MotivationMTLNCT02894346
Moving Towards Learning: Understanding Teachers' Motivation
An observational study of Motivation, run by University of Southern Denmark.
Trial summary
Since 2014 45 minutes of physical activity (PA) has been a mandatory part of all public schools in Denmark. PA has to be part of subject teaching, including Physical Education (PE), and of so-called support teaching. Research has shown that teachers not always find it meaningful to implement PA during lessons. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Motivation
- What is being tested?
- Teachers
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Danish school teachers in the public school system
Who may be able to join
- teachers across age, gender, subject, class and experience
Who cannot join
- members of school management, students
About this study
Official title: Moving Towards Learning: Understanding Teachers' Motivation for Using Physical Activity as a Tool for Learning
Since 2014 45 minutes of physical activity (PA) has been a mandatory part of all public schools in Denmark. PA has to be part of subject teaching, including Physical Education (PE), and of so-called support teaching. Research has shown that teachers not always find it meaningful to implement PA during lessons. In addition, even though PA seemingly has positive impacts on children's concentration and learning, teachers find it hard to integrate good quality PA with the learning objectives of any school subject. The purpose of this study is therefore to: 1) Analyse teachers' underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool using The Self Determination Theory (SDT), and 2) analyse how to support teachers' motivation by using the theory of scaffolding.
The study uses mixed methods. Through quantitative and qualitative methods the study analyses behavioural patterns focusing on teachers' motivation for implementing PA and need for support. The process is iterative moving from a quantitative (survey) to a qualitative approach (interviews).
Read more
The study provides new and important knowledge of teachers' motivation for implementing PA as a learning tool. Results from SDT analysis will point out teachers' levels of controlled versus autonomous motivation, and analysing teacher's need for scaffolding will give insight into how teachers' motivation can be framed in the process of implementing PA.
There can be both potentials and barriers for implementing PA in a learning context, and in the process of implementing PA during school days the role of the teacher becomes crucial. It is therefore important to understand teachers underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool, and in order to help them carry out qualified and suitable PA, it is important that the investigators know how to support them and maintain their motivation in this process.
Read the detailed description
Introduction According to research there is a positive link between physical activity and academic performance in children and young people, which means that exercise not only benefit physical health and well-being, but also cognition and performance in a learning context. However, developing and engaging in physical activity (PA) requires motivation and most importantly research shows that people who are intrinsically motivated are more likely to engage in PA consistently. When integrating PA in a school context the role of the teacher becomes crucial, as the teacher is responsible for developing and carrying out qualified PA activities. It is therefore important to understand the underlying factors of motivation - especially teachers' motivation for using PA as a tool for learning.
There can be both potential and barriers for integrating PA in a learning context. A recent study from the University of Southern Denmark suggests that teachers are willing to implement PA, and that it can be, but not always is, meaningful to use in a school setting and as a tool for learning. Furthermore, a number of teachers believe that PA and PE activities have a positive impact on concentration and learning, however, they find it hard to integrate and carry out qualified PA activities with suitable learning objectives during school lessons. The study also suggests that implementing PA as a tool for learning depends on how much teachers know about the didactics in relation to using PA.
With the implementation of The Danish School Reform in 2014, PA became a mandatory part of the school day, stating that all children must engage in at least 45 minutes of daily activity. The 45 minutes must either be part of the pupils learning process or separately from subject and lessons. It is, however, not stated in the reform what kind of activity, of what intensity, and at what time during the school day PA must be carried out. The reform is therefore open to interpretation and can be perceived by teachers in many ways. As a consequence schools and teachers carry out the 45 minutes of daily activity very differently - not only based on the lack of information in the Reform, but also based on their experience with and knowledge of PA. It is therefore important to examine and understand how teachers can be supported in the process of using PA as a tool for learning with particular focus on how to frame their learning process by using the theory of Scaffolding as an approach.
