Diabetes Mellitus Type 2NCT02879409
HbA1c Variability in Type II Diabetes
A study testing Metformin, Gliclazide and Sitagliptin in people with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar at 1 site in Qatar.
Trial summary
There are numerous possible reasons why it could be speculated that HbA1c variability may affect complication risk. Of interest are the concepts that both laboratory and clinic evidence suggests that periods of sustained hyperglycemia are 'remembered' (metabolic memory), this in turn is recognized to place patients at… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Metformin, Gliclazide and Sitagliptin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteQatar
- Study dates
- Nov 2016to 1 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Qatari subjects only with type 2 diabetes taking any medication.
- HbA1c 7.5-9.0%.
- Body mass index 26-36.
- Age 18 - 65 years of age.
- Recruitment of a gender balance reflecting the local eligible diabetes patients until 150 are recruited.
Who cannot join
- Patients with anemia or other conditions known to affect the validity of HbA1c measurement e.g. a haemoglobinopathy known to affect the Hamad HbA1c method or renal failure (CKD Stage 5)
- Patients with concurrent illness
- Patients on medication leading to insulin resistance e.g. corticosteroids
- Pregnancy
- Active retinopathy
- Any clinical exclusion for optimal diabetes control
- Hypoglycemic unawareness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Does Glycated Hemoglobin Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Differ Depending on the Diabetes Treatment Threshold Used in the Qatari Population: Implication on Diabetes Complication Risk?
There are numerous possible reasons why it could be speculated that HbA1c variability may affect complication risk. Of interest are the concepts that both laboratory and clinic evidence suggests that periods of sustained hyperglycemia are 'remembered' (metabolic memory), this in turn is recognized to place patients at greater long-term risk of complications. As such it can be speculated that the detrimental effect of variability in HbA1c may be mediated via the same mechanism as 'metabolic memory' phenomenon.
Aims: To determine whether treatment to one of 2 threshold levels will result in one group of type 2 diabetes patients having the same mean HbA1c but with differing HbA1c variability to that of another and related to markers of oxidative stress, inflammation and microvascular complications. To determine whether a difference in HbA1c variability between the 2 groups will reflect in changes in small nerve fibers assessed with the sensitive method of corneal confocal microscopy and cardiac autonomic function testing. To assess the reproducibility of HbA1c measurement from a whole blood samples initially analyzed and then stored at -80C until the end of the study (2-3 years), as well as storing an aliquot of haemolysate, for reanalysis at the end of the study.
In one arm the investigators will intensify treatment in those with FPG>140mg/dl until their FPG is <90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them, and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to >140mg/dl again. In the other group the investigators will intensify if their FPG is >115 mg/dl until it is <=115 mg/dl and intensify further if >115 mg/dl again. A total of 20 visits within a time frame of 2 and half years will be performed. Visits procedures will include routine biochemistry, eGFR, lipids, fasting glucose, insulin and full blood count, HbA1c, SHBG, hsCRP. EPIC and G-PAQ questionnaires will be collected. Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, and a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy and a 24 hour urine collection for urinary isoprostanes to measure oxidative stress will be performed, at baseline, 12 and 24 months.
Read the detailed description
One of the last unanswered question in relation to the influence of glycemic control on diabetes complications is whether increased month-to-month changes in blood glucose (as measured by variability in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)) compounds the complication rate and if this can be altered with intervention. Qatar has a high prevalence of diabetes, affecting approximately 23% of the adult population (International Diabetes Federation 2014) that is going to lead to the development of both microvascular and macrovascular complications resulting in the increased morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. The fact that improved glucose control in type 2 as well as type 1 diabetes reduces the risk of microvascular complications is well established. However, more recently it has been demonstrated that the month-to-month variability (the 'rises and falls') in glucose control are also associated with an increased risk of developing these diabetes-associated problems. An individual's long term measure of blood glucose control is represented by the amount of HbA1c measured in the blood. The HbA1c level changes slowly over a much longer period than the constantly fluctuating glucose levels, giving a good indication of overall glucose control in the preceding 2-3 months. What is not known is whether interventions to reduce variability in HbA1c could, in turn, lead to a reduction in diabetes complications. For example even when HbA1c mean is the optimal 7%, there can be high variability in the HbA1c measures (large standard deviation) that may still lead to complications.
