DeliriumNCT02932358
Effectiveness and Safety of a Flexible Family Visitation Model for Delirium Prevention in Adult Intensive Care Units: a Cluster-randomized, Crossover Trial (The ICU Visits Study)
A study testing Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM) and Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM) in people with Delirium, run by Hospital Moinhos de Vento at 33 sites in Brazil.
Trial summary
A cluster-randomized crossover trial involving adult ICU patients, family members, and ICU professionals will be conducted. Forty medical-surgical Brazilian ICUs with visiting hours <4.5 h/day will be randomly assigned to either a restrictive family visitation model (RFVM) (visits according to local policies) or a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Delirium
- What is being tested?
- Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM) and Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,650 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesBrazil
- Study dates
- 28 Apr 2017to 22 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- For ICUs: medical-surgical ICUs of of public and philanthropic Brazilian hospitals with restricted visitation policies(<4.5 hours/day).
- For Patients: Age ≥ 18 years, admission to the intensive care unit.
- For Patient's Family Members: nearest relative of the ICU patient recruited in the study and consent to participate in the study.
- For ICU Workers: ICU workers that assist patients in the ICU during the daytime for at least 20 hours per week and consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- For ICUs: ICUs with structural or organizational impediments to extended visitation.
- For Patients: Subjects with coma (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale -4 or -5) lasting > 96 hours from the moment of first evaluation for recruitment, or delirium at the baseline (positive Confusion Assessment Method for ICU) will be excluded. Individuals with cerebral death, aphasia, severe hearing deficit, a prediction of ICU length of stay < 48 hours, exclusively palliative treatment, or without a familiar member able to participate in extended ICU visits and those who are prisioners, unlikely to survive >24hs, re-admitted to the ICU after enrolment in the study will also be excluded.
- For Patient's Family Members: Another ICU patient's relative enrolled in the study; family members who don't speak Portuguese; Difficulty to answer the self-administered questionnaires (e.g.: illiteracy)
- For ICU Workers: ICU workers who have a prediction of withdrawal of ICU care activities >15 days during the study will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 1 country.
33 sites in 1 country
Brazil33 sites
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais
Hospital Tacchini
Bento Gonçalves, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Universitário Alcides Carneiro
Campina Grande, Paraíba
Hospital do Caâncer de Cascavel (UOPECCAN)
Cascavel, Paraná
Hospital Universitário do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
Cascavel, Paraná
Hospital São Camilo de Esteio
Esteio, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Geral Clériston Andrade
Feira de Santana, Estado de Bahia
Hospital INCARDIO
Feira de Santana, Estado de Bahia
Hospital de Urgências de Goiânia
Goiânia, Goiás
Hospital Alberto Urquiza Wanderley (UNIMED João Pessoa)
João Monlevade
Hospital Universitário Lauro Wanderley
João Pessoa, Paraíba
Hospital Dona Helena
Joinville, Santa Catarina
Fundação Hospital Adriano Jorge
Manaus, Amazonas
Hospital Montenegro
Montenegro
Hospital Geral de Nova Iguaçú
Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro
Hospital Deoclécio Marques de Lucena
Parnamirim, Rio Grande do Norte
Hospital da Cidade de Passo Fundo
Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Universitário de Petrolina
Petrolina, Pernambuco
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Dom Vicente Scherer
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Mãe de Deus
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceiçaão
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Santa Rita
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Pavilhão Pereira Filho
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Agamenom Magalhães
Recife, Pernambuco
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo
Hospital de Urgência e Emergência de Rio Branco
Rio Branco, Acre
Hospital Ana Nery
Santa Cruz do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Regional do Baixo Amazonas
Santarém, Pará
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São João Del Rei
São João del Rei, Minas Gerais
Hospital do Coração (HCor)
São Paulo, São Paulo
Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Piauí
Teresina, Piauí
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness and Safety of a Flexible Family Visitation Model for Delirium Prevention in Adult Intensive Care Units: a Cluster-randomized, Crossover Trial
A cluster-randomized crossover trial involving adult ICU patients, family members, and ICU professionals will be conducted. Forty medical-surgical Brazilian ICUs with visiting hours <4.5 h/day will be randomly assigned to either a restrictive family visitation model (RFVM) (visits according to local policies) or a flexible family visitation model (FFVM) (visitation during 12 consecutive hours per day) at a 1:1 ratio. After enrollment and follow-up of 25 patients, each ICU will be switched over to the other visitation model, until 25 more patients per site are enrolled and followed. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of delirium among ICU patients, measured twice a day using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Secondary outcome measures will include daily hazard of delirium, ventilator-free days at day 7, any ICU-acquired infections, ICU length of stay, and all-cause hospital mortality among the patients; symptoms of anxiety and depression and satisfaction among the family members; and prevalence of symptoms of burnout among the ICU professionals. Tertiary outcomes will include need for antipsychotic agents and/or mechanical restraints, coma-free days at day 7, unplanned loss of invasive devices, and ICU-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or bloodstream infection among the patients; self-perception of involvement in patient care among the family members; and satisfaction among the ICU professionals.
