Spinal Cord InjuryPhase 2NCT02893553
The Effects of Normalizing Blood Pressure on Cerebral Blood Flow in Hypotensive Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
A Phase 2 study testing Midodrine Hydrochloride, Pyridostigmine Bromide and Mirabegron in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Autonomic Dysreflexia, run by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Dysregulation of blood pressure (BP), secondary to decentralized autonomic nervous system (ANS) control of the cardiovascular system, often results in chronic hypotension and orthostatic hypotension (OH) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), particularly in those with high cord lesions (i.e., above T6). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury, Autonomic Dysreflexia, Baroreceptor Integrity
- What is being tested?
- Midodrine Hydrochloride, Pyridostigmine Bromide and Mirabegron
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to Dec 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Spinal Cord Injured
- Any level of injury
- Any ASIA grade of SCI
- Primarily wheelchair dependent for mobility
- Duration of injury ˃ 1 year
Who cannot join
- Current illness or infection
- History of severe autonomic dysreflexia (AD: condition where BP increases)
- More than 3 symptomatic events per week; BP elevations above 140/90 mmHg; adverse symptoms reporting (e.g., light headedness, dizziness, goosebumps, chills, nausea, etc.)
- Diagnosis of hypertension
- History of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
- Documented history of traumatic brain injury (TBI)
Show all 16Show fewer
- Neurological condition other than SCI (Alzheimer's disease, dementia, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, etc)
- History of epilepsy or other seizure disorder
- Liver or kidney disease
- Bladder problems including blockage of the urine and/or weak urine stream
- Diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
- Diagnosis of artery disease, heart failure, irregular heartbeat, and AV block
- Allergies to aspirin, a yellow dye, pyridostigmine bromide, midodrine hydrochloride, lyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycol, hydroxypropyl cellulose, butylated hydroxytoluene, magnesium stearate, hypromellose, yellow ferric oxide, and red ferric oxide
- Had major surgery in the last 30 days
- Illicit drug abuse within the last 6 months
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
James J Peters VAMC
The Bronx, New York, 10468
Kessler Foundation Research Center
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052
About this study
Dysregulation of blood pressure (BP), secondary to decentralized autonomic nervous system (ANS) control of the cardiovascular system, often results in chronic hypotension and orthostatic hypotension (OH) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), particularly in those with high cord lesions (i.e., above T6). While most hypotensive individuals with chronic SCI remain asymptomatic and do not complain of symptoms associated with cerebral hypoperfusion, evidence of reduced resting cerebral blood flow (CBF) has been reported in association with low systemic BP in the SCI and non-SCI populations. Reduced CBF in hypotensive individuals may lead to cognitive dysfunction, and we reported significantly impaired memory and marginally impaired attention processing in hypotensive individuals with SCI compared to a normotensive SCI cohort. Furthermore, we found that CBF was not increased during cognitive testing in individuals with SCI, which may contribute to impaired cognitive function compared to non-SCI controls. Although asymptomatic hypotension may have an adverse impact on cognitive function and quality of quality of life (QOL) clinical management of this condition is extremely low. In fact, we reported that while nearly 40% of Veterans with SCI were hypotensive, less than 1% carried the diagnosis of hypotension or were prescribed an anti-hypotensive medication. The discrepancy between incidence and treatment of asymptomatic hypotension in the SCI population may relate to a paucity of treatment options which are supported by rigorous clinical trials documenting safe and effective use of anti-hypotensive therapy on BP, CBF and cognitive function. We hypothesize these study medications may increase systolic blood pressure to the normal range and improve cerebral blood flow velocity. Results and conclusions will not be removed from the record.
Read the detailed description
Study 1: Subjects will visit the laboratory between 3 and 9 times for 4 hours to determine the BP response to each dose of the 3 study medications (midodrine, pyridostigmine, and mirabegron). Upon arrival to the laboratory subjects will be randomized to receive midodrine, pyridostigmine, or mirabegron. Subjects will remain seated in their wheelchair for the duration of testing. Instrumentation will be applied by study personnel while subject is seated quietly, this can take up to 20 minutes. Instrumentation includes placement of 3 ECG electrodes for continuous HR monitoring and finger and brachial BP cuffs. BP, BR and HR will be recorded for 5-minutes before medication administration (baseline). After baseline, a small pill will be given with a glass of water. BP, BR and HR will be monitored for 5-minutes every 30 minutes for 4 hours after drug administration.