Over all aim
- Analyse teachers' underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool using The Self Determination Theory (SDT), and 2) analyse how to support teachers' motivation by using the theory of scaffolding.
This objective will be investigated through the following research questions:
- What type of motivation structures and patterns from The Self-Determination Theory occur when using PA as a tool for learning?
- How and why are elements such as didactics, the learning environment and professional identification important and furthermore how do they relate to teachers' motivation?
- How can motivation be supported and framed by using the theory of scaffolding?
The goal is to: 1) Reach a systematic view and understanding of motivation by analysing how it affects teachers' use of PA as a tool for learning; 2) understand how to maintain and support motivation; 3) offer new and scientifically based knowledge for working with PA in a school context particularly for teachers responsible for developing and engaging in PA; and 4) offer teachers an insight into their own motivation towards PA.
Self-Determination Theory As a tool for analysing the patterns and structures of motivation The Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is used. The SDT is highly suitable when analysing underlying factors of motivation within an individual, and will be used as a starting point for understanding the elements of the teachers' motivation - both intrinsically and extrinsically.
According to Deci and Ryan, who developed the model, all human motivation is based on three innate psychological needs: competence, autonomy and relatedness. In this theory the distinction between self-determined or autonomous and controlled types of motivation will offer a way of measuring structures and patterns related to the teachers motivation focusing on motivation as an psychological process. These different types of motivation (autonomous and controlled) reflect individual reasons for participating in activities: autonomous is defined as engaging in an activity because it is perceived to be consistent with intrinsic goals. In contrast, controlled means engaging in an activity for external reasons such as rewards or approval from others. The model offers four types of extrinsic motivation: external, introjected, identified and integrated. These four types of extrinsic motivation are viewed as a motivation process from external to internal regulation. Using these four types of extrinsic motivation, it is possible to understand what kind of motivation patterns and structures occur when using PA and furthermore enable a nuanced look at teachers' intrinsic or extrinsic motivation for using PA as a tool for learning.
Scaffolding motivation- and learning processes By using elements from the scaffolding theory, it is examined how to support and maintain motivation in a learning process where PA is implemented. The method was originally developed as a way of examining children's learning processes, however, in previous research on this area, it was found that scaffolding teachers is equally important as scaffolding children in a learning process - especially when the learning process is new. The approach or method of scaffolding is basically a way of framing and supporting a learning process dividing it into six levels. Wood, Bruner and Ross pointed out that all learning processes require some sort of scaffolding where a more competent person offers support in the learning process using the appropriate amount of structure and guidance. By using this method, it is possible to point out how and where to support teachers in the process of developing and integrating PA and furthermore to point out, based on the findings from the SDT, how to support and more importantly to maintain teachers motivation for using PA as a tool for learning. In this sense the teacher is viewed as the learner undergoing a learning process. Inspired by the Russian psychologist Lev Vygotski's theory of The Zone of Proximal Development, Wood, Bruner \& Ross identified six levels of scaffolding. The six levels are: 1) Recruitment - gaining the interest from the learner; 2) Reduction in the degrees of freedom - simplifying the task; 3) Direction maintenance - keeping the learner on track; 4) Marking of critical features - marking the relevant and irrelevant parts of the task; 5) Frustration control - offering support and guidance; and 6) Demonstration - showing the learner the solution.
Research design The research design in this Ph.D. project uses mixed methods and is based on the methods mentioned below. Applying these different types of both quantitative and qualitative methods, it is possible to examine and analyse the objectives from different angles making sure that the point of data saturation is reached and at the same time answer the over all aim and research questions. This Ph.D. project does not contain a comparative study, but instead focus on gaining a deep insight into what is at stake regarding teachers' motivation after the implementation of the Danish School Reform.
- A thorough literature review based on current national and international literature will be carried out. This will be conducted in accordance to the key research questions of this project.
