AllergySYS-T-ACTNCT02931955
Applying Systems Immunology to the Search for Personalized Biomarkers of Clinical Efficacy
An observational study of Allergy, run by Luxembourg Institute of Health at 1 site in Luxembourg.
Trial summary
Study Objective: Allergies affect up to 20% of the population of developed countries and can cause substantial individual disease burden. For some allergies, immunotherapeutic regimens ("hyposensitization") have been established, e.g. for insect venom allergies and pollen allergies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergy
- What is being tested?
- Blood draw, stool collection.
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteLuxembourg
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to Jul 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The investigators will recruit participants from the allergy referral center at the CHL Luxembourg who are undergoing immunotherapy for insect venom or pollen allergy.
Who may be able to join
- patients undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy for insect venom or pollen allergy
Who cannot join
- patients < 18 years
- medical conditions preventing patients in participating in the immunotherapy
- lack of consent or lack to give consent to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Applying Systems Immunology to the Search for Personalized Biomarkers of Clinical Efficacy: Predicting the T Cell Activation Potential in Vivo From Resting T Cells of Patients
Study Objective: Allergies affect up to 20% of the population of developed countries and can cause substantial individual disease burden. For some allergies, immunotherapeutic regimens ("hyposensitization") have been established, e.g. for insect venom allergies and pollen allergies. This project aims at identifying the T cell activation potential in vivo from resting T cells of patients undergoing immunotherapy (IT) via a systems biology approach. For the participants, it involves blood draws and stool collection as well as gathering some basic medical information. The participation takes one week for patients undergoing insect venom IT and three months for patients undergoing pollen IT. A control group without a clinical history of allergies is recruited. Blood and stool samples are collected in the same time frames as in allergic patients.
This study is a cooperation project between the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg (CHL), the Luxemburg Institute of Health (LIH), the University of Luxembourg and the Integrated Biobank of Luxemburg (IBBL).
Read the detailed description
Summary of the study: Applying systems immunology to the search for personalized biomarkers of clinical efficacy: Predicting the T cell activation potential in vivo from resting T cells of patients.
Introduction Allergy affects more than 20% of the populations of most developed countries. The major allergic diseases, allergic rhinitis, asthma, food allergies and urticaria, are chronic, cause major disability, and are costly both to the individual and to the society (World Allergy Organisation (WAO) white book 2013). Besides occupational allergies, the most common allergies are caused by food, pollen, dust, mold, animal dander, insect sting, medications…Allergic phenomena are due to an exacerbated response of the immune system to antigens that are tolerated by non-allergic patients.
After exposure to antigens, naive CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) T cells can be differentiated in different subsets of T helper (Th) cells (Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, Th22, Tfh) and induced suppressive regulatory T cells characterized by different cytokine expression patterns, transcription factors and other surface markers, which will orchestrate adaptive and innate immune responses to these stimuli. Th2 cells are central players in all the various forms of Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated allergic diseases and are thus regarded as the most dominant T cell subset sustaining the allergic response. Upon antigen uptake and processing by antigen-presenting cells, CD4+ T cells are polarized towards a Th2 phenotype, leading to the expression of Th2 cell-associated cytokines such as Interleukin (IL)-4, -5, -9, -13, switching B cell response toward IgE production (sensitization or early phase). Allergen-specific IgE bind to a high-affinity receptor (FcεRI) of innate immune cells including basophils and mast cells, triggering the release of anaphylactogenic mediators (cytokines, chemokines, histamine, heparin, serotonin and proteases) responsible for inflammatory cell recruitment and allergic symptoms (effector or late phase). Identifying networks of genes expressed in resting and activated Th2 cells from allergic patients would help distinguish gene candidates predicting immune tolerance to allergens.
Allergies are diseases involving many cell subsets. The specific reactivities and contributions to the clinical picture are closely interdependent and not fully deciphered yet. The interplay between the different actors of the cellular immune system is further complexified by the existence of the commensal intestinal flora, also called the microbiota. Gut microbiota is partially under supervision of the immune system, and dysregulations or changes in the composition of the microbiota, for example due to antibiotics uptake during childhood and /or different eating habits, may impact adaptative and innate immune functions. Characterization of the gut microbiota of human hosts undergoing immunotherapy might be of high interest to delineate interactions between microbiota and adaptive immune system.
Despite substantial improvements in medications relieving daily allergy symptoms, a percentage of patients still experience uncontrolled severe symptoms. For these patients, strictly avoiding the allergen and keeping emergency medications within reach are the best recommendations so far, and the burden of living with allergy ultimately results in psychosocial, health, occupational and economic problems by impacting public health costs. In these cases, the best and feasible solution to improve quality of life is to apply an immunotherapeutic approach to induce allergen tolerance.
