Pain Monitor During AnesthesiaNCT02884778
Observational Evaluation of the Last Version of the PMD200TM
A study testing Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulus in people with Pain Monitor During Anesthesia, run by Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Title: Evaluation of the last version of the PMD200TM and its NoL index in patients undergoing laparotomies with intraoperative epidural analgesia Objectives: Measure NoL Index changes after a standardized nociceptive electrical stimulus at various intravenous remifentanil infusion rates (0.005, 0.05, 0.1 mcg/kg/min)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain Monitor During Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulus
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA status I, II or III
- Age 18 years or older
- Elective abdominal surgery with median laparotomy under general anesthesia and epidural analgesia.
Who cannot join
- Coronary artery disease
- Serious cardiac arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation)
- Patient refusal
- History of substance abuse
- Chronic use of psychotropic and/or opioid drugs
- Use of drugs that act on the autonomic nervous system (including β-blockers)
Show all 9Show fewer
- History of psychiatric diseases or psychological problems
- Contraindications to epidural analgesia
- Allergy to remifentanil
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H1T2M4
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Last Version of the PMD200TM and Its NoL Index in Patients Undergoing Laparotomies With Intraoperative Epidural Analgesia
Title: Evaluation of the last version of the PMD200TM and its NoL index in patients undergoing laparotomies with intraoperative epidural analgesia Objectives: Measure NoL Index changes after a standardized nociceptive electrical stimulus at various intravenous remifentanil infusion rates (0.005, 0.05, 0.1 mcg/kg/min) and also after clinical stimuli such as intubation.
Study Design: Prospective observational study Subject Population: Adults scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgery with laparotomy under general anesthesia and epidural analgesia Sample Size: 30 patients Study Duration: Starts April 2016 - Ends November 2016 Study Center: Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Adverse Events: None expected
Read the detailed description
The motivation behind the actual observational proposed study is to validate the ability of the new PMD-200TM system to accurately detect a nociceptive stimulus that occur during anesthesia (e.g. laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation, standardized electrical stimulations). The NoL index will also be recorded during period of time without any stimulation and called baseline values of NoL under standard anesthesia.
The PMD100TM was an early prototype of the pain monitor device developed by Medasense Biometrics Ltd (Ramat Yishai, Israel), which was used in our center in Montreal in a recently completed clinical trial. This device is based on a software that was integrated into a computer to analyze the different criteria with a multi-parametric index named NoL which estimates the nociception level during general anesthesia and incorporates heart rate, heart rate variability (0.15-0.4 Hz band power), plethysmograph wave amplitude, skin conductance level, number of skin conductance fluctuations (NSCF), and their time derivatives, using a non-linear regression technique. The rationale for the use of skin conductance and NSCF is that the presence of a physical stressor leads to a sympathetic-mediated filling of the palmar sweat glands, thus changing the ion concentration and the skin conductance. It has been shown to correlate with clinical stress score during intubation and to be less reactive to a tetanic stimulation when remifentanil was perfused. With the Medasense device PMD100TM, these five variables are obtained through a single non-invasive finger probe connecting the finger of the patient to the computer. Only signals from the patient are recorded. No signal is sent to the patient by the PMD100TM. The NoL Index obtained and displayed on the Medasense PMD200™ device is a single number from 0 to 100, with a lower score proposed to represent less painful stimulation.
The PMD-200TM system is an advanced configuration product in the final stages of development, with the introduction of several enhancements related to the Hardware (HW) and the Software (SW) platform:
- Enhanced finger probe - which include 4 new sensors (slightly different from the sensors used in PMD-100 and more efficient in terms of quality of signals)
- Improvement in the signal acquisition board - a HW module which converts the analog signals from all sensors to digital data
- All in one system - enables integrated viewing of the recorded signals and NoL index through a touch based user interface (the previous interface for the PMD100 was on a computer screen)
- A new Graphic user interface for the user The purpose of this new prospective observational study with the finalized PMD200TM device is to evaluate the responses of a multi-parameter index (the Nociception Level [NoL] Index) when patients under combined general anesthesia/epidural anesthesia for laparotomies are subjected to standard painful stimuli (laryngoscopy for intubation). Also during surgery, standardized electrical stimulations over the ulnar nerve (70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds) at different doses of remifentanil steady state infusion (0.005 mcg/kg/min; 0.05 mcg/kg/min; 0.1 mcg/kg/min) will be performed as we did in our previous study at HMR after Scientific and Ethic Committee approval in 2015.