This study proposes to gather data to determine whether different treatment thresholds for diabetes in Qatar people have inherently different effects on the variability of HbA1c on a month-to-month basis. By establishing an understanding of how different treatment regimens for hyperglycemia may affect HbA1c variability, this study would then inform on a long term study designed to determine whether interventions to reduce HbA1c variability can reduce micro- or macrovascular complication risk independently of mean HbA1c. If proven, this concept would allow patients to help avoid glycaemia-related vascular complications without having the high potential risk of hypoglycemia that is associated with the current gold standard of diabetes care.
The investigators plan to recruit 150 patients on any glucose lowering medication (HbA1c 7.5-9%), randomize them into one of two treatment threshold groups and test their HbA1c every 6 weeks for 20 visits (visit 1 baseline; therefore 114 weeks) to assess the HbA1c variability of each group. Self-monitored fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurement will be undertaken 3 times weekly and reported back to the medical team as part of the safety monitoring. Patients will be randomly divided into 2 treatment thresholds. In one the investigators will intensify treatment in those with FPG>140mg/dl until their FPG is <90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them, and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to >140mg/dl again. In the other group Investigators will intensify if their FPG is >115 mg/dl until it is <=115 mg/dl and intensify further if >115 mg/dl again. As such the study will be treatment threshold dependent and therapy independent. This will help circumvent any concern that the drug regimen could complicate the analysis or present a confounder. In practical terms it means the investigators give both groups of patients the same therapy that is intensified according to the treatment threshold with the addition of the same hypoglycemic agents as used in routine clinical practice. Intensifying treatment dose would be undertaken if three consecutive FPG were above the target of 140 or 115 mg/dl. This will be advised by the patient ringing the study coordinator and/or the study coordinator ringing the patient weekly and advising the consultant what the FPG values are for action. It is anticipated that the mean HbA1c will be comparable but the variability of the HbA1c will differ between the 2 populations.
Whole blood samples taken from the recruited patients will be freshly analyzed in a biochemical and HbA1c analyzer. Following this the samples and an aliquot of haemolysate will be stored at -80C for 2-3 years (the duration of the study), when they will be reanalyzed at the completion of the study and the results will be compared with the measurements prior to storage.
All patients entering the study will be assessed by a dietician at Hamad hospital and advised how to complete the food frequency questionnaire that was devised for an Arab population and based on EPIC. It will be completed every six weeks at the time that the HbA1c is taken. Patients will also be asked to fill in the WHO Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (G-PAQ) that has been translated into Arabic and will be collected on a six weekly basis.
Measurement of the serum lipids (total cholesterol, HDL), inflammatory marker (hsCRP) will be undertaken every 6 weeks when the HbA1c is measured. Twenty four hour urinary oxidative stress (urinary isoprostanes by LC/MS) will be measured at baseline, 12 and 24 months. These measures may provide some insight on the mechanism by which HbA1c variability may alter microvascular and macrovascular risk.
Measures for microvascular complications have been included and these include albumin/creatinine ratio and eGFR that will be undertaken every 4 months as a measure for nephropathy. For neuropathy, autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy will be performed at baseline, 12 and 24 months under the expertise of Professor Malik who has established the techniques here in Doha.
Recruitment of the patients:
Only Qatari patients will be recruited and the investigators will aim to recruit a gender balance that reflects that of the local eligible diabetes patients until 150 are recruited aged 18-65 years of age. Patients can be on any treatment including insulin as the study is aiming to look at treatment thresholds, rather than actual treatments. This would mean that patients might have additional medication added or substituted in order to reach the necessary threshold of the study. Patients who may be suitable will be given an information sheet detailing the study and asked to contact the designated coordinator within 2 days. After informed consent that will follow"HRP-803 and HRP-802 INVESTIGATOR GUIDANCE - Documentation of Informed Consent", taken by the study coordinator, subjects will be screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Should the patient be suitable for inclusion in the study then blood will be withdrawn for HbA1c, routine biochemistry including creatinine, insulin, fasting glucose, fasting lipids, blood for hsCRP and a full blood count at that visit. Urinary albumin/creatinine will also be assessed. Patients would be randomized at that point. Patients will either attend the clinic or have the study coordinator visit their home every 6 weeks to take blood for HbA1c, routine biochemistry including eGFR, lipids, and hsCRP. Urine for urinary isoprostanes will be taken as a measure of oxidative stress. Urinary albumin/creatinine will also be assessed. This will be undertaken for the 20 study visits to assess their HbA1c variability on their two treatment thresholds. A fasting insulin and glucose will be taken at the beginning, at week 60 and at the end of the study as a measure of insulin resistance (HOMA) to determine if there has been a change in insulin resistance over the course of the study. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) as an indirect measure of insulin resistance will also be taken in the event that the fasting bloods cannot be obtained. Assessment of retinopathy by an ophthalmologist and neuropathy will be undertaken at the beginning, mid point and end of the study that fits with current clinical practice. Renal function will be determined every 6 weeks throughout the study by monitoring GFR and measuring urinary albumin/creatinine. Urinary isoprostanes will be measured using LC/MS in a validated assay that is currently in use.
Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, and a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy to quantify corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) will be performed at baseline, 12 months and at 24 months (a total of 3 times over the 2 year study period).
Study Visit Schedule
Visit 1:
- Consent, inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Anthropometric measurement
- Baseline bloods: routine biochemistry including eGFR, lipids, fasting glucose, insulin and full blood count, HbA1c, SHBG, hsCRP.
- Urinary measurements. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio and isoprostane measurement.
- Randomization into one of the two treatment threshold regimes.
- Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability and small fiber nerve measurement using corneal confocal microscopy.
Visits 2-10:
Bloods: HbA1c, lipids. Each specimen will be identified and coded as part of the trial. Urinary isoprostanes will be measured in a validated assay that is currently in use.
Visit 11:
Midpoint of the study Anthropometric measurement: Height, Weight, Waist circumference, blood pressure Baseline bloods: routine biochemistry including sGFR, lipids, fasting glucose, insulin and full blood count, HbA1c, SHBG, hsCRP Urinary measurements: urinary albumin/creatinine ratio 24 hour isoprostane measurement, corneal confocal microscopy and autonomic function assessment performed
Visits 12-20:
Bloods: HbA1c, lipids, eGFR, hsCRP. Each specimen will be identified and coded. 24 hour isoprostane measurement, corneal confocal microscopy and autonomic function assessment performed at visit 20.
Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, and a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy and a 24 hour urine collection for urinary isoprostanes to measure oxidative stress will be performed, these measurements will be performed at baseline, 12 and 24 months.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
- Being tested
- Metformin, Gliclazide, Sitagliptin, Liraglutide, Pioglitazone
- Keywords
- HbA1c variability, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Diabetes microvascular complications, Diabetes macrovascular complications
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MetforminDrug
Also called Glucophage
Initial: 500 mg once daily; dosage may be increased by 500 mg weekly; maximum dose: 2,000 mg once daily
GliclazideDrug
Also called Diamicron, Diamicron MR
There is no fixed-dosage regimen for the management of diabetes mellitus with gliclazide. Dose will be individualized based on frequent determinations of blood glucose during dose titration and throughout maintenance. The 30 mg modified-release tablet equals the 80 mg immediate-release tablet.
Immediate-release tablet: Initial: 80 mg twice daily; titrate based on blood glucose levels. Usual dosage range: 80 to 320 mg/day (maximum dose: 320 mg/day); dosage of ≥160 mg should be divided into 2 equal parts for twice-daily administration.
Modified-release tablet: Initial: 30 mg once daily; titrate in 30 mg increments every 2 weeks based on blood glucose levels. Maximum dose: 120 mg once daily
SitagliptinDrug
Also called Januvia
Oral: 100 mg once daily
LiraglutideDrug
Also called Victoza
SubQ: Initial: 0.6 mg once daily for 1 week; then increase to 1.2 mg once daily; may increase further to 1.8 mg once daily if optimal glycemic response not achieved with 1.2 mg daily.