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has been implemented for more than 100 years, and achieves sustained unresponsiveness by administrating escalating doses of the causative allergen until a maintenance dose is reached. Immunotherapeutic protocols spanning different durations (from hours for ultra-rush protocols to weeks or months for conventional protocols) are applied for the treatment of food, pollen, pet dander and insect sting allergy. Desensitization takes place in sequential steps such as very early desensitization of mast cells and basophils, skewing of T- and B-cell responses towards regulatory phenotype, modulation of allergen-specific antibody isotypes and inhibition of migration and mediator release of eosinophils, basophils and mast cells.
Questions remain however about the very early events taking place at initiation of immunotherapy, as whether mechanisms are different in rush or conventional protocols. Immunotherapy outcome may be related to events occurring in different cell subsets, and the identification of predictive biomarkers for tolerance induction is still highly needed.
To that aim, systems biology will be applied. Systems biology aims at gathering informations on complex biological systems (for example, transcriptomics data) and to apply computational tools to better understand and predict whether and to which degrees these systems will react to perturbations. Based on "omics" data, systems biology gives a bigger picture of cellular events occurring during the course of AIT than approaches focusing on isolated gene candidates or signaling pathways. This systemic approach allows the building and inference of predictive gene expression networks that could not be determined using hypothesis-based approaches.
Rationale of the research project:
Human individuals show great variance in both innate and adaptive immune responses following immune stimuli. However, little is known about which and how molecular subnetworks quantitatively control the immune response potential. Until now, no predictive biomarkers of clinical efficacy of vaccinations or antigen-specific immunotherapies to allergy have been established. The current proposal is a pilot study to identify candidates of interest, which predictive value as biomarkers will be assessed in further studies involving larger groups of patients and appropriate controls.
The investigators hypothesize that early molecular events of cell stimulation in successful AIT correlate with a regulatory immune responsive signature of innate (Natural killer (NK) cells, innate lymphoid cells) and adaptive (T and B cells) immune cells. In this regard, characteristics of the resting (before AIT) Th2 cells of allergic patients and early changes occurring in this population within the course of AIT could ultimately predict therapeutic outcome.
The aim of this project is to develop a systems biology strategy to quantitatively predict the response potential of activated Th2 (T-helper type 2) cells from resting Th2 cells of allergic patients undergoing allergen desensitization treatment. The investigators plan to analyze the transcriptome of their cells at different timepoints throughout the course of AIT and to infer networks of gene expression that will allow us to determine key prognostic factors for AIT responsiveness and immune tolerance induction. In parallel to Th2 cells, the investigators will study the roles and subpopulations of NK cells, as the role of these subsets in allergy is still largely unknown. Additionally, as the gut microbiota is known to be associated and interacting with the immune system, the investigators will seize the opportunity to collect microbiota samples of patients undergoing AIT to assess changes that might occur during desensitization. The completion of this study will allow us i) to identify potential biomarkers that might ultimately be used to predict therapy outcome or to refine and adapt therapy to a patient's features ii) to monitor the changes occurring in NK cells from patients exposed to desensitization procedures, iii) to study the gut microbiota of allergic patients and explore potential microbiota predictive biomarkers (part of the study performed at IBBL). This study stands as a proof-of-concept study to start a future larger cohort, since the discovery of new biomarkers/features could open up new avenues to understand other disorders linked to immune dysregulation and in which tolerance induction is required, such as autoimmune diseases, transplant rejection and others.
Methodology:
Patients who will be enrolled in this study are allergic patients from the Immuno-Allergology department of the CHL, who will anyway undergo routine antigen-specific immunotherapy for medical reasons. These immunotherapeutic protocols are already established and used by experienced specialists at the CHL and will not be modified for the purpose of this research project. If patients eligible for AIT agree to participate in our research project, the investigators will collect blood and stool samples during the course of treatment. Depending on the allergy to be treated, there are two routine desensitization protocols: an ultra-rush protocol is performed for insect sting desensitization, while a conventional protocol is used for pollen desensitization. A control group without a clinical history of allergies is recruited. Blood and stool samples are collected in the same time frames as in allergic patients.
- Conditions
- Allergy
- Being tested
- Blood draw, stool collection.
- Keywords
- allergy, insect venom, pollen, systems biology
- Medical subject headings
- Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood draw, stool collection.Other
Blood will be drawn by certified personnel according to local regulations. Stool will be collected by the patients after instructions on how to use a stool collection kit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Venom Group | The investigators plan to include 15 patients with insect venom allergy and will collect blood at four time points and stool at three time points during the first week of immunotherapy.
