Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseDISCUSS COPDNCT02896257
De-implementing Inhaled Steroids to Improve Care and Safety in COPD
A study testing Guideline treatment recommendations in people with Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QuERI) project is designed to determine efficacy and acceptance of an intervention method to provide primary care providers with patient-tailored electronic consults and corresponding unsigned orders for de-implementation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Guideline treatment recommendations
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 181 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Sep 2016to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provider:
- Primary care provider (medical doctor/osteopathic physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant [MD/DO, NP, PA]) assigned to a PACT from VA Puget Sound Health Care System or Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (Bedford VA).
- Patient:
- Patient is a Veteran who is assigned a VA PCP and has received Rx for an inhaled corticosteroid within the past 180 days.
- Patient has an inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of COPD in the prior two years.
- Patient has undergone spirometry in the past 5 years that indicates either no airflow obstruction or mild to moderate airflow obstruction indicated by a forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1)/[greater of forced vital capacity (FVC) or vital capacity (VC)] =< 0.7 \& FEV1% predicted >= 30%.
Who cannot join
- Patients:
- Very severe airflow obstruction (<30% FEV1 % predicted)
- Severe disease as indicated by 1 inpatient COPD exacerbation in the year prior
- Severe disease as indicated by 2 outpatient COPD exacerbations in the year prior
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 and/or 10 diagnosed or clinically indicated asthmatics
- Significant bronchodilator response on spirometry (>12% increase in FEV1 post bronchodilator; >375 mL post-bronchodilator improvement)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
VA Bedford HealthCare System, Bedford, MA
Bedford, Massachusetts, 01730-1114
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532
About this study
Official title: De-implementing Inhaled Steroids to Improve Care and Safety in COPD (DISCUSS COPD) (QUE 15-471)
This Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QuERI) project is designed to determine efficacy and acceptance of an intervention method to provide primary care providers with patient-tailored electronic consults and corresponding unsigned orders for de-implementation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for patients with COPD when ICS are not indicated by guidelines.
Read the detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is among the most common medical diagnoses among Veterans. Approximately half of those who carry a diagnosis of COPD are prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), despite ICS having no role among those patients without fixed airflow obstruction (AFO) and a limited role among those who do. Guidelines explicitly state that ICS for COPD patients should be limited to those with severe AFO and those with frequent exacerbations. Even this benefit comes at a cost, as ICS use has been shown in multiple randomized controlled trials to increase rates of pneumonia. After prolonged exposure, ICS is also associated with higher bone fracture risk, incidence of cataracts and poor diabetes control. Among patients without disease or with mild-moderate AFO and low risk of exacerbation, ICS have no demonstrated efficacy, but retain the risk of harm. For this reason, evidence-based guidelines specifically recommend against their use in mild-moderate AFO.
The goal of this project is to improve the delivery and safety of care by de-implementing the ineffective use of ICS among Veterans with a diagnosis of COPD who otherwise lack a clinical indication for the medication. The primary aim is to reduce ICS use among Veterans with limited clinical indication for the medication. Investigators will test an intervention to de-implement unnecessary use of inhaled corticosteroids in Veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by having pulmonologists assume more responsibility for supporting COPD patients. The investigators will compare a substitution approach using proactive patient-tailored electronic consult (E-consult) compared to usual care with a single-session education outreach, which represents a non-intensive unlearning approach. The investigators are targeting the intervention to Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) providers who are randomized to either receive the intervention or not receive the intervention. For patients within intervention PACTs, the project clinicians will leverage the VA's integrated healthcare informatics system using specialist support through proactive patient-tailored electronic consults (E-consult) and inputting unsigned orders on behalf of Primary Care Providers (PCPs) to recommend and facilitate de-implementation of ICS. Primary care providers will have final say in accepting (signing), modifying, or declining the recommendations.
