Cerebral PalsySDRNCT02904694
Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) Database
An observational study of Cerebral Palsy, run by King's College London.
Trial summary
A national database is being set-up to collate clinical outcome information before and after children undergo Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR). SDR is a surgical procedure that has been used for many years but has not been routinely available within the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 9 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy
- How many people
- 137 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Sep 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 9 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: All patients who have consented to the Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) procedure in one of the five Trusts who are commissioned to do SDR.
Who may be able to join
- All patients who have consented to the SDR procedure in one of the five Trusts who are commissioned to do SDR.
- These will be asked to consent to their outcome data being added to the national database. There are no exclusions to the database.
- For inclusion in the CTE SDR programme, the criteria were established as:
- Children between the ages of 3 and 9 years with a diagnosis of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (based on NICE guidance [2]).
- Dynamic spasticity in lower limbs affecting function and mobility and no dystonia
- MRI shows typical Cerebral palsy changes and no damage to key areas of brain controlling posture and coordination.
Show all 11Show fewer
- GMFCS level II or III.
- No evidence of genetic or neurological progressive illness.
- Mild to moderate lower limb weakness with ability to maintain antigravity postures.
- No significant scoliosis or hip dislocation (Reimer's index [10] should be <40%).
- In addition to the above clinical criteria there must be written agreement from the referring responsible commissioner confirming financial and resource commitment to provide the post operative physiotherapy package as outlined in the CTE SDR programme selection criteria [5].
Who cannot join
- Under 3 years of age, or older than 9 years.
- Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, IV or V.
- Any other medical or personal aspects in conflict with those listed above under inclusion criteria.
About this study
Official title: Commissioning Through Evaluation: Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Database
A national database is being set-up to collate clinical outcome information before and after children undergo Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR). SDR is a surgical procedure that has been used for many years but has not been routinely available within the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). The SDR procedure is used to improve spasticity in children with cerebral palsy and involves dividing some of the nerve fibres running from the muscles back to the spinal cord. While it is believed that SDR is effective, there are no definitive data. In July 2014 NHS England commissioned five NHS Trusts to undertake SDR surgery in eligible children for a two-year period, and to collect detailed information on their outcomes. The proposed database will aggregate these data from the five centres and analyse them to provide overall evidence on the clinical effectiveness of SDR. This information will be used to inform future commissioning decisions. The database has been developed by the King's Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC) in conjunction with NHS England and the national clinical SDR steering committee and its data subcommittee. KiTEC undertakes research evaluations for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and has been commissioned by NICE to undertake this work. Clinicians in the SDR data subgroup have liaised closely with KiTEC to agree which data to collect so that it the least amount needed and will be in a standardised format across all centres. When all two-year outcome data are recorded, KiTEC will analyse the data and present a report to NHS England, NICE and the SDR steering committee and data sub-group. While there are no firm plans to follow the children beyond two years post-surgery, all parties involved are hoping that further funding can be obtained to continue following these children up as these data will be unique.
Read the detailed description
Disease overview:
Cerebral Palsy is an all-encompassing term for numerous neurological conditions caused by problems in the brain and nervous system. More specifically, cerebral palsy is related to problems in muscle movement, which result in abnormalities in walking, posture, and balance. Other important functions can also be affected, such as language/communication, learning, and vision. There is currently no cure for cerebral palsy; however, there are several treatment options that can aid alleviation of symptoms and improve quality of life. The selection of appropriate treatment(s) for each child requires input from a multi-disciplinary team of health professionals, such as paediatricians, social workers, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, neurologists and surgeons.
Treatment overview:
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published guidance related to treatment options for cerebral palsy in 2012 (CG145). One of the treatment options discussed was Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR). SDR is an irreversible surgical procedure, which involves the division of some of the sensory nerves of the spinal cord in order to reduce sensory input to the sensory-motor reflex arcs. Intensive physiotherapy is required SDR post surgery for up to 24 months to achieve the outcome goals of improvement in muscle function, tone, and quality of life. NICE CG145 recommends consideration of SDR in children with a GMFCS level II or III. This recommendation was based on a review of evidence evaluation, which concluded that there was reasonable evidence that SDR combined with appropriate post-operative treatment can result in significant improvements in motor function and quality of life.
