AzTrials
AzTrials

Wound ClosureNCT02935426

Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Adhesives to Sutures in the Palate After Connective Tissue Graft

A study testing n-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and 5-0 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) suture in people with Wound Closure, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives have been successfully used for wound closure. The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sutures in the donor site of connective tissue grafts. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Wound Closure
What is being tested?
n-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and 5-0 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) suture
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
9 Jan 2017to Aug 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients of the Graduate Periodontics Clinic, College of Dentistry, University of Manitoba that require harvesting of subepithelial connective tissue graft from the palate from October 2016 to December 2017 and have signed the consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with coagulation disorders (Hemophilia a/b, von Willebrand disease, liver disease, anticoagulative therapy), patients on corticosteroids, patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or with any systematic disease that periodontal surgery is contraindicated, and patient with history of contact dermatitis to formaldehyde will be excluded from the trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Chrysi Stavropoulou, DDS contact

204-960-2447

stavropc@myumanitoba.ca

Anastasia Cholakis, DMD, MDent contact

204-789-3597

anastasia.cholakis@umanitoba.ca

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Graduate Periodontics Clinic University of Manitoba

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W2

    Chrysi Stavropoulou, 204-960-2447, stavropc@myumanitoba.ca

    Anastasia Cholakis, 204-975-7765, Anastasia.Cholakis@umanitoba.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives to Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Sutures in the Donor Site of Connective Tissue Grafts- A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives have been successfully used for wound closure. The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sutures in the donor site of connective tissue grafts. Two groups of volunteers will randomly assigned to one of the two study groups. The wound closure at the palatal donor area will be achieved with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sutures in one group and with high viscosity cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives on the other group. The surgical procedure will be performed by one of three calibrated periodontics residents. Data will be collected at baseline-day of the surgery and in one week post-operatively. The primary outcome is patient's discomfort from the donor site during the first week after the surgery. Secondary outcomes is the time required for suture placement or cyanoacrylate application, patient's pain from donor and recipient site one week post-operatively, painkillers intake, presence or absence of inflammation and modified EHI early-wound healing index.

Read the detailed description

A prospective, randomized clinical trial will be conducted to determine whether cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives or sutures are better tolerated by patients receiving soft tissue gum grafts.

Periodontal plastic surgery procedures have become an integral part of periodontal treatment by addressing esthetic and functional demands. Several therapeutic modalities such as free gingival graft, pedicle flaps, connective tissue grafts, grafts combining the two lateral modalities and guided tissue regeneration have been used for covering the denuded roots and augmenting the width and thickness of the keratinized gingiva. Among various surgical techniques, subepithelial connective tissue (SECT) grafts remain the most commonly used and most successful root coverage procedures. The esthetic and functional success of SECT graft techniques is highly predictable and reliable and they have given them a common place in the clinical practice. Subepithelial connective tissue graft procedures require harvesting tissue from a donor area, usually the palate. This addition of another surgical site extends the complexity of the procedure and increases patient discomfort.

Single interrupted or continuous interlocking sutures are suggested at the donor site. Suturing is the most common method of wound closure. Other biomaterials such as staples, adhesive tapes, adhesive glues and fibrin sealants have been used generally to hasten the pace of healing. Adhesives interact with different materials, merge and allow them to remain whole. Cyanoacrylates are bio-adhesives that were discovered by Ardis in 1949 and first used for surgery by Coover et al in 1959. When applied to two opposing, wet, living tissue surfaces, they have the ability to cement them in place. Their general chemical formula is CH2=C(CN)-COOR , where R can be substituted for any alkyl group, ranging from methyl to decyl. They polymerize rapidly within seconds in an exothermic reaction following contact with proteinaceous surfaces to form strong and flexible bonds. Methyl cyanoacrylate was the first glue developed, but tissue toxicity precluded its use. The process of causing histologic toxicity is thought to be related to the byproducts of degradation into cyanoacetate and formaldehyde. Further research showed that changing the type of alkyl chains in the compound to one with a longer molecular chain can reduce tissue toxicity. Cyanoacrylates are simple, inexpensive and practical adhesives. Cyanoacrylates have been used for achieving hemostasis at intraoral and extra-oral surgical sites treating ulcers, attaching grafts, managing cerebral spinal fluid leaks, stabilizing the bone fragments during plating, sealing sinus membrane perforations, and achieving peripheral nerve re-anastomosis; as periodontal dressings; and for a number of other dental applications. They are sloughed from the surface of the skin and mucosa 7 to 10 days after adhesive application. Butyl cyanoacrylate is a bacteriostatic, biodegradable, hemostatic cyanoacrylate with a long half-life and good tissue compatibility. It can adhere in moist environments and is available in a formulation appropriate to be used in the oral cavity. It has been proven to be effective in closure of uninfected intraoral incisions on edentulous areas in the mandible, in extractions and periapical surgery.