- Conditions
- Delirium
- Being tested
- Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM), Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM)
- Keywords
- Intensive care units, Delirium, Cross infection, Mortality, Length of stay, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Delirium, Cross Infection, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM)Other
Visitation to ICU patients allowed during the period of 12 consecutive hours per day.
Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM)Other
Visitation to ICU patients allowed during intermittent periods according local ICU regulation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM) | Active comparator | In the FFVM, two or fewer family members will be allowed to visit the patient for up to 12 consecutive hours each day. In addition to family visitation, patients will be allowed to receive social visits in specific time intervals (according local ICU regulation). To have access to the FFVM, family members of ICU patients will have to attend a structured meeting at ICU in which they will receive orientations about the ICU environment, common ICU treatments, rehabilitation and basic infection control practices, multidisciplinary work at ICU and palliative treatment. Social visitors will not be required to attend the structured meeting. Receives: Other: Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM) |
| Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM) | Active comparator | In the RFVM, patients will be allowed to receive restricted visits according routine ICU practices, but respecting the maximum limit of 4.5 hours of visitation per day. Visitors will not be required to attend the structured meeting. The length of ICU visits will be similar to those of social visits in the FFVM. Receives: Other: Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Delirium among ICU patients
Incidence of delirium will be verified by trained intensive care professionals with the confusion assessment method for the ICU 2 times per day.
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Daily hazard of delirium among ICU patients
The daily hazard of delirium will be analyzed using a joint survival model that accounts for the treatment effect on repeated daily indicator of delirium (Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU) within each patient and terminating event (death or discharge from the ICU).
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Antipsychotic use among ICU patients
Need of antipsychotic use during ICU stay
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Need of mechanical restraints among ICU patients
Need of mechanical restraints among ICU patients during ICU stay
Measured: During ICU stay (from randomization until ICU discharge, or death, or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Coma-free days at day 7 among ICU patients
Days alive and free of coma (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale -4 or -5) during ICU stay.
Measured: During the first 7 days following patient enrollment.
Unplanned loss of invasive devices among ICU patients
Unplanned loss of venous catheter, tube feeding or urinary catheter
Measured: During ICU stay (from randomization until ICU discharge, or death, or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Mechanical ventilation-free days at day 7 among ICU patients
Days alive and free of mechanical ventilation during ICU stay.
Measured: During the first 7 days following patient enrollment.
Any ICU-acquired infection among ICU patients
Pneumonia or bloodstream infection or urinary tract infection acquired after 48 hours of ICU admission.
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU-acquired pneumonia among ICU patients
Pneumonia acquired after 48 hours of ICU admission.
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU-acquired bloodstream infection among ICU patients
Bloodstream infection acquired after 48 hours of ICU admission.