PioglitazoneDrug
Also called Actos
Oral, Monotherapy or combination therapy: 15-30 mg once daily
Patients with heart failure (NYHA Class I or II): Monotherapy or combination therapy: 15 mg once daily
DapagliflozinDrug
Also called Forxiga, Farxiga
5mg once daily increasing to 10mg once daily as required
human insulinDrug
Also called novorapid, glargine
insulin dosage and administration according to physician
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm 1 | Experimental | 75 Type 2 diabetic patients with a gender balance who will have the intervention if/when their FBG >140mg/dl
Intervention: intensify treatment until their FBG is <90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them using different interventions (Metformin, Gliclazide, Sitagliptin, Dapagliflozin, Liraglutide, Pioglitazone, human insulin), and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to >140mg/dl again. Receives: Drug: Metformin; Drug: Gliclazide; Drug: Sitagliptin; Drug: Liraglutide; Drug: Pioglitazone; Drug: Dapagliflozin; Drug: human insulin |
| Treatment arm 2 | Experimental | 75 Type 2 diabetic patients with a gender balance who will have the intervention if/when their FBG >115mg/dl
Intervention: intensify treatment until FBG is <=115 mg/dl and intensify further if >115 mg/dl again, using what ever clinical treatment is necessary (Metformin, Gliclazide, Sitagliptin, Dapagliflozin, Liraglutide, Pioglitazone, human insulin). Receives: Drug: Metformin; Drug: Gliclazide; Drug: Sitagliptin; Drug: Liraglutide; Drug: Pioglitazone; Drug: Dapagliflozin; Drug: human insulin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determination of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) between the 2 diabetes treatment thresholds
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether treatment to one of 2 threshold levels will result in one group of type 2 diabetes patients having the same mean HbA1c but with differing HbA1c variability to that of another.
Measured: 24-30 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Association of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) to microvascular changes in heart rate variability, corneal nerve fiber density, albumin/creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Heart rate variability will be measured by ECG changes to deep breathing. Corneal nerve fiber density will be measured by confocal corneal microscopy
Measured: 24-30 months
Association of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) to oxidative stress markers measured by urinary isoprostanes and inflammation measured by highly sensitive C-reactive protein.
This will be assessed by comparing the results of HbA1c and it's variability every 6 weeks with results of routine biochemistry including eGFR, lipids, SHBG, hsCRP measured on visit one (initial visit), visit 11 (midpoint of the study), and visit 20 (end of the study).
Measured: 24-30 months
Comparison of HbA1c (percent) for each subject at baseline and following sample storage of 2 years to assess HbA1c measurement stability.
HbA1c will be measured at the time of the sample collection from fresh and haemolysed blood, then the remaining of the samples will be aliquoted and stored in -80 C then remeasured again after short term storage (2-3 years)
Measured: 2-3 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2016
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023
- Study completion1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hamad Medical Corporation, Sidra Medicine, University of Hull
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rayaz Malik, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879409
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14-00058
- Other IDs
- NPRP: 8-315-3-065, 14-00058, 15103/15
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
PubMed 8366922Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. Effect of glucose variability on the long-term risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Oct;32(10):1901-3. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0109. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
PubMed 19549736Siegelaar SE, Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL, Hoekstra JB, Devries JH. Glucose variability does not contribute to the development of peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: data from the DCCT. Diabetologia. 2009 Oct;52(10):2229-32. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1473-x. Epub 2009 Aug 12. No abstract available.
PubMed 19672575Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jul;29(7):1486-90. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0293.
PubMed 16801566Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group; Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Bigger JT, Buse JB, Cushman WC, Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F, Grimm RH Jr, Probstfield JL, Simons-Morton DG, Friedewald WT. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PubMed 18539917Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
PubMed 9742976Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65.
PubMed 9742977UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):703-13.
PubMed 9732337ADVANCE Collaborative Group; Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, Woodward M, Marre M, Cooper M, Glasziou P, Grobbee D, Hamet P, Harrap S, Heller S, Liu L, Mancia G, Mogensen CE, Pan C, Poulter N, Rodgers A, Williams B, Bompoint S, de Galan BE, Joshi R, Travert F. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PubMed 18539916Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Reda D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, Zieve FJ, Marks J, Davis SN, Hayward R, Warren SR, Goldman S, McCarren M, Vitek ME, Henderson WG, Huang GD; VADT Investigators. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):129-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
PubMed 19092145Home P. Contributions of basal and post-prandial hyperglycaemia to micro- and macrovascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jul;21(7):989-98. doi: 10.1185/030079905x49662.
PubMed 16004665Raz I, Wilson PW, Strojek K, Kowalska I, Bozikov V, Gitt AK, Jermendy G, Campaigne BN, Kerr L, Milicevic Z, Jacober SJ. Effects of prandial versus fasting glycemia on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the HEART2D trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Mar;32(3):381-6. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1671.
PubMed 19246588Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. Mean blood glucose compared with HbA1c in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2008 Feb;51(2):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0883-x. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
PubMed 18040661Waden J, Forsblom C, Thorn LM, Gordin D, Saraheimo M, Groop PH; Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group. A1C variability predicts incident cardiovascular events, microalbuminuria, and overt diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009 Nov;58(11):2649-55. doi: 10.2337/db09-0693. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
PubMed 19651819Marcovecchio ML, Tossavainen PH, Dunger DB. Status and rationale of renoprotection studies in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Aug;10(5):347-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00510.x. Epub 2009 Jun 2. No abstract available.
