AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TransplantationPhase 1NCT02911714

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Kidney Transplant

A Phase 1 study testing Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a promising non-invasive imaging tool that may aid in the early detection of kidney transplant complications, such as delayed graft function (DGF) and acute allograft rejection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplantation
What is being tested?
Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Feb 2018to 30 Jun 2022
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult living-donor or deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients

Who cannot join

  • Subject is Pregnant
  • History of non-renal transplant
  • Uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension
  • Symptomatic or significant pulmonary or cardiovascular disease
  • Clinical decision by the treating team to forego the study procedure due to medical/surgical instability

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Utah Hospital

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study to Develop Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Kidney Transplant

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a promising non-invasive imaging tool that may aid in the early detection of kidney transplant complications, such as delayed graft function (DGF) and acute allograft rejection. The technique uses an intravenous contrast agent to improve organ visualization with standard duplex ultrasound equipment. A number of FDA-approved agents, including Optison, Definity and Lumason are widely used to improve visualization in technically limited echocardiograms, and Lumason was recently approved for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. The specific aims of this study are to: develop, implement and refine a contrast-enhanced ultrasound protocol using Lumason to safely maximize kidney allograft visualization; determine associations between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and patterns of allograft injury consistent with delayed graft function; and to compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound with duplex ultrasound for differentiating acute rejection from other causes of dysfunction.

Read the detailed description

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) given improved quality of life, longer survival and lower costs compared with chronic dialysis. Despite these long-term benefits, the first year post-transplant is a critical period that influences health care costs for transplantation and long-term patient and allograft survival. The two most common complications in the first year are delayed graft function (DGF), which affects nearly 25% of deceased-donor transplants, and acute allograft rejection, which affects nearly 10% of all transplants (deceased and living donor). DGF is most commonly caused by severe ischemia-reperfusion injury at transplantation and is a known risk factor for acute rejection and premature failure. Driven by an ever-growing transplant waiting list and limited organs, efforts to utilize higher-risk kidneys for increasingly higher-risk recipients may further increase these complication rates. While treatments exist for DGF and acute rejection, the current diagnostic paradigm is to obtain a duplex ultrasound (DUS) of the allograft, based on serial changes in serum creatinine, and then proceed to biopsy if there is clinical concern for rejection. Biopsy is the gold standard to differentiate between causes of allograft dysfunction, but the procedure is invasive and typically takes 24 hours or longer for an interpretation. Thus, early detection of these complications using non-invasive diagnostic methods (a major transplant research goal) could reduce our reliance on biopsies and help improve long-term patient and allograft survival.

Researchers in the United States have safely performed contrast-enhanced ultrasounds of the kidney in healthy participants, and radiologists have used ultrasound contrast agents off-label to better visualize organs other than the heart when clinically indicated. In terms of kidney transplants, European data suggest CEUS of the allograft on post-operative day (POD) 7 is superior to DUS for predicting 12-month allograft function, but there are no published studies using CEUS on POD 1 to diagnose DGF or acute rejection.

The pathophysiology of both DGF and acute rejection involve interactions between the microvasculature, parenchymal cells and inflammatory cells, though with differences in timing and within different zones of the kidney itself. A very important feature of CEUS is its capacity to measure microvascular perfusion, whereas DUS can only estimate flow within larger vessels. This potential innovation for assessing the renal macro- and microvasculature may allow for earlier non-invasive detection of DGF and acute rejection. With additional research, it may ultimately be shown that non-invasive CEUS will revolutionize early DGF and acute rejection diagnosis to enable improvement in long-term patient and allograft survival.

Being tested
Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
Keywords
Kidney Transplantation, Delayed Graft Function, Acute Allograft Rejection, Acute Kidney Injury
Medical subject headings
Delayed Graft Function, Acute Kidney Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lumason Contrast-Enhanced UltrasoundDrug

    Also called Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres

    In both arms, we will use Lumason to measure kidney allograft perfusion via contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Study groups in NCT02911714
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CEUS and Delayed Graft FunctionExperimentalOn the first post-operative day after kidney transplantation, recipients enrolled in the study will undergo CEUS using Lumason to quantify microvascular perfusion within the cortical and medullary zones of the kidney allograft for comparison to the concentration of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL, an early biomarker of acute kidney injury) measured from recipient urine simultaneously collected on the first post-operative day.
Receives: Drug: Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
CEUS and Biopsy-Proven Acute RejectionExperimentalWe will identify and enroll kidney transplant recipients in need of clinically-indicated duplex ultrasounds and possible biopsy to evaluate allograft dysfunction during hospital admissions and outpatient follow-up. Immediately after the duplex ultrasound, we will perform CEUS using Lumason for allograft perfusion measurements to determine its potential association with biopsy-proven acute rejection according to the most recent Banff criteria.
Receives: Drug: Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Biomarker-Defined Delayed Graft Function

    A meta-analysis of 19 studies found urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) >150 ng/mL (within hours of the inciting event) had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.815 for identifying acute kidney injury (defined as an ensuing rise in serum creatinine by ≥50%). We noted an AUC of 0.82 for predicting the need for dialysis in the first week (i.e., dialysis-defined delayed graft function) with an optimal urine NGAL cutoff of >350 ng/mL. For this study outcome, we will determine the Spearman correlation between CEUS-assessed allograft perfusion and degree of allograft injury based on post-operative day 1 urine NGAL concentration.

    Measured: Post-Operative Day 1

  2. Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection

    The Banff (2013) classification of acute kidney allograft rejection requires histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of recent antibody interaction with renal vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies in order to diagnose acute antibody-mediate rejection. Acute T-cell mediated rejection is histologically graded by the extent of interstitial inflammation and vascular involvement.

    Measured: Any Time After Kidney Transplantation

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Dialysis-Defined Delayed Graft Function

    The need for any dialysis in the first week of transplant.

    Measured: First Post-Operative Week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2022

Why it stopped: lack of funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02911714
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB_00092223
Other IDs
KL2TR002539
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
19 Sep 2016
Last updated
24 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Biomarker-Defined Delayed Graft Function (time frame: Post-Operative Day 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in