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU-acquired urinary tract infection among ICU patients
Urinary tract infection acquired after 48 hours of ICU admission.
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU length of stay among ICU patients
Length of ICU stay in days
Measured: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
All-cause hospital mortality among ICU patients
rates of all-cause mortality during hospital stay
Measured: During hospital stay (from enrollment until hospital discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Symptoms of anxiety among family members
symptoms of anxiety among family members measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Measured: IOn the day of patient discharge from ICU, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up.
Symptoms of depression among family members
symptoms of depression among family members measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Measured: On the day of patient discharge from ICU, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up.
Satisfaction among among family members
Rates of patient's families satisfaction measured by the critical care family needs inventory
Measured: On the day of patient discharge from ICU, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up.
Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome among ICU professionals
Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome among ICU workers measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory
Measured: It will be measured in two moments: within 15 days prior to the first ICU intervention and between the 15th and 30th days of the period in which no patient will be enrolled.
Satisfaction with the current ICU visiting policy among ICU professionals
Satisfaction with the current ICU visiting policy among ICU professionals
Measured: It will be measured between the 15th and 30th days of the period in which no patient will be enrolled.
Any adverse event related to ICU visitation
Any adverse event possible related to the ICU visitation model
Measured: During ICU stay (from randomization until ICU discharge, or death, or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start28 Apr 2017
- Primary completion22 Jun 2018
- Study completion22 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DeliriumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The following interventions will be evaluated in the present study: restrictive family visitation model (intermittent visits according to local ICU regulation) and flexible family visitation model (12 consecutive hours per day). The unit of of concealed randomization is the ICU to minimize the risk of contamination, given that we intend to apply the intervention to the whole ICU multidisciplinary team. We will randomize ICUs to either an RFVM or to an FFVM as the initial intervention (T1). After enrollment of 25 ICU patients, there will be a 30-day period without recruitment to avoid contamination bias. After this period, each ICU will be assigned to an intervention contrary to that which initially receive (T2) until the enrollment of more 25 ICU patients.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,650 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Moinhos de Vento
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Brazil
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Regis Rosa, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Moinhos de Vento
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02932358
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ICU Visits
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Publications
Rosa RG, Falavigna M, Robinson CC, da Silva DB, Kochhann R, de Moura RM, Santos MMS, Sganzerla D, Giordani NE, Eugenio C, Ribeiro T, Cavalcanti AB, Bozza F, Azevedo LCP, Machado FR, Salluh JIF, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Hochegger T, Amaral A, Teles JMM, da Luz LG, Barbosa MG, Birriel DC, Ferraz IL, Nobre V, Valentim HM, Correa E Castro L, Duarte PAD, Tregnago R, Barilli SLS, Brandao N, Giannini A, Teixeira C; ICU Visits Study Group Investigators and the BRICNet. Study protocol to assess the effectiveness and safety of a flexible family visitation model for delirium prevention in adult intensive care units: a cluster-randomised, crossover trial (The ICU Visits Study). BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e021193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021193.
PubMed 29654049Sganzerla D, Teixeira C, Robinson CC, Kochhann R, Santos MMS, de Moura RM, Barbosa MG, da Silva DB, Ribeiro T, Eugenio C, Schneider D, Mariani D, Jeffman RW, Bozza F, Cavalcanti AB, Azevedo LCP, Machado FR, Salluh JI, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Damiani LP, da Silva NB, Falavigna M, Rosa RG. Statistical analysis plan for a cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a flexible family visitation model for delirium prevention in adult intensive care units (the ICU Visits Study). Trials. 2018 Nov 19;19(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3006-8.