PubMed 19496962
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Glycated Hemoglobin Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Differ Depending on the Diabetes Treatment Threshold Used in the Qatari Population: Implication on Diabetes Complication Risk?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879409
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 14-00058
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
- Keywords
- HbA1c variability, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Diabetes microvascular complications, Diabetes macrovascular complications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Cornell Medical College in QatarUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hamad Medical Corporation, Sidra Medicine, University of Hull
- Study start
- Nov 2016
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are numerous possible reasons why it could be speculated that HbA1c variability may affect complication risk. Of interest are the concepts that both laboratory and clinic evidence suggests that periods of sustained hyperglycemia are 'remembered' (metabolic memory), this in turn is recognized to place patients at greater long-term risk of complications. As such it can be speculated that the detrimental effect of variability in HbA1c may be mediated via the same mechanism as 'metabolic memory' phenomenon.
Aims: To determine whether treatment to one of 2 threshold levels will result in one group of type 2 diabetes patients having the same mean HbA1c but with differing HbA1c variability to that of another and related to markers of oxidative stress, inflammation and microvascular complications. To determine whether a difference in HbA1c variability between the 2 groups will reflect in changes in small nerve fibers assessed with the sensitive method of corneal confocal microscopy and cardiac autonomic function testing. To assess the reproducibility of HbA1c measurement from a whole blood samples initially analyzed and then stored at -80C until the end of the study (2-3 years), as well as storing an aliquot of haemolysate, for reanalysis at the end of the study.
In one arm the investigators will intensify treatment in those with FPG>140mg/dl until their FPG is <90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them, and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to >140mg/dl again. In the other group the investigators will intensify if their FPG is >115 mg/dl until it is <=115 mg/dl and intensify further if >115 mg/dl again. A total of 20 visits within a time frame of 2 and half years will be performed. Visits procedures will include routine biochemistry, eGFR, lipids, fasting glucose, insulin and full blood count, HbA1c, SHBG, hsCRP. EPIC and G-PAQ questionnaires will be collected. Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, and a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy and a 24 hour urine collection for urinary isoprostanes to measure oxidative stress will be performed, at baseline, 12 and 24 months.
Detailed description
One of the last unanswered question in relation to the influence of glycemic control on diabetes complications is whether increased month-to-month changes in blood glucose (as measured by variability in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)) compounds the complication rate and if this can be altered with intervention. Qatar has a high prevalence of diabetes, affecting approximately 23% of the adult population (International Diabetes Federation 2014) that is going to lead to the development of both microvascular and macrovascular complications resulting in the increased morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. The fact that improved glucose control in type 2 as well as type 1 diabetes reduces the risk of microvascular complications is well established. However, more recently it has been demonstrated that the month-to-month variability (the 'rises and falls') in glucose control are also associated with an increased risk of developing these diabetes-associated problems. An individual's long term measure of blood glucose control is represented by the amount of HbA1c measured in the blood. The HbA1c level changes slowly over a much longer period than the constantly fluctuating glucose levels, giving a good indication of overall glucose control in the preceding 2-3 months. What is not known is whether interventions to reduce variability in HbA1c could, in turn, lead to a reduction in diabetes complications. For example even when HbA1c mean is the optimal 7%, there can be high variability in the HbA1c measures (large standard deviation) that may still lead to complications.
This study proposes to gather data to determine whether different treatment thresholds for diabetes in Qatar people have inherently different effects on the variability of HbA1c on a month-to-month basis. By establishing an understanding of how different treatment regimens for hyperglycemia may affect HbA1c variability, this study would then inform on a long term study designed to determine whether interventions to reduce HbA1c variability can reduce micro- or macrovascular complication risk independently of mean HbA1c. If proven, this concept would allow patients to help avoid glycaemia-related vascular complications without having the high potential risk of hypoglycemia that is associated with the current gold standard of diabetes care.