Study 2: Twenty will visit the laboratory on 4 occasions to determine the effects of three anti-hypotensive agents, compared to placebo, on BP, CBFv, and cognitive performance on selected neuropsychological tests. Upon arrival to the laboratory for every visit subjects will be randomized to receive midodrine, pyridostigmine, mirabegron, or matching placebo. Neither the study subject nor the investigator will know which is being administered. Subjects will remain seated in their wheelchair throughout the duration of the study session and will be closely monitored by study personnel. Instrumentation will include placement of 3 ECG electrodes for continuous heart rate (HR) monitoring, finger and brachial BP cuffs, and a Doppler ultrasound probe positioned at the left MCA for continuous CBFv monitoring. Subjects will remain quietly seated in their wheelchair for 30-minutes after instrumentation for a 5-minute recording of continuous HR, BP, and CBFv (baseline). Prior to the baseline data collection period, the first battery of cognitive tests will be administered. The study medication will be administered to the subject along with a glass of water approximately 30-minutes after arrival to the laboratory. There will be a 2 hour break period until the second cognitive battery begins.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Autonomic Dysreflexia, Baroreceptor Integrity, Sympathetic Integrity, Vagal Integrity, Autonomic Integrity
- Being tested
- Midodrine Hydrochloride, Pyridostigmine Bromide, Mirabegron, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Autonomic Dysreflexia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Midodrine HydrochlorideDrug
Also called midodrine
study 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial.
Pyridostigmine BromideDrug
Also called pyridostigmine
study 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial.
MirabegronDrug
study 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial.
PlaceboOther
placebo will only be used for study arm 2, the randomized blinded phase.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | Experimental | Study 1: is a dose escalation to determine the individualized dose of each of 3 medications (midodrine, pyridostigmine, mirabegron) that increases SBP into the normal range (111-139 mmHg). The investigator will be using midodrine hydrochloride, pyridostigmine bromide and mirabegron. Receives: Drug: Midodrine Hydrochloride; Drug: Pyridostigmine Bromide; Drug: Mirabegron |
| Study 2 | Experimental | Study2: is a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded investigation to determine the effect of the normalization of SBP on cerebral blood flow, cognitive function (memory and attention processing) and quality of life. The investigator will be using midodrine hydrochloride, pyridostigmine bromide, mirabegron and placebo. Receives: Drug: Midodrine Hydrochloride; Drug: Pyridostigmine Bromide; Drug: Mirabegron; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Systolic Blood Pressure
Seated systolic blood pressure following intervention administration.
Measured: 4 hours
Number of Participants With Normal Blood Pressure Readings
Number of participants with a systolic blood pressure readings between 111-139 mmHg in response to each of the four conditions:
- Placebo
- Midodrine
- Mirabegron
- Pyridostigmine
Measured: 4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completionDec 2021
- Study completionDec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- Kessler Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D., James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
- Investigators
- Jill M Wecht, Ed.D, Principal investigator, James J. Peters VA Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02893553
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WEC-16-015
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Normalizing Blood Pressure on Cerebral Blood Flow in Hypotensive Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02893553
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WEC-16-015
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Autonomic Dysreflexia, Baroreceptor Integrity, Sympathetic Integrity, Vagal Integrity, Autonomic Integrity
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- Kessler Foundation
- Study start
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dysregulation of blood pressure (BP), secondary to decentralized autonomic nervous system (ANS) control of the cardiovascular system, often results in chronic hypotension and orthostatic hypotension (OH) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), particularly in those with high cord lesions (i.e., above T6). While most hypotensive individuals with chronic SCI remain asymptomatic and do not complain of symptoms associated with cerebral hypoperfusion, evidence of reduced resting cerebral blood flow (CBF) has been reported in association with low systemic BP in the SCI and non-SCI populations. Reduced CBF in hypotensive individuals may lead to cognitive dysfunction, and we reported significantly impaired memory and marginally impaired attention processing in hypotensive individuals with SCI compared to a normotensive SCI cohort. Furthermore, we found that CBF was not increased during cognitive testing in individuals with SCI, which may contribute to impaired cognitive function compared to non-SCI controls. Although asymptomatic hypotension may have an adverse impact on cognitive function and quality of quality of life (QOL) clinical management of this condition is extremely low. In fact, we reported that while nearly 40% of Veterans with SCI were hypotensive, less than 1% carried the diagnosis of hypotension or were prescribed an anti-hypotensive medication. The discrepancy between incidence and treatment of asymptomatic hypotension in the SCI population may relate to a paucity of treatment options which are supported by rigorous clinical trials documenting safe and effective use of anti-hypotensive therapy on BP, CBF and cognitive function. We hypothesize these study medications may increase systolic blood pressure to the normal range and improve cerebral blood flow velocity. Results and conclusions will not be removed from the record.