PubMed 30454019de Souza JMB, Miozzo AP, da Rosa Minho Dos Santos R, Mocellin D, Rech GS, Trott G, Estivalete GPM, Sganzerla D, de Souza D, Rosa RG, Teixeira C. Long-term effects of flexible visitation in the intensive care unit on family members' mental health: 12-month results from a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct;50(10):1614-1621. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07577-3. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
PubMed 39172240Rosa RG, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Prieb RGG, Sganzerla D, Schneider D, Robinson CC, Kochhann R, da Silva DB, Amaral A, Prestes RM, Medeiros GS, Falavigna M, Teixeira C. Mechanism of a Flexible ICU Visiting Policy for Anxiety Symptoms Among Family Members in Brazil: A Path Mediation Analysis in a Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1504-1512. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005037.
PubMed 33870915Rosa RG, Falavigna M, da Silva DB, Sganzerla D, Santos MMS, Kochhann R, de Moura RM, Eugenio CS, Haack TDSR, Barbosa MG, Robinson CC, Schneider D, de Oliveira DM, Jeffman RW, Cavalcanti AB, Machado FR, Azevedo LCP, Salluh JIF, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Foernges RB, Torelly AP, Ayres LO, Duarte PAD, Lovato WJ, Sampaio PHS, de Oliveira Junior LC, Paranhos JLDR, Dantas ADS, de Brito PIPGG, Paulo EAP, Gallindo MAC, Pilau J, Valentim HM, Meira Teles JM, Nobre V, Birriel DC, Correa E Castro L, Specht AM, Medeiros GS, Tonietto TF, Mesquita EC, da Silva NB, Korte JE, Hammes LS, Giannini A, Bozza FA, Teixeira C; ICU Visits Study Group Investigators and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet). Effect of Flexible Family Visitation on Delirium Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The ICU Visits Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jul 16;322(3):216-228. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8766.
PubMed 31310297
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness and Safety of a Flexible Family Visitation Model for Delirium Prevention in Adult Intensive Care Units: a Cluster-randomized, Crossover Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02932358
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICU Visits
- Conditions
- Delirium
- Keywords
- Intensive care units, Delirium, Cross infection, Mortality, Length of stay, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,650 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Moinhos de VentoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Brazil
- Study start
- 28 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A cluster-randomized crossover trial involving adult ICU patients, family members, and ICU professionals will be conducted. Forty medical-surgical Brazilian ICUs with visiting hours <4.5 h/day will be randomly assigned to either a restrictive family visitation model (RFVM) (visits according to local policies) or a flexible family visitation model (FFVM) (visitation during 12 consecutive hours per day) at a 1:1 ratio. After enrollment and follow-up of 25 patients, each ICU will be switched over to the other visitation model, until 25 more patients per site are enrolled and followed. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of delirium among ICU patients, measured twice a day using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Secondary outcome measures will include daily hazard of delirium, ventilator-free days at day 7, any ICU-acquired infections, ICU length of stay, and all-cause hospital mortality among the patients; symptoms of anxiety and depression and satisfaction among the family members; and prevalence of symptoms of burnout among the ICU professionals. Tertiary outcomes will include need for antipsychotic agents and/or mechanical restraints, coma-free days at day 7, unplanned loss of invasive devices, and ICU-acquired pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or bloodstream infection among the patients; self-perception of involvement in patient care among the family members; and satisfaction among the ICU professionals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The following interventions will be evaluated in the present study: restrictive family visitation model (intermittent visits according to local ICU regulation) and flexible family visitation model (12 consecutive hours per day). The unit of of concealed randomization is the ICU to minimize the risk of contamination, given that we intend to apply the intervention to the whole ICU multidisciplinary team. We will randomize ICUs to either an RFVM or to an FFVM as the initial intervention (T1). After enrollment of 25 ICU patients, there will be a 30-day period without recruitment to avoid contamination bias. After this period, each ICU will be assigned to an intervention contrary to that which initially receive (T2) until the enrollment of more 25 ICU patients.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM) | Active comparator | Other: Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM)In the FFVM, two or fewer family members will be allowed to visit the patient for up to 12 consecutive hours each day. In addition to family visitation, patients will be allowed to receive social visits in specific time intervals (according local ICU regulation). To have access to the FFVM, family members of ICU patients will have to attend a structured meeting at ICU in which they will receive orientations about the ICU environment, common ICU treatments, rehabilitation and basic infection control practices, multidisciplinary work at ICU and palliative treatment. Social visitors will not be required to attend the structured meeting. |
| Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM) | Active comparator | Other: Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM)In the RFVM, patients will be allowed to receive restricted visits according routine ICU practices, but respecting the maximum limit of 4.5 hours of visitation per day. Visitors will not be required to attend the structured meeting. The length of ICU visits will be similar to those of social visits in the FFVM. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- For ICUs: medical-surgical ICUs of of public and philanthropic Brazilian hospitals with restricted visitation policies(<4.5 hours/day).
