Physical ActivityNCT02907164
Using Social Norms to Encourage People to Exercise More
A study testing Email invitation, Social norm and Intrinsic, health motive in people with Physical Activity, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators are interested in using social norms to motivate people to sign up for a 100-day exercise challenge and exploring how to make social norms messages more effective. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- Email invitation, Social norm and Intrinsic, health motive
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All benefits-eligible employees at partner university for whom the Human Resource office has an email address on record
Who cannot join
- Employees who sign up for the challenge prior to the implementation of the interventions will NOT be included in the analysis.
- (The interventions are implemented one week after the registration period has started. The partner university has to send invitation emails to all benefits-eligible employees with an email address on record, including those who already signed up. However, employees who already signed up cannot be affected by the interventions and thus will be excluded from the analysis.)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The investigators are interested in using social norms to motivate people to sign up for a 100-day exercise challenge and exploring how to make social norms messages more effective.
Read the detailed description
The investigators are interested in using social norms to motivate people to sign up for a 100-day exercise challenge and exploring how to make social norms messages more effective. Specifically, the primary purposes of this study are to test (a) whether social norms messages (i.e., information about how many people have signed up for the challenge) can increase signup rates and eventually lead people to exercise more and (b) whether such messages become more effective when they highlight different types of motivations (intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivations). Through a partnership with a university, the investigators are running a large-scale, randomized field controlled trial aimed at increasing sign-ups for the challenge and exercise frequencies during the challenge.
Benefits-eligible employees at the partner university are randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions and receive the corresponding version of email message encouraging them to sign up for the challenge.
(1) In the control group, the email does not mention the number of people who have signed up. (2) In the norm condition, the email mentions the number of people who have signed up. (3) In the norm and health motive condition, the email mentions the number of people who have signed up, and highlights that the challenge is designed to help people to stay fit in a fun way. (4) In the norm and reward motive condition, the email mentions the number of people who have signed up, and highlights that the challenge is designed to help people to stay active and earn rewards.
The investigators hypothesize that Groups 2, 3, and 4 will have a higher sign-up rate and higher exercise frequencies on average than Group 1, because positive social norms should motivate people to engage in the target, desirable behavior. Also, the investigators will compare sign-up rates and exercise frequencies between Groups 2, 3, and 4 to examine whether highlighting intrinsic and extrinsic motives can further increase sign-up rates and overall exercise frequencies than only giving social norms information.
All benefits-eligible employees at the partner university for whom the Human Resource (HR) office has an email address on record receive invitation emails from HR. The invitation emails that contain the interventions are sent out one week AFTER the registration period has started, because HR needs to know how many people sign up in the first week and use this information to create a social norms message. Employees who sign up for the challenge during the first week of the registration period (i.e., prior to the implementation of the interventions) cannot be affected by the interventions. Thus, the investigators decide in advance that these employees will be excluded from analysis.
Employees will receive two emails that are sent eight days apart from each other. Thus, the investigators plan to examine both the sign-up rates within one week after each email goes out and the overall sign-up rates throughout the 50-day registration period.
The investigators plan to explore moderators based on (a) employees' demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, position), (b) employees' participation in previous challenges, and (c) employees' health condition and fitness level prior to the challenge (such as how actively they have been participating in other wellness activities, their health statistics).
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Being tested
- Email invitation, Social norm, Intrinsic, health motive, Extrinsic, reward motive
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Email invitationBehavioural
Receive emails encouraging them to sign up
Social normBehavioural
Receive information about how many people have signed up
Intrinsic, health motiveBehavioural
Receive information about how the challenge helps people to stay fit in a fun way
Extrinsic, reward motiveBehavioural
Receive information about how the challenge helps people to stay active and earn rewards
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Control | Active comparator | People receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email does not mention the number of people who have signed up. Receives: Behavioral: Email invitation |
| Group 2: Norm | Experimental | People receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email mentions the number of people who have signed up. Receives: Behavioral: Email invitation; Behavioral: Social norm |
| Group 3: Norm and health motive | Experimental | People receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email mentions the number of people who have signed up AND highlights that the challenge helps people to stay fit in a fun way. Receives: Behavioral: Email invitation; Behavioral: Social norm; Behavioral: Intrinsic, health motive |
| Group 4: Norm and reward motive | Experimental | People receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email mentions the number of people who have signed up AND highlights that the challenge helps people to stay active and earn rewards. Receives: Behavioral: Email invitation; Behavioral: Social norm; Behavioral: Extrinsic, reward motive |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of people who sign up for the challenge
Whether or not each person signs up for the challenge during the registration period
Measured: During the registration period, 50 days
Activity level
Number of steps taken each day, as recorded in participants' online portal
Measured: Through study completion, 100 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
most recent BMI in pounds (weight) and inches (height) as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start. Obtaining the data is dependent on the ability to obtain the data from the online portal.
Measured: Most recent BMI as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
cholesterol
Most recent total, low, and high cholesterol levels in mg/dl as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start. Obtaining the data is dependent on the ability to obtain the data from the online portal.
Measured: Most recent cholesterol as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
blood pressure
Most recent systolic and diastolic levels in mmHg as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start. Obtaining the data is dependent on the ability to obtain the data from the online portal.
Measured: Most recent blood pressure as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
stress
Most recent self-reported stress level on a 1-5 scale (with 1 indicating "Relaxed" and 5 indicating "Highly Stressed") as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start. Obtaining the data is dependent on the ability to obtain the data from the online portal.
