Hemophilia APhase 3CHAWINCT02895945
BAX 802 in CHA With Inhibitors
A Phase 3 study testing Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802) in people with Hemophilia A, run by Baxalta now part of Shire at 24 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAX 802 in males with congenital hemophilia A (CHA) with inhibitors who are undergoing major or minor elective surgical, dental, or other invasive procedures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 75 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemophilia A
- What is being tested?
- Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Dec 2016to 22 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 75 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant requires a major or minor elective surgical, dental or other invasive procedure
- Participant is male and ≥ 12 to ≤ 75 years old at the time of screening
- Participant has provided signed informed consent (and assent for adolescent participants, as applicable) in accordance with local regulatory requirements
- Participant has severe (factor VIII (FVIII) level < 1%) or moderately severe (FVIII level ≤ 2%) congenital hemophilia A (CHA) with inhibitors to human factor VIII (hFVIII) of ≥ 0.6 Bethesda units (BU), as tested at screening at the central laboratory
- Participant is not currently receiving or has recently received (< 30 days) immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy
- Participant has a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 at screening
Show all 9Show fewer
- Participant is human immunodeficiency virus negative (HIV-); or HIV+ with stable disease and CD4+ count ≥ 200 cells/mm^3 at screening
- Participant is hepatitis C virus negative (HCV-) by antibody or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing; or HCV+ with chronic stable hepatitis disease. Positive serologies will be confirmed by PCR testing.
- Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
Who cannot join
- The participant requires emergency surgery
- Severe chronic liver dysfunction or disease (e.g., ≥ 5 × upper limit of normal [ULN] alanine aminotransferase [ALT], as confirmed by central laboratory at screening or a documented prothrombin time/international normalized ratio [PT/INR] > 1.5)
- Clinically symptomatic renal disease (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL), as confirmed by central laboratory at screening
- Anti-porcine factor VIII (pFVIII) inhibitor > 10 BU prior to surgery
- Platelet count < 100,000/μL at screening
- Participant has another active coagulation disorder, other than hemophilia A, as per the medical history
Show all 12Show fewer
- Planned use of α-interferon with or without ribavirin for HCV infected patients or planned use of a protease inhibitor for HIV infected patients. Patients currently taking any of these medications for ≥ 30 days are eligible
- Known hypersensitivity to recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII), or hamster or murine proteins
- Participant has an ongoing or recent (within 3 months of screening) thrombo-embolic disease, fibrinolysis or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
- Participant has been exposed to an IP within 30 days prior to enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving an investigational product (IP) or investigational device during the course of this study
- Participant is unable to tolerate quantity of blood to be drawn for protocol procedures
- Participant is a family member or employee of the Investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 12 countries.
24 sites in 12 countries
Italy4 sites
Presidio Ospedaliero di Castelfranco Veneto
Castelfranco Veneto, Treviso, 31033
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
Florence, 50134
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, 20122
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Padova, 35128
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Ankara University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 6590
Ege University Medical Faculty
Izmir, 35040
Ege University Medical Faculty
Izmir, 35100
Kocaeli University Medical Faculty
Kocaeli, 41300
United States3 sites
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-7284
Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Spain3 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
A Coruña, 15006
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, Valencia, 46026
Bulgaria2 sites
UMHAT 'Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL', EAD
Sofia, 1527
UMHATEM 'N.I. Pirogov', EAD
Sofia, 1606
Germany2 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Bonn AoeR
Bonn, 53127
Zentrum für Hämostaseologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
Leipzig, 04103
Canada1 site
Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont d/b/a CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Russia1 site
FSBI of Science "Kirov Scientific and Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion of FMBA.
Kirov, 610027
South Africa1 site
Bleeding Disorders Unit and Clinical Haematology Service at Charlotte Maxeke JHB Academic Hospital
Johannesburg, 2193
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of B-Domain Deleted Recombinant Porcine Factor VIII (BAX 802) in Subjects With Congenital Hemophilia A With Factor VIII Inhibitors Undergoing Surgical or Other Invasive Procedures
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAX 802 in males with congenital hemophilia A (CHA) with inhibitors who are undergoing major or minor elective surgical, dental, or other invasive procedures.
