (measured in liters)
Time frame: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure
Endoscopic Volume Reduction-Associated Complications Rate
Time frame: 6 months
Cycloergometry-associated Complications Rate
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 26113524Hartman JE, Klooster K, Ten Hacken NH, Slebos DJ. Treatment of emphysema using bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil technology: an update on efficacy and safety. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2015 Oct;9(5):251-9. doi: 10.1177/1753465815589904. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 24891327Deslee G, Klooster K, Hetzel M, Stanzel F, Kessler R, Marquette CH, Witt C, Blaas S, Gesierich W, Herth FJ, Hetzel J, van Rikxoort EM, Slebos DJ. Lung volume reduction coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema: a European multicentre trial. Thorax. 2014 Nov;69(11):980-6. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205221. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 26398112Boutou AK, Zoumot Z, Nair A, Davey C, Hansell DM, Jamurtas A, Polkey MI, Hopkinson NS. The Impact of Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Emphysema on Dynamic Hyperinflation in Patients With Severe COPD Assessed for Lung Volume Reduction. COPD. 2015;12(6):598-605. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1020149. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
- Background: PubMed 10956604Aros F, Boraita A, Alegria E, Alonso AM, Bardaji A, Lamiel R, Luengo E, Rabadan M, Alijarde M, Aznar J, Bano A, Cabanero M, Calderon C, Camprubi M, Candell J, Crespo M, de la Morena G, Fernandez A, Ferrero JA, Gayan R, Bolao IG, Hernandez M, Maceira A, Marin E, Muela de Lara A, Placer L, San Roman JA, Serratosa L, Sosa V, Subirana MT, Wilke M. [Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology for clinical practice in exercise testing]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2000 Aug;53(8):1063-94. Spanish.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pulmonary Emphysema
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of TSRA-196 in Adults With PiZZ Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD)
Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD)
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Xenon MRI to Evaluate Changes to Lung Function Following Bronchoscopic Treatment of Air Trapping in Emphysema
Air Trapping, Emphysema
RecruitingPhase 4
Genetic Variation in IgG in Alpha 1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
Alpha 1-Antitrypsin, COPD
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
AATD-Liver Scan Study
Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, AATD
RecruitingPhase 3
A Non-inferiority Pharmacokinetic and Safety/Tolerability Study of Two Different Doses of Weekly SC Alpha1-PI 15% Compared With Corresponding Standard IV Alpha1-PI in Participants With Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD)
Alpha 1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Iker Fernandez-Navamuel, MD, PhD principal investigator
FJD
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 10 coils in upper lobes, 15 coils in upper and lower lobes and cycloergometry in people with Pulmonary Emphysema, run by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lucia Llanos, MD, PhD (915504800 ext. 3144, luciallanos@fjd.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Inspiratory Capacity (L) (time frame: three months before procedure and six months after first procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02879331, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2019.