AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NCT02910141

Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of CSII vs. MDI in Type 2 Diabetes

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by King's College London.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare glycaemic control during continuous subcutaneous insulin fusion (CSII, insulin pump therapy) and multiple daily insulin injections in type 2 diabetes and to identify patient-level characteristics that predict the best improvement in control and any change in insulin dose or other outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
How many people
590 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2014to Dec 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: People with type 2 diabetes

Who may be able to join

  • RCTs of CSII vs. MDI in type 2 diabetes, study duration at least 2 months, non-pregnant

Who cannot join

  • Type 1 diabetes, studies <2 months duration, pregnant women, newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and extensions of previous studies.

About this study

Official title: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Glycaemic Control During Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion vs. Multiple Daily Insulin Injections in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

This study aims to compare glycaemic control during continuous subcutaneous insulin fusion (CSII, insulin pump therapy) and multiple daily insulin injections in type 2 diabetes and to identify patient-level characteristics that predict the best improvement in control and any change in insulin dose or other outcome.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will identify randomised controlled trials without language restriction that meet the inclusion criteria by searching the Cochrane database, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar and other sources. The investigators will exclude observational studies, short-term trials <2 months duration, studies in pregnant diabetic subjects, newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, trials in type 1 diabetes and extensions of previous studies.

Data on individual participants will be obtained directly from trialists and from funding sponsors who hold the trial data and will include age, sex, duration of diabetes, treatment group, baseline and final HbA1c, baseline and final insulin dose, baseline and final BMI.

A 'two-step' meta-analysis will be performed to estimate overall mean differences in HbA1c, insulin dose and weight/BMI for the trials. Then, a 'one-step' meta-regression analysis will be conducted by creating a single large dataset from the individual patient data. Determinants of final HbA1c, BMI/weight and insulin dose will be explored using Bayesian approaches with covariates that include baseline HbA1c, age, diabetes duration, BMI, insulin dose and interactions between the covariates.

Being tested
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
Keywords
Type 2 diabetes, Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, Meta-analysis, Insulin pump therapy, Multiple daily insulin injections
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusionDevice

    Also called Insulin pump therapy

    Infusion of short-acting insulin from a portable pump

Study groups in NCT02910141
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CSII (subcutaneous insulin infusion)People with Type 2 diabetes treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)
Receives: Device: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
MDI (multiple daily insulin injections)People with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple daily insulin injections

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. HbA1c

    Difference in glycaemic control between treatments, as measured by HbA1c

    Measured: Up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Insulin dose

    Difference in insulin dose between treatments

    Measured: Up to 24 months

  2. Weight or BMI

    Difference in weight or BMI between treatments

    Measured: Up to 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionJan 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
590 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02910141
Sponsor's protocol ID
IPDMetaT2
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
12 Sep 2016
Last updated
3 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Pickup JC, Reznik Y, Sutton AJ. Glycemic Control During Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Insulin Injections in Type 2 Diabetes: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Care. 2017 May;40(5):715-722. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2201.

    PubMed 28428322

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by King's College London.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

HbA1c (time frame: Up to 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02910141, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in