ESRDEPHEYLNCT02888639
Pharmacoepidemiological Study of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Lorraine
An observational study of ESRD, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France.
Trial summary
The pharmacoepidemiological EPHEYL (Étude PHarmacoÉpidémiologique de l'hYperparathyroïdie secondaire en Lorraine) study is a 2-year, open-cohort, prospective, observational study on incident SHPT, i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ESRD
- How many people
- 305 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2009to May 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: ESRD requiring mainteance dialysis
Who may be able to join
- age >= 18 years
- Patient on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis for 3 months or more in one of the 12 dialysis units in the study.
- Patient included in the REIN registry in the Lorraine region.
- Parathormone greater than or equal to 500 pg / ml for the first time after 01/04/2009 (patient incident for secondary hyperparathyroidism).
Who cannot join
- age < 18 years.
- Patient living in Lorraine but dialysed in a unit outside Lorraine.
- Diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism with higher parathormone or equal to 500 pg / ml placed before 1/4/2009.
- Patient who have received medical treatment with cinacalcet or by surgical parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism.
- Patient expressing opposition to the collection of information.
About this study
Official title: EPHEYL: Étude PHarmacoÉpidémiologique de l'hYperparathyroïdie Secondaire en Lorraine
The pharmacoepidemiological EPHEYL (Étude PHarmacoÉpidémiologique de l'hYperparathyroïdie secondaire en Lorraine) study is a 2-year, open-cohort, prospective, observational study on incident SHPT, i.e. newly diagnosed, with a 2 year follow-up, set in the 12 dialysis units located in the French region of Lorraine (public or private).
Read the detailed description
In the early stages of the disease, 90% of patients with chronic renal failure present evidence of bone remodeling due to secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). As the disease progresses and patients require dialysis for end-stage renal failure (ESRF), the incidence of secondary HPT declines to 25-40% with reduced bone remodeling as shown by osteomalacia observed in 4-12% of patients and adynamic bone in 20-40%. Observational studies have described an association between serum phosphorus level, phosphorus-calcium product, parathormone (PTH) level, and mortality. Since there is no real consensus, treatments, basically diet and drugs, are tailored to each individual. The therapeutic range is wide and interactions are frequent. Therapeutic efficacy is compromised by the variability of PTH assay results, the ambulatory nature of interventions, and poor patient adherence. The guidelines issued in 2003 stipulate that corrective measures, i.e. dietetic counseling with or without drug therapy, are needed when serum PTH exceeds 300 pg/ml. When the PTH level exceeds 500, or even more so 800 pg/ml, HPT can constitute an indication for parathyroid surgery or calcimimetic treatment.
Data from a randomized comparison between cinacalcet and surgery are lacking. The evidence-based decision for surgery is made conjointly by the nephrologist, the surgeon and the patient, limiting the feasibility of randomization. Parathyroidectomy can be achieved by three techniques whose efficacy has been studied in historical observational studies. Cinacalcet received marketing approval in 2004 for "the treatment of secondary HPT in patients with ESRF treated by dialysis. Mimpara can be used in the context of a regimen including phosphate chelators and/or vitamin D analogs, as needed". Four double-blind studies have demonstrated the efficacy of cinacalcet versus placebo in decreasing the PTH level, but there is no proof of the efficacy of cinacalcet in terms of cardiovascular events and mortality. One cost-effectiveness study showed that parathyroidectomy was superior to cinacalcet, except if the patient was on dialysis for a short period before renal transplantation or presented contraindications for surgery.
While randomized trials are the gold standard, such trials include a limited number of patients for a limited period of time. This does not enable an observation of long-term practices and adverse effects. Moreover, such trials do not concern patients with other co-morbid conditions taking several drugs, in particular, elderly subjects. The concept of the pharmacoepidemiological study is to describe real-life populations taking a given drug, using both quantitative and qualitative parameters to determine efficacy, risk, and drug use in real-life conditions free of the constraints of a clinical trial.
ÉPHÉYL is an observational pharmacoepidemiological study concerning the prescription of calcimimetic agents and parathyroidectomy in patients with ESRF on dialysis who present severe secondary HPT (PTH ≥ 500 pg/ml). The aim is to describe indications and efficacy: control of PTH, calcium and phosphorus serum levels within their recommended ranges, patient tolerance of the therapeutic interventions, and the cost of such interventions, as well as patients' adhesion to treatment and their self-assessed quality-of-life. This three-year inclusion study, based on the Lorraine REIN registry, will involve all participants in the Néphrolor network. The study will begin on April 1st, 2009.
- Conditions
- ESRD
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Parathormone level
Obtaining the therapeutic target according to the K/DOQI
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (9)
Phosphocalcium product level
Measured: 2 years
Serum calcium level
Measured: 2 years
Serum phosphorus level
Measured: 2 years
Symptoms and / or clinical events caused by hyperparathyroidism
using clinical and paraclinical examinations
Measured: 2 years
Tolerance of therapeutic interventions: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypocalcemia
using clinical and paraclinical examinations
Measured: 2 years
The quality of life
using the KDQOL questionnaire
Measured: 2 years
Satisfaction of professionals
Interview of professionals on patient care
Measured: 2 years
The direct costs of treatment
Cost related to medical treatment, parathyroidectomy, hospitalisation, clinical and paraclinical examination
Measured: 2 years
Patient compliance
using the CET (Compliance Evaluation Test ) Questionnaire
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2009
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ESRDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 305 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, France
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Luc Frimat, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, CHRU de Nancy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02888639
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPHEYL
- Acronym
- EPHEYL
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Filipozzi P, Ayav C, Ngueyon Sime W, Laurain E, Kessler M, Brunaud L, Frimat L. Trajectories of CKD-MBD biochemical parameters over a 2-year period following diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism: a pharmacoepidemiological study. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 27;7(3):e011482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011482.