Few studies are focused on evaluating the wound healing and assessing patient-centered outcomes at the palate donor area after different harvesting techniques To the best of our knowledge, there is no study that compares different methods of wound closure at the donor site.

This prospective clinical trial aims at obtaining information to determine which technique from the patient's standpoint is superior.

The participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The wound closure at the palatal donor area will be achieved with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sutures in one group and with high viscosity cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives on the other group. The surgical procedure will be performed by one of three calibrated periodontics residents (CS, JB, DR). Patients will be followed for 1 month post-operatively by the same resident to monitor the healing process and obtain patient feedback. Data will be collected at the baseline-day of the surgery, one day post-operatively and at the 1-week follow-up appointment. Randomization will be achieved using a computerized randomization scheme and will be communicated to the surgeon during the surgery by an independent examiner (AC). Participants will be block-randomized for each of the three operators for balance.

Anesthesia will be achieved with greater palatine block anesthesia and local infiltrations, if needed, on the palate with 1.8ml Lidocaine 2% 1:100,000 epinephrine. The single incision harvesting technique is chosen. Following administration for local anesthesia a single incision is made on the anterior hard palatal vault. The length of the incision depends on the size of the graft that is needed.

Once the graft is harvested pressure is applied to the palate until hemostasis is achieved and the graft is maintained in a moist environment.

Using 5-0 PTFE suture, continuous interlocking sutures 4mm apart are placed in the suture group leaving 3-4mm tails. Thin layers of cyanoacrylate are applied and rinsed with saline at least 3 times with interval at least 30s to allow complete polymerization in the cyanoacrylate group until hemostasis is achieved.

The harvested tissue graft is sutured to the donor site. The day of the surgery-a baseline record is obtained (see attached form). A loading dose of Amoxicillin 2g or Clindamycin 600mg, in case of allergy to penicillin, is provided to all participants immediately after the surgery with Ibuprofen 400mg for pain control. Postoperative instructions are also provided. They are also provided with an ice pack for the first 24 hours to minimize swelling from the recipient site. Sufficient amount of Ibuprofen 200mg is provided in a bag for the participants to consume 1-2 tablets po q4-6h PRN. They are instructed to return the bag for recording of the number of painkillers consumed at the 1-week follow-up appointment. A pain visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire with no pain on the left site and unbearable pain on the right site is given to the participants to note the level of pain from the palatal site the day after the surgery before the consumption of any painkillers. Participants are encouraged to contact the operator if they have any problem at any time.

Post-operative complications like severe bleeding, infection, abnormal pain, root exposure of the teeth adjacent to the donor site or sloughing, that need to be addressed before the scheduled appointments, will be recorded for 1 month after the surgery.

At the 1-week follow-up appointments the modified early-wound healing index (EHI), the wound length and width, and the presence of normal or abnormal inflammation will be recorded. The number of painkillers consumed the 1st week after the surgery will be counted and recorded. Participants will be asked to report any self-medication for pain. Sutures will be removed in the suture group. A 1-week follow-up VAS questionnaire is given to participants to fill during the 1-week follow-up appointment. The participants are asked to note the level of pain from the donor and recipient site and the level of discomfort (eating, speaking,.) from the donor site during the week after the surgery. Photos will be taken in all appointments.)