Studying the effect of different doses of infused remifentanil on the new and finalized version of the NoL Index from the PMD200TM device in patients subjected to a standardized painful stimulus under general anaesthesia would help validating this final version and to compare results to the prototype used in our center in a previous study.
Primary Aim: Establish a correlation between the NoL Index changes and the infused dose of remifentanil at the time the stimulation was applied. It is expected to see a strong correlation meaning that when the remifentanil infusion is high, the NoL response to the standardized electrical stimulation might be low.
Secondary Aims: NoL changes at different times of the surgery. Heart rate and blood Pressure and BISpectral index changes after clinical stimulus such as intubation, incision, and standardized electrical stimulations at different concentrations/infusions of remifentanil (0.005, 0.05, 0.1 msg/kg/min). Measure the sensitivity and specificity of the study criteria (NoL, BIS, Heart Rate and Mean Blood Pressure) in detecting a painful stimulus such as intubation and electrical stimulus at remifentanil 0.005mcg/kg/min if infusion.
Also, at the end of the surgery, we will still record the NoL index from the PMD200TM device. And we will also record the first pain score when the patient is extubated in PACU. This will be done in an observational manner. We will evaluate whether the last NoL index recorded under general anesthesia at the end of the surgical procedure (last stiches) with patient still under controlled ventilation does correlate with the first pain scores in PACU.
- Conditions
- Pain Monitor During Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulus
- Keywords
- pain, monitoring, anesthesia
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulusDiagnostic test
We will evaluate the changes of the NoL index absolute values after different types of stimulations such as intubation and electrical tetanic stimulation of the forearm (applied with the standard muscle relaxation monitor) in a patient under general anesthesia + epidural anesthesia for abdominal surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NoL index in response to stimulation | Experimental | There is only one arm in this study. The "intervention" is not a drug, but it is the stimulus applied to the patient such as intubation and a standardized electrical stimulus applied on the forearm of the anesthetized patient. There are several stimuli that are the so-called "interventions" and the NoL index and the classical vital signs (heart rate, mean blood pressure, BISspectral index) are registered in response to these stimuli in an observational manner. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation between NoL index absolute values after electrical stimulus and the doses of remifentanil infused at the time of the stimulation.
Measure NoL Index peak value (in fact we will take an average of 7 values: the peak value and 3 values before and 3 values after the peak, time between values = 5sec) after a nociceptive electrical stimulus and evaluate the spearman correlation between NoL Values after stimulus and remifentanil doses. It is expected to see that when we increase the doses of remifentanil infusion we see a decrease in the NoL index response to the painful standardized electrical stimulus.
Measured: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Secondary outcomes (9)
NoL index peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation, electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Measure NoL Index absolute peak value (in fact we will take an average of 7 values: the peak value and 3 values before and 3 values after the peak, time between values = 5sec) and delta NoL after a nociceptive stimulus such as surgical incision and standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Heart Rate peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation and electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Measure heart rate absolute peak value (in fact we will take an average of 7 values: the peak value and 3 values before and 3 values after the peak, time between values = 5sec) and delta heart rate after a nociceptive stimulus such as intubation and standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MABP) peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation and electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Measure MABP absolute peak value (in fact we will take an average of 7 values: the peak value and 3 values before and 3 values after the peak, time between values = 5sec) and delta heart rate after a nociceptive stimulus such as intubation and standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery during anesthesia
BISpectral index peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation and electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Measure BIS absolute peak value (in fact we will take an average of 7 values: the peak value and 3 values before and 3 values after the peak, time between values = 5sec) and delta heart rate after a nociceptive stimulus such as intubation and standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Correlation between the NoL index values (ranging from 0 to 100) and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Establish a correlation between the NoL Index changes and the infused dose of remifentanil at the time of the standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Correlation between the Heart Rate values and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Establish a correlation between the Heart rate changes and the infused dose of remifentanil at the time of the standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Correlation between the Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MABP) values and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Establish a correlation between the MABP changes and the infused dose of remifentanil at the time of the standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Correlation between the Bispectral index values and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Establish a correlation between the BIS changes and the infused dose of remifentanil at the time of the standardized electrical stimulus
Measured: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Sensitivity and specificity of NoL index, Heart Rate, Mean Blood Pressure and BIS index to detect stimulus under anesthesia during surgery
Measure the sensitivity and specificity of the study criteria above cited in detecting a painful stimulus: intubation, electrical stimulation of the forearm.
