Technical Skills TrainingNCT02895685
Group Dynamics in Surgical Skill Training
A study testing Dyad training in people with Technical Skills Training, run by Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The investigators have planned a randomized study, examining the effect of self-directed training in groups vs. individual training on trainees' acquisitions of open surgical skills. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Technical Skills Training
- What is being tested?
- Dyad training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The participants may enter the study if any of the following apply:
- Medical doctor from a department in the Capital Region and the region of Zeeland in Denmark.
- Medical students employed in internships or research year in surgical departments in the Capital Region and the region of Zeeland in Denmark.
- The participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
Who cannot join
- The participants may not enter the study if any of the following apply:
- The participant have performed more than 50 open surgical procedures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, 2100
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Group Dynamics in Surgical Skill Training
The investigators have planned a randomized study, examining the effect of self-directed training in groups vs. individual training on trainees' acquisitions of open surgical skills.
Eighty participants who signed up for a pre-existing simulation-based course in basic open surgical skills will be randomized to practice either in pairs or individually during the course. Participants open surgical skills will be tested on a simulated skin model before and after the course. The investigators hypothesis is that dyad training will enhance self-directed learning in open surgical skills.
Read the detailed description
The study is a prospective, rater-blinded, randomized, trial, examining the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups versus individual training in open surgical skills.
Setting The study will be conducted at Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study period will be twelve months from August 2016 to July 2017.
Basic open surgery training programme Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) has developed a course in basic surgical skills in open surgery. The course is aimed at junior residents who are about to start a career in surgery. The current course is a six-week course consisting of didactic instructions with an experienced surgeon, expert-guided self-training and self-directed training at home. Each class consists of eight participants. One week before the course starts the participants meet for an introduction. At the introduction participants are provided with training material consisting of a portable knot tying and suturing kit from Ethicon, Surgical Care, Johnson and Johnson and a written material with descriptions of instruments, instructions in different technical skills and theoretical knowledge in open surgery. The following six weeks participants meet once a week for a one and a half hour on-site class in open surgical techniques. The on-site classes are held in a traditional classroom setting at CAMES and consist of didactic instructions followed by expert-guided self-training. The content of each on-site class is predefined. The participants are instructed to read the written material before the on-site classes. The first on-site classes focus on simple open surgical techniques such as knot tying and introduction to instruments and their use. The following on-site classes focuses on suturing techniques. In the end of the course, participants are introduced to more complex tasks in open surgery, such as theory in abdominal opening and closure, dissection and haemostasis (Appendix B). The participants are instructed to practice the technical skills presented in the classroom at home, using the portable knot tying and suture kit. If the participants reach a predefined level of proficiency at the examination test, held within one week after the last on-site class, they are allowed to participate in an operative course in basic open surgery techniques the following week. During the operative course basic concepts of laparotomy, ligation and dissection are practiced. The majority of the operative course focuses on practical training on sedated pigs. Groups of three trainees are supervised by an experienced surgeon.
Participants will be randomized to self-directed training at home in pairs (forty participants) or self-directed training at home individually (forty sixteen participants). All participants will follow the regular course in basic surgical skills in open surgery. Randomization will be en-bloc, so all participants following the same course, with eight participants in each course, will be randomized to follow the same instructions. Participants will be informed that they are expected to take part in classroom on-site classes, but they decide themselves when and how much time to spend practicing and which of the task presented in the classroom they practice.
Technical skill test At the introduction participant's technical skills in open surgery is assessed in a pre-test. The same test is used for examination at the end of the course (post-test). The test is composed of five basic tasks performed on a simulated skin model. The tasks are designed to explore technical skills in three different knot-tying techniques, five different suturing techniques and knowledge in selecting the right instruments and sutures. The examination instructions are presented in written format (Appendix C). Participants are given twenty-five minutes to complete the tasks. Participants are instructed to distribute their time on each task themselves. Unlimited time is given before the test starts to read the instructions carefully and to select the sutures needed. Tests are recorded on video. The camera is placed so only the hands of the trainee and the operation field is showed on the video. Audio will be deleted to allow for blinded rating. To pass the course, the trainees must achieve a predefined proficiency level corresponding to fifty percent (15 points) of the maximum score (30 point) at the post-test. The test will be performed at CAMES assuring optimal height and light setting at every test session.