PubMed 28348181
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EPHEYL: Étude PHarmacoÉpidémiologique de l'hYperparathyroïdie Secondaire en Lorraine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02888639
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EPHEYL / EPHEYL
- Conditions
- ESRD
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 305 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The pharmacoepidemiological EPHEYL (Étude PHarmacoÉpidémiologique de l'hYperparathyroïdie secondaire en Lorraine) study is a 2-year, open-cohort, prospective, observational study on incident SHPT, i.e. newly diagnosed, with a 2 year follow-up, set in the 12 dialysis units located in the French region of Lorraine (public or private).
Detailed description
In the early stages of the disease, 90% of patients with chronic renal failure present evidence of bone remodeling due to secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). As the disease progresses and patients require dialysis for end-stage renal failure (ESRF), the incidence of secondary HPT declines to 25-40% with reduced bone remodeling as shown by osteomalacia observed in 4-12% of patients and adynamic bone in 20-40%. Observational studies have described an association between serum phosphorus level, phosphorus-calcium product, parathormone (PTH) level, and mortality. Since there is no real consensus, treatments, basically diet and drugs, are tailored to each individual. The therapeutic range is wide and interactions are frequent. Therapeutic efficacy is compromised by the variability of PTH assay results, the ambulatory nature of interventions, and poor patient adherence. The guidelines issued in 2003 stipulate that corrective measures, i.e. dietetic counseling with or without drug therapy, are needed when serum PTH exceeds 300 pg/ml. When the PTH level exceeds 500, or even more so 800 pg/ml, HPT can constitute an indication for parathyroid surgery or calcimimetic treatment.
Data from a randomized comparison between cinacalcet and surgery are lacking. The evidence-based decision for surgery is made conjointly by the nephrologist, the surgeon and the patient, limiting the feasibility of randomization. Parathyroidectomy can be achieved by three techniques whose efficacy has been studied in historical observational studies. Cinacalcet received marketing approval in 2004 for "the treatment of secondary HPT in patients with ESRF treated by dialysis. Mimpara can be used in the context of a regimen including phosphate chelators and/or vitamin D analogs, as needed". Four double-blind studies have demonstrated the efficacy of cinacalcet versus placebo in decreasing the PTH level, but there is no proof of the efficacy of cinacalcet in terms of cardiovascular events and mortality. One cost-effectiveness study showed that parathyroidectomy was superior to cinacalcet, except if the patient was on dialysis for a short period before renal transplantation or presented contraindications for surgery.
While randomized trials are the gold standard, such trials include a limited number of patients for a limited period of time. This does not enable an observation of long-term practices and adverse effects. Moreover, such trials do not concern patients with other co-morbid conditions taking several drugs, in particular, elderly subjects. The concept of the pharmacoepidemiological study is to describe real-life populations taking a given drug, using both quantitative and qualitative parameters to determine efficacy, risk, and drug use in real-life conditions free of the constraints of a clinical trial.
ÉPHÉYL is an observational pharmacoepidemiological study concerning the prescription of calcimimetic agents and parathyroidectomy in patients with ESRF on dialysis who present severe secondary HPT (PTH ≥ 500 pg/ml). The aim is to describe indications and efficacy: control of PTH, calcium and phosphorus serum levels within their recommended ranges, patient tolerance of the therapeutic interventions, and the cost of such interventions, as well as patients' adhesion to treatment and their self-assessed quality-of-life. This three-year inclusion study, based on the Lorraine REIN registry, will involve all participants in the Néphrolor network. The study will begin on April 1st, 2009.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- ESRD requiring mainteance dialysis
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age >= 18 years
- Patient on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis for 3 months or more in one of the 12 dialysis units in the study.
- Patient included in the REIN registry in the Lorraine region.
- Parathormone greater than or equal to 500 pg / ml for the first time after 01/04/2009 (patient incident for secondary hyperparathyroidism).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age < 18 years.
- Patient living in Lorraine but dialysed in a unit outside Lorraine.
- Diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism with higher parathormone or equal to 500 pg / ml placed before 1/4/2009.
- Patient who have received medical treatment with cinacalcet or by surgical parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism.
- Patient expressing opposition to the collection of information.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Parathormone level
Time frame: 2 years
Obtaining the therapeutic target according to the K/DOQI
9 secondary outcomes
Phosphocalcium product level
Time frame: 2 years
Serum calcium level
Time frame: 2 years
Serum phosphorus level
Time frame: 2 years
Symptoms and / or clinical events caused by hyperparathyroidism
Time frame: 2 years
Tolerance of therapeutic interventions: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypocalcemia
Time frame: 2 years
The quality of life
Time frame: 2 years
Satisfaction of professionals
Time frame: 2 years
The direct costs of treatment
Time frame: 2 years
Patient compliance
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28348181Filipozzi P, Ayav C, Ngueyon Sime W, Laurain E, Kessler M, Brunaud L, Frimat L. Trajectories of CKD-MBD biochemical parameters over a 2-year period following diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism: a pharmacoepidemiological study. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 27;7(3):e011482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011482.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for ESRD
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Atrasentan in Pediatric Patients With Primary IgAN
Berger Disease, Bergers Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luc Frimat, MD, PhD principal investigator
CHRU de Nancy
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of ESRD, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Parathormone level (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02888639, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2016.