AzTrials
AzTrials

HIVPtWNCT02932384

Reducing HIV Risk With High Risk HIV Negative Black MSM-Passport to Wellness

A study testing Intervention-Passport and Peer Mentor in people with HIV and Men, run by Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The proposed research study will focus on Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) who are HIV- or unknown status AND have not received HIV testing in over a year or who test irregularly (on 9/21/2016, the protocol was changed to modify the last to criteria and focus on those who have not used PrEP in the prior six… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
HIV, Men
What is being tested?
Intervention-Passport and Peer Mentor
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
105 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2015to Apr 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • self identify as male
  • self-identify as Black or African American
  • sex with a male or male-to-female transgender in the last 6 months
  • intercourse without a condom in the last 6 months
  • Los Angeles County resident,
  • either is unaware of HIV status and has not tested for HIV in the last 12 months or has recently tested (within 30 days), but had not received testing in the prior 12 months
  • 6) Modified 9/21/2016 to has not taken PrEP in the prior 6 months

Who cannot join

  • self-identify as female or transgender male or female
  • does not self-identify as Black or African American
  • no sex with a man or a male-to-female transgender in the last 6 months
  • no sexual intercourse in the last 6 months
  • resides outside of Los Angeles County
  • is HIV-positive OR has tested between 1 and 13 months prior to enrollment.
  • 6) Modified 9/21/2016 to has not taken PrEP in the prior 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse (LA CADA)

    Los Angeles, California, 90013

  • Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science

    Los Angeles, California, 90059

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Passport to Wellness-Full Intervention Phase

The proposed research study will focus on Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) who

  • are HIV- or unknown status AND
  • have not received HIV testing in over a year or
  • who test irregularly (on 9/21/2016, the protocol was changed to modify the last to criteria and focus on those who have not used PrEP in the prior six months). and implement an innovative, culturally-informed, peer-based, and client-centered approach that is designed to increase their awareness of their HIV status and their timely entry into prevention (including PrEP), testing, care, and treatment services. The research design compares the effect of an incentives-only approach to one that uses incentives, along with the involvement of peer mentors to support timely entry into prevention, testing, care and treatment. This phase of the study is designed to assess peer-supported intervention group versus a passport/incentive-only control group over an 18-month period using a randomized trial approach.
Read the detailed description

The proposed research study focuses on BMSM who have not received HIV testing in over a year, or who test irregularly, and implement an innovative, culturally-informed, peer-based, and client-centered approach that is designed to increase their awareness of their HIV status and their timely entry into prevention, care, and treatment services. On 9/21/2016, the protocol was changed to focus on those who have not used PrEP in the prior six months.

The research design compares the effect of an incentives-only approach to one that uses incentives, along with the involvement of peer mentors to support timely entry into prevention, testing, care and treatment. This phase of the study is designed to assess peer-supported intervention group versus a passport/incentive-only control group over an 18-month period using a randomized trial approach.

The Specific Aims of the full intervention phase are:

2 (Modified). To assess the effectiveness of a peer-supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (PtW) compared to a non-peer supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (Control) for linking at-risk BMSM to biomedical (PEP, STD testing), structural or behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care.

2a. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent and earlier linkages to services than the non-peer supported model (Control).

2b. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to greater reductions in HIV risk behaviors than the non-peer-supported model (Control).

3 (NEW). To assess the effectiveness of a peer-supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (PtW) compared to a non-peer supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (Control) for linking at-risk BMSM to PrEP services.

3a. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent receipt of PrEP education and consultations than the non-peer-supported model (Control) 3b. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent uptake of PrEP (defined as taking PrEP at six month follow-up) than the non-peer-supported model (Control).

Conditions
HIV, Men
Being tested
Intervention-Passport and Peer Mentor, Control-Passport Only
Keywords
HIV, Black/African American, Men, Gay/bisexual, Los Angeles
Medical subject headings
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intervention-Passport and Peer MentorBehavioural

    Also called Passport To Wellness

    In addition to the passport and incentives described below for the control condition, participants assigned to the intervention will select a peer mentor trained in motivational interviewing. The mentor will help guide the participant to complete passport items and address priorities. Participants will also be incentivized for regular meetings with his peer mentor.

  • Control-Passport OnlyBehavioural

    Also called Control

    A trained staff member will use a needs assessment and the participant's own priorities to develop a 'Passport to Wellness,' a personalized set of services whose access may encourage HIV prevention or address barriers to HIV testing.

    Example passport items include: getting an HIV test, attending an informational session about PEP/PrEP, meeting with a PrEP provider, attending 12-step meetings, yoga classes, a massage or Reiki session, or reviewing specific HIV prevention information online. Participants will be incentivized for each passport item they complete.

Study groups in NCT02932384
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control-Passport OnlyActive comparatorComplete a needs assessment and develop a written "Passport to Wellness," an itemized set of health promoting behaviors and services aligned with lifestyle and goals. Participants are compensated based on the items they complete, services they attend.
Receives: Behavioral: Control-Passport Only
Intervention-Passport and Peer MentorExperimentalIn addition to the "Passport to Wellness" developed with project staff, study participants will select a peer mentor trained in motivational interviewing. The peer mentor will help guide the participant to complete passport items. Part of passport development will include compensation for meeting with peer mentors to form strategies for meeting goals and addressing barriers/challenges that arise.
Receives: Behavioral: Intervention-Passport and Peer Mentor; Behavioral: Control-Passport Only

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number self-reporting specific HIV/STD (sexually transmitted disease) Testing outcomes

    --Number of participants 1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tested within one and six months of their baseline; 2) newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) obtaining testing for other STDs within six months of their baseline.

    Measured: 6 Months

  2. Number with specific PrEP outcomes

    --Number of participants who attend a PrEP information session, meet with a PrEP provider, or obtain a new PrEP prescription.

    Measured: 6 Months

  3. Number self-reporting specific Social and Behavioral Outcomes

    --Number of participants who obtain social and behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care.

    Measured: 6 Months

  4. Percentage self-reporting specific HIV/STD (sexually transmitted disease) Testing outcomes

    --Percentage of participants 1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tested within one and six months of their baseline; 2) newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) obtaining testing for other STDs within six months of their baseline. Summary data may include the percentage who report HIV or STD testing.

    Measured: 6 Months

  5. Percentage with specific PrEP outcomes

    --Percentage of participants who attend a PrEP information session, meet with a PrEP provider, or obtain a new PrEP prescription. Summary items may include the percentage who report doing any of these three PrEP activities.

    Measured: 6 Months

  6. Percentage of self-reporting specific Social and Behavioral Outcomes

    --Percentage of participants who obtain social and behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care.

    Measured: 6 Months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of referrals HIV tested

    The investigators will compare between the two arms, the number of HIV tested referrals from study participants in each arm who were 1) BMSM, 2) BMSM newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) people from other race/gender/sexual orientation groups

    Measured: 6 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionApr 2018
  4. Study completionApr 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02932384
Sponsor's protocol ID
TL13-LACA-576
Acronym
PtW
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
30 Aug 2016
Last updated
2 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intervention-Passport and Peer Mentor in people with HIV and Men, run by Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number self-reporting specific HIV/STD (sexually transmitted disease) Testing outcomes (time frame: 6 Months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in