- Conditions
- Hemophilia A
- Being tested
- Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802)
- Medical subject headings
- Hemophilia A
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802)Biological
Also called BAX 802, recombinant porcine factor VIII, Obizur, rpFVIII
In case of major surgery, FVIII target level is ≥80% for major surgeries/ procedures and ≥50% for minor surgeries/ procedures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BAX 802 in Surgery | Experimental | Participants who are undergoing major or minor elective surgical, dental, or other invasive procedures. Receives: Biological: Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Surgeries With a "Good" or "Excellent" Response as Measured by the Global Hemostatic Efficacy Assessment (GHEA) Score
GHEA score consisted of 3 individual rating scales: (1) Intra-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale, (2) Post-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale, and (3) Overall Peri-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale. Scales 1 and 2 was performed by the operating surgeon on Day 1, and Scale 3 was performed by the investigator on Day 14. Each rating scale was based on 4 points scale ranging from: 3 (Excellent), 2 (Good), 1 (Fair), and 0 (None). Total score ranged from 0 to 9, where scores evaluated as: excellent (7 to 9), good (5 to 7), fair (3 to 4), and none (0 to 2). The scores of 3 individual ratings scales were added together to form a GHEA score. For a GHEA score of 7 to be rated "excellent" with no individual assessment scores less than (<) 2 and at least 1 assessment score equal to (=) 3; otherwise a score of 7 was rated "good". Percentage of Surgeries With a "Good" or "Excellent" response as measured by the GHEA score were reported.
Measured: Day 1 up to discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Secondary outcomes (17)
Actual Blood Loss, Estimated Volume of Expected Average Blood Loss and Expected Maximum Blood Loss During Intra-operative, Post-operative and Peri-operative Period
Prior to the surgery, the surgeon/investigator predicted and compared the estimated volume (in milliliter [mL]) of the expected average blood loss and expected maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a comparable healthy individual with similar demographic characteristics; for intraoperative, postoperative, and overall perioperative time periods. Intra-operative defined as period from start of surgery to completion of surgical procedure. Post-operative defined as period from completion of surgical procedure till 24 hours post-surgery. Peri-operative defined as period from start of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier). Actual blood loss, estimated volume of expected average blood loss and expected maximum blood loss during each operative period was reported.
Measured: Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: at 24 hours post-surgery, and Peri-operative: at discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Ratio of Actual Blood Loss and Estimated Volume of Expected Average Blood Loss During Intra-operative, Post-operative and Peri-operative Period
Prior to the surgery, the surgeon/investigator predicted and compared the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average blood loss and expected maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a comparable healthy individual with similar demographic characteristics; for intraoperative, postoperative, and overall perioperative time periods. Intra-operative defined as period from start of surgery to completion of surgical procedure. Post-operative defined as period from completion of surgical procedure till 24 hours post-surgery. Peri-operative defined as period from start of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier). Ratio of actual blood loss and estimated volume of expected average blood loss during each operative period was reported.
Measured: Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: at 24 hours post-surgery, and Peri-operative: at discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Ratio of Actual Blood Loss and Expected Maximum Blood Loss During Intra-operative, Post-operative and Peri-operative Period
Prior to the surgery, the surgeon/investigator predicted and compared the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average blood loss and expected maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a comparable healthy individual with similar demographic characteristics; for intraoperative, postoperative, and overall perioperative time periods. Intra-operative defined as period from start of surgery to completion of surgical procedure. Post-operative defined as period from completion of surgical procedure till 24 hours post-surgery. Peri-operative defined as period from start of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier). Ratio of actual blood loss and expected maximum blood loss during each operative period was reported.