The patients will receive usual standard of care and no intervention. We will, however, include blood draw and stool samples collection from the patients. Receives: Other: Blood draw, stool collection. | |
| Pollen Group | The investigators plan to include 15 patients with pollen allergy and will collect blood at five time points and stool at three time points during the first three months of immunotherapy.
The patients will receive usual standard of care and no intervention. We will, however, include blood draw and stool samples collection from the patients. Receives: Other: Blood draw, stool collection. | |
| Control Group | The investigators plan to include 10 control persons without a clinical history of allergies. Blood and stool samples will be collected at seven/four times respectively.
The patients will receive usual standard of care and no intervention. Receives: Other: Blood draw, stool collection. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy against insect venom and pollens in allergic patients with use of gene expression networks.
This study will allow to predict the T cell activation potential (by evaluating gene expression networks) in vivo before start of immunotherapy for insect venom or pollen allergy meaning that the investigators will be able to predict which patients will profit from standard immunotherapy and which patients will need to receive altered immunotherapy strategies (i.e. higher doses, longer maintenance).
As this is an observational pilot study the investigators define this as outcome measure.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years/April 2018
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completion2 May 2018
- Study completionJul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AllergyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Luxembourg Institute of Health
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sebastian Bode, MD, Luxembourg Institute of Health
- Investigators
- Markus Ollert, Prof., Principal investigator, Luxembourg Institute of HealthFeng Q He, PhD, Principal investigator, Luxembourg Institute of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02931955
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SYS-T-ACT_01
- Acronym
- SYS-T-ACT
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 20 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pogorelov D, Bode SFN, He X, Ramiro-Garcia J, Hedin F, Ammerlaan W, Konstantinou M, Capelle CM, Zeng N, Poli A, Domingues O, Montamat G, Hunewald O, Cire S, Baron A, Longworth J, Demczuk A, Bazon ML, Casper I, Klimek L, Neuberger-Castillo L, Revets D, Guyonnet L, Delhalle S, Zimmer J, Benes V, Codreanu-Morel F, Lehners-Weber C, Weets I, Alper P, Brenner D, Gutermuth J, Guerin C, Morisset M, Hentges F, Schneider R, Shamji MH, Betsou F, Wilmes P, Glaab E, Cosma A, Goncalves J, Hefeng FQ, Ollert M. Multiomics approaches disclose very-early molecular and cellular switches during insect-venom allergen-specific immunotherapy: an observational study. Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 26;15(1):10266. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54684-2.
PubMed 39592626
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Applying Systems Immunology to the Search for Personalized Biomarkers of Clinical Efficacy: Predicting the T Cell Activation Potential in Vivo From Resting T Cells of Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02931955
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SYS-T-ACT / SYS-T-ACT_01
- Conditions
- Allergy
- Keywords
- allergy, insect venom, pollen, systems biology
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Luxembourg Institute of HealthOther government
- Collaborators
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg
- Study start
- Aug 2016
- Primary completion
- 2 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study Objective: Allergies affect up to 20% of the population of developed countries and can cause substantial individual disease burden. For some allergies, immunotherapeutic regimens ("hyposensitization") have been established, e.g. for insect venom allergies and pollen allergies. This project aims at identifying the T cell activation potential in vivo from resting T cells of patients undergoing immunotherapy (IT) via a systems biology approach. For the participants, it involves blood draws and stool collection as well as gathering some basic medical information. The participation takes one week for patients undergoing insect venom IT and three months for patients undergoing pollen IT. A control group without a clinical history of allergies is recruited. Blood and stool samples are collected in the same time frames as in allergic patients.
This study is a cooperation project between the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg (CHL), the Luxemburg Institute of Health (LIH), the University of Luxembourg and the Integrated Biobank of Luxemburg (IBBL).
Detailed description
Summary of the study: Applying systems immunology to the search for personalized biomarkers of clinical efficacy: Predicting the T cell activation potential in vivo from resting T cells of patients.
Introduction Allergy affects more than 20% of the populations of most developed countries. The major allergic diseases, allergic rhinitis, asthma, food allergies and urticaria, are chronic, cause major disability, and are costly both to the individual and to the society (World Allergy Organisation (WAO) white book 2013). Besides occupational allergies, the most common allergies are caused by food, pollen, dust, mold, animal dander, insect sting, medications…Allergic phenomena are due to an exacerbated response of the immune system to antigens that are tolerated by non-allergic patients.