- Being tested
- Guideline treatment recommendations
- Keywords
- Quality Improvement, Quality Enhancement Research Initiatives, QuERI, Interventional, Multicenter, Inhaled corticosteroids, Pneumonia, Safety, De-implementation, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Pulmonary Diseases, Chronic Obstructive COPD
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Guideline treatment recommendationsOther
Patient-tailored E-consult, orders and rationale to discontinue inhaled corticosteroids and discontinue or receive other COPD related care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Proactive patient-tailored electronic consult (E-consult) | Other | Primary care clinicians receive patient-tailored guideline concordant treatment recommendations, including orders and rationale to discontinue inhaled corticosteroids. Receives: Other: Guideline treatment recommendations |
| Usual care | No intervention | Standard practice (usual care). Primary care providers treat their patients as usual. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Patients With Discontinued or Expired and Not Renewed Inhaled Corticosteroids That Remain Off at 6 Months.
Percentage of patients with discontinued or expired and not renewed inhaled corticosteroids that remain off at 6 months from index date.
Measured: Assessed at 6 months post primary care visit defined as (index date + 180 days)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Rate of COPD Exacerbation
Rate of COPD exacerbation within 6 months starting the day after index date.
Measured: Within 6 months defined as (index date +1 day) to (index date + 180 days)
Rate of Pneumonia
Rate of pneumonia within 6 months starting the day after index date.
Measured: Within 6 months defined as (index date +1 day) to (index date + 180 days)
Mortality
Mortality determined by the presence of date of death occurring between (index date + 1 day) to (index date + 180 days)
Measured: Assessed during 6 months following primary care visit defined as (index date + 1 day) to (index date + 180 days)
Number of Patients Recommended to Stop Inhaled Corticosteroids
Among patients of intervention PCPs, number of patients recommended to stop inhaled corticosteroids
Measured: Collected at time of recommendation/order entry
Percentage of Recommendations to Discontinue Inhaled Corticosteroids Accepted by Primary Care Providers
Among patients assigned to intervention PCPs, percentage of recommendations to discontinue inhaled corticosteroids accepted by primary care providers
Measured: Assessed during 6 months following index date
Percentage of Patients Where ICS Discontinuation Recommendations Are Accepted But Restarted by 6 Months Following Index Date
Percentage of patients where ICS discontinuation recommendations are accepted but restarted by 6 months following index date
Measured: Assessed at 6 months post index date
Number of Patients for Whom Recommendations Are Made
Among patients assigned to intervention providers, number of patients for whom recommendations are made.
Measured: Collected at time or recommendation order entry
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start6 Sep 2016
- Primary completion29 Jul 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David H. Au, MD MS, Principal investigator, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WAChristian D. Helfrich, PhD MPH BA, Principal investigator, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02896257
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QUX 16-009
- Other IDs
- QUE 15-271
- Acronym
- DISCUSS COPD
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- De-implementing Inhaled Steroids to Improve Care and Safety in COPD (DISCUSS COPD) (QUE 15-471)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02896257
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DISCUSS COPD / QUX 16-009
- Keywords
- Quality Improvement, Quality Enhancement Research Initiatives, QuERI, Interventional, Multicenter, Inhaled corticosteroids, Pneumonia, Safety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 6 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jan 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QuERI) project is designed to determine efficacy and acceptance of an intervention method to provide primary care providers with patient-tailored electronic consults and corresponding unsigned orders for de-implementation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for patients with COPD when ICS are not indicated by guidelines.
Detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is among the most common medical diagnoses among Veterans. Approximately half of those who carry a diagnosis of COPD are prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), despite ICS having no role among those patients without fixed airflow obstruction (AFO) and a limited role among those who do. Guidelines explicitly state that ICS for COPD patients should be limited to those with severe AFO and those with frequent exacerbations. Even this benefit comes at a cost, as ICS use has been shown in multiple randomized controlled trials to increase rates of pneumonia. After prolonged exposure, ICS is also associated with higher bone fracture risk, incidence of cataracts and poor diabetes control. Among patients without disease or with mild-moderate AFO and low risk of exacerbation, ICS have no demonstrated efficacy, but retain the risk of harm. For this reason, evidence-based guidelines specifically recommend against their use in mild-moderate AFO.