Study Overview:
This current project is being commissioned by NICE to support NHS England in its Commissioning through Evaluation (CTE) approach. CTE was launched in September 2013 and involves funding medical treatments and technologies not routinely commissioned within the NHS. SDR is one such procedure which was selected for CTE, with the aim of evaluating the 'outcome of SDR and demonstrate improvement in function after SDR at 6 months that is maintained or improved at 12 months and two years post operation'. As part of this programme, NICE commissioned, in early 2014, a data collection and register development service from one of its External Assessment Centres (EACs): King's Imaging Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC). The key objective of the KiTEC EAC is to collect SDR related data that will inform clinical effectiveness and other outcomes of interest to NHS England in making its commissioning plans and addressing the following research question from section 4.5 of CG145:
'Does selective dorsal rhizotomy followed by intensive rehabilitation performed between the ages of 3 and 9 years in children who are at GMFCS level II or III result in good community mobility as a young adult?'
Study Design:
This is a multi-centre national database (register) project to obtain the evidence related to SDR that will address the research question in section 4.5 of CG145 and inform clinical effectiveness and other outcomes of interest to NHS England. All patients will undergo pre-assessment prior to undergoing SDR. This varies between centres, and can be anywhere from 6 months prior to SDR. Hospital admission for SDR usually is between 1-2 weeks. Post-SDR follow-up will be conducted up to two years for the purposes of this project. All patients' will followed up to two years post-SDR by members of the relevant clinical team. Post-SDR discharge there will be three main data collection points for the purposes of this project: 6, 12 and 24 months post-SDR. Patient data will be collected at various time-points, as agreed between the EAC and various SDR subgroup members. Pre-assessments may be split into more than one appointment, depending on the particular patient care pathway at each participating centre.
Parents of patients will be approached by the SDR clinical team when they attend for their first pre-SDR clinic visit. It will be explained to the parents and children that their hospital will be making clinical assessments before and after SDR to enable them to provide optimum care and to evaluate the success of the operation and post-operative rehabilitation. These assessments along with patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life assessments, will be standardised across all five commissioned hospitals. The parents and children will be asked for permission to add their data to the national database to facilitate aggregation of results across the United Kingdom (UK).
Study information sheets will be provided. If they agree to take part, parents will sign a consent form at the 2nd pre-SDR visit. This will allow time for them to consider whether or not they wish to take part.
Centre and Subject Compliance:
Centre compliance refers to all centres providing the agreed standardised dataset and input into the standardised database as per the CTE selection criteria. The EAC will regularly monitor Centre compliance in liaison with NHS England and include tables of compliance in the project report. The project report (with potential for interim analysis) will include tables on the number of eligible patients that were referred for treatment through the multi-disciplinary team process and consented to part of the database as well as those that were actually registered in the SDR database. The project report (with potential for interim analysis) will list the percentage of missing data in each of the clinical domains and differentiate between baseline and follow-up variables. Depending on the stage of the database a table depicting the number of children that have been lost to follow up will be included in the project report or in potential interim analyses reports. The SDR centres will be given regular reports on the quality of their data in terms of missing variables and possible outliers.
Statistical Considerations:
The EAC statisticians will carry out all analyses. All data obtained will be analysed at regular specified time points to inform ongoing assessment of the clinical effectiveness, relevant outcomes and assessment of the overall research question.The SDR database is expected to have small numbers, in the region of up to n=120 a year in England. A range of clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be recorded and there will be no single primary or secondary outcome. Rather the aim is to describe and quantify the changes in a number of important clinical domains such as spasticity, function, range of motion, gait and quality of life.
Ethical Considerations:
As the database constitutes research involving human subjects, the following ethical considerations arise:
- Parental consent will be required to add the child's data to the national database and patient information sheets (PIS) have been developed for both children and parents of potential children at the designated SDR centres.
- Only the minimum number of data items needed to meet the objectives of the database and comply with ethical and regulatory requirements will be included in the final dataset.
- Children's confidentiality will be protected during data collection and handling thus reducing the risk of disclosure.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66)
The GMFM-66 is a clinical tool to evaluate gross mortar function change in children with cerebral palsy. It contains 66 items in the tool, which a aggregated using a predefined summary calculation of all completed items.
Measured: Change from baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months.
Change in the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children
The Change in the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children, is a quality of life measure for children with cerebral palsy which can be completed by either the child, or the parent. It contains 53 items in the child version, and 65 items in the parent version.
Measured: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Duncan Ely Test: used to assess rectus femoris spasticity or tightness
Measured: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Modified Ashworth Scale
Measured: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Physiotherapy assessment measures: use of mobility and orthotic devices, and functional mobility scale.