After exposure to antigens, naive CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) T cells can be differentiated in different subsets of T helper (Th) cells (Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, Th22, Tfh) and induced suppressive regulatory T cells characterized by different cytokine expression patterns, transcription factors and other surface markers, which will orchestrate adaptive and innate immune responses to these stimuli. Th2 cells are central players in all the various forms of Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated allergic diseases and are thus regarded as the most dominant T cell subset sustaining the allergic response. Upon antigen uptake and processing by antigen-presenting cells, CD4+ T cells are polarized towards a Th2 phenotype, leading to the expression of Th2 cell-associated cytokines such as Interleukin (IL)-4, -5, -9, -13, switching B cell response toward IgE production (sensitization or early phase). Allergen-specific IgE bind to a high-affinity receptor (FcεRI) of innate immune cells including basophils and mast cells, triggering the release of anaphylactogenic mediators (cytokines, chemokines, histamine, heparin, serotonin and proteases) responsible for inflammatory cell recruitment and allergic symptoms (effector or late phase). Identifying networks of genes expressed in resting and activated Th2 cells from allergic patients would help distinguish gene candidates predicting immune tolerance to allergens.
Allergies are diseases involving many cell subsets. The specific reactivities and contributions to the clinical picture are closely interdependent and not fully deciphered yet. The interplay between the different actors of the cellular immune system is further complexified by the existence of the commensal intestinal flora, also called the microbiota. Gut microbiota is partially under supervision of the immune system, and dysregulations or changes in the composition of the microbiota, for example due to antibiotics uptake during childhood and /or different eating habits, may impact adaptative and innate immune functions. Characterization of the gut microbiota of human hosts undergoing immunotherapy might be of high interest to delineate interactions between microbiota and adaptive immune system.
Despite substantial improvements in medications relieving daily allergy symptoms, a percentage of patients still experience uncontrolled severe symptoms. For these patients, strictly avoiding the allergen and keeping emergency medications within reach are the best recommendations so far, and the burden of living with allergy ultimately results in psychosocial, health, occupational and economic problems by impacting public health costs. In these cases, the best and feasible solution to improve quality of life is to apply an immunotherapeutic approach to induce allergen tolerance.
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has been implemented for more than 100 years, and achieves sustained unresponsiveness by administrating escalating doses of the causative allergen until a maintenance dose is reached. Immunotherapeutic protocols spanning different durations (from hours for ultra-rush protocols to weeks or months for conventional protocols) are applied for the treatment of food, pollen, pet dander and insect sting allergy. Desensitization takes place in sequential steps such as very early desensitization of mast cells and basophils, skewing of T- and B-cell responses towards regulatory phenotype, modulation of allergen-specific antibody isotypes and inhibition of migration and mediator release of eosinophils, basophils and mast cells.
Questions remain however about the very early events taking place at initiation of immunotherapy, as whether mechanisms are different in rush or conventional protocols. Immunotherapy outcome may be related to events occurring in different cell subsets, and the identification of predictive biomarkers for tolerance induction is still highly needed.
To that aim, systems biology will be applied. Systems biology aims at gathering informations on complex biological systems (for example, transcriptomics data) and to apply computational tools to better understand and predict whether and to which degrees these systems will react to perturbations. Based on "omics" data, systems biology gives a bigger picture of cellular events occurring during the course of AIT than approaches focusing on isolated gene candidates or signaling pathways. This systemic approach allows the building and inference of predictive gene expression networks that could not be determined using hypothesis-based approaches.
Rationale of the research project:
Human individuals show great variance in both innate and adaptive immune responses following immune stimuli. However, little is known about which and how molecular subnetworks quantitatively control the immune response potential. Until now, no predictive biomarkers of clinical efficacy of vaccinations or antigen-specific immunotherapies to allergy have been established. The current proposal is a pilot study to identify candidates of interest, which predictive value as biomarkers will be assessed in further studies involving larger groups of patients and appropriate controls.
The investigators hypothesize that early molecular events of cell stimulation in successful AIT correlate with a regulatory immune responsive signature of innate (Natural killer (NK) cells, innate lymphoid cells) and adaptive (T and B cells) immune cells. In this regard, characteristics of the resting (before AIT) Th2 cells of allergic patients and early changes occurring in this population within the course of AIT could ultimately predict therapeutic outcome.
