Dental CareEDENT1NCT02904122
Oral Teleconsultation
A study testing teleconsultation in people with Dental Care, run by University Hospital, Montpellier.
Trial summary
In this study we want to compare a dental diagnose during face to face consultation vs remote consultation with telemedicine device. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Care
- What is being tested?
- teleconsultation
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject is aged at least 18 years
- The subject must be given free and informed consent
- Topics scheduled consultation from the dental center of Montpellier University Hospital and the Center Kyushu University (Japan).
Who cannot join
- NA
About this study
Official title: Validation Study of Oral Teleconsultation
In this study we want to compare a dental diagnose during face to face consultation vs remote consultation with telemedicine device.
Read the detailed description
Using Soprocare® camera, videos of patients' oral cavity are recorded and analysed remotely. 200 patients have been included: 100 in Montpellier (France) and 100 in Kitakyushu (Japan).
A classical face-to-face oral consultation is realized using ICDAS II classification. Then a student recorded 6 videos of patients' mouth: one video by sector, showing each face of molars and premolars in cario fluorescence mode of Soprocare® and one video of the maxillary and mandibular incisor-canine block in perio mode.
In a third step, a remote dentist analysed videos and made a telediagnosis using the same classification. Dental hygiene and missing teeth are also noted in classical and tele diagnostic.
The direct and the tele diagnostic are compared.
- Conditions
- Dental Care
- Being tested
- teleconsultation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
teleconsultationOther
Determine the interest of teleconsultation in dentistry tool for the diagnosis of caries. Ie whether oral teleconsultations are of the same quality as conventional consultations for the diagnosis of caries ..
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Teleconsultation | Other | Teleconsultation using a specific camera SoproCare®6 Receives: Other: teleconsultation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
diagnostic of caries
Teleconsultation will be made using a specific camera SoproCare®6, the company Acteon ..
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02904122
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9173
- Acronym
- EDENT1
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation Study of Oral Teleconsultation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02904122
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EDENT1 / 9173
- Conditions
- Dental Care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study we want to compare a dental diagnose during face to face consultation vs remote consultation with telemedicine device.
Detailed description
Using Soprocare® camera, videos of patients' oral cavity are recorded and analysed remotely. 200 patients have been included: 100 in Montpellier (France) and 100 in Kitakyushu (Japan).
A classical face-to-face oral consultation is realized using ICDAS II classification. Then a student recorded 6 videos of patients' mouth: one video by sector, showing each face of molars and premolars in cario fluorescence mode of Soprocare® and one video of the maxillary and mandibular incisor-canine block in perio mode.
In a third step, a remote dentist analysed videos and made a telediagnosis using the same classification. Dental hygiene and missing teeth are also noted in classical and tele diagnostic.
The direct and the tele diagnostic are compared.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Teleconsultation | Other | Other: teleconsultationTeleconsultation using a specific camera SoproCare®6 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The subject is aged at least 18 years
- The subject must be given free and informed consent
- Topics scheduled consultation from the dental center of Montpellier University Hospital and the Center Kyushu University (Japan).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- NA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| teleconsultationDetermine the interest of teleconsultation in dentistry tool for the diagnosis of caries. Ie whether oral teleconsultations are of the same quality as conventional consultations for the diagnosis of caries .. | Other | Teleconsultation |
Primary outcome
diagnostic of caries
Time frame: 1 day
Teleconsultation will be made using a specific camera SoproCare®6, the company Acteon ..
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Dental Care
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Periodontal Disease and Small Vulnerable Newborns in Rural Nepal: A Community-based Trial
Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight
Recruiting
Home-Use Dual-Light Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis in Full-Arch Implant Prostheses
Peri Implant Mucositis, Dental Implant Rehabilitation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Child Behavior Ratings During Dental Treatment
Child, Behaviour
Active, not recruiting
Adapting the Sensory Environment to Reduce Stress in Children With Autism During Dental Visits
Autism, Autism Disorders and Maternal Stress
Recruiting
Oral Health Intervention in Adult Primary Care
Dental Caries, Dry Mouth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing teleconsultation in people with Dental Care, run by University Hospital, Montpellier.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
diagnostic of caries (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2019.