Hematological MalignancyPhase 4NCT02880709
The Effect of Special Diets in Hematological Cancer Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Special diet in people with Hematological Malignancy, run by Jens Rikardt Andersen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Major weight loss and taste changes are well documented in patients with hematological cancer during chemotherapy. It has previously been documented, that such patients have preferences for much umami, a little sweet, sour and salt, and no bitter. The purpose of the study was to convert these results into real diets. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hematological Malignancy
- What is being tested?
- Special diet
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hematological cancer
- Ongoing chemotherapy
- Ability to eat by mouth
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Lack of the ability to understand the informations given
- Lack of the ability to understand the conditions of the experiment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Special Diets on Weight and Nutritional Intake in Haematological Cancer Patients
Major weight loss and taste changes are well documented in patients with hematological cancer during chemotherapy. It has previously been documented, that such patients have preferences for much umami, a little sweet, sour and salt, and no bitter. The purpose of the study was to convert these results into real diets. Patients participated in two sensory pilot studies (n=10), where dishes were tested for preferences before and after chemotherapy. From these results four dishes were selected and tested on 32 patients in 30 days in a cross-over design. The diets resulted in a beneficial and statistical significant difference in weight development (p= 0.0008), with 1.2 ± 1.9 kg (+2%) in the intervention period and -2.8 ± 5.2 kg (-4%) in the control period. This difference persisted after sensitivity analysis (± 10%) p= 0.005. However, the nutritional intake was still low in both periods, and the treatment with cytarabin turned out to be a major confounder as dosage was significantly higher in the control period.
Read the detailed description
The study was approved by the regional scientific ethical committee, and was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov NTC no………...
Patients were selected consecutively with acute and chronic leukemia and lymphoma, Hodg-kin's lymphoma, and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in treatment with chemotherapy.
Eligible patients were aged >18 years, and only patients who were able to com-municate and understand written and oral information and receive food orally were included. The special diets were developed at the Central Kitchen at Rigshospitalet Initially, two single blinded pilot studies of five patients were performed, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as the main study. In the first study patients tested 17 dishes with a taste-mix of dominating umami, a little sweet, sour and salt, and no bitter. In the second round six dishes were selected based on the results from the first round. All dishes had a high energy-density, with a protein content of at least 5 g/100 g. Every dish was tested both before and after chemotherapy. Patients rated acceptability on 9-point scales.
The clinical controlled cross-over design with two periods of four weeks, intervention and control, tested four dishes selected after the second pilot study. 32 patients were included in that trial, and they started with their habitual diet as control and then switched to recommendation of introduction of the four dishes selected.
The patients registered their weight every time they were at the hospital. During the intervention period the patients received a recipe booklet with the four dishes and a noted every time they ingested one of these. Compliance measurements were based on this registration. Patients had access to the dishes when in-patients, but they did their own cooking at home. It was possible to buy the similar dishes as pre-prepared meals in the supermarkets. The dishes in the final study were: Chili con Carne, Chicken in Curry, Curry Soup and Pasta Carbonara with added curry.
Data were analyzed with R (version 2.15.3). In histograms used to show the degree of acceptability for the dishes in the pilot studies, answers above 5 were graded as high grade of acceptance. To present descriptive statistics, the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (interquartile range (IQR)) and range. As the data did not show a normal distribution, Wilcoxon rang-sum tests (paired and unpaired) were used. Analyses were carried out both according to intention-to- treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) principles. As many of the data sampled, especially the subjective ones, sensitivity analysis (± 10% correction of the results) were performed.