Measured: Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: at 24 hours post-surgery, and Peri-operative: at discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Percentage of Major Surgeries With Good or Excellent Hemostatic Score
Percentage of major surgeries with good or excellent hemostatic score was analyzed by GHEA score. It consisted of 3 individual ratings: (1) Intra-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale, (2) Post-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale, (3) Postoperative Efficacy Assessment Scale. Ratings 1 and 2 was performed by the operating surgeon on Day 1, and Rating 3 was performed by the investigator on Day 14. Each rating scale was based on 4 point scale ranging from: 3 (Excellent), 2 (Good), 1 (Fair), and 0 (None). The scores of each of the 3 individual ratings scales, was added together to form a GHEA score. Total score ranged from 0 to 9 where scores evaluated as excellent (7 to 9), good (5 to 7), fair (3 to 4), and none (0 to 2). Hemostatic efficacy success was defined as "excellent" or "good "outcome for >=70% of hemostatic efficacy assessments. Percentage of major surgeries with good or excellent hemostatic score were reported.
Measured: Day 1 up to discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Average Daily Weight-adjusted Dose of BAX 802 Per Participant During Pre-operative, Intra-operative and Post-operative Period
Body-weight adjusted dose equals to amount infused/body-weight (kilogram [kg]), where amount infused as amount of drug infused (International Units [IU]) and body-weight as the last available body-weight (kg) prior to the infusion. Pre-operative defined as period prior to surgery. Intra-operative defined as period from start of surgery to completion of surgical procedure. Post-operative defined as period from completion of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier). Average daily weight-adjusted dose of BAX 802 per participant during each operative period was reported.
Measured: Pre-operative: before surgery, Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: from completion of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier)
Total Weight-adjusted Dose of BAX 802 Per Participant During Pre-operative, Intra-operative and Post-operative Period
Body-weight adjusted dose equals to amount infused/body-weight (kg), where amount infused as amount of drug infused (IU) and body-weight as the last available body-weight (kg) prior to the infusion. Pre-operative defined as period prior to surgery. Intra-operative defined as period from start of surgery to completion of surgical procedure. Post-operative defined as period from completion of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier). Total weight-adjusted dose of BAX 802 per participant during each operative period was reported.
Measured: Pre-operative: before surgery, Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: from completion of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier)
Volume of Blood Products Transfused
The volume (in mL) of blood products transfused from initiation of the intervention to discharge or Day 14 (whichever came earlier) was reported.
Measured: From initiation of the surgery up to discharge or Day 14 (whichever came earlier)
Number of Participants With De Novo Inhibitors
De novo inhibitor was defined as a post-baseline inhibitor titer to FVIII (hFVIII or porcine factor VIII [pFVIII])of >=0.6 Bethesda units per milliliter (BU/mL) given a baseline of <0.6 BU/mL. Number of participants with de novo inhibitors were reported.
Measured: Baseline up end of study (EOS) (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Anamnestic Reactions
An anamnestic reaction was defined as an increase from a measurable baseline (>0.6 BU/mL) in the inhibitor titer to FVIII (human or porcine) of >=10 BU/mL. Number of participants with anamnestic reactions were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Mean Change From Baseline up to EOS in Inhibitory and Binding Antibodies to pFVIII
The assessment of inhibitory antibodies (immunoglobulin G [IgG] and immunoglobulin M [IgM]) to pFVIII was determined using Bethesda assay, and assessment of binding antibodies (IgG and IgM) to pFVIII was determined using validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Mean change from baseline in inhibitory and binding antibodies to pFVIII was reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Mean Change From Baseline up to EOS in Inhibitory and Binding Antibodies to hFVIII
The assessment of inhibitory antibodies (IgG and IgM) to hFVIII was determined using Bethesda assay, and assessment of binding antibodies (IgG and IgM) to hFVIII was determined using ELISA. Mean change from baseline in inhibitory and binding antibodies to hFVIII was reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Binding Antibodies to Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK) Proteins
The assessment of binding antibodies to BHK proteins was determined using ELISA. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in binding antibodies to BHK proteins were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Thromboembolic Events
Thromboembolism defined as formation in a blood vessel of a clot (thrombus) that breaks loose and carried by the blood stream to plug another vessel. Number of participants with thromboembolic events was reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Severe Allergic Reactions
Number of participants with severe allergic reaction (example: anaphylaxis) after administration of study drug were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Investigational Product (IP) Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to study assigned treatment or not) that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital abnormality/birth defect, or was an important medical event. TEAEs was defined as any adverse events (classified by preferred term) that had a start date on or after the first dose of study treatment or that had a start date before the date of first dose of study treatment, but increased in severity after the first dose of study treatment. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Sign
