Postoperative PainNCT02898103
Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for Postoperative Analgesia
A study testing Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in people with Postoperative Pain, run by University of California, San Diego at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following orthopedic surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Feb 2017to 20 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Undergoing orthopedic surgical procedure that frequently results in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain
- At least 18 years of age
- Able to understand and willing to take part in study and adhere to all study requirements
Who cannot join
- Postoperative analgesic plan includes a single-injection peripheral nerve block in the surgical extremity
- Chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
- Known neuro-muscular deficit of the target nerve(s)
- Anticipated MRI within the following 2 weeks
- Compromised immune system based on medical history (e.g., immunosuppressive therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, sepsis, infection), or other conditions that places the subject at increased risk in the opinion of the investigator
- Implanted spinal cord stimulator, cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator, deep brain stimulator, or other implantable neurostimulator whose stimulus current pathway may overlap
Show all 13Show fewer
- History of bleeding disorder
- Antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapies other than aspirin
- Allergy to all local anesthetic agents such as lidocaine or previous reaction to anesthesia
- Allergy to skin-contact materials (occlusive dressings, bandages, tape etc.)
- Any other condition that may interfere with ability to participate in a clinical trial (e.g., anatomy that may interfere with lead placement) as determined by the Investigators
- Incarceration
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
UCSD Medical Center, Thornton
La Jolla, California, 92037
Ucsd Ctri
La Jolla, California, 92097
UCSD Medical Center, Hillcrest
San Diego, California, 92103
About this study
Official title: Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for Postoperative Analgesia: A Feasibility/Proof-of-Concept Study
The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following orthopedic surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse). Potent site-specific analgesia with fewer side effects may be provided with a "continuous peripheral nerve block," which involves the percutaneous insertion of a catheter adjacent to the peripheral nerve(s) supplying a surgical site. Local anesthetic is introduced via the catheter. However, there are major problems with continuous nerve blocks that have dramatically limited their use outside academic centers. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) or "nerve modulation" is an alternative method of pain control involving the insertion of an electrical lead through an introducing needle-obviating an open surgical incision for placement-followed by the introduction of electric current to produce analgesia. This modality has been used to treat chronic pain, but it has not been evaluated with a randomized, controlled study when applied to acute pain management (post-surgical analgesia). This temporary therapy has multiple theoretical benefits over existing analgesics, such as a lack of systemic side effects (e.g., nausea, respiratory depression), an absence of induced muscle weakness, and a reduced risk of adverse events (e.g. infection). The purpose of the proposed randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover, feasibility study is to explore the possibility of treating postoperative pain with ultrasound-guided percutaneous PNS and, if so, to help power a subsequent definitive randomized, controlled trial.
Read the detailed description
Written, informed consent will be obtained using an IRB-approved ICF prior to any study procedures. Lead insertion may occur up to 2 weeks prior to surgery within the CTRI, or the morning of surgery in the regional anesthesia induction area (it just depends on subject and surgeon preference, as well as logistical issues such as the time of the surgery and availability of the investigators). Muscle strength will be measured with a pressure transducer.
Preoperative lead insertion (approximately 1-3 hours). A percutaneous, helically-coiled, insulated electrical lead will be inserted via an introducer needle at least 2 cm proximal or distal to the perineural catheter location along the target nerve using real-time ultrasound guidance:
Surgical Procedure Location: Perineural Catheter Location, Electrical Lead Location
Shoulder: Interscalene, Interscalene or supraclavicular or suprascapular
At or distal to the elbow: Infraclavicular, Interscalene, supraclavicular or terminal nerve(s)
Foot or ankle: Popliteal-sciatic [adductor canal optional], Subgluteal-sciatic [femoral optional] <or vice vera>
Knee or distal thigh: Adductor canal [popliteal-sciatic optional], Femoral [subgluteal-sciatic optional]
It will be optional for a conducting probe to be used prior to lead insertion-this allows identification of the optimal lead tip location relative to the target nerve by passing electrical current via the insulated probe. The desired end point is a pleasant paresthesia in the distribution of the target nerve reported by the subject. If used, the probe will be completely withdrawn following target location identification, and a lead subsequently inserted to the target location. Following needle removal, the percutaneous helical lead will have electric current passed using the SPRINT (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, OH) pulse generator to ensure accurate placement (a pleasant paresthesia in the distribution of the target nerve). It will be replaced, if necessary. Muscle strength will be measured with a pressure transducer during the delivery of electrical current. The pulse generator will then be removed and the lead affixed to the skin using an occlusive dressing.
