AzTrials
AzTrials

MusclesNCT02899650

Rates of Recovery From Strenuous Exercise in Physically Active Older Adults

A study testing exercise in people with Muscles, run by University of Texas at Austin at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study to determine if older adults who are healthy and physically active (i.e., Masters athletes) demonstrate slower rates of recovery from unaccustomed strenuous exercise of downhill running than younger peers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Muscles
What is being tested?
exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Aug 2016to 1 Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Sedentary (exercise < 1 time/week) or well-trained individuals (exercise ≧ 2 times/week)
  • Ages 18-39 and 50-80 years
  • Individuals who can safely exercise

Who cannot join

  • Individuals who reports "Symptoms or Signs Suggestive of Disease" on the Health Research Questionnaire (heart and respiratory problems, dizziness and ankle edema).
  • Individuals who report substance abuse within the last 6 months (elicit drugs, alcohol)
  • Smokers

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Cardiovascular Aging Research Lab at UT Austin

    Austin, Texas, 78712

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study to determine if older adults who are healthy and physically active (i.e., Masters athletes) demonstrate slower rates of recovery from unaccustomed strenuous exercise of downhill running than younger peers.

Read the detailed description

There is a well-conceived notion that the recovery from strenuous exercise gets slower as individuals get older in age. Studies using animal models have demonstrated that stretching of electrically-activated skeletal muscle to mimic eccentric muscle contractions results in a greater decline and slower recovery in muscular force in old mice than in young mice. Similarly, in human studies using sedentary adults, age has been associated with a slower rate of recovery from a series of eccentric contractions. However, the process of aging is often confounded by coexisting diseases and gradual sedentary lifestyles that progress with advancing aging. Could older adults who are apparently healthy and habitually exercising demonstrate slower rates of recovery from strenuous exercise? In a small-scale study, recreationally-active middle-aged adults did not display a slower recovery from unaccustomed eccentric exercise than young adults. Masters athletes are an effective experimental model to address this question as extrinsic factors (e.g., deconditioning, chronic degenerative diseases) that often confound the intrinsic aging process can be minimized in this population. As no study has been conducted in Masters athletes, it is unknown if Masters athletes would experience slower rates of recovery similar to their sedentary peers.

With this information as background, the general aim of the proposed study is to determine if older adults who are healthy and physically active demonstrate slower rates of recovery from unaccustomed strenuous exercise of downhill running than younger peers. In an attempt to properly determine the influence of aging and regular physical activity, 4 groups of apparently healthy adults, including young sedentary, young trained, older sedentary, and older trained adults, will be studied.

A total of 60 apparently healthy men and women will serve as subjects. Half will be young [18-40-year-old (n=30)] and the other half older [50-80-year-old (n=30)]. After the screening and familiarization, investigators will ask participants to visit the laboratory four times (four consecutive days) to perform downhill running and to test physiological measurements (muscular strength, pain scale, range of motion, arterial stiffness and blood pressure and blood creatinine and myoglobin concentrations).

Conditions
Muscles
Being tested
exercise
Keywords
Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness, Eccentric exercise, Masters athlete

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • exerciseOther

    acute downhill running

Study groups in NCT02899650
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Young FitExperimentalYoung (18-39 yrs) people who have endurance training habit
Receives: Other: exercise
Young UnfitExperimentalYoung (18-39 yrs) people who have sedentary lifestyle.
Receives: Other: exercise
Older FitExperimentalOlder (50-80 yrs) people who have endurance training habit
Receives: Other: exercise
Older UnfitExperimentalOlder (50-80 yrs) people who have sedentary lifestyle
Receives: Other: exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Force Development

    Rate of force development are measured by determining peak torque achieved on an isometric leg extension machine.

    Measured: After the downhill running protocol, various markers of muscle damage and muscular strength were obtained 24 hours post (the third visit), 48 hours post (the forth visit) and 72 hours post (the fifth visit).

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Pain Scale

    Pain scale on quadriceps muscle was assessed using a validated visual pain scale. The scale was on a 10-point scale (0 being absence of soreness, 10 being worst imaginable soreness).

    Measured: After the downhill running protocol, muscle damage pain scale was measured 24 hours post (the third visit), 48 hours post (the forth visit) and 72 hours post (the fifth visit).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2017

Why it stopped: This was a research project that was conducted by a visiting scholar and his time for departure came earlier than the study completion.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02899650
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016-04-0070
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
2 Sep 2016
Last updated
22 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lavender AP, Nosaka K. Changes in markers of muscle damage of middle-aged and young men following eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. J Sci Med Sport. 2008 Apr;11(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.11.004. Epub 2007 Mar 9.

    PubMed 17350334
  • Dedrick ME, Clarkson PM. The effects of eccentric exercise on motor performance in young and older women. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;60(3):183-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00839156.

    PubMed 2347319
  • Brooks SV, Faulkner JA. Contraction-induced injury: recovery of skeletal muscles in young and old mice. Am J Physiol. 1990 Mar;258(3 Pt 1):C436-42. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1990.258.3.C436.

    PubMed 2316632
  • Brooks SV, Faulkner JA. The magnitude of the initial injury induced by stretches of maximally activated muscle fibres of mice and rats increases in old age. J Physiol. 1996 Dec 1;497 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):573-80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021790.

    PubMed 8961197

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing exercise in people with Muscles, run by University of Texas at Austin at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jan 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Force Development (time frame: After the downhill running protocol, various markers of muscle damage and muscular strength were obtained 24 hours post (the third visit), 48 hours post (the forth visit) and 72 hours post (the fifth visit).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02899650, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in