Vital sign parameters included: temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Any changes in vital signs which were deemed clinically significant was judged by the investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in vital signs were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values
Clinical laboratory assessment included hematology and clinical chemistry. Any changes in clinical laboratory results which were deemed clinically significant was judged by the investigator. Number of participants with clinical significant change from baseline in clinical laboratory values were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start22 Dec 2016
- Primary completion22 Jan 2021
- Study completion22 Jan 2021
Why it stopped: Takeda has determined that the benefit/risk profile does not support continuation of the surgery Study for this specific Congenital Hemophilia A with Inhibitors patient population.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hemophilia AStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baxalta now part of Shire
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now part of Shire
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, Shire
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02895945
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 241502
- Other IDs
- 2015-005521-39, 2015
- Acronym
- CHAWI
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: De-identified individual participant data from this particular study will not be shared as there is a reasonable likelihood that individual patients could be re-identified (due to the limited number of study participants).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of B-Domain Deleted Recombinant Porcine Factor VIII (BAX 802) in Subjects With Congenital Hemophilia A With Factor VIII Inhibitors Undergoing Surgical or Other Invasive Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02895945
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHAWI / 241502
- Conditions
- Hemophilia A
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Takeda has determined that the benefit/risk profile does not support continuation of the surgery Study for this specific Congenital Hemophilia A with Inhibitors patient population.
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baxalta now part of ShireIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now part of Shire
- Study start
- 22 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Oct 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAX 802 in males with congenital hemophilia A (CHA) with inhibitors who are undergoing major or minor elective surgical, dental, or other invasive procedures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BAX 802 in Surgery | Experimental | Biological: Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802)Participants who are undergoing major or minor elective surgical, dental, or other invasive procedures. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 75 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Participant requires a major or minor elective surgical, dental or other invasive procedure
- Participant is male and ≥ 12 to ≤ 75 years old at the time of screening
- Participant has provided signed informed consent (and assent for adolescent participants, as applicable) in accordance with local regulatory requirements
- Participant has severe (factor VIII (FVIII) level < 1%) or moderately severe (FVIII level ≤ 2%) congenital hemophilia A (CHA) with inhibitors to human factor VIII (hFVIII) of ≥ 0.6 Bethesda units (BU), as tested at screening at the central laboratory
- Participant is not currently receiving or has recently received (< 30 days) immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- The participant requires emergency surgery
- Severe chronic liver dysfunction or disease (e.g., ≥ 5 × upper limit of normal [ULN] alanine aminotransferase [ALT], as confirmed by central laboratory at screening or a documented prothrombin time/international normalized ratio [PT/INR] > 1.5)
- Clinically symptomatic renal disease (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL), as confirmed by central laboratory at screening
- Anti-porcine factor VIII (pFVIII) inhibitor > 10 BU prior to surgery
- Platelet count < 100,000/μL at screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802)Also: BAX 802, recombinant porcine factor VIII, Obizur, rpFVIIIIn case of major surgery, FVIII target level is ≥80% for major surgeries/ procedures and ≥50% for minor surgeries/ procedures. | Biological | BAX 802 in Surgery |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Surgeries With a "Good" or "Excellent" Response as Measured by the Global Hemostatic Efficacy Assessment (GHEA) Score
Time frame: Day 1 up to discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
GHEA score consisted of 3 individual rating scales: (1) Intra-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale, (2) Post-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale, and (3) Overall Peri-operative Efficacy Assessment Scale. Scales 1 and 2 was performed by the operating surgeon on Day 1, and Scale 3 was performed by the investigator on Day 14. Each rating scale was based on 4 points scale ranging from: 3 (Excellent), 2 (Good), 1 (Fair), and 0 (None). Total score ranged from 0 to 9, where scores evaluated as: excellent (7 to 9), good (5 to 7), fair (3 to 4), and none (0 to 2). The scores of 3 individual ratings scales were added together to form a GHEA score. For a GHEA score of 7 to be rated "excellent" with no individual assessment scores less than (<) 2 and at least 1 assessment score equal to (=) 3; otherwise a score of 7 was rated "good". Percentage of Surgeries With a "Good" or "Excellent" response as measured by the GHEA score were reported.
