Standard TrainingELSINCT02887339
Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Substudy in Relation to the GTEx Project
A study testing Training Website in people with Standard Training and Online Training, run by Temple University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The Ethical, Legal and Social Issues Substudy in relation to the Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) aims to describe tissue requesters' approach to discussions about donation to GTEx and to assess the determinants of families' and patients' willingness to donate to GTEx. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Standard Training, Online Training
- What is being tested?
- Training Website
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 512 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must either be a:
- family decision maker approached to donate their loved one's tissues to the GTEx project or
- a staff person at an OPO that approaches family decision makers for the GTEx project.
Who cannot join
- 1. Persons who neither approached for GTEx or were approached are excluded from participation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23219
About this study
Official title: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Substudy in Relation to the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project
The Ethical, Legal and Social Issues Substudy in relation to the Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) aims to describe tissue requesters' approach to discussions about donation to GTEx and to assess the determinants of families' and patients' willingness to donate to GTEx. It also explores ethical issues such as privacy, risks, and release of incidental findings and recommend best practices for conducting authorizations and training requesters.
Read the detailed description
The Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) is a partnership between multiple NIH agencies and funded by the Common Fund. Families who agreed to donation of organs and tissues for transplantation were asked to authorize the collection of additional tissues for GTEx by participating Organ Procurement Organizations (OPO). Donated tissues are placed in a National Cancer Institute biobank, and the donor's genome and medical record information analyzed and released to researchers through NIH's database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). The tissues and information will be kept in the biobank indefinitely and cell lines may be developed from the donated skin and blood.
An ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI) sub-study examines the issues surrounding risks to privacy and breach of confidentiality to family decision makers (FDM) as well as FDM perspectives on the return of findings to donor families. The ELSI sub-study assessed the authorization process and make suggestions for its improvement. Semi-structured interviews were completed with families who decided to donate to GTEx as well as those who refused to donate to the project. Tissue requesters (TR) who make the GTEx approaches for participating OPOs, were also asked to complete an online survey for each approach they completed for GTEx.
The study builds on this research team's extensive work in organ and tissue donation and the work currently being conducting during the ELSI pilot of the GTEx project. Specifically, the investigators propose to examine the impact of stress and complex information on donor families' decision-making to inform the consent process; understand how variations in requesters, consent approaches, and the characteristics of family decision makers affect understanding, recall of and willingness to donate tissues for research; consider the ethical and legal issues of the request and consent process; and, test a novel intervention designed to train tissue requesters to employ effective communication techniques when making requests for tissue. The overall goal is to develop a set of recommendations that will maximize the likelihood that family decision makers (FDM) make informed donation decisions under stressful circumstances. The specific aims of the ELSI GTEx study are:
This study will build on this research team's extensive work in organ and tissue donation and the work they are currently conducting during the ELSI pilot of the GTEx project. Specifically, the investigators propose to examine the impact of stress and complex information on the decision making of donor families to inform the consent process, understand how variations in requesters, consent approaches, and the characteristics of family decision makers affect understanding and recall of and willingness to donate tissues for research, consider the ethical and legal issues of the request and consent process, and test an intervention to train tissue requesters to employ effective communication techniques when making requests for tissue. The overall goal is to develop a set of recommendations that will maximize the likelihood that family decision makers (FDM) make informed donation decisions under stressful circumstances. The specific aims of the ELSI GTEx study are:
- Identify elements of nonverbal and relational communication impacting FDM knowledge, recall and GTEx decision making. Using the methods and procedures of the pilot study, the investigators will conduct an observational study of the GTEx request process to understand the communication-related variables impacting FDM knowledge, recall and decision making. In addition, a subsample of audiotapes will be obtained from tissue-only donors whose consent conversations are conducted by telephone and are audiotaped. This will provide information about the important nonverbal and relational elements of communication on the outcome variables. H1a. Sociodemographic characteristics of FDM will impact the major outcomes of interest to this study (recall, comprehension and consent). Specifically, FDM who have more education, are white, female and younger will be more likely to donate, have better recall and knowledge. H1b. Relational elements of communication, such as confirmational messages (e.g., messages that expressed validation or acceptance) or persuasive tactics such as credibility, altruism, or esteem, and engaging in a lengthier conversation will be associated with a greater likelihood to donate have better recall and knowledge. H1c. Tissue requesters' and FDMs' comfort speaking about GTEx, the proclivity of FDMs to ask question and engage more proactively in the conversation will be associated with a greater likelihood to donate have better recall and knowledge.
