AzTrials
AzTrials

Thyroid DisfunctionTIRASHNCT02915380

Pituitary Dysfunction After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

An observational study of Thyroid Disfunction and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage From Cerebral Aneurism Rupture, run by Dr. Rita Bertuetti.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recently, the occurrence and potential impact of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH has gained increasing interest. Several studies have demonstrated pituitary dysfunction after SAH suggesting that pituitary dysfunction may be a contributing factor for residual symptoms after SAH. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Evaluation of pituitary endocrine function, Evaluation of clinical outcome and Evaluation of neuropsychological function
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2017to Jan 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Who may be able to join

  • patients with acute aneurysmal SAH aged between 18 and 70 years of age who could be subjected to endocrine evaluation within 10 days of ictus and at follow-up.

Who cannot join

  • be major depression, psychiatric premorbidity, pituitary adenoma or perisellar lesion,preexisting hypopituitarism of any degree, previous hormonal substitution, patients in moribund state, pregnancy, glucocorticoid medication on admission to hospital or during treatment, prior pituitary insufficiency, and unsalvageable aSAH.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Chiara Robba, MD contact

kiarobba@gmail.com

Rita Bertuetti, MD contact

rita_zoso@yahoo.it

About this study

Recently, the occurrence and potential impact of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH has gained increasing interest. Several studies have demonstrated pituitary dysfunction after SAH suggesting that pituitary dysfunction may be a contributing factor for residual symptoms after SAH. This is an observational multicentric study aimed to test the prevalence of thyroid abnormalities, other neuroendocrinological dysfunction and their influence on outcome of patients affected by aSAH.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) varies between 6 to 10/100,000 subjects per year and it is a major cause of death and disability. The mortality rate ranges from 40 to 50%, and those who do survive SAH have high rates of functional limitations that could lead to impaired quality of life, including fatigue, depression, and loss of motivation.

Because aSAH affects patients in their most productive years of life, the disease has important social, and economic implications, and early prediction of long-term outcome is based on multiple factors including the primary injury secondary insults as well as neurorehabilitation interventions.

Recently, the occurrence and potential impact of pituitary dysfunction after aSAH has gained increasing interest. Several studies have demonstrated pituitary dysfunction after SAH suggesting that pituitary dysfunction may be a contributing factor for residual symptoms after SAH. However, questions remain about the real prevalence and impact of such dysfunction on patients' outcome both in the acute and chronic phase after these events.

In two recent metanalysis, the prevalence of total pituitary dysfunction was found with pooled frequencies of 0.31 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.22-0.43) [Can et a.] and 49.3.0% (95% CI 41.6%-56.9%) [Robba et al] during the acute phase (< 6 months from aSAH) and decreasing in the chronic phase to 0.25 (95% CI: 0.16-0.36) [Can et al.] and 25.6% (95% CI 18.0%-35.1%) [Robba et al]. However, the authors found high heterogenicity and different results between the available literature; many differences were found in the in the choice of time of pituitary function assessment and SAH, of diagnostic criteria and units of measurement used to establish the diagnosis of hypopituitarism after SAH.

Finally, it is not clear which is the hormone axis more likely to be affected after aSAH.

It is believed that, among the other, the incidence of thyroid dysfunction is the most relevant, as it is associated with severe clinical impairment and symptoms. In literature, the prevalence of thyroid dysfunction after aSAH is reported from 0 to 35%.[Karaka, Tanrivedi].

Hypothyroidism includes a wide variety of symptoms including weakness, fatigue, depression, irritability, memory loss and decreased libido. Should these abnormalities complicate more than one third of the patients, hormone testing and eventually replacement should become "standard of care" to test.

In order to define the actual incidence of these abnormalities, an observational multicentric study to test thyroid abnormalities, including TSH, fT4 (free thyroxine) and fT3 (free triiodothyronine) changes, is warranted.

Secondary endpoints of such study include the prevalence of other neuroendocrinological dysfunction and their influence on the patients' outcome.

