AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationSDM4AfibNCT02905032

SDM for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

A study testing Decision Aid in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Mayo Clinic at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this project is to evaluate a treatment decision aid for patients with atrial fibrillation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Decision Aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,186 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2016to 27 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Clinician Inclusion Criteria:

  • All clinicians (MDs, NP/PAs, PharmDs) that are responsible for the modality of Anticoagulation in eligible AF patients at participating sites, without exclusion

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation deemed at high risk of thromboembolic strokes (CHA2D2-VASc Score ≥ 1, or 2 in women)
  • Able to read and understand (despite cognitive, sensorial, hearing or language challenges) the informed consent document as determined by the study coordinator during consent

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinician indicates that patient is not a candidate for a discussion about anticoagulation medication

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • University of Alabama

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • University of Mississippi Medical Center

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • Hennepin County Medical Center

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415

  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Park Nicollet Health Partners

    Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Shared Decision Making for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4Afib): A Randomized Trial

The objective of this project is to evaluate a treatment decision aid for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to determine the extent to which the Anticoagulation Choice tool promotes shared decision making and its impact on anticoagulation use and adherence versus standard care in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Being tested
Decision Aid
Keywords
Afib, Atrial fib, Shared, Decision, Making, Aid, AF
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Helping Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Decision AidBehavioural

    Also called DA

    Observation of clinical encounter using the electronic decision aid to facilitate treatment option conversation between clinician and patient.

Study groups in NCT02905032
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard CareNo interventionObservations in clinical encounter via video, audio or observational notes.
Standard Care + Decision AidActive comparatorObservation of clinical encounter using the decision aid via video, audio, or observational notes.
Receives: Behavioral: Decision Aid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Clinician Satisfied Encounters

    The number of encounters that the clinicians were satisfied with the decision-making process. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. A 5 point likert scale questioning satisfaction with discussion about anticoagulation medication choice. The 5 point likert scale ranges from 1-5, with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being completely satisfied. Any values of 4 or 5 were considered to be satisfied.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Number of Clinician Recommendation

    The number of encounters were the clinician would recommend the decision making process approach. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. Clinician was asked whether they would recommend the approached used to other clinician for other discussions on a 7 point Likert scale. The 7 point likert scale ranges from 1-7, with 1 being no I would strongly recommend against it and 7 being yes I would strongly recommend it. Any values of 6 or 7 were considered to be clinician would recommend.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of Participants With Anticoagulant Medication Use

    The number of subjects who chose to start or continue receive an anticoagulant medication.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Patient Involvement

    Patient involvement in decision-making as assessed through video recordings of the encounters using the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making 12-item scale. The 12 items measure observed patient involvement. Each of the 12 items have possible scores that range from 0 (the behavior is not observed) to 4 (the behavior is exhibited to a very high standard). To calculate the total score for each patient, the 12 items are summed, divided by 48 (the maximum possible score), and multiplied by 100. Total score minimum is 0, maximum is 100. The higher the total score the higher the patient involvement.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Encounter Duration

    The length of time for the subjects visit with the clinician, as measured in minutes.

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion27 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion27 Jun 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,186 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02905032
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-005409
Other IDs
1R01HL131535
Acronym
SDM4Afib
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
9 Sep 2016
Last updated
25 Jan 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sivly A, Gorr HS, Gravholt D, Branda ME, Linzer M, Noseworthy P, Hargraves I, Kunneman M, Doubeni CA, Suzuki T, Brito JP, Jackson EA, Burnett B, Wambua M, Montori VM; Shared Decision-Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Enrolling people of color to evaluate a practice intervention: lessons from the shared decision-making for atrial fibrillation (SDM4AFib) trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08399-z.

    PubMed 35962351
  • Noseworthy PA, Branda ME, Kunneman M, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Brito JP, Burnett B, Zeballos-Palacios C, Linzer M, Suzuki T, Lee AT, Gorr H, Jackson EA, Hess E, Brand-McCarthy SR, Shah ND, Montori VM; SDM4AFib (Shared Decision-Making for Atrial Fibrillation) Trial Investigators *. Effect of Shared Decision-Making for Stroke Prevention on Treatment Adherence and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jan 18;11(2):e023048. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023048. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

    PubMed 35023356
  • Kamath CC, Giblon R, Kunneman M, Lee AI, Branda ME, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Bellolio F, Jackson EA, Burnett B, Gorr H, Torres Roldan VD, Spencer-Bonilla G, Shah ND, Noseworthy PA, Montori VM, Brito JP; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Cost Conversations About Anticoagulation Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116009. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16009.

    PubMed 34255051
  • Kunneman M, Branda ME, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Lee AT, Gorr H, Burnett B, Suzuki T, Jackson EA, Hess E, Linzer M, Brand-McCarthy SR, Brito JP, Noseworthy PA, Montori VM; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2908.

    PubMed 32897386
  • Spencer-Bonilla G, Thota A, Organick P, Ponce OJ, Kunneman M, Giblon R, Branda ME, Sivly AL, Behnken E, May CR, Montori VM; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study. Trials. 2020 May 12;21(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04305-2.

    PubMed 32398149
  • Kunneman M, Branda ME, Noseworthy PA, Linzer M, Burnett B, Dick S, Spencer-Bonilla G, Fernandez CA, Gorr H, Wambua M, Keune S, Zeballos-Palacios C, Hargraves I, Shah ND, Montori VM. Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Sep 29;18(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2178-y.

    PubMed 28962662

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Decision Aid in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Mayo Clinic at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Clinician Satisfied Encounters (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02905032, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in