With the subject's permission the investigators may photograph or videotape the procedures described above for educational, training, or publication purposes. The photos or video will focus only on the lead insertion site and affected limb. Ultrasound images from the procedure may also be collected. Every effort will be made to protect the subject's privacy and the photos or video will not include the subject's face or any other personal identifiers such as birthmarks. Subjects and their caretakers will be trained in device care and management, and given written instructions as well. Following successful lead insertion, a perineural catheter may be inserted, if the patient desires a catheter (with normal saline injection and not local anesthetic via the inserting needle). This will be used to deliver perineural local anesthetic as a rescue analgesic method postoperatively in case the SPRINT system provides inadequate analgesia.
Randomization. Within the recovery room, the surgeon often performs a standard neurologic examination (variable depending on the surgeon and surgical procedure), after which time the subject will have baseline end points measured, including a pain score at the surgical site using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10), pain score (NRS) within the target nerve distribution, and sensory deficits (measured with alcohol pads and von Frey filaments compared to the contralateral limb within the cutaneous distribution of the target nerve). For their first pulse generator-"Stimulator A"-subjects will be randomized to one of two treatments-current or sham-using computer generated lists and opaque, sealed envelopes. The stimulator will then be attached to the lead and switched "on" (sham stimulator produces no current). The end points will be measured per the table below. Subsequently, the stimulator will be replaced by the alternative (current or sham)-"Stimulator B". The subject will have the end points measured and the stimulator replaced with a unit set to deliver active current for the remainder of study participation ("Stimulator C"). Operating and recovery room pharmacologic analgesic requirements will be recorded. Of note, if a lead fails to provide paresthesias within the target nerve distribution with either Stimulator A or B (adjustment of stimulator settings allowed), the lead may be replaced at the discretion of the subject and investigators.
End point collection (first day within the recovery room; approximately 30 minutes):
Baseline, then stimulator A is activated (sham or real) Minutes 1-5, then stimulator B is activated (sham or real) Minutes 1-5, then stimulator C is activated (always real) Minute 5 and 30 within the recovery room Daily x 14 days Months 1 and 3
Endpoints will include the numeric rating scale for pain (NRS) at the surgical site at rest and with movement, the lead-related NRS (pain at lead site), muscle strength, sensory deficits, and the question "adequate analgesia?" as a nominal response of yes or no.
Of note, the data derived from the chronic pain literature suggests that there is a "carry over" effect following stimulation: analgesia is provided even after the cessation of electrical current. It remains unknown if this is true following surgery in the acute postoperative pain period. For subjects randomized to active current from Stimulator A, the data collected for Stimulator B placebo treatment may be lowered due to the carry over effect. Therefore, this data will not be compared with the baseline or Stimulator A outcome measures. However, it is valuable data to possibly detect and quantify the carry-over effect of the initial stimulation.
At any time, subjects may choose to have their perineural catheter bolused with local anesthetic and a perineural local anesthetic infusion begun (if they desired a catheter with subsequent insertion). Therefore, subjects will not risk receiving inferior analgesia by participating in this study. However, subjects also have the option of leaving their infusion pump off and using neuromodulation as their primary analgesic if the latter proves adequate-the decision is completely each subject's and may be made any time prior to perineural catheter removal.
