Good Use of AntibioticsBONANTIBIONCT02884687
Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospital: Eight Years Review (BONANTIBIO)
An observational study of Good Use of Antibiotics, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville.
Trial summary
The study focuses on the use of antibiotics in Regional Hospital Center Metz-Thionville (CHRMT) between 2007 and 2014. To analyze the strategies and decisions related to the appropriate use of antibiotics for this center, some Semi-Directive Interviews (SDI) are realized on the study period with all concerned actors… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Good Use of Antibiotics
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All antibiotics delivery
Who may be able to join
- indication of antibiotics
Who cannot join
- Non Applicable
About this study
Official title: Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospital: Eight Years Review
The study focuses on the use of antibiotics in Regional Hospital Center Metz-Thionville (CHRMT) between 2007 and 2014. To analyze the strategies and decisions related to the appropriate use of antibiotics for this center, some Semi-Directive Interviews (SDI) are realized on the study period with all concerned actors of the Good Use of antibiotics. An interviewing plan and tree interview guidelines were created. All SDI are processed by the same person.
Read the detailed description
The study focuses on the use of antibiotics in Regional Hospital Center Metz-Thionville (CHRMT) between 2007 and 2014. CHRMT is a 2000-bed hospital in which 160 000 short hospitalizations are performed. To analyze the strategies and decisions related to the appropriate use of antibiotics for this center, some Semi-Directive Interviews (SDI) are realized on the study period with all concerned actors of the Good Use of antibiotics. An interviewing plan and tree interview guidelines were created. All SDI are processed by the same person.
- Conditions
- Good Use of Antibiotics
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evolution of the antibiotics use in the hospital compared with the efficacy indicators
Measured: 2007 to 2014
Secondary outcomes (3)
Antibiotics consumption
Measured: 2007 to 2014
Bacterial resistance
Measured: 2007 to 2014
Composite index of the appropriate use of the antibiotics
Measured: 2007 to 2014
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Good Use of AntibioticsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gregory RONDELOT, MD, Study director, CHR Metz-Thionville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02884687
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2015-07Obs-CHRMT
- Acronym
- BONANTIBIO
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospital: Eight Years Review
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02884687
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BONANTIBIO / 2015-07Obs-CHRMT
- Conditions
- Good Use of Antibiotics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-ThionvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study focuses on the use of antibiotics in Regional Hospital Center Metz-Thionville (CHRMT) between 2007 and 2014. To analyze the strategies and decisions related to the appropriate use of antibiotics for this center, some Semi-Directive Interviews (SDI) are realized on the study period with all concerned actors of the Good Use of antibiotics. An interviewing plan and tree interview guidelines were created. All SDI are processed by the same person.
Detailed description
The study focuses on the use of antibiotics in Regional Hospital Center Metz-Thionville (CHRMT) between 2007 and 2014. CHRMT is a 2000-bed hospital in which 160 000 short hospitalizations are performed. To analyze the strategies and decisions related to the appropriate use of antibiotics for this center, some Semi-Directive Interviews (SDI) are realized on the study period with all concerned actors of the Good Use of antibiotics. An interviewing plan and tree interview guidelines were created. All SDI are processed by the same person.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All antibiotics delivery
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- indication of antibiotics
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Non Applicable
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Evolution of the antibiotics use in the hospital compared with the efficacy indicators
Time frame: 2007 to 2014
3 secondary outcomes
Antibiotics consumption
Time frame: 2007 to 2014
Bacterial resistance
Time frame: 2007 to 2014
Composite index of the appropriate use of the antibiotics
Time frame: 2007 to 2014
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2016.
Related trials for Good Use of Antibiotics
Recruiting
Cocreating Action to Improve Rationality in the Health System
Health-Related Quality-of-Life, Social Capital
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregory RONDELOT, MD study director
CHR Metz-Thionville
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Good Use of Antibiotics, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evolution of the antibiotics use in the hospital compared with the efficacy indicators (time frame: 2007 to 2014). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2016.