Measured: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionSep 2018
- Study completionSep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 2 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janet Peacock, PhD, Principal investigator, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02904694
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 162253
- Acronym
- SDR
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Commissioning Through Evaluation: Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Database
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02904694
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SDR / 162253
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A national database is being set-up to collate clinical outcome information before and after children undergo Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR). SDR is a surgical procedure that has been used for many years but has not been routinely available within the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). The SDR procedure is used to improve spasticity in children with cerebral palsy and involves dividing some of the nerve fibres running from the muscles back to the spinal cord. While it is believed that SDR is effective, there are no definitive data. In July 2014 NHS England commissioned five NHS Trusts to undertake SDR surgery in eligible children for a two-year period, and to collect detailed information on their outcomes. The proposed database will aggregate these data from the five centres and analyse them to provide overall evidence on the clinical effectiveness of SDR. This information will be used to inform future commissioning decisions. The database has been developed by the King's Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC) in conjunction with NHS England and the national clinical SDR steering committee and its data subcommittee. KiTEC undertakes research evaluations for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and has been commissioned by NICE to undertake this work. Clinicians in the SDR data subgroup have liaised closely with KiTEC to agree which data to collect so that it the least amount needed and will be in a standardised format across all centres. When all two-year outcome data are recorded, KiTEC will analyse the data and present a report to NHS England, NICE and the SDR steering committee and data sub-group. While there are no firm plans to follow the children beyond two years post-surgery, all parties involved are hoping that further funding can be obtained to continue following these children up as these data will be unique.
Detailed description
Disease overview:
Cerebral Palsy is an all-encompassing term for numerous neurological conditions caused by problems in the brain and nervous system. More specifically, cerebral palsy is related to problems in muscle movement, which result in abnormalities in walking, posture, and balance. Other important functions can also be affected, such as language/communication, learning, and vision. There is currently no cure for cerebral palsy; however, there are several treatment options that can aid alleviation of symptoms and improve quality of life. The selection of appropriate treatment(s) for each child requires input from a multi-disciplinary team of health professionals, such as paediatricians, social workers, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, neurologists and surgeons.
Treatment overview:
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published guidance related to treatment options for cerebral palsy in 2012 (CG145). One of the treatment options discussed was Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR). SDR is an irreversible surgical procedure, which involves the division of some of the sensory nerves of the spinal cord in order to reduce sensory input to the sensory-motor reflex arcs. Intensive physiotherapy is required SDR post surgery for up to 24 months to achieve the outcome goals of improvement in muscle function, tone, and quality of life. NICE CG145 recommends consideration of SDR in children with a GMFCS level II or III. This recommendation was based on a review of evidence evaluation, which concluded that there was reasonable evidence that SDR combined with appropriate post-operative treatment can result in significant improvements in motor function and quality of life.
Study Overview:
This current project is being commissioned by NICE to support NHS England in its Commissioning through Evaluation (CTE) approach. CTE was launched in September 2013 and involves funding medical treatments and technologies not routinely commissioned within the NHS. SDR is one such procedure which was selected for CTE, with the aim of evaluating the 'outcome of SDR and demonstrate improvement in function after SDR at 6 months that is maintained or improved at 12 months and two years post operation'. As part of this programme, NICE commissioned, in early 2014, a data collection and register development service from one of its External Assessment Centres (EACs): King's Imaging Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC). The key objective of the KiTEC EAC is to collect SDR related data that will inform clinical effectiveness and other outcomes of interest to NHS England in making its commissioning plans and addressing the following research question from section 4.5 of CG145:
'Does selective dorsal rhizotomy followed by intensive rehabilitation performed between the ages of 3 and 9 years in children who are at GMFCS level II or III result in good community mobility as a young adult?'
Study Design:
This is a multi-centre national database (register) project to obtain the evidence related to SDR that will address the research question in section 4.5 of CG145 and inform clinical effectiveness and other outcomes of interest to NHS England. All patients will undergo pre-assessment prior to undergoing SDR. This varies between centres, and can be anywhere from 6 months prior to SDR. Hospital admission for SDR usually is between 1-2 weeks. Post-SDR follow-up will be conducted up to two years for the purposes of this project. All patients' will followed up to two years post-SDR by members of the relevant clinical team. Post-SDR discharge there will be three main data collection points for the purposes of this project: 6, 12 and 24 months post-SDR. Patient data will be collected at various time-points, as agreed between the EAC and various SDR subgroup members. Pre-assessments may be split into more than one appointment, depending on the particular patient care pathway at each participating centre.
