ObesityNCT02917668
Evaluation of the Risk of Hyperoxia-induced Hypercapnia in Obese Cardiac Surgery Patients
A study testing FreeO2 in people with Obesity and Hyperoxia, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the risk of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in post-op obese cardiac surgery patients. It will compare two oxygenation modes in terms of their effect on the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) : manual titration of oxygen delivery for a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Hyperoxia, Hypercapnia
- What is being tested?
- FreeO2
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to 8 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- BMI > 30 kg/m2
- SpO2 > or = 95 % before extubation
- Procedure : coronary artery bypass
Who cannot join
- Comorbidities : chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, restrictive syndrome not associated with obesity (pulmonary fibrosis, neuromuscular junction disease, etc.)
- Obstructive sleep apnea requiring a positive-pressure mask in the posteoperative period
- FreeO2 device unavailable
- Inclusion in another study that does not permit dual inclusion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Québec, G1V4G5
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Risk of Hyperoxia-induced Hypercapnia in Obese Patients in a Cardiac Surgery Postoperative Setting
This study aims to evaluate the risk of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in post-op obese cardiac surgery patients. It will compare two oxygenation modes in terms of their effect on the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) : manual titration of oxygen delivery for a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) target of > or = 95 % versus automatic titration by a closed-loop system for a SpO2 target of 90%. 15 post-op obese cardiac surgery patients will be recruited and each will receive both interventions (cross-over design). The main outcome will be the PaCO2, which will be compared after each study period. The research hypothesis is that the usual SpO2 target of > or = 95 % is associated with a greater PaCO2 compared with a lesser SpO2 target of 90%.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to evaluate the risk of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in post-op obese cardiac surgery patients.
The investigators will compare two oxygenation modes in terms of their effect on PaCO2 : a SpO2 target of > or = 95 % achieved with manual titration (usual practice) and a more conservative SpO2 target of 90 % achieved with automatic titration by a closed-loop system (FreeO2).
The choice of a SpO2 target of 90 % is consistent with recent guidelines issued by the British Thoracic Society and the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, which both recommend a SpO2 target of 88-92 % for morbidly obese patients (BMI > 40 kg/m2).
FreeO2 is a closed-loop oxygen delivery system which adjusts the oxygen flow according to the patient's real-time SpO2 and a target programed by the physician. The system also records data on heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2. Its safety and efficacy have been tested in healthy subjects as well as in patients suffering from COPD or acute respiratory distress in the emergency room, with promising results.
The research hypothesis is that the usual SpO2 target of > or = 95 % is associated with a greater PaCO2 compared with a lesser SpO2 target of 90%.
30 obese patients will be recruited* at the Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec. A written consent from the patient will be obtained the day before the surgery. The protocol has been submitted to and approved by the establishment's ethics committee.
The study will compare the effect of two different oxygenation modes on the patients' PaCO2 immediately after extubation :
FreeO2 mode : oxygen delivered by nasal cannula or Venturi mask (if flow > 5L/min during > 5 minutes), automatically titrated for a SpO2 of 90 +/- 2 %
Usual mode : oxygen delivered by Venturi mask, manually titrated for a SpO2 superior or equal to 95 % (the local protocol is to deliver a post-extubation FiO2 which is 10 % superior to the pre-extubation FiO2)
Patients meeting all of the eligibility criteria will be randomized in the postoperative period. After extubation, they will receive oxygen for 30 minutes according to FreeO2 mode or the usual mode, depending on randomization. After 30 minutes, a first arterial blood gas will be obtained through their arterial cannula. Next, they will be oxygenated according to the second oxygenation mode for another 30 minutes, after which a second arterial blood gas will be obtained. Each patient will thus act as his own control (cross-over design).
When patients will be oxygenated according to the usual mode, FreeO2 will be in recording mode, but will not be delivering any oxygen.
The study will last 1h for each patient, and will have to begin within 30 minutes after extubation. A member of the research team will be at the patient's bedside for the whole data collecting period.
Complete data collection should be achieved within 12 months.