Subjects and their caretakers will be trained in device care and management, and given written instructions as well. Pain scores (resting and dynamic worst and average) will be collected daily for two weeks, along with oral analgesic requirements, perineural local anesthetic use, and sensory/motor deficits (all specific to the previous 24 hours). Perineural catheters will be removed at home upon subject request, after 3 days, or upon local anesthetic reservoir exhaustion, whichever comes first (standard-of-care). The electrical leads will be removed upon subject request, or after 30 days, whichever comes first. The leads will be removed at home by subjects or their caretakers (standard-of-care for perineural catheter withdrawal) or by investigators, depending on both investigator and subject preference. If removed by subjects or their caretakers, a picture of the extracted lead tip must be texted/emailed to investigators, or the physical lead returned to investigators for inspection. Subjects will be contacted no less than every 5 days following the initial 2-week period until their lead is removed; and, will then be contacted 1 and 3 months postoperatively and the end points again verbally collected.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
- Being tested
- Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation, Sham stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulationDevice
Also called Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation, Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation
Active electrical stimulation for 5 minutes in the recovery room
Sham stimulationDevice
Sham (placebo) stimulation for 5 minutes in the recovery room
Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulationDevice
Also called Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation, Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation
Active electrical stimulation for 2-4 weeks at home
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Current then Sham then Active Current | Experimental | Electrical current will be introduced to the insulated percutaneous lead(s) for 5 minutes; then sham/placebo for 5 minutes; and then active electrical current for the following 2-4 weeks Receives: Device: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation; Device: Sham stimulation |
| Sham then Active Current | Active comparator | Sham/placebo will be introduced to the insulated percutaneous lead(s) for 5 minutes; then active electrical current for the following 2-4 weeks Receives: Device: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation; Device: Sham stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain]
Pain is evaluated on a Numeric Rating Scale: 0-10 scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure is calculated as such: the pain score 5 and then 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated on the Numeric Rating Scale divided by the baseline pain score measured on the same scale. Of note, although this is a crossover design, the order of treatment does influence the effects of each treatment, so the 7 total subjects cannot be grouped together for the active portion and then again for the sham portion--they must remain separate, distinct groups even though this is a crossover design.
Measured: 5 and 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start24 Feb 2017
- Primary completion20 Jul 2018
- Study completion20 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University California Academic Senate, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, SPR Therapeutics, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego
- Investigators
- Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University California San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02898103
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Percutaneous PNS Postop pilot
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Monahan AM, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Finneran JJ 4th, Jaeger PT, Schwartz AK, Ahmed SS. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Sciatic Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Foot Surgery, a Proof-of-Concept Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):580-589. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000819.
PubMed 29905630Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Nguyen PL, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Sztain JF, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Meunier MJ, Hentzen ER, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve and brachial plexus for postoperative analgesia following ambulatory rotator cuff repair. A proof-of-concept study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):310-318. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100121. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
PubMed 30770421Ilfeld BM, Said ET, Finneran JJ 4th, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Gabriel RA, Khatibi B, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Femoral Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Proof of Concept Study. Neuromodulation. 2019 Jul;22(5):621-629. doi: 10.1111/ner.12851. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
PubMed 30160335
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for Postoperative Analgesia: A Feasibility/Proof-of-Concept Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02898103
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Percutaneous PNS Postop pilot
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San DiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University California Academic Senate, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, SPR Therapeutics, Inc.
- Study start
- 24 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Mar 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The moderate-to-severe pain many patients experience following orthopedic surgery is often treated with opioids, which are associated with side effects such as nausea/vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression (and a risk of abuse). Potent site-specific analgesia with fewer side effects may be provided with a "continuous peripheral nerve block," which involves the percutaneous insertion of a catheter adjacent to the peripheral nerve(s) supplying a surgical site. Local anesthetic is introduced via the catheter. However, there are major problems with continuous nerve blocks that have dramatically limited their use outside academic centers. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) or "nerve modulation" is an alternative method of pain control involving the insertion of an electrical lead through an introducing needle-obviating an open surgical incision for placement-followed by the introduction of electric current to produce analgesia. This modality has been used to treat chronic pain, but it has not been evaluated with a randomized, controlled study when applied to acute pain management (post-surgical analgesia). This temporary therapy has multiple theoretical benefits over existing analgesics, such as a lack of systemic side effects (e.g., nausea, respiratory depression), an absence of induced muscle weakness, and a reduced risk of adverse events (e.g. infection). The purpose of the proposed randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover, feasibility study is to explore the possibility of treating postoperative pain with ultrasound-guided percutaneous PNS and, if so, to help power a subsequent definitive randomized, controlled trial.
Detailed description
Written, informed consent will be obtained using an IRB-approved ICF prior to any study procedures. Lead insertion may occur up to 2 weeks prior to surgery within the CTRI, or the morning of surgery in the regional anesthesia induction area (it just depends on subject and surgeon preference, as well as logistical issues such as the time of the surgery and availability of the investigators). Muscle strength will be measured with a pressure transducer.
