AzTrials
AzTrials

Relapsed or Refractory Multiple MyelomaPhase 1INTREPID-1NCT02939183

Phase 1b Study Evaluating OPomD in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1 study testing Immediate Release (IR) Formulation, Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation and Dexamethasone in people with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, run by Amgen at 20 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A study evaluating two new formulations of oprozomib plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in participants with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
Immediate Release (IR) Formulation, Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation and Dexamethasone
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
61 participants
Where
20 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
17 Jan 2017to 6 Oct 2022
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant must have a pathologically documented, definitively diagnosed, multiple myeloma relapse, or refractory progressive disease after at least 2 lines of therapy for multiple myeloma. Prior therapeutic treatment or regimens must include a proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide.
  • Participant must be willing and able to undergo bone marrow aspirate per protocol (with or without bone marrow biopsy per institutional guidelines).
  • Measurable disease (assessed within 28 days prior to day 1).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of <= 2.
  • Other Inclusion Criteria May Apply

Who cannot join

  • Currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 28 days or 5 half-lives whichever is shorter since ending treatment on another investigational device or drug study(s).
  • Previously received an allogeneic stem cell transplant and the occurrence of one or more of the following: received the transplant within 6 months prior to study day 1; received immunosuppressive therapy within the last 3 months prior to study day 1; having signs or symptoms of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease.
  • Autologous stem cell transplant < 90 days prior to study day 1.
  • Multiple myeloma with IgM subtype.
  • POEM syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes).
  • Plasma cell leukemia (> 2.0 X10^9/L circulating plasma cells by standard differential).
  • Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia.
  • Other Exclusion Criteria May Apply

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 4 countries.

20 sites in 4 countries

United States13 sites
  • Research Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Research Site

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20817

  • Research Site

    Canton, Ohio, 44718

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637-6613

  • Research Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Research Site

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Research Site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Research Site

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Research Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Research Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Research Site

    West Hollywood, California, 90069

Other trials in United States

Australia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Clayton, Victoria, 3168

  • Research Site

    Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

  • Research Site

    Perth, Western Australia, 6000

Other trials in Australia

Canada2 sites
  • Research Site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9

  • Research Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C1

Other trials in Canada

Spain2 sites
  • Research Site

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Research Site

    Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: (INTREPID-1) A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Oprozomib in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A study evaluating two new formulations of oprozomib plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in participants with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.

Read the detailed description

A multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, dose-exploration study evaluating two new formulations of oprozomib plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in participants with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. The study will be conducted in two parts. Part 1 will evaluate the formulations of oprozomib in combination with dexamethasone only. Part 2 will evaluate the formulations of oprozomib administered at increasing dose levels (dose escalation) in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone.

Being tested
Immediate Release (IR) Formulation, Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation, Dexamethasone, Pomalidomide
Keywords
Multiple Myeloma
Medical subject headings
Recurrence, Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Immediate Release (IR) FormulationDrug

    Immediate Release (IR) Formulation

  • Gastro-Retentive (GR) FormulationDrug

    Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation

  • DexamethasoneDrug

    Dexamethasone

  • PomalidomideDrug

    Pomalidomide

Study groups in NCT02939183
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Part 1 Oprozomib Immediate-release (IR) + DexamethasoneExperimentalOprozomib IR plus dexamethasone
Receives: Drug: Immediate Release (IR) Formulation; Drug: Dexamethasone
Part 1 Oprozomib Gastro-retentive (GR) + DexamethasoneExperimentalOprozomib GR plus dexamethasone
Receives: Drug: Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation; Drug: Dexamethasone
Part 2 Oprozomib IR + Pomalidomide + DexamethasoneExperimentalOprozomib IR plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Receives: Drug: Immediate Release (IR) Formulation; Drug: Dexamethasone; Drug: Pomalidomide
Part 2 Oprozomib GR + Pomalidomide + DexamethasoneExperimentalOprozomib GR plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone
Receives: Drug: Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation; Drug: Dexamethasone; Drug: Pomalidomide
Open-label Roll-overExperimentalOprozomib GR monotherapy, or oprozomib GR plus dexamethasone
Receives: Drug: Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation; Drug: Dexamethasone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose-Limiting Toxcity (DLT)

    DLTs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 and included the below, if judged by the investigator/medical monitor to be possibly related to study treatment: Non-hematologic DLTs were any ≥ Grade 3 toxicity, except: Grade 3 asymptomatic electrolyte abnormalities (except hypophosphatemia > 24 hours); Grade 3 nausea, vomiting and diarrhea < 3 days; Grade 3 fatigue < 14 days; ≥ Grade 3 hyperglycemia/toxicity due to dexamethasone; ≥ Grade 3 rash due to pomalidomide. Hematologic DLTs included: Grade 4 neutropenia if absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10^9/L ≥ 7 days; febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days; Grade ≥ 3 with ≥ Grade 2 bleeding/requiring platelet transfusion.

    Measured: Day 1 to day 28 of cycle 1, where each cycle was 28 days

  2. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Each Formulation of Oprozomib in Combination With Pomolidomide and Dexamethasone

    The MTD was the dose with the highest posterior probability of having a DLT rate within the target toxicity interval (15% to 25%), while the posterior probability of excessive/unacceptable toxicity (>25% to 100%) is <40%.