The investigators plan to recruit 150 patients on any glucose lowering medication (HbA1c 7.5-9%), randomize them into one of two treatment threshold groups and test their HbA1c every 6 weeks for 20 visits (visit 1 baseline; therefore 114 weeks) to assess the HbA1c variability of each group. Self-monitored fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurement will be undertaken 3 times weekly and reported back to the medical team as part of the safety monitoring. Patients will be randomly divided into 2 treatment thresholds. In one the investigators will intensify treatment in those with FPG>140mg/dl until their FPG is <90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them, and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to >140mg/dl again. In the other group Investigators will intensify if their FPG is >115 mg/dl until it is <=115 mg/dl and intensify further if >115 mg/dl again. As such the study will be treatment threshold dependent and therapy independent. This will help circumvent any concern that the drug regimen could complicate the analysis or present a confounder. In practical terms it means the investigators give both groups of patients the same therapy that is intensified according to the treatment threshold with the addition of the same hypoglycemic agents as used in routine clinical practice. Intensifying treatment dose would be undertaken if three consecutive FPG were above the target of 140 or 115 mg/dl. This will be advised by the patient ringing the study coordinator and/or the study coordinator ringing the patient weekly and advising the consultant what the FPG values are for action. It is anticipated that the mean HbA1c will be comparable but the variability of the HbA1c will differ between the 2 populations.
Whole blood samples taken from the recruited patients will be freshly analyzed in a biochemical and HbA1c analyzer. Following this the samples and an aliquot of haemolysate will be stored at -80C for 2-3 years (the duration of the study), when they will be reanalyzed at the completion of the study and the results will be compared with the measurements prior to storage.
All patients entering the study will be assessed by a dietician at Hamad hospital and advised how to complete the food frequency questionnaire that was devised for an Arab population and based on EPIC. It will be completed every six weeks at the time that the HbA1c is taken. Patients will also be asked to fill in the WHO Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (G-PAQ) that has been translated into Arabic and will be collected on a six weekly basis.
Measurement of the serum lipids (total cholesterol, HDL), inflammatory marker (hsCRP) will be undertaken every 6 weeks when the HbA1c is measured. Twenty four hour urinary oxidative stress (urinary isoprostanes by LC/MS) will be measured at baseline, 12 and 24 months. These measures may provide some insight on the mechanism by which HbA1c variability may alter microvascular and macrovascular risk.
Measures for microvascular complications have been included and these include albumin/creatinine ratio and eGFR that will be undertaken every 4 months as a measure for nephropathy. For neuropathy, autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy will be performed at baseline, 12 and 24 months under the expertise of Professor Malik who has established the techniques here in Doha.
Recruitment of the patients:
Only Qatari patients will be recruited and the investigators will aim to recruit a gender balance that reflects that of the local eligible diabetes patients until 150 are recruited aged 18-65 years of age. Patients can be on any treatment including insulin as the study is aiming to look at treatment thresholds, rather than actual treatments. This would mean that patients might have additional medication added or substituted in order to reach the necessary threshold of the study. Patients who may be suitable will be given an information sheet detailing the study and asked to contact the designated coordinator within 2 days. After informed consent that will follow"HRP-803 and HRP-802 INVESTIGATOR GUIDANCE - Documentation of Informed Consent", taken by the study coordinator, subjects will be screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Should the patient be suitable for inclusion in the study then blood will be withdrawn for HbA1c, routine biochemistry including creatinine, insulin, fasting glucose, fasting lipids, blood for hsCRP and a full blood count at that visit. Urinary albumin/creatinine will also be assessed. Patients would be randomized at that point. Patients will either attend the clinic or have the study coordinator visit their home every 6 weeks to take blood for HbA1c, routine biochemistry including eGFR, lipids, and hsCRP. Urine for urinary isoprostanes will be taken as a measure of oxidative stress. Urinary albumin/creatinine will also be assessed. This will be undertaken for the 20 study visits to assess their HbA1c variability on their two treatment thresholds. A fasting insulin and glucose will be taken at the beginning, at week 60 and at the end of the study as a measure of insulin resistance (HOMA) to determine if there has been a change in insulin resistance over the course of the study. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) as an indirect measure of insulin resistance will also be taken in the event that the fasting bloods cannot be obtained. Assessment of retinopathy by an ophthalmologist and neuropathy will be undertaken at the beginning, mid point and end of the study that fits with current clinical practice. Renal function will be determined every 6 weeks throughout the study by monitoring GFR and measuring urinary albumin/creatinine. Urinary isoprostanes will be measured using LC/MS in a validated assay that is currently in use.
Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, and a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy to quantify corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) will be performed at baseline, 12 months and at 24 months (a total of 3 times over the 2 year study period).