Demographic data (age, sex, weight, height and BMI) will be collected upon study entering as well as pre-operative room air PCO2 on capillary blood gas, type of surgery (number of bypass grafts, extracorporal circulation time), opiates dosage per-op and post-op, and pre-op left ventricular ejection fraction and renal function. FreeO2 will be recording respiratory rate, heart rate and SpO2 for the whole study duration. The respiratory rate will also be recorded manually and on the monitor. When patients will be receiving oxygen from FreeO2, the system will record the delivered flow ; with the usual mode, the staff will record the delivered FiO2. At the end of each intervention, hemodynamic measures will be taken : systolic, diastolic and median arterial blood pressure, systolic, diastolic and median pulmonary artery pressure and amine level.
*Initially, 15 patients were supposed to be included. After inclusion of those 15 patients, statistical analyses showed a lack of statistical power and a possibly significant difference in PaCO2, but only in half the patients. We thus submitted a protocol amendment to our institution's ethics committee to enlarge the sample size to 30 patients, which was accepted on July 13th, 2017.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Hyperoxia, Hypercapnia
- Being tested
- FreeO2, Usual care
- Keywords
- Obesity, Hyperoxia, Hypercapnia, Postoperative complications, Cardiac surgical procedures
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Hyperoxia, Hypercapnia, Postoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FreeO2Other
Oxygen delivery automatically titrated by a closed-loop system that adjusts the oxygen flow based on the patient's real-time SpO2 and a programed SpO2 target of 90 %
Usual careOther
Oxygen delivery manually titrated by the nursing staff for a SpO2 target of > or = 95 %
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Active comparator | 15 patients who will receive usual care for 30 minutes and then switch to FreeO2 for another 30 minutes Receives: Other: FreeO2; Other: Usual care |
| Group B | Active comparator | 15 patients who will be oxygenated by FreeO2 for 30 minutes and then switch to usual care for another 30 minutes Receives: Other: FreeO2; Other: Usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in PaCO2
Difference in end-of-period PaCO2 on arterial blood gas
Measured: At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Secondary outcomes (11)
Difference in pH
Difference in end-of-period pH on arterial blood gas
Measured: At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Difference in PaO2
Difference in end-of-period PaO2 on arterial blood gas
Measured: At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hypoxemia (SpO2 < 88%)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hypoxemia (SpO2 < 88%) between periods
Measured: In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in severe hypoxemia (SpO2 < 85 %)
Difference in percentage of time spent in severe hypoxemia (SpO2 < 85 %) between periods
Measured: In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hyperoxemia (SpO2 > 96 %)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hyperoxemia (SpO2 > 96 %) between periods
Measured: In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in respiratory rate (manual and monitor)
Difference in respiratory rate (manual, monitor, FreeO2) between periods for each measuring technique (manual and monitor)
Measured: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in mean heart rate
Difference in mean heart rate, recorded continuously by FreeO2, between periods
Measured: In the first 30 minutes and between 30 and 60 minutes
Difference in arterial blood pressure
Difference in arterial blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean) between periods
Measured: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in pulmonary artery pressure
Difference in pulmonary artery pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean) between periods
Measured: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in vasopressor dosage
Difference in vasopressor dosagel at different times between periods
Measured: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in body temperature
Difference in body temperature at different times between periods
Measured: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completion8 Jan 2018
- Study completion8 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Laval UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laval University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, François Lellouche, Laval University
- Investigators
- François Lellouche, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Laval University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02917668
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21366
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 11 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The investigators would like to publish our results in scientific magazine and/or present them in a Conference.
Publications
Beasley R, Chien J, Douglas J, Eastlake L, Farah C, King G, Moore R, Pilcher J, Richards M, Smith S, Walters H. Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand oxygen guidelines for acute oxygen use in adults: 'Swimming between the flags'. Respirology. 2015 Nov;20(8):1182-91. doi: 10.1111/resp.12620.
PubMed 26486092O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG; British Thoracic Society. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax. 2008 Oct;63 Suppl 6:vi1-68. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.102947. No abstract available.