- For Patients: Age ≥ 18 years, admission to the intensive care unit.
- For Patient's Family Members: nearest relative of the ICU patient recruited in the study and consent to participate in the study.
- For ICU Workers: ICU workers that assist patients in the ICU during the daytime for at least 20 hours per week and consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- For ICUs: ICUs with structural or organizational impediments to extended visitation.
- For Patients: Subjects with coma (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale -4 or -5) lasting > 96 hours from the moment of first evaluation for recruitment, or delirium at the baseline (positive Confusion Assessment Method for ICU) will be excluded. Individuals with cerebral death, aphasia, severe hearing deficit, a prediction of ICU length of stay < 48 hours, exclusively palliative treatment, or without a familiar member able to participate in extended ICU visits and those who are prisioners, unlikely to survive >24hs, re-admitted to the ICU after enrolment in the study will also be excluded.
- For Patient's Family Members: Another ICU patient's relative enrolled in the study; family members who don't speak Portuguese; Difficulty to answer the self-administered questionnaires (e.g.: illiteracy)
- For ICU Workers: ICU workers who have a prediction of withdrawal of ICU care activities >15 days during the study will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM)Visitation to ICU patients allowed during the period of 12 consecutive hours per day. | Other | Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM) |
| Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM)Visitation to ICU patients allowed during intermittent periods according local ICU regulation. | Other | Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM) |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Delirium among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Incidence of delirium will be verified by trained intensive care professionals with the confusion assessment method for the ICU 2 times per day.
18 secondary outcomes
Daily hazard of delirium among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Antipsychotic use among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Need of mechanical restraints among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from randomization until ICU discharge, or death, or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Coma-free days at day 7 among ICU patients
Time frame: During the first 7 days following patient enrollment.
Unplanned loss of invasive devices among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from randomization until ICU discharge, or death, or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Mechanical ventilation-free days at day 7 among ICU patients
Time frame: During the first 7 days following patient enrollment.
Any ICU-acquired infection among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU-acquired pneumonia among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU-acquired bloodstream infection among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU-acquired urinary tract infection among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
ICU length of stay among ICU patients
Time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
All-cause hospital mortality among ICU patients
Time frame: During hospital stay (from enrollment until hospital discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Symptoms of anxiety among family members
Time frame: IOn the day of patient discharge from ICU, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up.
Symptoms of depression among family members
Time frame: On the day of patient discharge from ICU, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up.
Satisfaction among among family members
Time frame: On the day of patient discharge from ICU, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up.
Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome among ICU professionals
Time frame: It will be measured in two moments: within 15 days prior to the first ICU intervention and between the 15th and 30th days of the period in which no patient will be enrolled.
Satisfaction with the current ICU visiting policy among ICU professionals
Time frame: It will be measured between the 15th and 30th days of the period in which no patient will be enrolled.
Any adverse event related to ICU visitation
Time frame: During ICU stay (from randomization until ICU discharge, or death, or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2018.