The aim of this project is to develop a systems biology strategy to quantitatively predict the response potential of activated Th2 (T-helper type 2) cells from resting Th2 cells of allergic patients undergoing allergen desensitization treatment. The investigators plan to analyze the transcriptome of their cells at different timepoints throughout the course of AIT and to infer networks of gene expression that will allow us to determine key prognostic factors for AIT responsiveness and immune tolerance induction. In parallel to Th2 cells, the investigators will study the roles and subpopulations of NK cells, as the role of these subsets in allergy is still largely unknown. Additionally, as the gut microbiota is known to be associated and interacting with the immune system, the investigators will seize the opportunity to collect microbiota samples of patients undergoing AIT to assess changes that might occur during desensitization. The completion of this study will allow us i) to identify potential biomarkers that might ultimately be used to predict therapy outcome or to refine and adapt therapy to a patient's features ii) to monitor the changes occurring in NK cells from patients exposed to desensitization procedures, iii) to study the gut microbiota of allergic patients and explore potential microbiota predictive biomarkers (part of the study performed at IBBL). This study stands as a proof-of-concept study to start a future larger cohort, since the discovery of new biomarkers/features could open up new avenues to understand other disorders linked to immune dysregulation and in which tolerance induction is required, such as autoimmune diseases, transplant rejection and others.
Methodology:
Patients who will be enrolled in this study are allergic patients from the Immuno-Allergology department of the CHL, who will anyway undergo routine antigen-specific immunotherapy for medical reasons. These immunotherapeutic protocols are already established and used by experienced specialists at the CHL and will not be modified for the purpose of this research project. If patients eligible for AIT agree to participate in our research project, the investigators will collect blood and stool samples during the course of treatment. Depending on the allergy to be treated, there are two routine desensitization protocols: an ultra-rush protocol is performed for insect sting desensitization, while a conventional protocol is used for pollen desensitization. A control group without a clinical history of allergies is recruited. Blood and stool samples are collected in the same time frames as in allergic patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Venom Group | – | Other: Blood draw, stool collection.The investigators plan to include 15 patients with insect venom allergy and will collect blood at four time points and stool at three time points during the first week of immunotherapy. The patients will receive usual standard of care and no intervention. We will, however, include blood draw and stool samples collection from the patients. |
| Pollen Group | – | Other: Blood draw, stool collection.The investigators plan to include 15 patients with pollen allergy and will collect blood at five time points and stool at three time points during the first three months of immunotherapy. The patients will receive usual standard of care and no intervention. We will, however, include blood draw and stool samples collection from the patients. |
| Control Group | – | Other: Blood draw, stool collection.The investigators plan to include 10 control persons without a clinical history of allergies. Blood and stool samples will be collected at seven/four times respectively. The patients will receive usual standard of care and no intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The investigators will recruit participants from the allergy referral center at the CHL Luxembourg who are undergoing immunotherapy for insect venom or pollen allergy.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy for insect venom or pollen allergy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients < 18 years
- medical conditions preventing patients in participating in the immunotherapy
- lack of consent or lack to give consent to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood draw, stool collection.Blood will be drawn by certified personnel according to local regulations. Stool will be collected by the patients after instructions on how to use a stool collection kit. | Other | Control Group, Pollen Group, Venom Group |
Primary outcome
Predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy against insect venom and pollens in allergic patients with use of gene expression networks.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years/April 2018
This study will allow to predict the T cell activation potential (by evaluating gene expression networks) in vivo before start of immunotherapy for insect venom or pollen allergy meaning that the investigators will be able to predict which patients will profit from standard immunotherapy and which patients will need to receive altered immunotherapy strategies (i.e. higher doses, longer maintenance). As this is an observational pilot study the investigators define this as outcome measure.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39592626Pogorelov D, Bode SFN, He X, Ramiro-Garcia J, Hedin F, Ammerlaan W, Konstantinou M, Capelle CM, Zeng N, Poli A, Domingues O, Montamat G, Hunewald O, Cire S, Baron A, Longworth J, Demczuk A, Bazon ML, Casper I, Klimek L, Neuberger-Castillo L, Revets D, Guyonnet L, Delhalle S, Zimmer J, Benes V, Codreanu-Morel F, Lehners-Weber C, Weets I, Alper P, Brenner D, Gutermuth J, Guerin C, Morisset M, Hentges F, Schneider R, Shamji MH, Betsou F, Wilmes P, Glaab E, Cosma A, Goncalves J, Hefeng FQ, Ollert M. Multiomics approaches disclose very-early molecular and cellular switches during insect-venom allergen-specific immunotherapy: an observational study. Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 26;15(1):10266. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54684-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Allergy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Markus Ollert, Prof. principal investigator
Luxembourg Institute of Health
Feng Q He, PhD principal investigator
Luxembourg Institute of Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Allergy, run by Luxembourg Institute of Health at 1 site in Luxembourg.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Luxembourg. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy against insect venom and pollens in allergic patients with use of gene expression networks. (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 years/April 2018). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02931955, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2020.