Atrial FibrillationSDM4AfibNCT02905032
SDM for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing Decision Aid in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Mayo Clinic at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this project is to evaluate a treatment decision aid for patients with atrial fibrillation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Decision Aid
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,186 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2016to 27 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Clinician Inclusion Criteria:
- All clinicians (MDs, NP/PAs, PharmDs) that are responsible for the modality of Anticoagulation in eligible AF patients at participating sites, without exclusion
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation deemed at high risk of thromboembolic strokes (CHA2D2-VASc Score ≥ 1, or 2 in women)
- Able to read and understand (despite cognitive, sensorial, hearing or language challenges) the informed consent document as determined by the study coordinator during consent
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinician indicates that patient is not a candidate for a discussion about anticoagulation medication
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Park Nicollet Health Partners
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
About this study
Official title: Shared Decision Making for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4Afib): A Randomized Trial
The objective of this project is to evaluate a treatment decision aid for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Read the detailed description
The goal of this study is to determine the extent to which the Anticoagulation Choice tool promotes shared decision making and its impact on anticoagulation use and adherence versus standard care in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Decision Aid
- Keywords
- Afib, Atrial fib, Shared, Decision, Making, Aid, AF
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Helping Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Decision AidBehavioural
Also called DA
Observation of clinical encounter using the electronic decision aid to facilitate treatment option conversation between clinician and patient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | No intervention | Observations in clinical encounter via video, audio or observational notes. |
| Standard Care + Decision Aid | Active comparator | Observation of clinical encounter using the decision aid via video, audio, or observational notes. Receives: Behavioral: Decision Aid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Clinician Satisfied Encounters
The number of encounters that the clinicians were satisfied with the decision-making process. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. A 5 point likert scale questioning satisfaction with discussion about anticoagulation medication choice. The 5 point likert scale ranges from 1-5, with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being completely satisfied. Any values of 4 or 5 were considered to be satisfied.
Measured: 1 month
Number of Clinician Recommendation
The number of encounters were the clinician would recommend the decision making process approach. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. Clinician was asked whether they would recommend the approached used to other clinician for other discussions on a 7 point Likert scale. The 7 point likert scale ranges from 1-7, with 1 being no I would strongly recommend against it and 7 being yes I would strongly recommend it. Any values of 6 or 7 were considered to be clinician would recommend.
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Anticoagulant Medication Use
The number of subjects who chose to start or continue receive an anticoagulant medication.
Measured: 12 months
Patient Involvement
Patient involvement in decision-making as assessed through video recordings of the encounters using the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making 12-item scale. The 12 items measure observed patient involvement. Each of the 12 items have possible scores that range from 0 (the behavior is not observed) to 4 (the behavior is exhibited to a very high standard). To calculate the total score for each patient, the 12 items are summed, divided by 48 (the maximum possible score), and multiplied by 100. Total score minimum is 0, maximum is 100. The higher the total score the higher the patient involvement.
Measured: 1 month
Encounter Duration
The length of time for the subjects visit with the clinician, as measured in minutes.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Sep 2016
- Primary completion27 Jun 2019
- Study completion27 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,186 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Park Nicollet Clinic, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter A. Noseworthy, M.D., Mayo Clinic
- Investigators
- Peter A Noseworthy, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02905032
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-005409
- Other IDs
- 1R01HL131535
- Acronym
- SDM4Afib
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sivly A, Gorr HS, Gravholt D, Branda ME, Linzer M, Noseworthy P, Hargraves I, Kunneman M, Doubeni CA, Suzuki T, Brito JP, Jackson EA, Burnett B, Wambua M, Montori VM; Shared Decision-Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Enrolling people of color to evaluate a practice intervention: lessons from the shared decision-making for atrial fibrillation (SDM4AFib) trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08399-z.
PubMed 35962351Noseworthy PA, Branda ME, Kunneman M, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Brito JP, Burnett B, Zeballos-Palacios C, Linzer M, Suzuki T, Lee AT, Gorr H, Jackson EA, Hess E, Brand-McCarthy SR, Shah ND, Montori VM; SDM4AFib (Shared Decision-Making for Atrial Fibrillation) Trial Investigators *. Effect of Shared Decision-Making for Stroke Prevention on Treatment Adherence and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jan 18;11(2):e023048. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023048. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
PubMed 35023356Kamath CC, Giblon R, Kunneman M, Lee AI, Branda ME, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Bellolio F, Jackson EA, Burnett B, Gorr H, Torres Roldan VD, Spencer-Bonilla G, Shah ND, Noseworthy PA, Montori VM, Brito JP; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Cost Conversations About Anticoagulation Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116009. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16009.
PubMed 34255051Kunneman M, Branda ME, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Lee AT, Gorr H, Burnett B, Suzuki T, Jackson EA, Hess E, Linzer M, Brand-McCarthy SR, Brito JP, Noseworthy PA, Montori VM; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2908.
PubMed 32897386Spencer-Bonilla G, Thota A, Organick P, Ponce OJ, Kunneman M, Giblon R, Branda ME, Sivly AL, Behnken E, May CR, Montori VM; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study. Trials. 2020 May 12;21(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04305-2.