- Conduct a study, using a quasi-experimental design, to understand the impact of the stressful environment in which the requests occur. This study will assist the ELSI team to obtain an evidence base that will allow us to disentangle the effects of stress from the complexity of the information about the purpose of the donation and guide recommendations for a final consent process.
- Adapt and test a communication intervention targeting tissue requesters' (TR) use of effective, ethically acceptable techniques that maximize the likelihood of consent.
H3a. Post intervention, TRs will exhibit more relational communication with FDMs during requests. H3b. Post intervention, TRs will spend more time attending to the emotional needs of FDMs.
H3c. Post intervention, TRs will spend more time discussing information identified as important to informed decision making for tissue donation.
H3d. Post intervention, there will be overall higher consent rates for donation to the research.
- Conditions
- Standard Training, Online Training
- Being tested
- Training Website, Control
- Keywords
- Informed Consent, Research donation request, Effective Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Training WebsiteOther
Additional training website can be found at gtextraing.org
ControlOther
Standard training given by OPOs and GTEx staff
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Tissue requesters from participating OPOs are randomly assigned to complete additional informed consent training through an interactive online training website. Receives: Other: Training Website |
| Control Group | Experimental | The control group of tissue requesters receive the standard training offered by their OPO and GTEx partners. Receives: Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of family members who chose to donate to GTEx
Number of family decision makers who choose to donate to GTEx
Measured: Up to 8 months after donation request
Secondary outcomes (1)
Knowledge and Comprehension of Elements of Consent
Knowledge and comprehension were assessed by participant answers to questionnaire.
Measured: Up to 8 months after donation request
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Standard TrainingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 512 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Temple University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Laura Siminoff, Temple University
- Investigators
- Laura Siminoff, PhD, Principal investigator, Temple UniversityHeather Traino, PhD, Principal investigator, Temple University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02887339
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10XS170
- Acronym
- ELSI
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):580-5. doi: 10.1038/ng.2653.
PubMed 23715323
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Substudy in Relation to the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02887339
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ELSI / 10XS170
- Conditions
- Standard Training, Online Training
- Keywords
- Informed Consent, Research donation request, Effective Communication
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 512 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Temple UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Ethical, Legal and Social Issues Substudy in relation to the Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) aims to describe tissue requesters' approach to discussions about donation to GTEx and to assess the determinants of families' and patients' willingness to donate to GTEx. It also explores ethical issues such as privacy, risks, and release of incidental findings and recommend best practices for conducting authorizations and training requesters.
Detailed description
The Genotype Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) is a partnership between multiple NIH agencies and funded by the Common Fund. Families who agreed to donation of organs and tissues for transplantation were asked to authorize the collection of additional tissues for GTEx by participating Organ Procurement Organizations (OPO). Donated tissues are placed in a National Cancer Institute biobank, and the donor's genome and medical record information analyzed and released to researchers through NIH's database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). The tissues and information will be kept in the biobank indefinitely and cell lines may be developed from the donated skin and blood.
An ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI) sub-study examines the issues surrounding risks to privacy and breach of confidentiality to family decision makers (FDM) as well as FDM perspectives on the return of findings to donor families. The ELSI sub-study assessed the authorization process and make suggestions for its improvement. Semi-structured interviews were completed with families who decided to donate to GTEx as well as those who refused to donate to the project. Tissue requesters (TR) who make the GTEx approaches for participating OPOs, were also asked to complete an online survey for each approach they completed for GTEx.
