AzTrials
AzTrials

AnastomosisNCT02897531

Comparison Between End-to-side and Side-to-side Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy

A study testing ES anastomosis and SS anastomosis in people with Anastomosis, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 2 sites in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of end-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy compared with that of side-to-side anastomosis. The investigators hypothesize that the end-to-side anastomosis may be associated with superior recovery compared with side-to-side anastomosis after… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Anastomosis
What is being tested?
ES anastomosis and SS anastomosis
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
130 participants
Where
2 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
Sep 2016to Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 18 - 80
  • Right-sided colon cancer (adenocarcinoma, located in cecum to hepatic flexure)
  • Appropriate laboratory (Bone marrow) findings (Hemoglobin ≥ 10g/dl, White blood cell count ≥ 4,000/mm3, Platelet ≥ 100,000/mm3)
  • Appropriate renal function (Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dl)
  • Appropriate cardio-pulmonary functions
  • Appropriate understanding of the study and provide the informed consent
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Exclusion Criteria: Patients who have 1 or more of the following:
  • Distant metastasis or locally advanced tumor which required combined resection of other organs, such as the ureter, duodenum, or small bowel.
  • Not suitable for laparoscopic surgery
  • Currently taking medication for dyschezia, such as constipation or diarrhea.
  • Not suitable for adapting enhanced recovery program due to underlying diseases, such as cardio-pulmonary disease, mental disorder, and etc.
  • Not suitable for participation in this clinical trial based on the judgment of the investigators

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

South Korea2 sites
  • Seoul National Univercity Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam, Gyeonggido, 463-707

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam, 463-707

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between End-to-side and Side-to-side Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of end-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy compared with that of side-to-side anastomosis. The investigators hypothesize that the end-to-side anastomosis may be associated with superior recovery compared with side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy under enhanced recovery program. The primary endpoint is the cumulative recovery rate, consisting of the recovery time of diet, pain, ambulation, and afebrile status.

Read the detailed description

All patients will be received a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy by three experienced colorectal surgeons and randomly divided into two groups according to the method of anastomosis: - the end-to-side anastomosis group and the side-to-side anastomosis group. After the surgery, enhanced recovery program will be implemented. The primary endpoint is the cumulative recovery rate according to the method of anastomosis. The cumulative recovery rate is defined as the percentage of patients who are satisfied with all aspects of recovery time, including i) tolerance of diet for 24 hours, 2) analgesic-free (oral or intravenous (IV) analgesic drugs not necessary after cessation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)), 3) safe ambulation (ambulation of 600m without assistance), 4) afebrile status without major complications (fever was defined as body temperature greater than 37.2°C at axilla). Secondary endpoints are postoperative hospital stay, complications, the failure rate of the enhanced recovery program, and the readmission rate within 1 month after surgery. The expected cumulative recovery rate in postoperative day 7 is 90% in the end-to-side anastomosis group and 70% in the side-to-side anastomosis group. The sample size of 130 patients was calculated as follow: Based on the assumption that cumulative recovery rate will increase to 20% using the end-to-side anastomosis, it was calculated that 65 patients should be in each group. The sample size was calculated by the formula for a power 80%, alpha error of 0.05 and dropout rate of 10%.

Conditions
Anastomosis
Being tested
ES anastomosis, SS anastomosis
Keywords
Ileocolic, stapled, laparoscopy, right hemicolectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ES anastomosisProcedure or surgery

    The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the end of the distal ileum with one circular stapler, and the blind end of the transverse colon will be closed with one linear stapler.

  • SS anastomosisProcedure or surgery

    The side wall of the transverse colon will be anastomosed to the side wall of the distal ileum with two linear staplers.

Study groups in NCT02897531
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ES anastomosisActive comparatorStapled end-to-side anastomosis
Receives: Procedure: ES anastomosis
SS anastomosisActive comparatorStapled side-to-side anastomosis
Receives: Procedure: SS anastomosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulative Recovery Rate

    The cumulative recovery rate is defined as the percentage of patients who are satisfied with all aspects of recovery time. Recovery time includes the following:

    1. Tolerance of diet for 24hours
    2. Analgesic-free status (oral or intravenous (IV) analgesic drugs not necessary after cessation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)),
    3. Safe ambulation (ambulation of 600m without assistance),
    4. Afebrile status without major complications (fever was defined as body temperature greater than 37.2°C at axilla).

    Measured: at 7 days after operation

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Postoperative Hospital Stay

    Time(days) from operation to discharge

    Measured: at discharge from hospital, an average of 1 week

  2. Postoperative Complications

    Includes any minor complication (ileus, wound infection) to major complications requiring re-intervention

    Measured: at 30 days

  3. Failure Rate of the Enhanced Recovery Program

    the number of patients who failed to adhere to the ERAS protocol

    Measured: at discharge from hospital, an average of 1 week

  4. Readmission Rate Within 1 Month After Surgery

    the number of patients who were re-admitted after discharge within 1 month after surgery

    Measured: at 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2016
  3. Primary completionAug 2019
  4. Study completionJul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
130 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02897531
Sponsor's protocol ID
B-1607-354-004
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
2 Sep 2016
Last updated
5 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in