Task 1: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound using far-far near-near running suturing technique, 3-0 monofilament, nonabsorbable suture, anatomical forceps, and to start and end the suture using two hand knot tying technique.
Task 2: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound, the skin model simulates the fascia, they are asked to use an absorbable suture, De Bakey forceps and one hand knot tying technique to start and end the suturing.
Task 3: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound using subcuticular suturing technique, a 4-0 absorbable suture, anatomical forceps, and to start and end the suture using instrumental knot tying technique.
Task 4: The participant is instructed to demonstrate three far-far near-near interrupted sutures on a five cm wound, using 4-0 monofilament, nonabsorbable suture, anatomical forceps and to close each suture with one hand knot tying technique.
Task 5: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound using simple interrupted suturing technique. The participant decides themselves which suture, instruments and knot tying technique they will use.
Participants are instructed to show what kind of sutures that have chosen for each task to the camera.
Training log Participants will be asked to keep a training log with details of time spend on training and number of training sessions. The training log will contain information on which type of task is practised and if the training is performed in pairs. Also time spend in the operation room, assisting or performing open surgery will be registered (APPENDIX D). Every week when the participants meet for the on-site class held at CAMES, the training log will be copied, to ensure the participants fill in the training log correctly and regularly.
Expert assessment Two experts in surgery will do the ratings based on video-recordings. One rater will be blinded for both the randomization (dyad-training versus individually training) and who is performing on the video-recording. The other rater will teach the on-site classes and rate the examination tests, and is therefore not blinded for the randomization for the post-test. However, this rater will still be blinded for the randomization for the pre-test ratings and who that perform on the video-recording. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) is used as the primary endpoint of this study. OSATS is a validated assessment tool for the evaluation of general surgical skills[15, 16]. OSATS consists of a five-point global rating scale (GRS) and task specific checklists[15]. Only the GRS will be used for assessment, as no full procedures are performed in the test. A modified GRS will be used, as the audio will be deleted from all videos and no assistant will be available during testing. Using the modified GRS trainees will be evaluated on the following categories: 1) respect for tissue, 2) time and motion, 3) instrument handling, 4) knowledge of instruments, 5) flow of operation and forward planning and 6) knowledge of specific procedure (Appendix E).
Handling of adverse events during testing
During testing there is a risk of adverse events. They should be handled as follows:
The practical equipment fails:
Testing is stopped. If equipment fail is repairable on the testing session, testing is restarted at the point it was stopped. If not, the testing session is seen as failed and the testing session will not be used or counted as an attempt. A new test will be performed.
The simulated skin model becomes detached from the table:
The participant is allowed to fix the simulated skin model to the table and will continue to finish the task. If this is not possible, a score of zero will be given.
Other interruptions during testing:
Testing is stopped. If the interruption can be overcome during the testing session, testing is restarted at the point it was stopped. If not, the testing session is seen as a failed testing session and will not be used.
A test session which fails due to adverse events will not be used in the final analysis and a new test session will be arranged.
Study participants Participants are medical doctors with a surgical interest and medical students in relevant jobs related to surgery (internships, research year) participating in the course in basic surgical skills in open surgery. Eighty trainees', who sign up for the current course in basic open surgical skills, will be enrolled in the study.
Note:
Base-line testing (pre-test) for 15 participants have been carried out in august 2016. These participants where randomized according to the protocol. No changes has been made to the protocol, and data has not been analyzed, since no post-testing has been carried out. The data from the first 15 participants will not be obtained and analyzed before the post-test at the end of september.