Preoperative lead insertion (approximately 1-3 hours). A percutaneous, helically-coiled, insulated electrical lead will be inserted via an introducer needle at least 2 cm proximal or distal to the perineural catheter location along the target nerve using real-time ultrasound guidance:
Surgical Procedure Location: Perineural Catheter Location, Electrical Lead Location
Shoulder: Interscalene, Interscalene or supraclavicular or suprascapular
At or distal to the elbow: Infraclavicular, Interscalene, supraclavicular or terminal nerve(s)
Foot or ankle: Popliteal-sciatic [adductor canal optional], Subgluteal-sciatic [femoral optional] <or vice vera>
Knee or distal thigh: Adductor canal [popliteal-sciatic optional], Femoral [subgluteal-sciatic optional]
It will be optional for a conducting probe to be used prior to lead insertion-this allows identification of the optimal lead tip location relative to the target nerve by passing electrical current via the insulated probe. The desired end point is a pleasant paresthesia in the distribution of the target nerve reported by the subject. If used, the probe will be completely withdrawn following target location identification, and a lead subsequently inserted to the target location. Following needle removal, the percutaneous helical lead will have electric current passed using the SPRINT (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, OH) pulse generator to ensure accurate placement (a pleasant paresthesia in the distribution of the target nerve). It will be replaced, if necessary. Muscle strength will be measured with a pressure transducer during the delivery of electrical current. The pulse generator will then be removed and the lead affixed to the skin using an occlusive dressing.
With the subject's permission the investigators may photograph or videotape the procedures described above for educational, training, or publication purposes. The photos or video will focus only on the lead insertion site and affected limb. Ultrasound images from the procedure may also be collected. Every effort will be made to protect the subject's privacy and the photos or video will not include the subject's face or any other personal identifiers such as birthmarks. Subjects and their caretakers will be trained in device care and management, and given written instructions as well. Following successful lead insertion, a perineural catheter may be inserted, if the patient desires a catheter (with normal saline injection and not local anesthetic via the inserting needle). This will be used to deliver perineural local anesthetic as a rescue analgesic method postoperatively in case the SPRINT system provides inadequate analgesia.
Randomization. Within the recovery room, the surgeon often performs a standard neurologic examination (variable depending on the surgeon and surgical procedure), after which time the subject will have baseline end points measured, including a pain score at the surgical site using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10), pain score (NRS) within the target nerve distribution, and sensory deficits (measured with alcohol pads and von Frey filaments compared to the contralateral limb within the cutaneous distribution of the target nerve). For their first pulse generator-"Stimulator A"-subjects will be randomized to one of two treatments-current or sham-using computer generated lists and opaque, sealed envelopes. The stimulator will then be attached to the lead and switched "on" (sham stimulator produces no current). The end points will be measured per the table below. Subsequently, the stimulator will be replaced by the alternative (current or sham)-"Stimulator B". The subject will have the end points measured and the stimulator replaced with a unit set to deliver active current for the remainder of study participation ("Stimulator C"). Operating and recovery room pharmacologic analgesic requirements will be recorded. Of note, if a lead fails to provide paresthesias within the target nerve distribution with either Stimulator A or B (adjustment of stimulator settings allowed), the lead may be replaced at the discretion of the subject and investigators.
End point collection (first day within the recovery room; approximately 30 minutes):
Baseline, then stimulator A is activated (sham or real) Minutes 1-5, then stimulator B is activated (sham or real) Minutes 1-5, then stimulator C is activated (always real) Minute 5 and 30 within the recovery room Daily x 14 days Months 1 and 3
Endpoints will include the numeric rating scale for pain (NRS) at the surgical site at rest and with movement, the lead-related NRS (pain at lead site), muscle strength, sensory deficits, and the question "adequate analgesia?" as a nominal response of yes or no.
Of note, the data derived from the chronic pain literature suggests that there is a "carry over" effect following stimulation: analgesia is provided even after the cessation of electrical current. It remains unknown if this is true following surgery in the acute postoperative pain period. For subjects randomized to active current from Stimulator A, the data collected for Stimulator B placebo treatment may be lowered due to the carry over effect. Therefore, this data will not be compared with the baseline or Stimulator A outcome measures. However, it is valuable data to possibly detect and quantify the carry-over effect of the initial stimulation.
At any time, subjects may choose to have their perineural catheter bolused with local anesthetic and a perineural local anesthetic infusion begun (if they desired a catheter with subsequent insertion). Therefore, subjects will not risk receiving inferior analgesia by participating in this study. However, subjects also have the option of leaving their infusion pump off and using neuromodulation as their primary analgesic if the latter proves adequate-the decision is completely each subject's and may be made any time prior to perineural catheter removal.