Conditions
Wound Closure
Being tested
n-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate, 5-0 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) suture
Keywords
cyanoacrylate, sutures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • n-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylateDevice

    Also called PeriAcryl®90

    used in cyanoacrylate group

  • 5-0 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sutureDevice

    used in suture group

Study groups in NCT02935426
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cyanoacrylate groupExperimentalWound closure after harvesting of connective tissue graft in the donor site will be achieved with application of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
Receives: Device: n-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate
Suture groupActive comparatorWound closure after harvesting of connective tissue graft in the donor site will be achieved with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) continuous interlocking sutures
Receives: Device: 5-0 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) suture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient's discomfort from the donor site

    VAS questionnaire

    Measured: During the first week after the surgery

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Operative time

    Time required to place sutures or to apply cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives

    Measured: A baseline-during the surgery

  2. Pain from the donor site

    VAS questionnaire

    Measured: one day after the surgery

  3. Pain from donor site

    VAS questionnaire

    Measured: During the first week after the surgery

  4. Painkillers intake

    amount of Ibuprofen consumed during the first week after the surgery

    Measured: during the first week after the surgery

  5. modified EHI early-wound healing index

    assessment of wound closure and presence of fibrin and/or necrosis

    Measured: one week post-operatively

  6. Complications

    severe bleeding (more than 20 min), infection (swollen and presence of pus), abnormal pain (maximum consumption of painkillers, self-medication), root exposure, sloughing, other

    Measured: one week post-operatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completionAug 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
32 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02935426
Sponsor's protocol ID
B2016:092
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
13 Oct 2016
Last updated
26 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Caffesse RG, Guinard EA. Treatment of localized gingival recessions. Part II. Coronally repositioned flap with a free gingival graft. J Periodontol. 1978 Jul;49(7):357-61. doi: 10.1902/jop.1978.49.7.357.

    PubMed 279663
  • Guinard EA, Caffesse RG. Treatment of localized gingival recessions. Part I. Lateral sliding flap. J Periodontol. 1978 Jul;49(7):351-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1978.49.7.351.

    PubMed 279662
  • Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1985 Dec;56(12):715-20. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.12.715.

    PubMed 3866056
  • Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical performance of a regenerative strategy for intrabony defects: scientific evidence and clinical experience. J Periodontol. 2005 Mar;76(3):341-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.341.

    PubMed 15857066
  • Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Magnani C, Cortellini P, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession. J Periodontol. 1992 Nov;63(11):919-28. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.919.

    PubMed 1453307
  • Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S8-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.130674.

    PubMed 25644302
  • Pandit N, Khasa M, Gugnani S, Malik R, Bali D. Comparison of two techniques of harvesting connective tissue and its effects on healing pattern at palate and recession coverage at recipient site. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.177099.

    PubMed 27041892
  • Fickl S, Fischer KR, Jockel-Schneider Y, Stappert CF, Schlagenhauf U, Kebschull M. Early wound healing and patient morbidity after single-incision vs. trap-door graft harvesting from the palate--a clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Dec;18(9):2213-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1204-7. Epub 2014 Feb 23.

    PubMed 24562700
  • Vastani A, Maria A. Healing of intraoral wounds closed using silk sutures and isoamyl 2-cyanoacrylate glue: a comparative clinical and histologic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;71(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

    PubMed 23089654
  • Gumus P, Buduneli E. Graft stabilization with cyanoacrylate decreases shrinkage of free gingival grafts. Aust Dent J. 2014 Mar;59(1):57-64. doi: 10.1111/adj.12149. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

    PubMed 24494804
  • Costa HJ, Pereira CS, Costa MP, Fabri FS, Lancellotti CL, Dolci JE. Experimental comparative study in rabbits of three different ways of cartilage graft fixation: suture, gelatin-resorcin-formaldehyde and butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Sep;127(9):947-51. doi: 10.1080/00016480601089689.

    PubMed 17712674
  • Yoo J, Chandarana S, Cosby R. Clinical application of tissue adhesives in soft-tissue surgery of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;16(4):312-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283018209.

    PubMed 18626248
  • Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Toxicity of cyanoacrylate adhesives and their occupational impacts for dental staff. Ind Health. 2004 Apr;42(2):207-11. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.42.207.

    PubMed 15128170
  • Toriumi DM, Raslan WF, Friedman M, Tardy ME. Histotoxicity of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. A comparative study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 May;116(5):546-50. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870050046004.

    PubMed 2183824
  • Forrest JO. The use of cyanoacrylates in periodontal surgery. J Periodontol. 1974 Apr;45(4):225-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1974.45.4.225. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4594350

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing n-butyl cyanoacrylate and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and 5-0 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) suture in people with Wound Closure, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chrysi Stavropoulou, DDS (204-960-2447, stavropc@myumanitoba.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient's discomfort from the donor site (time frame: During the first week after the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02935426, which also lists 26 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in