- Survey: A survey will provide a basic knowledge of teachers' motivation and furthermore give the opportunity to define teachers' motivation based on the SDT. The questionnaire will be distributed to minimum 500 teachers in Denmark, who will be selected from a variety of Danish Public Schools based on the following criteria: Size, location, and socio-demographics. The sample will consist of key respondents (teachers) that potentially will provide the data that will make it possible to answer the main objectives of this Ph.D. project and at the same time make sure that maximum variation is obtained. Teachers will therefore be selected based on the following differentiation, where teachers from both categories are needed: Age, gender, subject, class and experience. The questionnaire will be based on the The Work Task Motivation Scale for Teachers (WTMST).
- Based on the knowledge gained from the questionnaires, where it is defined how the selected teachers are motivated in-depth interviews will be conducted with 10 teachers. The sample will consist of teachers that show different levels of both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in accordance to the SDT and picked from the survey.
- Conditions
- Motivation
- Being tested
- Teachers
- Keywords
- Motivation, Teachers, Physical activity, School
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TeachersOther
Also called The Work Task Motivation Scale for Teachers (WTMST)
Teachers are exposed to the WTMST survey that based on the theory of Self-Determination (SDT) will categorize them according to the elements of the SDT: Intrinsic, identified, introjected, external and a motivation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Teachers | Public school teachers in Denmark - across age, gender, subject, class and experience. Receives: Other: Teachers |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
teachers' motivation based on the Self-Determination Theory
Survey instrument based on the Self-Determination Theory
Measured: January 2017 - June 2017
Secondary outcomes (1)
teachers' need for scaffolding
Personal interviews with selected teachers.
Measured: August 2017 - december 2017
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MotivationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern Denmark
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Louise Stjerne Knudsen, University of Southern Denmark
- Investigators
- Jørgen Povlsen, Study director, University of Southern Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02894346
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SDUSF-2015-147/R1
- Acronym
- MTL
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Knudsen LS, Skovgaard T, Bredahl T. Understanding and scaffolding Danish schoolteachers' motivation for using classroom-based physical activity: study protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019857. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019857.
PubMed 29540419
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Moving Towards Learning: Understanding Teachers' Motivation for Using Physical Activity as a Tool for Learning
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02894346
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MTL / SDUSF-2015-147/R1
- Conditions
- Motivation
- Keywords
- Motivation, Teachers, Physical activity, School
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern DenmarkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Since 2014 45 minutes of physical activity (PA) has been a mandatory part of all public schools in Denmark. PA has to be part of subject teaching, including Physical Education (PE), and of so-called support teaching. Research has shown that teachers not always find it meaningful to implement PA during lessons. In addition, even though PA seemingly has positive impacts on children's concentration and learning, teachers find it hard to integrate good quality PA with the learning objectives of any school subject. The purpose of this study is therefore to: 1) Analyse teachers' underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool using The Self Determination Theory (SDT), and 2) analyse how to support teachers' motivation by using the theory of scaffolding.
The study uses mixed methods. Through quantitative and qualitative methods the study analyses behavioural patterns focusing on teachers' motivation for implementing PA and need for support. The process is iterative moving from a quantitative (survey) to a qualitative approach (interviews).
The study provides new and important knowledge of teachers' motivation for implementing PA as a learning tool. Results from SDT analysis will point out teachers' levels of controlled versus autonomous motivation, and analysing teacher's need for scaffolding will give insight into how teachers' motivation can be framed in the process of implementing PA.
There can be both potentials and barriers for implementing PA in a learning context, and in the process of implementing PA during school days the role of the teacher becomes crucial. It is therefore important to understand teachers underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool, and in order to help them carry out qualified and suitable PA, it is important that the investigators know how to support them and maintain their motivation in this process.
Detailed description
Introduction According to research there is a positive link between physical activity and academic performance in children and young people, which means that exercise not only benefit physical health and well-being, but also cognition and performance in a learning context. However, developing and engaging in physical activity (PA) requires motivation and most importantly research shows that people who are intrinsically motivated are more likely to engage in PA consistently. When integrating PA in a school context the role of the teacher becomes crucial, as the teacher is responsible for developing and carrying out qualified PA activities. It is therefore important to understand the underlying factors of motivation - especially teachers' motivation for using PA as a tool for learning.
