Diabetes MellitusNCT02910674
Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System - Android Devices User Performance Study Report
A study testing Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by LabStyle Innovations Ltd. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System as compared to a reference method (Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus) and to evaluate the usability of the device when used by laypersons. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has Type 1 or Type II diabetes
- Subject speaks and reads English proficiently
- Subject is able and agrees to sign the informed consent form (minor subjects must be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian to provide consent for their participation in the study)
Who cannot join
- Subject has medical training or works in the field of blood glucose monitoring systems.
- Subject is critically ill.
- Subject has an impairment that prevents him/her from following the study procedures.
- Subject has any condition that the Principal Investigator believes may interfere in the subject's participation in the study.
- Hematocrit levels outside the range of 20%-60%.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System - Android Devices User Performance
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System as compared to a reference method (Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus) and to evaluate the usability of the device when used by laypersons.
Read the detailed description
The objectives for this study are to evaluate the blood glucose level results obtained from the subject's fingertip using the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System paired with a reference device from one of three Android smart mobile device families as compared to the results from the Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus. The usability of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System when paired with a reference device from one of three Android smart mobile device families and used by laypersons is also evaluated.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemDevice
Accuracy with usability assessment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| One Arm | Other | This is a comparative diagnostic study, no interventional actions are being taken. Receives: Device: Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy of Glucose Concentrations (%)
Accuracy acceptability is defined as follows:
Ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results shall fall within +/-15 mg/dL of the results of the Dario's measurement at glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL and within +/- 20% at glucose concentrations greater than or equal to 75 mg/dL.
The accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System when used with Android operating system smart mobile devices was assessed against the Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus.
Measured: 1 Day
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Would Rate Your Success in Operating Dario BGMS"
Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-completely fails, 2-unsuccessful, 3-Partially successful, 4-successful, 5-very successful.
Average rank of 3.5 ('average'/'successful') or above in question #2 - How would you rate your success in operating Dario™ BGMS?
Measured: 1 Day
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Easy Was it to Operate the Dario™ BGMS on the First Time?"
Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-very hard, 2-hard, 3-average, 4-easy, 5-very easy.
An average rank of 3 ('average') or above in question #3 - How easy was it to operate the Dario™ BGMS on the first time?
Measured: 1 Day
Percent of Participants Responding 'YES' on the Question "Did You Successfully Obtain Measurement Result Using the Dario™ BGMS?"
The acceptance criteria for this question is: at least ninety percent (90%) need to answer 'Yes' on question #1 - Did you successfully obtain measurement result using the Dario™ BGMS?
100% of subjects (102 of 102) answered "Yes" to this question.
Measured: 1 Day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- LabStyle Innovations Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02910674
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CP-0004
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System - Android Devices User Performance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02910674
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CP-0004
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- LabStyle Innovations Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2016
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Apr 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System as compared to a reference method (Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus) and to evaluate the usability of the device when used by laypersons.
Detailed description
The objectives for this study are to evaluate the blood glucose level results obtained from the subject's fingertip using the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System paired with a reference device from one of three Android smart mobile device families as compared to the results from the Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus. The usability of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System when paired with a reference device from one of three Android smart mobile device families and used by laypersons is also evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| One Arm | Other | Device: Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemThis is a comparative diagnostic study, no interventional actions are being taken. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject has Type 1 or Type II diabetes
- Subject speaks and reads English proficiently
- Subject is able and agrees to sign the informed consent form (minor subjects must be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian to provide consent for their participation in the study)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subject has medical training or works in the field of blood glucose monitoring systems.
- Subject is critically ill.
- Subject has an impairment that prevents him/her from following the study procedures.
- Subject has any condition that the Principal Investigator believes may interfere in the subject's participation in the study.
- Hematocrit levels outside the range of 20%-60%.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemAccuracy with usability assessment | Device | One Arm |
Primary outcome
Accuracy of Glucose Concentrations (%)
Time frame: 1 Day
Accuracy acceptability is defined as follows: Ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results shall fall within +/-15 mg/dL of the results of the Dario's measurement at glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL and within +/- 20% at glucose concentrations greater than or equal to 75 mg/dL. The accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System when used with Android operating system smart mobile devices was assessed against the Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus.
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Would Rate Your Success in Operating Dario BGMS"
Time frame: 1 Day
Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-completely fails, 2-unsuccessful, 3-Partially successful, 4-successful, 5-very successful. Average rank of 3.5 ('average'/'successful') or above in question #2 - How would you rate your success in operating Dario™ BGMS?
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Easy Was it to Operate the Dario™ BGMS on the First Time?"
Time frame: 1 Day
Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-very hard, 2-hard, 3-average, 4-easy, 5-very easy. An average rank of 3 ('average') or above in question #3 - How easy was it to operate the Dario™ BGMS on the first time?
Percent of Participants Responding 'YES' on the Question "Did You Successfully Obtain Measurement Result Using the Dario™ BGMS?"
Time frame: 1 Day
The acceptance criteria for this question is: at least ninety percent (90%) need to answer 'Yes' on question #1 - Did you successfully obtain measurement result using the Dario™ BGMS? 100% of subjects (102 of 102) answered "Yes" to this question.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by LabStyle Innovations Ltd. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy of Glucose Concentrations (%) (time frame: 1 Day). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2021.