- Conditions
- Technical Skills Training
- Being tested
- Dyad training
- Keywords
- Simulation, Self-regulated training, Education, Open surgery, Dyad training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dyad trainingOther
Participants will be paired in teams at the introduction. Participants will be instructed to train and supervise each other in pairs and will receive information on how to give constructive feedback. Participants will practice in pairs during on-site classes and encouraged to train in pairs during the self-regulated training at home. At the on-site classes, participants will be instructed to practice with their partner, during the expert-guided self-training and receive all feedback in pairs. Participants will train at the same table with space for two people. Outside the classroom, participants will decide themselves when and how often they will meet to practise. Participants are instructed to actively observe his or her partner while practising and are encouraged to discuss their performance and any difficulties they encounter. Testing will be done individually. With the training log, the investigators will measure whether the participants train in pairs at home as instructed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dyad training | Experimental | Participants randomized to train in pairs during the whole 6-week course Receives: Other: Dyad training |
| Control group: individually training | No intervention | If randomized to train individually, participants will be instructed to do all the training individually. Participants will be instructed not to practice with others when practising at home and will only receive feedback from the expert during the expert-guided self-training. At the training at CAMES, participants will sit at separate tables. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences between pre-test and post-test scores in basic tasks on a simulated model
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences in time(mins.) spend on self-directed training
Measured: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences in number of self-directed training sessions
Measured: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences in number of dyadic training sessions at home
Measured: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences in number of participants completing the course
Measured: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences in attendance in on-site classes
Measured: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences in number of tasks performed per trainee during self-directed training (hands-on time)
Measured: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Differences in rating scores (blinded, non-blinded)
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completionJul 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Technical Skills TrainingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Council for Independent Research, Johnson & Johnson
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Diana Haunstrup Bregner Overgaard, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02895685
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KKA dyad practice
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Group Dynamics in Surgical Skill Training
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02895685
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KKA dyad practice
- Conditions
- Technical Skills Training
- Keywords
- Simulation, Self-regulated training, Education, Open surgery, Dyad training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Council for Independent Research, Johnson & Johnson
- Study start
- Aug 2016
- Primary completion
- Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators have planned a randomized study, examining the effect of self-directed training in groups vs. individual training on trainees' acquisitions of open surgical skills.
Eighty participants who signed up for a pre-existing simulation-based course in basic open surgical skills will be randomized to practice either in pairs or individually during the course. Participants open surgical skills will be tested on a simulated skin model before and after the course. The investigators hypothesis is that dyad training will enhance self-directed learning in open surgical skills.
Detailed description
The study is a prospective, rater-blinded, randomized, trial, examining the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups versus individual training in open surgical skills.
Setting The study will be conducted at Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study period will be twelve months from August 2016 to July 2017.
Basic open surgery training programme Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) has developed a course in basic surgical skills in open surgery. The course is aimed at junior residents who are about to start a career in surgery. The current course is a six-week course consisting of didactic instructions with an experienced surgeon, expert-guided self-training and self-directed training at home. Each class consists of eight participants. One week before the course starts the participants meet for an introduction. At the introduction participants are provided with training material consisting of a portable knot tying and suturing kit from Ethicon, Surgical Care, Johnson and Johnson and a written material with descriptions of instruments, instructions in different technical skills and theoretical knowledge in open surgery. The following six weeks participants meet once a week for a one and a half hour on-site class in open surgical techniques. The on-site classes are held in a traditional classroom setting at CAMES and consist of didactic instructions followed by expert-guided self-training. The content of each on-site class is predefined. The participants are instructed to read the written material before the on-site classes. The first on-site classes focus on simple open surgical techniques such as knot tying and introduction to instruments and their use. The following on-site classes focuses on suturing techniques. In the end of the course, participants are introduced to more complex tasks in open surgery, such as theory in abdominal opening and closure, dissection and haemostasis (Appendix B). The participants are instructed to practice the technical skills presented in the classroom at home, using the portable knot tying and suture kit. If the participants reach a predefined level of proficiency at the examination test, held within one week after the last on-site class, they are allowed to participate in an operative course in basic open surgery techniques the following week. During the operative course basic concepts of laparotomy, ligation and dissection are practiced. The majority of the operative course focuses on practical training on sedated pigs. Groups of three trainees are supervised by an experienced surgeon.