Parents of patients will be approached by the SDR clinical team when they attend for their first pre-SDR clinic visit. It will be explained to the parents and children that their hospital will be making clinical assessments before and after SDR to enable them to provide optimum care and to evaluate the success of the operation and post-operative rehabilitation. These assessments along with patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life assessments, will be standardised across all five commissioned hospitals. The parents and children will be asked for permission to add their data to the national database to facilitate aggregation of results across the United Kingdom (UK).
Study information sheets will be provided. If they agree to take part, parents will sign a consent form at the 2nd pre-SDR visit. This will allow time for them to consider whether or not they wish to take part.
Centre and Subject Compliance:
Centre compliance refers to all centres providing the agreed standardised dataset and input into the standardised database as per the CTE selection criteria. The EAC will regularly monitor Centre compliance in liaison with NHS England and include tables of compliance in the project report. The project report (with potential for interim analysis) will include tables on the number of eligible patients that were referred for treatment through the multi-disciplinary team process and consented to part of the database as well as those that were actually registered in the SDR database. The project report (with potential for interim analysis) will list the percentage of missing data in each of the clinical domains and differentiate between baseline and follow-up variables. Depending on the stage of the database a table depicting the number of children that have been lost to follow up will be included in the project report or in potential interim analyses reports. The SDR centres will be given regular reports on the quality of their data in terms of missing variables and possible outliers.
Statistical Considerations:
The EAC statisticians will carry out all analyses. All data obtained will be analysed at regular specified time points to inform ongoing assessment of the clinical effectiveness, relevant outcomes and assessment of the overall research question.The SDR database is expected to have small numbers, in the region of up to n=120 a year in England. A range of clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be recorded and there will be no single primary or secondary outcome. Rather the aim is to describe and quantify the changes in a number of important clinical domains such as spasticity, function, range of motion, gait and quality of life.
Ethical Considerations:
As the database constitutes research involving human subjects, the following ethical considerations arise:
- Parental consent will be required to add the child's data to the national database and patient information sheets (PIS) have been developed for both children and parents of potential children at the designated SDR centres.
- Only the minimum number of data items needed to meet the objectives of the database and comply with ethical and regulatory requirements will be included in the final dataset.
- Children's confidentiality will be protected during data collection and handling thus reducing the risk of disclosure.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 9 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- All patients who have consented to the Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) procedure in one of the five Trusts who are commissioned to do SDR.
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- All patients who have consented to the SDR procedure in one of the five Trusts who are commissioned to do SDR.
- These will be asked to consent to their outcome data being added to the national database. There are no exclusions to the database.
- Children between the ages of 3 and 9 years with a diagnosis of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (based on NICE guidance [2]).
- Dynamic spasticity in lower limbs affecting function and mobility and no dystonia
- MRI shows typical Cerebral palsy changes and no damage to key areas of brain controlling posture and coordination.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Under 3 years of age, or older than 9 years.
- Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, IV or V.
- Any other medical or personal aspects in conflict with those listed above under inclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66)
Time frame: Change from baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months.
The GMFM-66 is a clinical tool to evaluate gross mortar function change in children with cerebral palsy. It contains 66 items in the tool, which a aggregated using a predefined summary calculation of all completed items.
Change in the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children
Time frame: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
The Change in the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children, is a quality of life measure for children with cerebral palsy which can be completed by either the child, or the parent. It contains 53 items in the child version, and 65 items in the parent version.
3 secondary outcomes
Duncan Ely Test: used to assess rectus femoris spasticity or tightness
Time frame: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Physiotherapy assessment measures: use of mobility and orthotic devices, and functional mobility scale.
Time frame: Change from Baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Changes in Land-Based Motor Function After Routine Hydrotherapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Not yet recruiting
EFFECT OF ROBOTIC GLOVES TRAINING ON UPPER LIMB COORDINATION, SELECTIVE MOTOR CONTROL AND ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING IN CHILDREN WITH HEMIPARETIC CEREBRAL PALSY.
Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders Related to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
Frontotemporal Dementia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Recruiting
Combined Popliteal and Adductor Canal Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janet Peacock, PhD principal investigator
King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cerebral Palsy, run by King's College London.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) (time frame: Change from baseline, to 6 months, 12 months and 24 months.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2019.