CancerTOPNCT02883699
Individually Tailored Training Prescriptions in Cancer Patients: The TOP Study
A study testing Standard endurance training, Polarized endurance training and Standard resistance training in people with Cancer, run by University Hospital Heidelberg at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The TOP Study is a two-stage study on individually tailored endurance and resistance training prescriptions for breast and prostate cancer patients after the end of primary therapy in order to optimize training effects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Standard endurance training, Polarized endurance training and Standard resistance training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to 27 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosed with early stage breast cancer (M0) or prostate cancer (M0 or M1 with PSA evidence of stable disease)
- 6 to 52 weeks after the end of primary therapy
- ≥18 to 75 years of age
- no regular endurance or resistance training (≥ one session per week) since diagnosis or within the last 6 months
- sufficient German language skills
- willing/ able to train at the provided exercise facilities twice per week and to take part in the scheduled testing
- signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- diagnosed with additional other cancer
- brain or bone metastases in M1 prostate cancer patients
- heart failure >NYHA III, unstable angina pectoris or severe arrhythmia
- uncontrolled hypertension
- reduced standing or walking ability
- any other comorbidities that preclude participation in exercise testing or training.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The TOP Study is a two-stage study on individually tailored endurance and resistance training prescriptions for breast and prostate cancer patients after the end of primary therapy in order to optimize training effects.
Read the detailed description
The TOP Study is a two-stage study on individually tailored endurance and resistance training prescriptions for breast and prostate cancer patients after the end of primary therapy in order to optimize training effects.
The TOP Study Part I aims at identifying the most appropriate way of individual intensity prescription. In a descriptive cross sectional study, 20 breast and 20 prostate cancer patients perform singe endurance and resistance training sessions prescribed by means of different methods of intensity prescription. The most appropriate method of intensity prescription is identified through considering predictability/homogeneity of physiological responses as well as perceived exertion and enjoyment.
The TOP Study Part II aims at investigating the most effective training method in terms of enhancing physical fitness for both endurance and strength training. The design is an exploratory four-arm 12-week randomized controlled training intervention trial in 60 breast and 60 prostate cancer patients. In two endurance arms, vigorous continuous training is compared to a polarized program consisting of moderate training and aerobic high intensity interval training (HIIT). Similarly, in two resistance training arms, standard machine based hypertrophy training is compared to training following a daily undulating periodization design.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Standard endurance training, Polarized endurance training, Standard resistance training, Daily undulating periodization resistance training
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Prostate cancer, Exercise prescription, High intensity interval training, Daily undulating periodization training, Aerobic training, Resistance training, Physical fitness, Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard endurance trainingBehavioural
Continuous vigorous training 2 x per week on a cycle ergometer
Polarized endurance trainingBehavioural
Continuous moderate training 1 x per week and aerobic high intensity interval training (HIIT) 1 x per week on the cycle ergometer
Standard resistance trainingBehavioural
Machine based hypertrophy training 2 x per week
Daily undulating periodization resistance trainingBehavioural
Machine based daily undulating periodization resistance training 1 x per week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endurance Training Group 1 | Active comparator | Standard endurance training Receives: Behavioral: Standard endurance training |
| Endurance Training Group 2 | Experimental | Polarized endurance training Receives: Behavioral: Polarized endurance training |
| Resistance Training Group 1 | Active comparator | Standard resistance training Receives: Behavioral: Standard resistance training |
| Resistance Training Group 2 | Experimental | Daily undulating periodization resistance training Receives: Behavioral: Daily undulating periodization resistance training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (endurance training groups only)
Change in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) assessed in a maximal incremental exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in one repetition maximum (1RM) of the knee extensors (resistance training groups only)
Change in one repetition maximum (1RM) of the knee extensors in a machine based 1RM test
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in maximal isokinetic peak torque (MIPT) of the knee extensors (resistance training groups only)
Change in maximal isokinetic peak torque (MIPT) of the knee extensors assessed in a stationary dynamometer test
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (14)
Change in peak power output (PPO) (endurance training groups only)
Change in peak power output (PPO) assessed in a maximal incremental exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in blood lactate threshold (endurance training groups only)
Change in blood lactate threshold assessed in a maximal incremental exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in ventilatory threshold (endurance training groups only)
Change in ventilatory threshold assessed in a maximal incremental exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee extensors (resistance training groups only)
Change in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee extensors assessed in a stationary dynamometer test
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in total work (TW) of the knee extensors
Change in total work (TW) of the knee extensors assessed in a stationary dynamometer test
Measured: 12 weeks
Change in muscular fatigue index (FI%) of the knee extensors
Change in muscular fatigue index (FI%) of the knee extensors assessed in a stationary dynamometer test
Measured: 12 weeks
Adherence to the training programs
Adherence to the training programs
Measured: 12 weeks
Drop-out rate in the training groups
Drop-out rate in the training groups
Measured: 12 weeks
Pain during and between training sessions
Pain during and between training sessions (Brief Pain Inventory, BPI)
Measured: 12 weeks
Minor and major adverse events during training sessions
Minor and major adverse events during training sessions
Measured: 12 weeks
Changes in fatigue
Changes in fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, MFI 20)
Measured: 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life (QoL)
Changes in Quality of Life (QoL) (European Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30)
Measured: 12 weeks
Changes in depression
Changes in depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, CES-D)
Measured: 12 weeks
Enjoyment of the training programs
Enjoyment of the training programs (according to Rogers)
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionJan 2020
- Study completion27 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital HeidelbergThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Heidelberg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Friederike Rosenberger (University Hospital Heidelberg), Principal Investigator, Dietmar Hopp Stiftung
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joachim Wiskemann, University Hospital Heidelberg
- Investigators
- Joachim Wiskemann, Dr., Principal investigator, Heidelberg University Hospital, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division of Medical Oncology, Working Group Exercise Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02883699
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TOP-S-347/2016
- Acronym
- TOP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pelzer F, Leisge K, Schluter K, Schneider J, Wiskemann J, Rosenberger F. Effects of exercise mode and intensity on patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors: a four-arm intervention trial. Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 2;31(5):315. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07757-9.