There can be both potential and barriers for integrating PA in a learning context. A recent study from the University of Southern Denmark suggests that teachers are willing to implement PA, and that it can be, but not always is, meaningful to use in a school setting and as a tool for learning. Furthermore, a number of teachers believe that PA and PE activities have a positive impact on concentration and learning, however, they find it hard to integrate and carry out qualified PA activities with suitable learning objectives during school lessons. The study also suggests that implementing PA as a tool for learning depends on how much teachers know about the didactics in relation to using PA.
With the implementation of The Danish School Reform in 2014, PA became a mandatory part of the school day, stating that all children must engage in at least 45 minutes of daily activity. The 45 minutes must either be part of the pupils learning process or separately from subject and lessons. It is, however, not stated in the reform what kind of activity, of what intensity, and at what time during the school day PA must be carried out. The reform is therefore open to interpretation and can be perceived by teachers in many ways. As a consequence schools and teachers carry out the 45 minutes of daily activity very differently - not only based on the lack of information in the Reform, but also based on their experience with and knowledge of PA. It is therefore important to examine and understand how teachers can be supported in the process of using PA as a tool for learning with particular focus on how to frame their learning process by using the theory of Scaffolding as an approach.
Over all aim
- Analyse teachers' underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool using The Self Determination Theory (SDT), and 2) analyse how to support teachers' motivation by using the theory of scaffolding.
This objective will be investigated through the following research questions:
- What type of motivation structures and patterns from The Self-Determination Theory occur when using PA as a tool for learning?
- How and why are elements such as didactics, the learning environment and professional identification important and furthermore how do they relate to teachers' motivation?
- How can motivation be supported and framed by using the theory of scaffolding?
The goal is to: 1) Reach a systematic view and understanding of motivation by analysing how it affects teachers' use of PA as a tool for learning; 2) understand how to maintain and support motivation; 3) offer new and scientifically based knowledge for working with PA in a school context particularly for teachers responsible for developing and engaging in PA; and 4) offer teachers an insight into their own motivation towards PA.
Self-Determination Theory As a tool for analysing the patterns and structures of motivation The Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is used. The SDT is highly suitable when analysing underlying factors of motivation within an individual, and will be used as a starting point for understanding the elements of the teachers' motivation - both intrinsically and extrinsically.
According to Deci and Ryan, who developed the model, all human motivation is based on three innate psychological needs: competence, autonomy and relatedness. In this theory the distinction between self-determined or autonomous and controlled types of motivation will offer a way of measuring structures and patterns related to the teachers motivation focusing on motivation as an psychological process. These different types of motivation (autonomous and controlled) reflect individual reasons for participating in activities: autonomous is defined as engaging in an activity because it is perceived to be consistent with intrinsic goals. In contrast, controlled means engaging in an activity for external reasons such as rewards or approval from others. The model offers four types of extrinsic motivation: external, introjected, identified and integrated. These four types of extrinsic motivation are viewed as a motivation process from external to internal regulation. Using these four types of extrinsic motivation, it is possible to understand what kind of motivation patterns and structures occur when using PA and furthermore enable a nuanced look at teachers' intrinsic or extrinsic motivation for using PA as a tool for learning.
