AzTrials
AzTrials

MotivationMTLNCT02894346

Moving Towards Learning: Understanding Teachers' Motivation

An observational study of Motivation, run by University of Southern Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Since 2014 45 minutes of physical activity (PA) has been a mandatory part of all public schools in Denmark. PA has to be part of subject teaching, including Physical Education (PE), and of so-called support teaching. Research has shown that teachers not always find it meaningful to implement PA during lessons. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Motivation
What is being tested?
Teachers
How many people
250 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2017to Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Danish school teachers in the public school system

Who may be able to join

  • teachers across age, gender, subject, class and experience

Who cannot join

  • members of school management, students

About this study

Official title: Moving Towards Learning: Understanding Teachers' Motivation for Using Physical Activity as a Tool for Learning

Since 2014 45 minutes of physical activity (PA) has been a mandatory part of all public schools in Denmark. PA has to be part of subject teaching, including Physical Education (PE), and of so-called support teaching. Research has shown that teachers not always find it meaningful to implement PA during lessons. In addition, even though PA seemingly has positive impacts on children's concentration and learning, teachers find it hard to integrate good quality PA with the learning objectives of any school subject. The purpose of this study is therefore to: 1) Analyse teachers' underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool using The Self Determination Theory (SDT), and 2) analyse how to support teachers' motivation by using the theory of scaffolding.

The study uses mixed methods. Through quantitative and qualitative methods the study analyses behavioural patterns focusing on teachers' motivation for implementing PA and need for support. The process is iterative moving from a quantitative (survey) to a qualitative approach (interviews).

Read more

The study provides new and important knowledge of teachers' motivation for implementing PA as a learning tool. Results from SDT analysis will point out teachers' levels of controlled versus autonomous motivation, and analysing teacher's need for scaffolding will give insight into how teachers' motivation can be framed in the process of implementing PA.

There can be both potentials and barriers for implementing PA in a learning context, and in the process of implementing PA during school days the role of the teacher becomes crucial. It is therefore important to understand teachers underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool, and in order to help them carry out qualified and suitable PA, it is important that the investigators know how to support them and maintain their motivation in this process.

Read the detailed description

Introduction According to research there is a positive link between physical activity and academic performance in children and young people, which means that exercise not only benefit physical health and well-being, but also cognition and performance in a learning context. However, developing and engaging in physical activity (PA) requires motivation and most importantly research shows that people who are intrinsically motivated are more likely to engage in PA consistently. When integrating PA in a school context the role of the teacher becomes crucial, as the teacher is responsible for developing and carrying out qualified PA activities. It is therefore important to understand the underlying factors of motivation - especially teachers' motivation for using PA as a tool for learning.

There can be both potential and barriers for integrating PA in a learning context. A recent study from the University of Southern Denmark suggests that teachers are willing to implement PA, and that it can be, but not always is, meaningful to use in a school setting and as a tool for learning. Furthermore, a number of teachers believe that PA and PE activities have a positive impact on concentration and learning, however, they find it hard to integrate and carry out qualified PA activities with suitable learning objectives during school lessons. The study also suggests that implementing PA as a tool for learning depends on how much teachers know about the didactics in relation to using PA.

With the implementation of The Danish School Reform in 2014, PA became a mandatory part of the school day, stating that all children must engage in at least 45 minutes of daily activity. The 45 minutes must either be part of the pupils learning process or separately from subject and lessons. It is, however, not stated in the reform what kind of activity, of what intensity, and at what time during the school day PA must be carried out. The reform is therefore open to interpretation and can be perceived by teachers in many ways. As a consequence schools and teachers carry out the 45 minutes of daily activity very differently - not only based on the lack of information in the Reform, but also based on their experience with and knowledge of PA. It is therefore important to examine and understand how teachers can be supported in the process of using PA as a tool for learning with particular focus on how to frame their learning process by using the theory of Scaffolding as an approach.

Over all aim

  1. Analyse teachers' underlying factors of motivation for using PA as a learning tool using The Self Determination Theory (SDT), and 2) analyse how to support teachers' motivation by using the theory of scaffolding.

This objective will be investigated through the following research questions:

  • What type of motivation structures and patterns from The Self-Determination Theory occur when using PA as a tool for learning?
  • How and why are elements such as didactics, the learning environment and professional identification important and furthermore how do they relate to teachers' motivation?
  • How can motivation be supported and framed by using the theory of scaffolding?

The goal is to: 1) Reach a systematic view and understanding of motivation by analysing how it affects teachers' use of PA as a tool for learning; 2) understand how to maintain and support motivation; 3) offer new and scientifically based knowledge for working with PA in a school context particularly for teachers responsible for developing and engaging in PA; and 4) offer teachers an insight into their own motivation towards PA.

Self-Determination Theory As a tool for analysing the patterns and structures of motivation The Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is used. The SDT is highly suitable when analysing underlying factors of motivation within an individual, and will be used as a starting point for understanding the elements of the teachers' motivation - both intrinsically and extrinsically.