PubMed 37129687
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Individually Tailored Training Prescriptions in Cancer Patients: The TOP Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02883699
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOP / TOP-S-347/2016
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Prostate cancer, Exercise prescription, High intensity interval training, Daily undulating periodization training, Aerobic training, Resistance training, Physical fitness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital HeidelbergUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Friederike Rosenberger (University Hospital Heidelberg), Principal Investigator, Dietmar Hopp Stiftung
- Study start
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The TOP Study is a two-stage study on individually tailored endurance and resistance training prescriptions for breast and prostate cancer patients after the end of primary therapy in order to optimize training effects.
Detailed description
The TOP Study is a two-stage study on individually tailored endurance and resistance training prescriptions for breast and prostate cancer patients after the end of primary therapy in order to optimize training effects.
The TOP Study Part I aims at identifying the most appropriate way of individual intensity prescription. In a descriptive cross sectional study, 20 breast and 20 prostate cancer patients perform singe endurance and resistance training sessions prescribed by means of different methods of intensity prescription. The most appropriate method of intensity prescription is identified through considering predictability/homogeneity of physiological responses as well as perceived exertion and enjoyment.
The TOP Study Part II aims at investigating the most effective training method in terms of enhancing physical fitness for both endurance and strength training. The design is an exploratory four-arm 12-week randomized controlled training intervention trial in 60 breast and 60 prostate cancer patients. In two endurance arms, vigorous continuous training is compared to a polarized program consisting of moderate training and aerobic high intensity interval training (HIIT). Similarly, in two resistance training arms, standard machine based hypertrophy training is compared to training following a daily undulating periodization design.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endurance Training Group 1 | Active comparator | Behavioral: Standard endurance trainingStandard endurance training |
| Endurance Training Group 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: Polarized endurance trainingPolarized endurance training |
| Resistance Training Group 1 | Active comparator | Behavioral: Standard resistance trainingStandard resistance training |
| Resistance Training Group 2 | Experimental | Behavioral: Daily undulating periodization resistance trainingDaily undulating periodization resistance training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- diagnosed with early stage breast cancer (M0) or prostate cancer (M0 or M1 with PSA evidence of stable disease)
- 6 to 52 weeks after the end of primary therapy
- ≥18 to 75 years of age
- no regular endurance or resistance training (≥ one session per week) since diagnosis or within the last 6 months
- sufficient German language skills
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- diagnosed with additional other cancer
- brain or bone metastases in M1 prostate cancer patients
- heart failure >NYHA III, unstable angina pectoris or severe arrhythmia
- uncontrolled hypertension
- reduced standing or walking ability
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard endurance trainingContinuous vigorous training 2 x per week on a cycle ergometer | Behavioural | Endurance Training Group 1 |
| Polarized endurance trainingContinuous moderate training 1 x per week and aerobic high intensity interval training (HIIT) 1 x per week on the cycle ergometer | Behavioural | Endurance Training Group 2 |
| Standard resistance trainingMachine based hypertrophy training 2 x per week | Behavioural | Resistance Training Group 1 |
| Daily undulating periodization resistance trainingMachine based daily undulating periodization resistance training 1 x per week | Behavioural | Resistance Training Group 2 |
Primary outcome
Change in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (endurance training groups only)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) assessed in a maximal incremental exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer
Change in one repetition maximum (1RM) of the knee extensors (resistance training groups only)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in one repetition maximum (1RM) of the knee extensors in a machine based 1RM test
Change in maximal isokinetic peak torque (MIPT) of the knee extensors (resistance training groups only)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in maximal isokinetic peak torque (MIPT) of the knee extensors assessed in a stationary dynamometer test
14 secondary outcomes
Change in peak power output (PPO) (endurance training groups only)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in blood lactate threshold (endurance training groups only)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in ventilatory threshold (endurance training groups only)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee extensors (resistance training groups only)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in total work (TW) of the knee extensors
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in muscular fatigue index (FI%) of the knee extensors
Time frame: 12 weeks
Adherence to the training programs
Time frame: 12 weeks
Drop-out rate in the training groups
Time frame: 12 weeks
Pain during and between training sessions
Time frame: 12 weeks
Minor and major adverse events during training sessions
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in fatigue
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life (QoL)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in depression
Time frame: 12 weeks
Enjoyment of the training programs
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37129687Pelzer F, Leisge K, Schluter K, Schneider J, Wiskemann J, Rosenberger F. Effects of exercise mode and intensity on patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors: a four-arm intervention trial. Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 2;31(5):315. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07757-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joachim Wiskemann, Dr. principal investigator
Heidelberg University Hospital, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division of Medical Oncology, Working Group Exercise Oncology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standard endurance training, Polarized endurance training and Standard resistance training in people with Cancer, run by University Hospital Heidelberg at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (endurance training groups only) (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02883699, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2020.