Being tested
Evaluation of pituitary endocrine function, Evaluation of clinical outcome, Evaluation of neuropsychological function

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Evaluation of pituitary endocrine functionBiological

    The basal thyroid hormone and test to perform will be: TSH, fT4, fT3.

    When available, the following hormones will be tested:

    FSH, LH, estradiol (in women), testosterone (in men), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), ACTH, cortisol, prolactin, Na, K; serum levels of GH and IGF-1; and serum and urine osmolality.

    Adrenal function will be evaluated through ACTH-stimulation testing . Adrenal or GH insufficiency will be evaluated by insulin tolerance testing (ITT)

  • Evaluation of clinical outcomeBehavioural

    Patients' outcome will be assessed as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge from the hospital, at 3, 6 and 12 months.

  • Evaluation of neuropsychological functionBehavioural

    Neuropsychological examination will be conducted focusing on verbal comprehension (Token Test) and visual neglect. Verbal and visual short term and working memory visuospatial construction and figural memory will be performed through Rey Osterrieth Complex figure test, and psychomotor speed attention and concentration through Trail Making Test.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of thyroid disfunction

    Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxin (fT4), free triiodothyronine (fT3).

    Measured: At 2 weeks after aSAH

  2. Incidence of thyroid disfunction

    Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxin (fT4), free triiodothyronine (fT3).

    Measured: 3 months after aSAH

  3. Incidence of thyroid disfunction

    Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxin (fT4), free triiodothyronine (fT3).

    Measured: 6 months after aSAH

  4. Incidence of thyroid disfunction

    Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxin (fT4), free triiodothyronine (fT3).

    Measured: 12 months after aSAH

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of pituitary- sexual hormones disfunction

    serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (in women), testosterone (in men), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).

    Measured: At 2 weeks, and at follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months.

  2. Survival

    Modified Ranking Scale

    Measured: At 2 weeks, and at follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months

  3. Incidence of pituitary-adrenal axis disfunction

    Serum levels of adrenocortico-tropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, Na, K; serum and urine osmolality. Adrenal function will be evaluated through ACTH-stimulation testing with injection of 250 mcg of ACTH, and a peak of cortisol <500 nmol/l will be considered pathologic. Adrenal or GH insufficiency will be evaluated by insulin tolerance testing (ITT), and peak response of more than 3ng/ml for GH and and 500 nmol/l for cortisol will be considered as normal.

    Measured: At 2 weeks, and at follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months.

  4. Incidence of growth hormone insufficiency

    serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Adrenal or GH insufficiency will be evaluated by insulin tolerance testing (ITT), and peak response of more than 3ng/ml for GH and and 500 nmol/l for cortisol will be considered as normal.

    Measured: At 2 weeks, and at follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months

  5. Incidence of language disorders

    Neuropsychological examination focused on verbal comprehension will be evaluated through the application of Token Test .

    Incidence of impaired scoring will be correlated to incidence of altered hormone levels detected in the blood.

    Measured: At 2 weeks, and at follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Incidence of memory disorders

    Verbal and visual short term and working memory visuospatial construction and figural memory will be performed through Rey Osterrieth Complex figure test.

    Incidence of impaired scoring will be correlated to incidence of altered hormone levels detected in the blood.

    Measured: At 2 weeks, and at follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months

  7. Incidence of attention disorders

    Psychomotor speed attention and concentration will be assessed through Trail Making Test.

    Incidence of impaired scoring will be correlated to incidence of altered hormone levels detected in the blood.

    Measured: At 2 weeks, and at follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completionJan 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02915380
Sponsor's protocol ID
TIRASH-1.0
Acronym
TIRASH
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
6 Sep 2016
Last updated
27 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Thyroid Disfunction and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage From Cerebral Aneurism Rupture, run by Dr. Rita Bertuetti.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chiara Robba, MD (kiarobba@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of thyroid disfunction (time frame: At 2 weeks after aSAH). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Sep 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in