AzTrials
AzTrials

Elective SurgeryPROPOREVNCT02932397

Efficacy of Propofol vs Placebo in the Prevention of Coughing During Emergence of General Anesthesia Under Desflurane

A study testing Intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol and Intravenous dose of 0.05 mL/kg of saline solution in people with Elective Surgery and Coughing, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Emergence of general anesthesia is a critical period, in the same way as the induction of anesthesia, during which several adverse events may occur. Extubation may even be more difficult than the intubation, with a higher respiratory complications rate. Among these, cough is common and expected. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Elective Surgery, Coughing
What is being tested?
Intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol and Intravenous dose of 0.05 mL/kg of saline solution
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
154 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Oct 2016to Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients aged between 18 to 80 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with an orotracheal intubation;
  • Patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I to III inclusively at the preoperative evaluation
  • Patients affiliated to a medical insurance system.

Who cannot join

  • Ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery, thoracic and neurological surgery ;
  • Participation refusal;
  • Patient allergic to or presenting a contraindication to propofol;
  • Patient with a tracheostomy;
  • Chronic coughing, i.e. daily cough for 8 weeks or more;
  • Asthma / severe or exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD);
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Recent respiratory tracts infection (< 4 weeks);
  • Hemostasis disorders;
  • Patient known for a non-secure cerebral aneurysm;
  • Patient known for a difficult intubation (grade 3 or 4);
  • Patient suffering from mental, neurological, or severe cardiovascular disease;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • Patients with deafness and/or unable to have conversations in a normal voice;
  • Patient with language barrier (not speaking French, nor English);
  • Patient suffering from dementia or patient under guardianship.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • CHUM

    Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1T8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of an Intravenous Dose of Propofol Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Coughing During Emergence of General Anesthesia Under Desflurane

Emergence of general anesthesia is a critical period, in the same way as the induction of anesthesia, during which several adverse events may occur. Extubation may even be more difficult than the intubation, with a higher respiratory complications rate. Among these, cough is common and expected. It can be associated with significant complications including hypertension, tachycardia, increased intracranial pressure, bleeding at the surgical site or even wound dehiscence.

The incidence of coughing during emergence of general anesthesia varies depending on the type of airway instrumentation, the population under study, agents used for the maintenance of the anesthesia and techniques used to prevent coughing. In the literature, the incidence of coughing during emergence of general anesthesia under endotracheal intubation varies from 38 to 96%. In our center, the incidence of coughing during emergence of general anesthesia under desflurane and endotracheal intubation is 30 % according to a local preliminary study.

Read more

Propofol is well-known to inhibit airway reflexes. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is associated with a lower incidence of coughing compared to inhalated anesthesia. The efficacy of propofol at a subhypnotic dose to reduce coughing during emergence has recently been demonstrated in patients undergoing nasal surgery under sevoflurane. However, the most effective antitussive dose remains unknown and its efficacy during anesthesia under desflurane has not yet been demonstrated.

Propofol is rapidly available, simple to administer and has an interesting pharmacological profile, among others due to its short half-life.

The aim of this study is to evaluate if an intravenous bolus of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol is more effective than placebo administration to decrease the incidence of coughing during emergence of general anesthesia under desflurane (PROPOREV). Propofol could also reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Being tested
Intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol, Intravenous dose of 0.05 mL/kg of saline solution
Keywords
Ambulatory surgery, Perioperative outcomes, General anesthesia under desflurane, Prevention of coughing, Propofol
Medical subject headings
Cough

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofolDrug

  • Intravenous dose of 0.05 mL/kg of saline solutionDrug

Study groups in NCT02932397
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PropofolActive comparatorActive drug given to patients as an intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol
Receives: Drug: Intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol
Saline solutionPlacebo comparatorPlacebo drug given to patients as an intravenous dose of 0.05 mL/kg of saline solution (NaCl 0.9%)
Receives: Drug: Intravenous dose of 0.05 mL/kg of saline solution

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of coughing (between discontinuation of desflurane and minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 0.15 of desflurane)

    Incidence of coughing during emergence of general anesthesia (between discontinuation of desflurane and MAC of 0.15 of desflurane) and its severity based on a 4-grade scale

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Incidence of coughing (between discontinuation of desflurane, MAC of 0.1 and 0.2 of desflurane, at extubation, as well as 5 and 10 min after extubation)

    Incidence of coughing during emergence of general anesthesia (between MAC of 0.15 of desflurane and until 10 min after extubation) and its severity based on a 4-grade scale

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  2. Extubation time

    Interval between discontinuation of desflurane and extubation

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  3. Sedation of the patient

    Sedation of the patient two, five and ten minutes following extubation, then at 15 minutes interval in the recovery room, based on the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/A), until 30 minutes after the admission in the recovery room

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  4. Incidence of hypoventilation

    incidence of hypoventilation (breathing rate < 8/min)

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  5. Incidence of hypoxic episode

    incidence of hypoxic episode (oxygen saturation < 90%)

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  6. Blood pressure

    Measurement of blood pressure before the induction and during emergence (every 5 min) in order to calculate incidence of fluctuation of non invasive blood pressure and heart rate of more than 20% between the values before induction of anesthesia until 10 min after extubation

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  7. Heart rate

    Measurement of heart rate before the induction and during emergence (every 5 min) in order to calculate incidence of fluctuation of non invasive blood pressure and heart rate of more than 20% between the values before induction of anesthesia until 10 min after extubation

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  8. Agitation of the patient during emergence

    Note the possible agitation of the patient during emergence

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  9. Complications

    Describe potential complications secondary to the bolus of the substance under study at the emergence

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  10. Cumulative incidence of nausea/vomiting

    Calculate cumulative incidence of nausea/vomiting between extubation and 30 minutes after the admission in the recovery room

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

  11. Swallowing pain scores

    Evaluate swallowing pain scores evaluated using a verbal simple numeric scale (0 = no pain et 10 = worst pain imaginable) 30 min after extubation

    Measured: one day, perioperative period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2017
  4. Study completionDec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
154 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02932397
Sponsor's protocol ID
CE16.176
Acronym
PROPOREV
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
5 Oct 2016
Last updated
24 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ouellet MF, Moore A, Williams S, Girard F, Desroches J, Ruel M, Beaulieu P. Efficacy of a propofol bolus against placebo to prevent cough at emergence from general anesthesia with desflurane: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2023 May;70(5):842-850. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02401-w. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

    PubMed 36829104

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol and Intravenous dose of 0.05 mL/kg of saline solution in people with Elective Surgery and Coughing, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of coughing (between discontinuation of desflurane and minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 0.15 of desflurane) (time frame: one day, perioperative period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02932397, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in