PubMed 18838559Lellouche F, L'her E. Automated oxygen flow titration to maintain constant oxygenation. Respir Care. 2012 Aug;57(8):1254-62. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01343. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
PubMed 22348812Denault MH, Ruel C, Simon M, Bouchard PA, Simard S, Lellouche F. Evaluation of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in obese patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized crossover comparison of conservative and liberal oxygen administration. Can J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;67(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01500-x. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
PubMed 31650500
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Risk of Hyperoxia-induced Hypercapnia in Obese Patients in a Cardiac Surgery Postoperative Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02917668
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 21366
- Conditions
- Obesity, Hyperoxia, Hypercapnia
- Keywords
- Obesity, Hyperoxia, Hypercapnia, Postoperative complications, Cardiac surgical procedures
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Laval UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2016
- Primary completion
- 8 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the risk of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in post-op obese cardiac surgery patients. It will compare two oxygenation modes in terms of their effect on the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) : manual titration of oxygen delivery for a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) target of > or = 95 % versus automatic titration by a closed-loop system for a SpO2 target of 90%. 15 post-op obese cardiac surgery patients will be recruited and each will receive both interventions (cross-over design). The main outcome will be the PaCO2, which will be compared after each study period. The research hypothesis is that the usual SpO2 target of > or = 95 % is associated with a greater PaCO2 compared with a lesser SpO2 target of 90%.
Detailed description
This study aims to evaluate the risk of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in post-op obese cardiac surgery patients.
The investigators will compare two oxygenation modes in terms of their effect on PaCO2 : a SpO2 target of > or = 95 % achieved with manual titration (usual practice) and a more conservative SpO2 target of 90 % achieved with automatic titration by a closed-loop system (FreeO2).
The choice of a SpO2 target of 90 % is consistent with recent guidelines issued by the British Thoracic Society and the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, which both recommend a SpO2 target of 88-92 % for morbidly obese patients (BMI > 40 kg/m2).
FreeO2 is a closed-loop oxygen delivery system which adjusts the oxygen flow according to the patient's real-time SpO2 and a target programed by the physician. The system also records data on heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2. Its safety and efficacy have been tested in healthy subjects as well as in patients suffering from COPD or acute respiratory distress in the emergency room, with promising results.
The research hypothesis is that the usual SpO2 target of > or = 95 % is associated with a greater PaCO2 compared with a lesser SpO2 target of 90%.
30 obese patients will be recruited* at the Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec. A written consent from the patient will be obtained the day before the surgery. The protocol has been submitted to and approved by the establishment's ethics committee.
The study will compare the effect of two different oxygenation modes on the patients' PaCO2 immediately after extubation :
FreeO2 mode : oxygen delivered by nasal cannula or Venturi mask (if flow > 5L/min during > 5 minutes), automatically titrated for a SpO2 of 90 +/- 2 %
Usual mode : oxygen delivered by Venturi mask, manually titrated for a SpO2 superior or equal to 95 % (the local protocol is to deliver a post-extubation FiO2 which is 10 % superior to the pre-extubation FiO2)
Patients meeting all of the eligibility criteria will be randomized in the postoperative period. After extubation, they will receive oxygen for 30 minutes according to FreeO2 mode or the usual mode, depending on randomization. After 30 minutes, a first arterial blood gas will be obtained through their arterial cannula. Next, they will be oxygenated according to the second oxygenation mode for another 30 minutes, after which a second arterial blood gas will be obtained. Each patient will thus act as his own control (cross-over design).
When patients will be oxygenated according to the usual mode, FreeO2 will be in recording mode, but will not be delivering any oxygen.
The study will last 1h for each patient, and will have to begin within 30 minutes after extubation. A member of the research team will be at the patient's bedside for the whole data collecting period.
Complete data collection should be achieved within 12 months.