Subjects and their caretakers will be trained in device care and management, and given written instructions as well. Pain scores (resting and dynamic worst and average) will be collected daily for two weeks, along with oral analgesic requirements, perineural local anesthetic use, and sensory/motor deficits (all specific to the previous 24 hours). Perineural catheters will be removed at home upon subject request, after 3 days, or upon local anesthetic reservoir exhaustion, whichever comes first (standard-of-care). The electrical leads will be removed upon subject request, or after 30 days, whichever comes first. The leads will be removed at home by subjects or their caretakers (standard-of-care for perineural catheter withdrawal) or by investigators, depending on both investigator and subject preference. If removed by subjects or their caretakers, a picture of the extracted lead tip must be texted/emailed to investigators, or the physical lead returned to investigators for inspection. Subjects will be contacted no less than every 5 days following the initial 2-week period until their lead is removed; and, will then be contacted 1 and 3 months postoperatively and the end points again verbally collected.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Current then Sham then Active Current | Experimental | Device: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation, Device: Sham stimulationElectrical current will be introduced to the insulated percutaneous lead(s) for 5 minutes; then sham/placebo for 5 minutes; and then active electrical current for the following 2-4 weeks |
| Sham then Active Current | Active comparator | Device: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation, Device: Sham stimulationSham/placebo will be introduced to the insulated percutaneous lead(s) for 5 minutes; then active electrical current for the following 2-4 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Undergoing orthopedic surgical procedure that frequently results in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain
- At least 18 years of age
- Able to understand and willing to take part in study and adhere to all study requirements
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Postoperative analgesic plan includes a single-injection peripheral nerve block in the surgical extremity
- Chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
- Known neuro-muscular deficit of the target nerve(s)
- Anticipated MRI within the following 2 weeks
- Compromised immune system based on medical history (e.g., immunosuppressive therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, sepsis, infection), or other conditions that places the subject at increased risk in the opinion of the investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulationAlso: Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation, Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulationActive electrical stimulation for 5 minutes in the recovery room | Device | Active Current then Sham then Active Current, Sham then Active Current |
| Sham stimulationSham (placebo) stimulation for 5 minutes in the recovery room | Device | Active Current then Sham then Active Current, Sham then Active Current |
| Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulationAlso: Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation, Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulationActive electrical stimulation for 2-4 weeks at home | Device | Active Current then Sham then Active Current, Sham then Active Current |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain]
Time frame: 5 and 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated
Pain is evaluated on a Numeric Rating Scale: 0-10 scale with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure is calculated as such: the pain score 5 and then 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated on the Numeric Rating Scale divided by the baseline pain score measured on the same scale. Of note, although this is a crossover design, the order of treatment does influence the effects of each treatment, so the 7 total subjects cannot be grouped together for the active portion and then again for the sham portion--they must remain separate, distinct groups even though this is a crossover design.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 29905630Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Monahan AM, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Finneran JJ 4th, Jaeger PT, Schwartz AK, Ahmed SS. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Sciatic Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Foot Surgery, a Proof-of-Concept Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):580-589. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000819.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30770421Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Nguyen PL, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Sztain JF, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Meunier MJ, Hentzen ER, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve and brachial plexus for postoperative analgesia following ambulatory rotator cuff repair. A proof-of-concept study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):310-318. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100121. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30160335Ilfeld BM, Said ET, Finneran JJ 4th, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Gabriel RA, Khatibi B, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Femoral Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Proof of Concept Study. Neuromodulation. 2019 Jul;22(5):621-629. doi: 10.1111/ner.12851. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruiting
Dance Study for Post-surgical Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer, Survivorship
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Gabapentin to Reduce Opioid Use Postoperatively (GROUP) in Children
Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Extended Post-Operative Oral Tranexamic Acid Dosing After ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Active, not recruiting
Pivotal Study on the NOVABLOC System for Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS principal investigator
University California San Diego
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in people with Postoperative Pain, run by University of California, San Diego at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Mar 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline of Surgical Site Pain Level (NRS) at Rest [Percentage of Baseline Pain] (time frame: 5 and 10 minutes after the stimulator is first activated). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02898103, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2021.