Study Visit Schedule
Visit 1:
- Consent, inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Anthropometric measurement
- Baseline bloods: routine biochemistry including eGFR, lipids, fasting glucose, insulin and full blood count, HbA1c, SHBG, hsCRP.
- Urinary measurements. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio and isoprostane measurement.
- Randomization into one of the two treatment threshold regimes.
- Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability and small fiber nerve measurement using corneal confocal microscopy.
Visits 2-10:
Bloods: HbA1c, lipids. Each specimen will be identified and coded as part of the trial. Urinary isoprostanes will be measured in a validated assay that is currently in use.
Visit 11:
Midpoint of the study Anthropometric measurement: Height, Weight, Waist circumference, blood pressure Baseline bloods: routine biochemistry including sGFR, lipids, fasting glucose, insulin and full blood count, HbA1c, SHBG, hsCRP Urinary measurements: urinary albumin/creatinine ratio 24 hour isoprostane measurement, corneal confocal microscopy and autonomic function assessment performed
Visits 12-20:
Bloods: HbA1c, lipids, eGFR, hsCRP. Each specimen will be identified and coded. 24 hour isoprostane measurement, corneal confocal microscopy and autonomic function assessment performed at visit 20.
Autonomic function testing using deep breathing heart rate variability, and a sensitive measure of small fiber neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy and a 24 hour urine collection for urinary isoprostanes to measure oxidative stress will be performed, these measurements will be performed at baseline, 12 and 24 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm 1 | Experimental | Drug: Metformin, Drug: Gliclazide, Drug: Sitagliptin, Drug: Liraglutide, Drug: Pioglitazone, Drug: Dapagliflozin, Drug: human insulin75 Type 2 diabetic patients with a gender balance who will have the intervention if/when their FBG >140mg/dl Intervention: intensify treatment until their FBG is <90mg/dl, using whatever treatment is clinically appropriate for them using different interventions (Metformin, Gliclazide, Sitagliptin, Dapagliflozin, Liraglutide, Pioglitazone, human insulin), and only intensify it further if their FPG rises to >140mg/dl again. |
| Treatment arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: Metformin, Drug: Gliclazide, Drug: Sitagliptin, Drug: Liraglutide, Drug: Pioglitazone, Drug: Dapagliflozin, Drug: human insulin75 Type 2 diabetic patients with a gender balance who will have the intervention if/when their FBG >115mg/dl Intervention: intensify treatment until FBG is <=115 mg/dl and intensify further if >115 mg/dl again, using what ever clinical treatment is necessary (Metformin, Gliclazide, Sitagliptin, Dapagliflozin, Liraglutide, Pioglitazone, human insulin). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Qatari subjects only with type 2 diabetes taking any medication.
- HbA1c 7.5-9.0%.
- Body mass index 26-36.
- Age 18 - 65 years of age.
- Recruitment of a gender balance reflecting the local eligible diabetes patients until 150 are recruited.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with anemia or other conditions known to affect the validity of HbA1c measurement e.g. a haemoglobinopathy known to affect the Hamad HbA1c method or renal failure (CKD Stage 5)
- Patients with concurrent illness
- Patients on medication leading to insulin resistance e.g. corticosteroids
- Pregnancy
- Active retinopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MetforminAlso: GlucophageInitial: 500 mg once daily; dosage may be increased by 500 mg weekly; maximum dose: 2,000 mg once daily | Drug | Treatment arm 1, Treatment arm 2 |
| GliclazideAlso: Diamicron, Diamicron MRThere is no fixed-dosage regimen for the management of diabetes mellitus with gliclazide. Dose will be individualized based on frequent determinations of blood glucose during dose titration and throughout maintenance. The 30 mg modified-release tablet equals the 80 mg immediate-release tablet. Immediate-release tablet: Initial: 80 mg twice daily; titrate based on blood glucose levels. Usual dosage range: 80 to 320 mg/day (maximum dose: 320 mg/day); dosage of ≥160 mg should be divided into 2 equal parts for twice-daily administration. Modified-release tablet: Initial: 30 mg once daily; titrate in 30 mg increments every 2 weeks based on blood glucose levels. Maximum dose: 120 mg once daily | Drug | Treatment arm 1, Treatment arm 2 |
| SitagliptinAlso: JanuviaOral: 100 mg once daily | Drug | Treatment arm 1, Treatment arm 2 |
| LiraglutideAlso: VictozaSubQ: Initial: 0.6 mg once daily for 1 week; then increase to 1.2 mg once daily; may increase further to 1.8 mg once daily if optimal glycemic response not achieved with 1.2 mg daily. | Drug | Treatment arm 1, Treatment arm 2 |
| PioglitazoneAlso: ActosOral, Monotherapy or combination therapy: 15-30 mg once daily Patients with heart failure (NYHA Class I or II): Monotherapy or combination therapy: 15 mg once daily | Drug | Treatment arm 1, Treatment arm 2 |
| DapagliflozinAlso: Forxiga, Farxiga5mg once daily increasing to 10mg once daily as required | Drug | Treatment arm 1, Treatment arm 2 |
| human insulinAlso: novorapid, glargineinsulin dosage and administration according to physician | Drug | Treatment arm 1, Treatment arm 2 |
Primary outcome
Determination of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) between the 2 diabetes treatment thresholds
Time frame: 24-30 months
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether treatment to one of 2 threshold levels will result in one group of type 2 diabetes patients having the same mean HbA1c but with differing HbA1c variability to that of another.