Scaffolding motivation- and learning processes By using elements from the scaffolding theory, it is examined how to support and maintain motivation in a learning process where PA is implemented. The method was originally developed as a way of examining children's learning processes, however, in previous research on this area, it was found that scaffolding teachers is equally important as scaffolding children in a learning process - especially when the learning process is new. The approach or method of scaffolding is basically a way of framing and supporting a learning process dividing it into six levels. Wood, Bruner and Ross pointed out that all learning processes require some sort of scaffolding where a more competent person offers support in the learning process using the appropriate amount of structure and guidance. By using this method, it is possible to point out how and where to support teachers in the process of developing and integrating PA and furthermore to point out, based on the findings from the SDT, how to support and more importantly to maintain teachers motivation for using PA as a tool for learning. In this sense the teacher is viewed as the learner undergoing a learning process. Inspired by the Russian psychologist Lev Vygotski's theory of The Zone of Proximal Development, Wood, Bruner \& Ross identified six levels of scaffolding. The six levels are: 1) Recruitment - gaining the interest from the learner; 2) Reduction in the degrees of freedom - simplifying the task; 3) Direction maintenance - keeping the learner on track; 4) Marking of critical features - marking the relevant and irrelevant parts of the task; 5) Frustration control - offering support and guidance; and 6) Demonstration - showing the learner the solution.
Research design The research design in this Ph.D. project uses mixed methods and is based on the methods mentioned below. Applying these different types of both quantitative and qualitative methods, it is possible to examine and analyse the objectives from different angles making sure that the point of data saturation is reached and at the same time answer the over all aim and research questions. This Ph.D. project does not contain a comparative study, but instead focus on gaining a deep insight into what is at stake regarding teachers' motivation after the implementation of the Danish School Reform.
- A thorough literature review based on current national and international literature will be carried out. This will be conducted in accordance to the key research questions of this project.
- Survey: A survey will provide a basic knowledge of teachers' motivation and furthermore give the opportunity to define teachers' motivation based on the SDT. The questionnaire will be distributed to minimum 500 teachers in Denmark, who will be selected from a variety of Danish Public Schools based on the following criteria: Size, location, and socio-demographics. The sample will consist of key respondents (teachers) that potentially will provide the data that will make it possible to answer the main objectives of this Ph.D. project and at the same time make sure that maximum variation is obtained. Teachers will therefore be selected based on the following differentiation, where teachers from both categories are needed: Age, gender, subject, class and experience. The questionnaire will be based on the The Work Task Motivation Scale for Teachers (WTMST).
- Based on the knowledge gained from the questionnaires, where it is defined how the selected teachers are motivated in-depth interviews will be conducted with 10 teachers. The sample will consist of teachers that show different levels of both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in accordance to the SDT and picked from the survey.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Teachers | – | Other: TeachersPublic school teachers in Denmark - across age, gender, subject, class and experience. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Danish school teachers in the public school system
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- teachers across age, gender, subject, class and experience
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- members of school management, students
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TeachersAlso: The Work Task Motivation Scale for Teachers (WTMST)Teachers are exposed to the WTMST survey that based on the theory of Self-Determination (SDT) will categorize them according to the elements of the SDT: Intrinsic, identified, introjected, external and a motivation. | Other | Teachers |
Primary outcome
teachers' motivation based on the Self-Determination Theory
Time frame: January 2017 - June 2017
Survey instrument based on the Self-Determination Theory
1 secondary outcome
teachers' need for scaffolding
Time frame: August 2017 - december 2017
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29540419Knudsen LS, Skovgaard T, Bredahl T. Understanding and scaffolding Danish schoolteachers' motivation for using classroom-based physical activity: study protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019857. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019857.
- Louise Stjerne Knudsen - profileLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Motivation
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
PREVENT HPV -Related Cancers Trial
HPV Vaccination, Uptake Vaccination
Active, not recruiting
AI-Assisted Child Health Podcast Education for Nursing Students
Nursing Education
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Factors Influencing Adoption of a Novel Malaria Treatment in Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, and Rwanda
Malaria
Recruiting
IMB-Guided Health Education Intervention for Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Non-adherent Hypertensive Patients
Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
E-Bike Commuting and Health in Overweight College Students
Obesity &Amp; Overweight, Sedentary Behaviors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jørgen Povlsen study director
University of Southern Denmark
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Motivation, run by University of Southern Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
teachers' motivation based on the Self-Determination Theory (time frame: January 2017 - June 2017). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02894346, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2018.