Participants will be randomized to self-directed training at home in pairs (forty participants) or self-directed training at home individually (forty sixteen participants). All participants will follow the regular course in basic surgical skills in open surgery. Randomization will be en-bloc, so all participants following the same course, with eight participants in each course, will be randomized to follow the same instructions. Participants will be informed that they are expected to take part in classroom on-site classes, but they decide themselves when and how much time to spend practicing and which of the task presented in the classroom they practice.
Technical skill test At the introduction participant's technical skills in open surgery is assessed in a pre-test. The same test is used for examination at the end of the course (post-test). The test is composed of five basic tasks performed on a simulated skin model. The tasks are designed to explore technical skills in three different knot-tying techniques, five different suturing techniques and knowledge in selecting the right instruments and sutures. The examination instructions are presented in written format (Appendix C). Participants are given twenty-five minutes to complete the tasks. Participants are instructed to distribute their time on each task themselves. Unlimited time is given before the test starts to read the instructions carefully and to select the sutures needed. Tests are recorded on video. The camera is placed so only the hands of the trainee and the operation field is showed on the video. Audio will be deleted to allow for blinded rating. To pass the course, the trainees must achieve a predefined proficiency level corresponding to fifty percent (15 points) of the maximum score (30 point) at the post-test. The test will be performed at CAMES assuring optimal height and light setting at every test session.
Task 1: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound using far-far near-near running suturing technique, 3-0 monofilament, nonabsorbable suture, anatomical forceps, and to start and end the suture using two hand knot tying technique.
Task 2: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound, the skin model simulates the fascia, they are asked to use an absorbable suture, De Bakey forceps and one hand knot tying technique to start and end the suturing.
Task 3: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound using subcuticular suturing technique, a 4-0 absorbable suture, anatomical forceps, and to start and end the suture using instrumental knot tying technique.
Task 4: The participant is instructed to demonstrate three far-far near-near interrupted sutures on a five cm wound, using 4-0 monofilament, nonabsorbable suture, anatomical forceps and to close each suture with one hand knot tying technique.
Task 5: The participant is instructed to close a five cm wound using simple interrupted suturing technique. The participant decides themselves which suture, instruments and knot tying technique they will use.
Participants are instructed to show what kind of sutures that have chosen for each task to the camera.
Training log Participants will be asked to keep a training log with details of time spend on training and number of training sessions. The training log will contain information on which type of task is practised and if the training is performed in pairs. Also time spend in the operation room, assisting or performing open surgery will be registered (APPENDIX D). Every week when the participants meet for the on-site class held at CAMES, the training log will be copied, to ensure the participants fill in the training log correctly and regularly.
Expert assessment Two experts in surgery will do the ratings based on video-recordings. One rater will be blinded for both the randomization (dyad-training versus individually training) and who is performing on the video-recording. The other rater will teach the on-site classes and rate the examination tests, and is therefore not blinded for the randomization for the post-test. However, this rater will still be blinded for the randomization for the pre-test ratings and who that perform on the video-recording. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) is used as the primary endpoint of this study. OSATS is a validated assessment tool for the evaluation of general surgical skills[15, 16]. OSATS consists of a five-point global rating scale (GRS) and task specific checklists[15]. Only the GRS will be used for assessment, as no full procedures are performed in the test. A modified GRS will be used, as the audio will be deleted from all videos and no assistant will be available during testing. Using the modified GRS trainees will be evaluated on the following categories: 1) respect for tissue, 2) time and motion, 3) instrument handling, 4) knowledge of instruments, 5) flow of operation and forward planning and 6) knowledge of specific procedure (Appendix E).