3 secondary outcomes
Association of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) to microvascular changes in heart rate variability, corneal nerve fiber density, albumin/creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Time frame: 24-30 months
Association of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) to oxidative stress markers measured by urinary isoprostanes and inflammation measured by highly sensitive C-reactive protein.
Time frame: 24-30 months
Comparison of HbA1c (percent) for each subject at baseline and following sample storage of 2 years to assess HbA1c measurement stability.
Time frame: 2-3 years.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2025.
- Background: PubMed 8366922Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
- Background: PubMed 19549736Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. Effect of glucose variability on the long-term risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Oct;32(10):1901-3. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0109. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 19672575Siegelaar SE, Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL, Hoekstra JB, Devries JH. Glucose variability does not contribute to the development of peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: data from the DCCT. Diabetologia. 2009 Oct;52(10):2229-32. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1473-x. Epub 2009 Aug 12. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16801566Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jul;29(7):1486-90. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0293.
- Background: PubMed 18539917Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group; Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Bigger JT, Buse JB, Cushman WC, Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F, Grimm RH Jr, Probstfield JL, Simons-Morton DG, Friedewald WT. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 9742976Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
- Background: PubMed 9742977Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65.
- Background: PubMed 9732337UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):703-13.
- Background: PubMed 18539916ADVANCE Collaborative Group; Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, Woodward M, Marre M, Cooper M, Glasziou P, Grobbee D, Hamet P, Harrap S, Heller S, Liu L, Mancia G, Mogensen CE, Pan C, Poulter N, Rodgers A, Williams B, Bompoint S, de Galan BE, Joshi R, Travert F. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 19092145Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Reda D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, Zieve FJ, Marks J, Davis SN, Hayward R, Warren SR, Goldman S, McCarren M, Vitek ME, Henderson WG, Huang GD; VADT Investigators. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):129-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 16004665Home P. Contributions of basal and post-prandial hyperglycaemia to micro- and macrovascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jul;21(7):989-98. doi: 10.1185/030079905x49662.
- Background: PubMed 19246588Raz I, Wilson PW, Strojek K, Kowalska I, Bozikov V, Gitt AK, Jermendy G, Campaigne BN, Kerr L, Milicevic Z, Jacober SJ. Effects of prandial versus fasting glycemia on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the HEART2D trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Mar;32(3):381-6. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1671.
- Weill Cornell Biostatistics coreLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Impact of the Accu-Chek SmartGuide CGM Solution on the Mean Change in Time in Range Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Participants With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Enrolling by invitation
MTM2MTG Pilot Ancillary Study
Diet, Healthy, HbA1c
Active, not recruiting
Metabolic and Inflammatory Outcomes of the Ketogenic Diet Comparing Saturated and Unsaturated Fat Sources
PreDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Testing the Safety and Possible Benefits of an Ear Injection of a New Compound, Paliroden, in People With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Difficulty Understanding Speech in Noisy Situations
Cochlear Synaptopathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Research Study to Check the Safety of NNC9836-0001 When Given to Healthy Participants and Participants With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rayaz Malik, MD PhD principal investigator
Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Metformin, Gliclazide and Sitagliptin in people with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, run by Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar at 1 site in Qatar.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determination of the variability of HbA1c (by measurement of standard deviation of HbA1c) between the 2 diabetes treatment thresholds (time frame: 24-30 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02879409, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2025.