Measured: Most recent stress as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
Email open and click rates
The rates at which people in each experimental condition read the invitation emails and click on links in the emails
Measured: Through study completion, 100 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Physical ActivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 15,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hengchen Dai, Washington University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Hengchen Dai, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Washington University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02907164
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201608038
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Social Norms to Encourage People to Exercise More
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02907164
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201608038
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Study start
- Sep 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators are interested in using social norms to motivate people to sign up for a 100-day exercise challenge and exploring how to make social norms messages more effective.
Detailed description
The investigators are interested in using social norms to motivate people to sign up for a 100-day exercise challenge and exploring how to make social norms messages more effective. Specifically, the primary purposes of this study are to test (a) whether social norms messages (i.e., information about how many people have signed up for the challenge) can increase signup rates and eventually lead people to exercise more and (b) whether such messages become more effective when they highlight different types of motivations (intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivations). Through a partnership with a university, the investigators are running a large-scale, randomized field controlled trial aimed at increasing sign-ups for the challenge and exercise frequencies during the challenge.
Benefits-eligible employees at the partner university are randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions and receive the corresponding version of email message encouraging them to sign up for the challenge.
(1) In the control group, the email does not mention the number of people who have signed up. (2) In the norm condition, the email mentions the number of people who have signed up. (3) In the norm and health motive condition, the email mentions the number of people who have signed up, and highlights that the challenge is designed to help people to stay fit in a fun way. (4) In the norm and reward motive condition, the email mentions the number of people who have signed up, and highlights that the challenge is designed to help people to stay active and earn rewards.
The investigators hypothesize that Groups 2, 3, and 4 will have a higher sign-up rate and higher exercise frequencies on average than Group 1, because positive social norms should motivate people to engage in the target, desirable behavior. Also, the investigators will compare sign-up rates and exercise frequencies between Groups 2, 3, and 4 to examine whether highlighting intrinsic and extrinsic motives can further increase sign-up rates and overall exercise frequencies than only giving social norms information.
All benefits-eligible employees at the partner university for whom the Human Resource (HR) office has an email address on record receive invitation emails from HR. The invitation emails that contain the interventions are sent out one week AFTER the registration period has started, because HR needs to know how many people sign up in the first week and use this information to create a social norms message. Employees who sign up for the challenge during the first week of the registration period (i.e., prior to the implementation of the interventions) cannot be affected by the interventions. Thus, the investigators decide in advance that these employees will be excluded from analysis.
Employees will receive two emails that are sent eight days apart from each other. Thus, the investigators plan to examine both the sign-up rates within one week after each email goes out and the overall sign-up rates throughout the 50-day registration period.
The investigators plan to explore moderators based on (a) employees' demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, position), (b) employees' participation in previous challenges, and (c) employees' health condition and fitness level prior to the challenge (such as how actively they have been participating in other wellness activities, their health statistics).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Control | Active comparator | Behavioral: Email invitationPeople receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email does not mention the number of people who have signed up. |
| Group 2: Norm | Experimental | Behavioral: Email invitation, Behavioral: Social normPeople receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email mentions the number of people who have signed up. |
| Group 3: Norm and health motive | Experimental | Behavioral: Email invitation, Behavioral: Social norm, Behavioral: Intrinsic, health motivePeople receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email mentions the number of people who have signed up AND highlights that the challenge helps people to stay fit in a fun way. |
| Group 4: Norm and reward motive | Experimental | Behavioral: Email invitation, Behavioral: Social norm, Behavioral: Extrinsic, reward motivePeople receive emails encouraging them to sign up for the challenge. The email mentions the number of people who have signed up AND highlights that the challenge helps people to stay active and earn rewards. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All benefits-eligible employees at partner university for whom the Human Resource office has an email address on record
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Employees who sign up for the challenge prior to the implementation of the interventions will NOT be included in the analysis.
- (The interventions are implemented one week after the registration period has started. The partner university has to send invitation emails to all benefits-eligible employees with an email address on record, including those who already signed up. However, employees who already signed up cannot be affected by the interventions and thus will be excluded from the analysis.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Email invitationReceive emails encouraging them to sign up | Behavioural | Group 1: Control, Group 2: Norm, Group 3: Norm and health motive, Group 4: Norm and reward motive |
| Social normReceive information about how many people have signed up | Behavioural | Group 2: Norm, Group 3: Norm and health motive, Group 4: Norm and reward motive |
| Intrinsic, health motiveReceive information about how the challenge helps people to stay fit in a fun way | Behavioural | Group 3: Norm and health motive |
| Extrinsic, reward motiveReceive information about how the challenge helps people to stay active and earn rewards | Behavioural | Group 4: Norm and reward motive |
Primary outcome
Percentage of people who sign up for the challenge
Time frame: During the registration period, 50 days
Whether or not each person signs up for the challenge during the registration period
Activity level
Time frame: Through study completion, 100 days
Number of steps taken each day, as recorded in participants' online portal
5 secondary outcomes
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: Most recent BMI as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
cholesterol
Time frame: Most recent cholesterol as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
blood pressure
Time frame: Most recent blood pressure as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
stress
Time frame: Most recent stress as entered by participant, an expected average of 2 months after study start
Email open and click rates
Time frame: Through study completion, 100 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2016.
Related trials for Physical Activity
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hengchen Dai, Ph.D principal investigator
Washington University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Email invitation, Social norm and Intrinsic, health motive in people with Physical Activity, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of people who sign up for the challenge (time frame: During the registration period, 50 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2016.