PubMed 32398149Kunneman M, Branda ME, Noseworthy PA, Linzer M, Burnett B, Dick S, Spencer-Bonilla G, Fernandez CA, Gorr H, Wambua M, Keune S, Zeballos-Palacios C, Hargraves I, Shah ND, Montori VM. Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Sep 29;18(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2178-y.
PubMed 28962662
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Shared Decision Making for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4Afib): A Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02905032
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SDM4Afib / 16-005409
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Afib, Atrial fib, Shared, Decision, Making, Aid, AF
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,186 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Park Nicollet Clinic, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jan 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this project is to evaluate a treatment decision aid for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Detailed description
The goal of this study is to determine the extent to which the Anticoagulation Choice tool promotes shared decision making and its impact on anticoagulation use and adherence versus standard care in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care | No intervention | –Observations in clinical encounter via video, audio or observational notes. |
| Standard Care + Decision Aid | Active comparator | Behavioral: Decision AidObservation of clinical encounter using the decision aid via video, audio, or observational notes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Decision AidAlso: DAObservation of clinical encounter using the electronic decision aid to facilitate treatment option conversation between clinician and patient. | Behavioural | Standard Care + Decision Aid |
Primary outcome
Number of Clinician Satisfied Encounters
Time frame: 1 month
The number of encounters that the clinicians were satisfied with the decision-making process. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. A 5 point likert scale questioning satisfaction with discussion about anticoagulation medication choice. The 5 point likert scale ranges from 1-5, with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being completely satisfied. Any values of 4 or 5 were considered to be satisfied.
Number of Clinician Recommendation
Time frame: 1 month
The number of encounters were the clinician would recommend the decision making process approach. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. Clinician was asked whether they would recommend the approached used to other clinician for other discussions on a 7 point Likert scale. The 7 point likert scale ranges from 1-7, with 1 being no I would strongly recommend against it and 7 being yes I would strongly recommend it. Any values of 6 or 7 were considered to be clinician would recommend.
3 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Anticoagulant Medication Use
Time frame: 12 months
Patient Involvement
Time frame: 1 month
Encounter Duration
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35962351Sivly A, Gorr HS, Gravholt D, Branda ME, Linzer M, Noseworthy P, Hargraves I, Kunneman M, Doubeni CA, Suzuki T, Brito JP, Jackson EA, Burnett B, Wambua M, Montori VM; Shared Decision-Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Enrolling people of color to evaluate a practice intervention: lessons from the shared decision-making for atrial fibrillation (SDM4AFib) trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08399-z.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35023356Noseworthy PA, Branda ME, Kunneman M, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Brito JP, Burnett B, Zeballos-Palacios C, Linzer M, Suzuki T, Lee AT, Gorr H, Jackson EA, Hess E, Brand-McCarthy SR, Shah ND, Montori VM; SDM4AFib (Shared Decision-Making for Atrial Fibrillation) Trial Investigators *. Effect of Shared Decision-Making for Stroke Prevention on Treatment Adherence and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jan 18;11(2):e023048. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023048. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34255051Kamath CC, Giblon R, Kunneman M, Lee AI, Branda ME, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Bellolio F, Jackson EA, Burnett B, Gorr H, Torres Roldan VD, Spencer-Bonilla G, Shah ND, Noseworthy PA, Montori VM, Brito JP; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Cost Conversations About Anticoagulation Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116009. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16009.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32897386Kunneman M, Branda ME, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, Lee AT, Gorr H, Burnett B, Suzuki T, Jackson EA, Hess E, Linzer M, Brand-McCarthy SR, Brito JP, Noseworthy PA, Montori VM; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2908.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32398149Spencer-Bonilla G, Thota A, Organick P, Ponce OJ, Kunneman M, Giblon R, Branda ME, Sivly AL, Behnken E, May CR, Montori VM; Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study. Trials. 2020 May 12;21(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04305-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28962662Kunneman M, Branda ME, Noseworthy PA, Linzer M, Burnett B, Dick S, Spencer-Bonilla G, Fernandez CA, Gorr H, Wambua M, Keune S, Zeballos-Palacios C, Hargraves I, Shah ND, Montori VM. Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Sep 29;18(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2178-y.
- Mayo Clinic Clinical TrialsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intracardiac Echocardiography Catheter Supply-Chain Reliability and Clinical Access Study
Cardiovascular Diseases, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Recruiting
Posterior Mitral Isthmus Line With Vein of Marshall Ethanolisation Compared With Anterior Mitral Lines in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruiting
Exclusion of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Emergency Department Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing CT to Assess for Pulmonary Embolus: A Feasibility Study
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Recruiting
Impact of Atrial Fibrosis Surface Area on the Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke of Undetermined Origin: a Prospective Cardiac MRI Pilot Study.
Stroke, Implantation of an Implantable Cardiac Monitor
RecruitingObservational study
Globe Registry: Globe® Pulsed Field System Registry Study for Treating Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter A Noseworthy principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Decision Aid in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Mayo Clinic at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Clinician Satisfied Encounters (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02905032, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2022.