- Background: PubMed 29654049Rosa RG, Falavigna M, Robinson CC, da Silva DB, Kochhann R, de Moura RM, Santos MMS, Sganzerla D, Giordani NE, Eugenio C, Ribeiro T, Cavalcanti AB, Bozza F, Azevedo LCP, Machado FR, Salluh JIF, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Hochegger T, Amaral A, Teles JMM, da Luz LG, Barbosa MG, Birriel DC, Ferraz IL, Nobre V, Valentim HM, Correa E Castro L, Duarte PAD, Tregnago R, Barilli SLS, Brandao N, Giannini A, Teixeira C; ICU Visits Study Group Investigators and the BRICNet. Study protocol to assess the effectiveness and safety of a flexible family visitation model for delirium prevention in adult intensive care units: a cluster-randomised, crossover trial (The ICU Visits Study). BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e021193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021193.
- Background: PubMed 30454019Sganzerla D, Teixeira C, Robinson CC, Kochhann R, Santos MMS, de Moura RM, Barbosa MG, da Silva DB, Ribeiro T, Eugenio C, Schneider D, Mariani D, Jeffman RW, Bozza F, Cavalcanti AB, Azevedo LCP, Machado FR, Salluh JI, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Damiani LP, da Silva NB, Falavigna M, Rosa RG. Statistical analysis plan for a cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a flexible family visitation model for delirium prevention in adult intensive care units (the ICU Visits Study). Trials. 2018 Nov 19;19(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3006-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39172240de Souza JMB, Miozzo AP, da Rosa Minho Dos Santos R, Mocellin D, Rech GS, Trott G, Estivalete GPM, Sganzerla D, de Souza D, Rosa RG, Teixeira C. Long-term effects of flexible visitation in the intensive care unit on family members' mental health: 12-month results from a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct;50(10):1614-1621. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07577-3. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33870915Rosa RG, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Prieb RGG, Sganzerla D, Schneider D, Robinson CC, Kochhann R, da Silva DB, Amaral A, Prestes RM, Medeiros GS, Falavigna M, Teixeira C. Mechanism of a Flexible ICU Visiting Policy for Anxiety Symptoms Among Family Members in Brazil: A Path Mediation Analysis in a Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1504-1512. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005037.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31310297Rosa RG, Falavigna M, da Silva DB, Sganzerla D, Santos MMS, Kochhann R, de Moura RM, Eugenio CS, Haack TDSR, Barbosa MG, Robinson CC, Schneider D, de Oliveira DM, Jeffman RW, Cavalcanti AB, Machado FR, Azevedo LCP, Salluh JIF, Pellegrini JAS, Moraes RB, Foernges RB, Torelly AP, Ayres LO, Duarte PAD, Lovato WJ, Sampaio PHS, de Oliveira Junior LC, Paranhos JLDR, Dantas ADS, de Brito PIPGG, Paulo EAP, Gallindo MAC, Pilau J, Valentim HM, Meira Teles JM, Nobre V, Birriel DC, Correa E Castro L, Specht AM, Medeiros GS, Tonietto TF, Mesquita EC, da Silva NB, Korte JE, Hammes LS, Giannini A, Bozza FA, Teixeira C; ICU Visits Study Group Investigators and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet). Effect of Flexible Family Visitation on Delirium Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The ICU Visits Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jul 16;322(3):216-228. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8766.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Related trials for Delirium
RecruitingObservational study
The Impact of Fast-Track Anesthesia on Postoperative Neurocognitive Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Delirium - Postoperative, Cardiac Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Prediction and Prevention of Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity
Dementia, Postoperative Delirium (POD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
Lactium Premedication to Prevent Emergence Agitation
Lactium, Premedication
Not yet recruiting
DEXmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia and Delirium Prevention After NEUROsurgery (DEX-NEURO Trial)
Neurosurgery, Brain Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Regis Rosa, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
33 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Flexible Family Visitation Model (FFVM) and Restrictive Family Visitation Model (RFVM) in people with Delirium, run by Hospital Moinhos de Vento at 33 sites in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Delirium among ICU patients (time frame: During ICU stay (from enrollment until ICU discharge, or death or a maximum of 30 days of follow-up)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02932358, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2018.