Measured: Intraoperative, day of surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain Monitor During AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medasense Biometrics Ltd
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philippe Richebé, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
- Investigators
- Philippe Richebe, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montreal, University of Montreal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02884778
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15074
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 27 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Renaud-Roy E, Stockle PA, Maximos S, Brulotte V, Sideris L, Dube P, Drolet P, Tanoubi I, Issa R, Verdonck O, Fortier LP, Richebe P. Correlation between incremental remifentanil doses and the Nociception Level (NOL) index response after intraoperative noxious stimuli. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;66(9):1049-1061. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01372-1. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PubMed 30997633
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Last Version of the PMD200TM and Its NoL Index in Patients Undergoing Laparotomies With Intraoperative Epidural Analgesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02884778
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15074
- Conditions
- Pain Monitor During Anesthesia
- Keywords
- pain, monitoring, anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medasense Biometrics Ltd
- Study start
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Title: Evaluation of the last version of the PMD200TM and its NoL index in patients undergoing laparotomies with intraoperative epidural analgesia Objectives: Measure NoL Index changes after a standardized nociceptive electrical stimulus at various intravenous remifentanil infusion rates (0.005, 0.05, 0.1 mcg/kg/min) and also after clinical stimuli such as intubation.
Study Design: Prospective observational study Subject Population: Adults scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgery with laparotomy under general anesthesia and epidural analgesia Sample Size: 30 patients Study Duration: Starts April 2016 - Ends November 2016 Study Center: Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Adverse Events: None expected
Detailed description
The motivation behind the actual observational proposed study is to validate the ability of the new PMD-200TM system to accurately detect a nociceptive stimulus that occur during anesthesia (e.g. laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation, standardized electrical stimulations). The NoL index will also be recorded during period of time without any stimulation and called baseline values of NoL under standard anesthesia.
The PMD100TM was an early prototype of the pain monitor device developed by Medasense Biometrics Ltd (Ramat Yishai, Israel), which was used in our center in Montreal in a recently completed clinical trial. This device is based on a software that was integrated into a computer to analyze the different criteria with a multi-parametric index named NoL which estimates the nociception level during general anesthesia and incorporates heart rate, heart rate variability (0.15-0.4 Hz band power), plethysmograph wave amplitude, skin conductance level, number of skin conductance fluctuations (NSCF), and their time derivatives, using a non-linear regression technique. The rationale for the use of skin conductance and NSCF is that the presence of a physical stressor leads to a sympathetic-mediated filling of the palmar sweat glands, thus changing the ion concentration and the skin conductance. It has been shown to correlate with clinical stress score during intubation and to be less reactive to a tetanic stimulation when remifentanil was perfused. With the Medasense device PMD100TM, these five variables are obtained through a single non-invasive finger probe connecting the finger of the patient to the computer. Only signals from the patient are recorded. No signal is sent to the patient by the PMD100TM. The NoL Index obtained and displayed on the Medasense PMD200™ device is a single number from 0 to 100, with a lower score proposed to represent less painful stimulation.
The PMD-200TM system is an advanced configuration product in the final stages of development, with the introduction of several enhancements related to the Hardware (HW) and the Software (SW) platform:
- Enhanced finger probe - which include 4 new sensors (slightly different from the sensors used in PMD-100 and more efficient in terms of quality of signals)
- Improvement in the signal acquisition board - a HW module which converts the analog signals from all sensors to digital data
- All in one system - enables integrated viewing of the recorded signals and NoL index through a touch based user interface (the previous interface for the PMD100 was on a computer screen)
- A new Graphic user interface for the user The purpose of this new prospective observational study with the finalized PMD200TM device is to evaluate the responses of a multi-parameter index (the Nociception Level [NoL] Index) when patients under combined general anesthesia/epidural anesthesia for laparotomies are subjected to standard painful stimuli (laryngoscopy for intubation). Also during surgery, standardized electrical stimulations over the ulnar nerve (70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds) at different doses of remifentanil steady state infusion (0.005 mcg/kg/min; 0.05 mcg/kg/min; 0.1 mcg/kg/min) will be performed as we did in our previous study at HMR after Scientific and Ethic Committee approval in 2015.
Studying the effect of different doses of infused remifentanil on the new and finalized version of the NoL Index from the PMD200TM device in patients subjected to a standardized painful stimulus under general anaesthesia would help validating this final version and to compare results to the prototype used in our center in a previous study.
Primary Aim: Establish a correlation between the NoL Index changes and the infused dose of remifentanil at the time the stimulation was applied. It is expected to see a strong correlation meaning that when the remifentanil infusion is high, the NoL response to the standardized electrical stimulation might be low.