According to Deci and Ryan, who developed the model, all human motivation is based on three innate psychological needs: competence, autonomy and relatedness. In this theory the distinction between self-determined or autonomous and controlled types of motivation will offer a way of measuring structures and patterns related to the teachers motivation focusing on motivation as an psychological process. These different types of motivation (autonomous and controlled) reflect individual reasons for participating in activities: autonomous is defined as engaging in an activity because it is perceived to be consistent with intrinsic goals. In contrast, controlled means engaging in an activity for external reasons such as rewards or approval from others. The model offers four types of extrinsic motivation: external, introjected, identified and integrated. These four types of extrinsic motivation are viewed as a motivation process from external to internal regulation. Using these four types of extrinsic motivation, it is possible to understand what kind of motivation patterns and structures occur when using PA and furthermore enable a nuanced look at teachers' intrinsic or extrinsic motivation for using PA as a tool for learning.

Scaffolding motivation- and learning processes By using elements from the scaffolding theory, it is examined how to support and maintain motivation in a learning process where PA is implemented. The method was originally developed as a way of examining children's learning processes, however, in previous research on this area, it was found that scaffolding teachers is equally important as scaffolding children in a learning process - especially when the learning process is new. The approach or method of scaffolding is basically a way of framing and supporting a learning process dividing it into six levels. Wood, Bruner and Ross pointed out that all learning processes require some sort of scaffolding where a more competent person offers support in the learning process using the appropriate amount of structure and guidance. By using this method, it is possible to point out how and where to support teachers in the process of developing and integrating PA and furthermore to point out, based on the findings from the SDT, how to support and more importantly to maintain teachers motivation for using PA as a tool for learning. In this sense the teacher is viewed as the learner undergoing a learning process. Inspired by the Russian psychologist Lev Vygotski's theory of The Zone of Proximal Development, Wood, Bruner \& Ross identified six levels of scaffolding. The six levels are: 1) Recruitment - gaining the interest from the learner; 2) Reduction in the degrees of freedom - simplifying the task; 3) Direction maintenance - keeping the learner on track; 4) Marking of critical features - marking the relevant and irrelevant parts of the task; 5) Frustration control - offering support and guidance; and 6) Demonstration - showing the learner the solution.

Research design The research design in this Ph.D. project uses mixed methods and is based on the methods mentioned below. Applying these different types of both quantitative and qualitative methods, it is possible to examine and analyse the objectives from different angles making sure that the point of data saturation is reached and at the same time answer the over all aim and research questions. This Ph.D. project does not contain a comparative study, but instead focus on gaining a deep insight into what is at stake regarding teachers' motivation after the implementation of the Danish School Reform.

  1. A thorough literature review based on current national and international literature will be carried out. This will be conducted in accordance to the key research questions of this project.
  2. Survey: A survey will provide a basic knowledge of teachers' motivation and furthermore give the opportunity to define teachers' motivation based on the SDT. The questionnaire will be distributed to minimum 500 teachers in Denmark, who will be selected from a variety of Danish Public Schools based on the following criteria: Size, location, and socio-demographics. The sample will consist of key respondents (teachers) that potentially will provide the data that will make it possible to answer the main objectives of this Ph.D. project and at the same time make sure that maximum variation is obtained. Teachers will therefore be selected based on the following differentiation, where teachers from both categories are needed: Age, gender, subject, class and experience. The questionnaire will be based on the The Work Task Motivation Scale for Teachers (WTMST).
  3. Based on the knowledge gained from the questionnaires, where it is defined how the selected teachers are motivated in-depth interviews will be conducted with 10 teachers. The sample will consist of teachers that show different levels of both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in accordance to the SDT and picked from the survey.
Conditions
Motivation
Being tested
Teachers
Keywords
Motivation, Teachers, Physical activity, School
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TeachersOther

    Also called The Work Task Motivation Scale for Teachers (WTMST)

    Teachers are exposed to the WTMST survey that based on the theory of Self-Determination (SDT) will categorize them according to the elements of the SDT: Intrinsic, identified, introjected, external and a motivation.

Study groups in NCT02894346
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TeachersPublic school teachers in Denmark - across age, gender, subject, class and experience.
Receives: Other: Teachers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. teachers' motivation based on the Self-Determination Theory

    Survey instrument based on the Self-Determination Theory

    Measured: January 2017 - June 2017

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. teachers' need for scaffolding

    Personal interviews with selected teachers.

    Measured: August 2017 - december 2017

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
250 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02894346
Sponsor's protocol ID
SDUSF-2015-147/R1
Acronym
MTL
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
5 Sep 2016
Last updated
26 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Knudsen LS, Skovgaard T, Bredahl T. Understanding and scaffolding Danish schoolteachers' motivation for using classroom-based physical activity: study protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019857. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019857.

    PubMed 29540419

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Motivation, run by University of Southern Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

teachers' motivation based on the Self-Determination Theory (time frame: January 2017 - June 2017). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02894346, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in