The study builds on this research team's extensive work in organ and tissue donation and the work currently being conducting during the ELSI pilot of the GTEx project. Specifically, the investigators propose to examine the impact of stress and complex information on donor families' decision-making to inform the consent process; understand how variations in requesters, consent approaches, and the characteristics of family decision makers affect understanding, recall of and willingness to donate tissues for research; consider the ethical and legal issues of the request and consent process; and, test a novel intervention designed to train tissue requesters to employ effective communication techniques when making requests for tissue. The overall goal is to develop a set of recommendations that will maximize the likelihood that family decision makers (FDM) make informed donation decisions under stressful circumstances. The specific aims of the ELSI GTEx study are:
This study will build on this research team's extensive work in organ and tissue donation and the work they are currently conducting during the ELSI pilot of the GTEx project. Specifically, the investigators propose to examine the impact of stress and complex information on the decision making of donor families to inform the consent process, understand how variations in requesters, consent approaches, and the characteristics of family decision makers affect understanding and recall of and willingness to donate tissues for research, consider the ethical and legal issues of the request and consent process, and test an intervention to train tissue requesters to employ effective communication techniques when making requests for tissue. The overall goal is to develop a set of recommendations that will maximize the likelihood that family decision makers (FDM) make informed donation decisions under stressful circumstances. The specific aims of the ELSI GTEx study are:
- Identify elements of nonverbal and relational communication impacting FDM knowledge, recall and GTEx decision making. Using the methods and procedures of the pilot study, the investigators will conduct an observational study of the GTEx request process to understand the communication-related variables impacting FDM knowledge, recall and decision making. In addition, a subsample of audiotapes will be obtained from tissue-only donors whose consent conversations are conducted by telephone and are audiotaped. This will provide information about the important nonverbal and relational elements of communication on the outcome variables. H1a. Sociodemographic characteristics of FDM will impact the major outcomes of interest to this study (recall, comprehension and consent). Specifically, FDM who have more education, are white, female and younger will be more likely to donate, have better recall and knowledge. H1b. Relational elements of communication, such as confirmational messages (e.g., messages that expressed validation or acceptance) or persuasive tactics such as credibility, altruism, or esteem, and engaging in a lengthier conversation will be associated with a greater likelihood to donate have better recall and knowledge. H1c. Tissue requesters' and FDMs' comfort speaking about GTEx, the proclivity of FDMs to ask question and engage more proactively in the conversation will be associated with a greater likelihood to donate have better recall and knowledge.
- Conduct a study, using a quasi-experimental design, to understand the impact of the stressful environment in which the requests occur. This study will assist the ELSI team to obtain an evidence base that will allow us to disentangle the effects of stress from the complexity of the information about the purpose of the donation and guide recommendations for a final consent process.
- Adapt and test a communication intervention targeting tissue requesters' (TR) use of effective, ethically acceptable techniques that maximize the likelihood of consent.
H3a. Post intervention, TRs will exhibit more relational communication with FDMs during requests. H3b. Post intervention, TRs will spend more time attending to the emotional needs of FDMs.
H3c. Post intervention, TRs will spend more time discussing information identified as important to informed decision making for tissue donation.
H3d. Post intervention, there will be overall higher consent rates for donation to the research.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Training WebsiteTissue requesters from participating OPOs are randomly assigned to complete additional informed consent training through an interactive online training website. |
| Control Group | Experimental | Other: ControlThe control group of tissue requesters receive the standard training offered by their OPO and GTEx partners. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- family decision maker approached to donate their loved one's tissues to the GTEx project or
- a staff person at an OPO that approaches family decision makers for the GTEx project.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Persons who neither approached for GTEx or were approached are excluded from participation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Training WebsiteAdditional training website can be found at gtextraing.org | Other | Intervention Group |
| ControlStandard training given by OPOs and GTEx staff | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Number of family members who chose to donate to GTEx
Time frame: Up to 8 months after donation request
Number of family decision makers who choose to donate to GTEx
1 secondary outcome
Knowledge and Comprehension of Elements of Consent
Time frame: Up to 8 months after donation request
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2021.
- Background: PubMed 23715323GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):580-5. doi: 10.1038/ng.2653.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Standard Training
Recruiting
Remote Rehabilitation in Patients With HFpEF (PATRON-HF)
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of Eccentric Compared to Standard Strength Training in Primary Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of an On-site Simulation-based Training Programme on Adherence to Standard Precautions and Healthcare-associated Infections in Adult Intensive Care
Cross Infection
Recruiting
Additional Effects of Kinetic Chain Training Combined With Standard Shoulder Exercises in Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Shouder Impingement Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Siminoff, PhD principal investigator
Temple University
Heather Traino, PhD principal investigator
Temple University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Training Website in people with Standard Training and Online Training, run by Temple University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of family members who chose to donate to GTEx (time frame: Up to 8 months after donation request). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02887339, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2021.