17 secondary outcomes
Actual Blood Loss, Estimated Volume of Expected Average Blood Loss and Expected Maximum Blood Loss During Intra-operative, Post-operative and Peri-operative Period
Time frame: Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: at 24 hours post-surgery, and Peri-operative: at discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Ratio of Actual Blood Loss and Estimated Volume of Expected Average Blood Loss During Intra-operative, Post-operative and Peri-operative Period
Time frame: Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: at 24 hours post-surgery, and Peri-operative: at discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Ratio of Actual Blood Loss and Expected Maximum Blood Loss During Intra-operative, Post-operative and Peri-operative Period
Time frame: Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: at 24 hours post-surgery, and Peri-operative: at discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Percentage of Major Surgeries With Good or Excellent Hemostatic Score
Time frame: Day 1 up to discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)
Average Daily Weight-adjusted Dose of BAX 802 Per Participant During Pre-operative, Intra-operative and Post-operative Period
Time frame: Pre-operative: before surgery, Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: from completion of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier)
Total Weight-adjusted Dose of BAX 802 Per Participant During Pre-operative, Intra-operative and Post-operative Period
Time frame: Pre-operative: before surgery, Intra-operative: up to completion of surgery (Day 1), Post-operative: from completion of surgical procedure till discharge or 14 days post surgery (whichever was earlier)
Volume of Blood Products Transfused
Time frame: From initiation of the surgery up to discharge or Day 14 (whichever came earlier)
Number of Participants With De Novo Inhibitors
Time frame: Baseline up end of study (EOS) (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Anamnestic Reactions
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Mean Change From Baseline up to EOS in Inhibitory and Binding Antibodies to pFVIII
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Mean Change From Baseline up to EOS in Inhibitory and Binding Antibodies to hFVIII
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Binding Antibodies to Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK) Proteins
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Thromboembolic Events
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Severe Allergic Reactions
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Investigational Product (IP) Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Sign
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (up to 44 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain more information on the study, click here/on this linkLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. De-identified individual participant data from this particular study will not be shared as there is a reasonable likelihood that individual patients could be re-identified (due to the limited number of study participants).
Related trials for Hemophilia A
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Lentiviral FVIII Gene Therapy
Hemophilia A
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in Human Study of ARD001 in Healthy Volunteers and People With Hemophilia A
Hemophilia A, Healthy Adult Participants
RecruitingPhase 3
A Research Study Investigating Denecimig (Mim8) in Adults With Acquired Haemophilia A
Haemophilia A
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Fitusiran Prophylaxis in Male Participants Aged 1 to Less Than 12 Years With Hemophilia A or B
Hemophilia
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Learn More About How Well Damoctocog Alfa Pegol Works in Previously Treated Children With Hemophilia A
Hemophilia A
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Director study director
Shire
24 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Porcine Sequence (BAX 802) in people with Hemophilia A, run by Baxalta now part of Shire at 24 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in Italy, Turkey (Türkiye), United States, Spain, Bulgaria and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Surgeries With a "Good" or "Excellent" Response as Measured by the Global Hemostatic Efficacy Assessment (GHEA) Score (time frame: Day 1 up to discharge or Day 14 (whichever was earlier)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2021.