AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis CNCT02933970

Comparison of Telemedicine to Usual Care for HCV Management for Methadone-maintained Individuals

A study testing Telemedicine in people with Hepatitis C, run by Andrew Talal at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the effectiveness of a patient-centered, opiate agonist treatment (OAT)-integrated telemedicine-based approach for management and delivery of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment to persons with substance use disorders (PWSUD) versus usual care, which we anticipate in most cases will be referral to an offsite… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatitis C
What is being tested?
Telemedicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
602 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Feb 2017to 1 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HCV antibody detected
  • Ability and willingness of subject or legal representative to provide written informed consent.
  • 18 years of age
  • A minimum of 12-month enrollment in the opiate agonist treatment program
  • Likely to be adherent to the therapeutic regimen
  • Covered by medical insurance

Who cannot join

  • Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of the informed consent or ability to be compliant with the study is uncertain.
  • <18 years of age
  • < 12 months enrolled in an opiate agonist treatment program.
  • Non-compliance with therapeutic regimen defined as three consecutive missed appointments that will result in a discussion between the principal investigator at the site and the study participant to determine the reason for the missed appointments. Continuation in the study for the participant will be assessed on a case-by-case basis between the study PI and the site PI.
  • Lack of medical insurance coverage
  • Ineligibility for HCV treatment
  • Active treatment for HCV at the time of the study enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Andrew H Talal

    Buffalo, New York, 14216

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Stepped-Wedge Randomized Control Trial to Compare Integrated, Co-located, Telemedicine-based HCV Management for Individuals on Opiate Agonist Treatment Versus Usual Care Treatment of HCV of Individuals on Opiate Agonist Treatment

To compare the effectiveness of a patient-centered, opiate agonist treatment (OAT)-integrated telemedicine-based approach for management and delivery of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment to persons with substance use disorders (PWSUD) versus usual care, which we anticipate in most cases will be referral to an offsite location for HCV management. The effectiveness will be expressed through the primary patient centered and clinical outcome, achievement of viral eradication, defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks post-treatment cessation.

Read the detailed description

The study is a non-blinded stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial with two arms: onsite HCV management through telemedicine versus HCV management through usual care, referral to an offsite hepatitis specialist (Referral). The arm assignment is at the cluster (clinic) level. After an initial period (9 months) in which all clinics implement the control intervention (usual care), at regular intervals (i.e., the "steps") of 9 months duration each, one group of clinics is randomized to cross over from the Usual Care arm to the Telemedicine arm. The process continues until all clinics have crossed over to implement telemedicine, and thus all clinics contribute data to both interventions. In addition, patients cured of HCV are followed for two years post-treatment cessation to assess for reinfection or relapse of HCV RNA.

Conditions
Hepatitis C
Being tested
Telemedicine
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis C

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TelemedicineOther

    Also called Two way video conferencing

    Patients will be linked with the provider via two-way video-teleconferencing facilitated by an onsite OAT program staff member

Study groups in NCT02933970
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionReferral-HCV seropositive subjects enrolled for at least 12 months in an opiate agonist treatment (OAT) program will be referred to an off-site liver specialist
InterventionOtherTelemedicine - HCV seropositive subjects enrolled for at least 12 months in an OAT program will be treated on site by a liver specialist via two-way video conferencing. (telemedicine)
Receives: Other: Telemedicine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Observed Percentage of Patients in Both Arms Who Achieve Viral Eradication

    Percentage of patients who achieve viral eradication (defined as undetectable HCV RNA for 12 weeks post treatment cessation)

    Measured: 12 weeks post treatment cessation

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Comparison of Treatment Initiation Percentages

    Comparison of treatment initiation percentages between the two arms, as measured by the percentage of patients that take an initial medication dose.

    Measured: Up to 160 weeks

  2. Comparison of Treatment Completion Rates

    Comparison of treatment completion percentages between the two arms.

    Measured: Up to 210 weeks

  3. Comparison of Patient Satisfaction

    We assessed patient satisfaction with healthcare delivery between the two arms through the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) (1). The instrument is comprised of 18 questions from 7 subscales with responses on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "1=Strongly Agree" to "5=Strongly Disagree". We administered the PSQ-18 at baseline and at the SVR time point. The higher the scored value, the higher the satisfaction. We calculated the score per participant, per time point, as the average of the scored values of all questions answered out of 18, and subsequently rounded the average score to the nearest integer (2).

    1. Marshall GN, Hays RD. The patient satisfaction questionnaire short-form (PSQ-18). Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1994.
    2. Talal AH, Sofikitou EM, Wang K, Dickerson SS, Jaanimagi U, Markatou M. High Satisfaction with Patient-Centered Telemedicine for Hepatitis C Virus Delivered to Substance Users: A Mixed-Methods Study. Telemed J E-Health, 2023; 29: 395-407.

    Measured: Baseline (initial time point) and at time HCV is cured, i.e., sustained virological response (up to 210 weeks).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
602 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02933970
Sponsor's protocol ID
Telemedicine vs. Usual Care
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
24 Sep 2016
Last updated
20 Dec 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: At the completion of the study, the data will be filed with the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and will be publicly availability.

Publications

  • Talal AH, Markatou M, Zeremski M, Liu A, Dharia A, George SG, Taylor M, Davis K, Silber A, Brown LS, Tobin JN. Opioid treatment program-integrated facilitated telemedicine for hepatitis C treatment: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation analysis. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Oct 15;25(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-05138-9.

    PubMed 41094463
  • Dickerson SS, George SJ, Ventuneac A, Dharia A, Talal AH. Care Integration for Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Through Facilitated Telemedicine Within Opioid Treatment Programs: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 12;26:e53049. doi: 10.2196/53049.

    PubMed 38865703
  • Talal AH, Markatou M, Liu A, Perumalswami PV, Dinani AM, Tobin JN, Brown LS. Integrated Hepatitis C-Opioid Use Disorder Care Through Facilitated Telemedicine: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2024 Apr 23;331(16):1369-1378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.2452.

    PubMed 38568601
  • Ventuneac A, Dickerson SS, Dharia A, George SJ, Talal AH. Scaling and Sustaining Facilitated Telemedicine to Expand Treatment Access Among Underserved Populations: A Qualitative Study. Telemed J E Health. 2023 Dec;29(12):1862-1869. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0534. Epub 2023 May 26.

    PubMed 37252770
  • Talal AH, Sofikitou EM, Wang K, Dickerson S, Jaanimagi U, Markatou M. High Satisfaction with Patient-Centered Telemedicine for Hepatitis C Virus Delivered to Substance Users: A Mixed-Methods Study. Telemed J E Health. 2023 Mar;29(3):395-407. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0189. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

    PubMed 35925809

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Telemedicine in people with Hepatitis C, run by Andrew Talal at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Observed Percentage of Patients in Both Arms Who Achieve Viral Eradication (time frame: 12 weeks post treatment cessation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02933970, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in