Handling of adverse events during testing
During testing there is a risk of adverse events. They should be handled as follows:
The practical equipment fails:
Testing is stopped. If equipment fail is repairable on the testing session, testing is restarted at the point it was stopped. If not, the testing session is seen as failed and the testing session will not be used or counted as an attempt. A new test will be performed.
The simulated skin model becomes detached from the table:
The participant is allowed to fix the simulated skin model to the table and will continue to finish the task. If this is not possible, a score of zero will be given.
Other interruptions during testing:
Testing is stopped. If the interruption can be overcome during the testing session, testing is restarted at the point it was stopped. If not, the testing session is seen as a failed testing session and will not be used.
A test session which fails due to adverse events will not be used in the final analysis and a new test session will be arranged.
Study participants Participants are medical doctors with a surgical interest and medical students in relevant jobs related to surgery (internships, research year) participating in the course in basic surgical skills in open surgery. Eighty trainees', who sign up for the current course in basic open surgical skills, will be enrolled in the study.
Note:
Base-line testing (pre-test) for 15 participants have been carried out in august 2016. These participants where randomized according to the protocol. No changes has been made to the protocol, and data has not been analyzed, since no post-testing has been carried out. The data from the first 15 participants will not be obtained and analyzed before the post-test at the end of september.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dyad training | Experimental | Other: Dyad trainingParticipants randomized to train in pairs during the whole 6-week course |
| Control group: individually training | No intervention | –If randomized to train individually, participants will be instructed to do all the training individually. Participants will be instructed not to practice with others when practising at home and will only receive feedback from the expert during the expert-guided self-training. At the training at CAMES, participants will sit at separate tables. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The participants may enter the study if any of the following apply:
- Medical doctor from a department in the Capital Region and the region of Zeeland in Denmark.
- Medical students employed in internships or research year in surgical departments in the Capital Region and the region of Zeeland in Denmark.
- The participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- The participants may not enter the study if any of the following apply:
- The participant have performed more than 50 open surgical procedures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dyad trainingParticipants will be paired in teams at the introduction. Participants will be instructed to train and supervise each other in pairs and will receive information on how to give constructive feedback. Participants will practice in pairs during on-site classes and encouraged to train in pairs during the self-regulated training at home. At the on-site classes, participants will be instructed to practice with their partner, during the expert-guided self-training and receive all feedback in pairs. Participants will train at the same table with space for two people. Outside the classroom, participants will decide themselves when and how often they will meet to practise. Participants are instructed to actively observe his or her partner while practising and are encouraged to discuss their performance and any difficulties they encounter. Testing will be done individually. With the training log, the investigators will measure whether the participants train in pairs at home as instructed. | Other | Dyad training |
Primary outcome
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
Differences between pre-test and post-test scores in basic tasks on a simulated model
7 secondary outcomes
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Technical Skills Training
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Self-training and Resuscitation Techniques: Evaluation of the Performance and Impact on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
Cardiac Arrest (CA)
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of Flipped vs Traditional Classroom Teaching for Primary Surgical Skills in Postgraduate Surgical Trainees
FLIPPED CLASSROOM METHODS, Traditional Classroom-Based Learning
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Hysteroscopy Skills With a New Assessment Tool
Hysteroscopy, Assessment Methods in Medical Training
Enrolling by invitation
THE EFFECT OF URINARY CATHETER PLACEMENT TRAINING
Nursing Students
Active, not recruiting
Real-Time Pose Recognition Technology for Improving Tennis Learning in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities
Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate, Adolescence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dyad training in people with Technical Skills Training, run by Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To examine the effect of off-site self-directed training in groups vs. individual training (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2016.