Secondary Aims: NoL changes at different times of the surgery. Heart rate and blood Pressure and BISpectral index changes after clinical stimulus such as intubation, incision, and standardized electrical stimulations at different concentrations/infusions of remifentanil (0.005, 0.05, 0.1 msg/kg/min). Measure the sensitivity and specificity of the study criteria (NoL, BIS, Heart Rate and Mean Blood Pressure) in detecting a painful stimulus such as intubation and electrical stimulus at remifentanil 0.005mcg/kg/min if infusion.
Also, at the end of the surgery, we will still record the NoL index from the PMD200TM device. And we will also record the first pain score when the patient is extubated in PACU. This will be done in an observational manner. We will evaluate whether the last NoL index recorded under general anesthesia at the end of the surgical procedure (last stiches) with patient still under controlled ventilation does correlate with the first pain scores in PACU.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NoL index in response to stimulation | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulusThere is only one arm in this study. The "intervention" is not a drug, but it is the stimulus applied to the patient such as intubation and a standardized electrical stimulus applied on the forearm of the anesthetized patient. There are several stimuli that are the so-called "interventions" and the NoL index and the classical vital signs (heart rate, mean blood pressure, BISspectral index) are registered in response to these stimuli in an observational manner. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ASA status I, II or III
- Age 18 years or older
- Elective abdominal surgery with median laparotomy under general anesthesia and epidural analgesia.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Coronary artery disease
- Serious cardiac arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation)
- Patient refusal
- History of substance abuse
- Chronic use of psychotropic and/or opioid drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulusWe will evaluate the changes of the NoL index absolute values after different types of stimulations such as intubation and electrical tetanic stimulation of the forearm (applied with the standard muscle relaxation monitor) in a patient under general anesthesia + epidural anesthesia for abdominal surgery | Diagnostic test | NoL index in response to stimulation |
Primary outcome
Correlation between NoL index absolute values after electrical stimulus and the doses of remifentanil infused at the time of the stimulation.
Time frame: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Measure NoL Index peak value (in fact we will take an average of 7 values: the peak value and 3 values before and 3 values after the peak, time between values = 5sec) after a nociceptive electrical stimulus and evaluate the spearman correlation between NoL Values after stimulus and remifentanil doses. It is expected to see that when we increase the doses of remifentanil infusion we see a decrease in the NoL index response to the painful standardized electrical stimulus.
9 secondary outcomes
NoL index peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation, electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Time frame: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Heart Rate peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation and electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Time frame: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MABP) peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation and electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Time frame: Day of surgery during anesthesia
BISpectral index peak absolute value after painful stimulus: intubation and electrical stimulations, no pain period, end of surgery
Time frame: Day of surgery during anesthesia
Correlation between the NoL index values (ranging from 0 to 100) and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Time frame: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Correlation between the Heart Rate values and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Time frame: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Correlation between the Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MABP) values and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Time frame: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Correlation between the Bispectral index values and i.v. remifentanil infusion rate at the time of the electrical stimulation
Time frame: Day of surgery intraoperative during anesthesia
Sensitivity and specificity of NoL index, Heart Rate, Mean Blood Pressure and BIS index to detect stimulus under anesthesia during surgery
Time frame: Intraoperative, day of surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30997633Renaud-Roy E, Stockle PA, Maximos S, Brulotte V, Sideris L, Dube P, Drolet P, Tanoubi I, Issa R, Verdonck O, Fortier LP, Richebe P. Correlation between incremental remifentanil doses and the Nociception Level (NOL) index response after intraoperative noxious stimuli. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;66(9):1049-1061. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01372-1. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain Monitor During Anesthesia
Recruiting
EEG and Pain Monitor Data Under Anesthesia to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects of Opioids and Sedatives
Sedation and Analgesia, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
RecruitingObservational study
qNOX Response to Nociceptive Motor Events During Procedural Sedation
Monitoring Noxious Events Using EEG-Derived Pain Indices, Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Caudal and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks With Pain Monitoring in Children
Regional Anesthesia Success, Pain Monitor During Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe Richebe, MD PhD principal investigator
Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montreal, University of Montreal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Detection of pain after nociceptive stimulus in people with Pain Monitor During Anesthesia, run by Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation between NoL index absolute values after electrical stimulus and the doses of remifentanil infused at the time of the stimulation. (time frame: Day of surgery during anesthesia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02884778, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2018.