The goal of this project is to improve the delivery and safety of care by de-implementing the ineffective use of ICS among Veterans with a diagnosis of COPD who otherwise lack a clinical indication for the medication. The primary aim is to reduce ICS use among Veterans with limited clinical indication for the medication. Investigators will test an intervention to de-implement unnecessary use of inhaled corticosteroids in Veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by having pulmonologists assume more responsibility for supporting COPD patients. The investigators will compare a substitution approach using proactive patient-tailored electronic consult (E-consult) compared to usual care with a single-session education outreach, which represents a non-intensive unlearning approach. The investigators are targeting the intervention to Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) providers who are randomized to either receive the intervention or not receive the intervention. For patients within intervention PACTs, the project clinicians will leverage the VA's integrated healthcare informatics system using specialist support through proactive patient-tailored electronic consults (E-consult) and inputting unsigned orders on behalf of Primary Care Providers (PCPs) to recommend and facilitate de-implementation of ICS. Primary care providers will have final say in accepting (signing), modifying, or declining the recommendations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Proactive patient-tailored electronic consult (E-consult) | Other | Other: Guideline treatment recommendationsPrimary care clinicians receive patient-tailored guideline concordant treatment recommendations, including orders and rationale to discontinue inhaled corticosteroids. |
| Usual care | No intervention | –Standard practice (usual care). Primary care providers treat their patients as usual. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Primary care provider (medical doctor/osteopathic physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant [MD/DO, NP, PA]) assigned to a PACT from VA Puget Sound Health Care System or Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital (Bedford VA).
- Patient is a Veteran who is assigned a VA PCP and has received Rx for an inhaled corticosteroid within the past 180 days.
- Patient has an inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of COPD in the prior two years.
- Patient has undergone spirometry in the past 5 years that indicates either no airflow obstruction or mild to moderate airflow obstruction indicated by a forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1)/[greater of forced vital capacity (FVC) or vital capacity (VC)] =< 0.7 \& FEV1% predicted >= 30%.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Very severe airflow obstruction (<30% FEV1 % predicted)
- Severe disease as indicated by 1 inpatient COPD exacerbation in the year prior
- Severe disease as indicated by 2 outpatient COPD exacerbations in the year prior
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 and/or 10 diagnosed or clinically indicated asthmatics
- Significant bronchodilator response on spirometry (>12% increase in FEV1 post bronchodilator; >375 mL post-bronchodilator improvement)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Guideline treatment recommendationsPatient-tailored E-consult, orders and rationale to discontinue inhaled corticosteroids and discontinue or receive other COPD related care. | Other | Proactive patient-tailored electronic consult (E-consult) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Patients With Discontinued or Expired and Not Renewed Inhaled Corticosteroids That Remain Off at 6 Months.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months post primary care visit defined as (index date + 180 days)
Percentage of patients with discontinued or expired and not renewed inhaled corticosteroids that remain off at 6 months from index date.
7 secondary outcomes
Rate of COPD Exacerbation
Time frame: Within 6 months defined as (index date +1 day) to (index date + 180 days)
Rate of Pneumonia
Time frame: Within 6 months defined as (index date +1 day) to (index date + 180 days)
Mortality
Time frame: Assessed during 6 months following primary care visit defined as (index date + 1 day) to (index date + 180 days)
Number of Patients Recommended to Stop Inhaled Corticosteroids
Time frame: Collected at time of recommendation/order entry
Percentage of Recommendations to Discontinue Inhaled Corticosteroids Accepted by Primary Care Providers
Time frame: Assessed during 6 months following index date
Percentage of Patients Where ICS Discontinuation Recommendations Are Accepted But Restarted by 6 Months Following Index Date
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months post index date
Number of Patients for Whom Recommendations Are Made
Time frame: Collected at time or recommendation order entry
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of 24 to 52 Weeks Treatment to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Galvokimig in Study Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) With Chronic Bronchitis
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Chronic Bronchitis
Recruiting
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of dNerva Lung Denervation System in Patients With COPD
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Impact of Eradication Therapy on Helicobacter Pylori Infection With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), With Poitive H Pylori
Not yet recruiting
A New ECP Protocol for the Treatment of cGVHD
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David H. Au, MD MS principal investigator
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Christian D. Helfrich, PhD MPH BA principal investigator
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Guideline treatment recommendations in people with Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Patients With Discontinued or Expired and Not Renewed Inhaled Corticosteroids That Remain Off at 6 Months. (time frame: Assessed at 6 months post primary care visit defined as (index date + 180 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2023.