Demographic data (age, sex, weight, height and BMI) will be collected upon study entering as well as pre-operative room air PCO2 on capillary blood gas, type of surgery (number of bypass grafts, extracorporal circulation time), opiates dosage per-op and post-op, and pre-op left ventricular ejection fraction and renal function. FreeO2 will be recording respiratory rate, heart rate and SpO2 for the whole study duration. The respiratory rate will also be recorded manually and on the monitor. When patients will be receiving oxygen from FreeO2, the system will record the delivered flow ; with the usual mode, the staff will record the delivered FiO2. At the end of each intervention, hemodynamic measures will be taken : systolic, diastolic and median arterial blood pressure, systolic, diastolic and median pulmonary artery pressure and amine level.
*Initially, 15 patients were supposed to be included. After inclusion of those 15 patients, statistical analyses showed a lack of statistical power and a possibly significant difference in PaCO2, but only in half the patients. We thus submitted a protocol amendment to our institution's ethics committee to enlarge the sample size to 30 patients, which was accepted on July 13th, 2017.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Active comparator | Other: FreeO2, Other: Usual care15 patients who will receive usual care for 30 minutes and then switch to FreeO2 for another 30 minutes |
| Group B | Active comparator | Other: FreeO2, Other: Usual care15 patients who will be oxygenated by FreeO2 for 30 minutes and then switch to usual care for another 30 minutes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- BMI > 30 kg/m2
- SpO2 > or = 95 % before extubation
- Procedure : coronary artery bypass
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Comorbidities : chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, restrictive syndrome not associated with obesity (pulmonary fibrosis, neuromuscular junction disease, etc.)
- Obstructive sleep apnea requiring a positive-pressure mask in the posteoperative period
- FreeO2 device unavailable
- Inclusion in another study that does not permit dual inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FreeO2Oxygen delivery automatically titrated by a closed-loop system that adjusts the oxygen flow based on the patient's real-time SpO2 and a programed SpO2 target of 90 % | Other | Group A, Group B |
| Usual careOxygen delivery manually titrated by the nursing staff for a SpO2 target of > or = 95 % | Other | Group A, Group B |
Primary outcome
Difference in PaCO2
Time frame: At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Difference in end-of-period PaCO2 on arterial blood gas
11 secondary outcomes
Difference in pH
Time frame: At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Difference in PaO2
Time frame: At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hypoxemia (SpO2 < 88%)
Time frame: In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in severe hypoxemia (SpO2 < 85 %)
Time frame: In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in percentage of time spent in hyperoxemia (SpO2 > 96 %)
Time frame: In the first 30 minutes (first intervention) and between 30 min and 1h (second intervention)
Difference in respiratory rate (manual and monitor)
Time frame: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in mean heart rate
Time frame: In the first 30 minutes and between 30 and 60 minutes
Difference in arterial blood pressure
Time frame: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in pulmonary artery pressure
Time frame: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in vasopressor dosage
Time frame: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Difference in body temperature
Time frame: At 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 26486092Beasley R, Chien J, Douglas J, Eastlake L, Farah C, King G, Moore R, Pilcher J, Richards M, Smith S, Walters H. Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand oxygen guidelines for acute oxygen use in adults: 'Swimming between the flags'. Respirology. 2015 Nov;20(8):1182-91. doi: 10.1111/resp.12620.
- Background: PubMed 18838559O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG; British Thoracic Society. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax. 2008 Oct;63 Suppl 6:vi1-68. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.102947. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22348812Lellouche F, L'her E. Automated oxygen flow titration to maintain constant oxygenation. Respir Care. 2012 Aug;57(8):1254-62. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01343. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31650500Denault MH, Ruel C, Simon M, Bouchard PA, Simard S, Lellouche F. Evaluation of hyperoxia-induced hypercapnia in obese patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized crossover comparison of conservative and liberal oxygen administration. Can J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;67(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01500-x. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The investigators would like to publish our results in scientific magazine and/or present them in a Conference.
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
François Lellouche, MD, PhD principal investigator
Laval University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FreeO2 in people with Obesity and Hyperoxia, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in PaCO2 (time frame: At 30 minutes (first intervention) and at 1h (second intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02917668, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2018.