- Conditions
- Hematological Malignancy
- Being tested
- Special diet
- Medical subject headings
- Hematologic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Special dietDietary supplement
Tate and energy content adjusted with spices to obtain maximal intake
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Special diet | Experimental | Special diet with taste, energy-and protein content adjusted according to previous finding Receives: Dietary Supplement: Special diet |
| Usual diet | No intervention | Patients habitual diet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Weight loss
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hematological MalignancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jens Rikardt Andersen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jens Rikardt Andersen, University of Copenhagen
- Investigators
- Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD,MPA, Principal investigator, University of Copenhagen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02880709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Curry
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Special Diets on Weight and Nutritional Intake in Haematological Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02880709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Curry
- Conditions
- Hematological Malignancy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jens Rikardt AndersenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Major weight loss and taste changes are well documented in patients with hematological cancer during chemotherapy. It has previously been documented, that such patients have preferences for much umami, a little sweet, sour and salt, and no bitter. The purpose of the study was to convert these results into real diets. Patients participated in two sensory pilot studies (n=10), where dishes were tested for preferences before and after chemotherapy. From these results four dishes were selected and tested on 32 patients in 30 days in a cross-over design. The diets resulted in a beneficial and statistical significant difference in weight development (p= 0.0008), with 1.2 ± 1.9 kg (+2%) in the intervention period and -2.8 ± 5.2 kg (-4%) in the control period. This difference persisted after sensitivity analysis (± 10%) p= 0.005. However, the nutritional intake was still low in both periods, and the treatment with cytarabin turned out to be a major confounder as dosage was significantly higher in the control period.
Detailed description
The study was approved by the regional scientific ethical committee, and was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov NTC no………...
Patients were selected consecutively with acute and chronic leukemia and lymphoma, Hodg-kin's lymphoma, and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in treatment with chemotherapy.
Eligible patients were aged >18 years, and only patients who were able to com-municate and understand written and oral information and receive food orally were included. The special diets were developed at the Central Kitchen at Rigshospitalet Initially, two single blinded pilot studies of five patients were performed, with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as the main study. In the first study patients tested 17 dishes with a taste-mix of dominating umami, a little sweet, sour and salt, and no bitter. In the second round six dishes were selected based on the results from the first round. All dishes had a high energy-density, with a protein content of at least 5 g/100 g. Every dish was tested both before and after chemotherapy. Patients rated acceptability on 9-point scales.
The clinical controlled cross-over design with two periods of four weeks, intervention and control, tested four dishes selected after the second pilot study. 32 patients were included in that trial, and they started with their habitual diet as control and then switched to recommendation of introduction of the four dishes selected.
The patients registered their weight every time they were at the hospital. During the intervention period the patients received a recipe booklet with the four dishes and a noted every time they ingested one of these. Compliance measurements were based on this registration. Patients had access to the dishes when in-patients, but they did their own cooking at home. It was possible to buy the similar dishes as pre-prepared meals in the supermarkets. The dishes in the final study were: Chili con Carne, Chicken in Curry, Curry Soup and Pasta Carbonara with added curry.
Data were analyzed with R (version 2.15.3). In histograms used to show the degree of acceptability for the dishes in the pilot studies, answers above 5 were graded as high grade of acceptance. To present descriptive statistics, the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (interquartile range (IQR)) and range. As the data did not show a normal distribution, Wilcoxon rang-sum tests (paired and unpaired) were used. Analyses were carried out both according to intention-to- treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) principles. As many of the data sampled, especially the subjective ones, sensitivity analysis (± 10% correction of the results) were performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Special diet | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Special dietSpecial diet with taste, energy-and protein content adjusted according to previous finding |
| Usual diet | No intervention | –Patients habitual diet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Hematological cancer
- Ongoing chemotherapy
- Ability to eat by mouth
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Lack of the ability to understand the informations given
- Lack of the ability to understand the conditions of the experiment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Special dietTate and energy content adjusted with spices to obtain maximal intake | Dietary supplement | Special diet |
Primary outcome
Weight loss
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hematological Malignancy
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
MACE and BTK Inhibitors
Hematologic Cancer, MACE
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
HMCT/CT2401: Abatacept GVHD Prophylaxis Following Omidubicel HCT
Hematologic Malignancy
Recruiting
An Exploratory Study to Evaluate Immune Determinants of the Response to Adoptive Cell Therapy (ACT) in Solid and Hematologic Tumors
Solid Tumor, Adult, Solid Tumor, Childhood
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study to Determine Drug Metabolism Phenotype and Appropriate Germline Source DNA in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Leukemia, Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD,MPA principal investigator
University of Copenhagen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Special diet in people with Hematological Malignancy, run by Jens Rikardt Andersen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Weight loss (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2016.