Detailed description
Study 1: Subjects will visit the laboratory between 3 and 9 times for 4 hours to determine the BP response to each dose of the 3 study medications (midodrine, pyridostigmine, and mirabegron). Upon arrival to the laboratory subjects will be randomized to receive midodrine, pyridostigmine, or mirabegron. Subjects will remain seated in their wheelchair for the duration of testing. Instrumentation will be applied by study personnel while subject is seated quietly, this can take up to 20 minutes. Instrumentation includes placement of 3 ECG electrodes for continuous HR monitoring and finger and brachial BP cuffs. BP, BR and HR will be recorded for 5-minutes before medication administration (baseline). After baseline, a small pill will be given with a glass of water. BP, BR and HR will be monitored for 5-minutes every 30 minutes for 4 hours after drug administration.
Study 2: Twenty will visit the laboratory on 4 occasions to determine the effects of three anti-hypotensive agents, compared to placebo, on BP, CBFv, and cognitive performance on selected neuropsychological tests. Upon arrival to the laboratory for every visit subjects will be randomized to receive midodrine, pyridostigmine, mirabegron, or matching placebo. Neither the study subject nor the investigator will know which is being administered. Subjects will remain seated in their wheelchair throughout the duration of the study session and will be closely monitored by study personnel. Instrumentation will include placement of 3 ECG electrodes for continuous heart rate (HR) monitoring, finger and brachial BP cuffs, and a Doppler ultrasound probe positioned at the left MCA for continuous CBFv monitoring. Subjects will remain quietly seated in their wheelchair for 30-minutes after instrumentation for a 5-minute recording of continuous HR, BP, and CBFv (baseline). Prior to the baseline data collection period, the first battery of cognitive tests will be administered. The study medication will be administered to the subject along with a glass of water approximately 30-minutes after arrival to the laboratory. There will be a 2 hour break period until the second cognitive battery begins.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | Experimental | Drug: Midodrine Hydrochloride, Drug: Pyridostigmine Bromide, Drug: MirabegronStudy 1: is a dose escalation to determine the individualized dose of each of 3 medications (midodrine, pyridostigmine, mirabegron) that increases SBP into the normal range (111-139 mmHg). The investigator will be using midodrine hydrochloride, pyridostigmine bromide and mirabegron. |
| Study 2 | Experimental | Drug: Midodrine Hydrochloride, Drug: Pyridostigmine Bromide, Drug: Mirabegron, Other: PlaceboStudy2: is a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded investigation to determine the effect of the normalization of SBP on cerebral blood flow, cognitive function (memory and attention processing) and quality of life. The investigator will be using midodrine hydrochloride, pyridostigmine bromide, mirabegron and placebo. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Spinal Cord Injured
- Any level of injury
- Any ASIA grade of SCI
- Primarily wheelchair dependent for mobility
- Duration of injury ˃ 1 year
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Current illness or infection
- History of severe autonomic dysreflexia (AD: condition where BP increases)
- More than 3 symptomatic events per week; BP elevations above 140/90 mmHg; adverse symptoms reporting (e.g., light headedness, dizziness, goosebumps, chills, nausea, etc.)
- Diagnosis of hypertension
- History of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Midodrine HydrochlorideAlso: midodrinestudy 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial. | Drug | Study 1, Study 2 |
| Pyridostigmine BromideAlso: pyridostigminestudy 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial. | Drug | Study 1, Study 2 |
| Mirabegronstudy 1 will be single blind. study 2 will be blinded randomized-control trial. | Drug | Study 1, Study 2 |
| Placeboplacebo will only be used for study arm 2, the randomized blinded phase. | Other | Study 2 |
Primary outcome
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: 4 hours
Seated systolic blood pressure following intervention administration.
Number of Participants With Normal Blood Pressure Readings
Time frame: 4 hours
Number of participants with a systolic blood pressure readings between 111-139 mmHg in response to each of the four conditions: 1. Placebo 2. Midodrine 3. Mirabegron 4. Pyridostigmine
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jill M Wecht, Ed.D principal investigator
James J. Peters VA Medical Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Midodrine Hydrochloride, Pyridostigmine Bromide and Mirabegron in people with Spinal Cord Injury and Autonomic Dysreflexia, run by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Systolic Blood Pressure (time frame: 4 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.