    DLTs were graded using CTCAE version 4.03 and included the below, if judged by the investigator/medical monitor to be possibly related to study treatment: Non-hematologic DLTs were any ≥ Grade 3 toxicity, except: Grade 3 asymptomatic electrolyte abnormalities (except hypophosphatemia > 24 hours); Grade 3 nausea, vomiting and diarrhea < 3 days; Grade 3 fatigue < 14 days; ≥ Grade 3 hyperglycemia/toxicity due to dexamethasone; ≥ Grade 3 rash due to pomalidomide. Hematologic DLTs included: Grade 4 neutropenia if absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10^9/L ≥ 7 days; febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days; Grade ≥ 3 with ≥ Grade 2 bleeding/requiring platelet transfusion.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 28 of cycle 1, where each cycle was 28 days

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Oprozomib in Combination With Dexamethasone and/or Pomalidomide)

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant. TEAEs were any AE that started on or after receiving the first dose of investigational product and up to and including 30 days after the last dose of investigational product or the end of study date, whichever is earlier. Treatment-related TEAEs were those considered related to study treatment by the investigator. Any clinically significant changes in electrocardiograms, vital signs, physical examination with a neurological assessment and clinical laboratory tests were recorded as TEAEs.

    Measured: Day 1 of cycle 1 to 30 (+7) days after the last dose of study treatment or end of study date, whichever is earlier (where each cycle was 28 days). Median treatment duration in Part 1 was 11.43 weeks and in Part 2 was 28 weeks

  4. Number of Participants With TEAEs and Treatment-emergent Serious AEs (Open-label Roll-over)

    TEAEs were any AE that started on or after receiving the first dose of investigational product and up to and including 30 days after the last dose of investigational product or the end of study date, whichever is earlier. Treatment-related TEAEs were those considered related to study treatment by the investigator. Serious TEAEs were any AE meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: fatal; life-threatening; required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; other medically important serious event.

    Measured: Day 1 to 30 (+7) days after the last dose of study treatment or end of study date, whichever is earlier (where each cycle was 28 days). Median treatment duration for the open-label roll-over arm was 75.14 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Oprozomib

    The mean Cmax of oprozomib is presented following dosing on cycle 1 day 8 and cycle 1 day 22 for the IR and GR oprozomib formulations.

    Measured: Cycle 1 days 8 and 22: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose. GR only: cycle 1 day 8: 8 hours post-dose

  2. Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Oprozomib

    The median Tmax of oprozomib is presented following dosing on cycle 1 day 8 and cycle 1 day 22 for the IR and GR oprozomib formulations.

    Measured: Cycle 1 days 8 and 22: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose. GR only: cycle 1 day 8: 8 hours post-dose

  3. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Oprozomib

    The mean AUClast of oprozomib is presented following dosing on cycle 1 day 8 and cycle 1 day 22 for the IR and GR oprozomib formulations.

    Measured: Cycle 1 days 8 and 22: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose. GR only: cycle 1 day 8: 8 hours post-dose

  4. Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Revised International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC)

    BOR was the best response per IMWG-URC from best to worst: stringent complete response (sCR; complete response [CR], normal serum free light chain ratio, no clonal cells in bone marrow [BM]), CR (negative immunofixation on serum and urine, soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance, < 5% plasma cells in BM), very good partial response (VGPR; serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein [urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24-h]), partial response (PR; ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or < 200 mg/24-h), minimal response (MR; 25-49% reduction of serum M-protein and 50-89% in 24-h urinary M-protein, exceeding 200 mg/24-h), stable disease (SD; not CR, VGPR, PR or progressive disease [PD]), and PD (≥ 25% increase in serum or urine M-component, development of new or increased size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas, hypercalcemia attributed to the plasma cell proliferative disorder).

    Measured: Day 1 of cycle 1 up to the end of study visit (where each cycle was 28 days); median treatment duration in Part 1 was 11.43 weeks and in Part 2 was 28 weeks

  5. Overall Response Rate (ORR) According to IMWG-URC

    The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a BOR of sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR per the IMWG-URC. Complete response (CR): Negative immunofixation on serum and urine, soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance, < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow (BM). Stringent CR (sCR): CR and normal serum free light chain ratio and no clonal cells in BM. Very Good Partial Response (VGPR): Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein (urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24-h). PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24-h. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: Day 1 of cycle 1 up to the end of study visit (where each cycle was 28 days); median treatment duration in Part 1 was 11.43 weeks and in Part 2 was 28 weeks

  6. Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) Events

    PFS was defined as the number of months from a participant's first dose of study treatment to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause. The number of participants who had a PFS event or who were censored are presented. PFS events were an assessment of progressive disease according to the IMWG-URC or death due to any cause. PFS data was censored: participants alive and no documented disease progression at time of analysis were censored at date of last disease assessment; participants alive with no disease assessment were censored at the first study dose date; participants alive without documented disease progression, with withdrawn consent were censored at date of last disease assessment before consent withdrawal; and for participants who started anti-cancer therapy other than study treatment prior to documentation of disease progression were censored at date of last disease assessment prior to starting new therapy.

    Measured: Day 1 of cycle 1 up to the end of study visit (where each cycle was 28 days); median treatment duration in Part 1 was 11.43 weeks and in Part 2 was 28 weeks

  7. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS

    PFS was defined as the number of months from a participant's first dose of study treatment to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CIs were estimated using the method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) with log-log transformation. PFS data was censored: participants alive and no documented disease progression at time of analysis were censored at date of last disease assessment; participants alive with no disease assessment were censored at the first study dose date; participants alive without documented disease progression, with withdrawn consent were censored at date of last disease assessment before consent withdrawal; and for participants who started anti-cancer therapy other than study treatment prior to documentation of disease progression were censored at date of last disease assessment prior to starting new therapy.

    Measured: Day 1 of cycle 1 up to the end of study visit (where each cycle was 28 days); median treatment duration in Part 1 was 11.43 weeks and in Part 2 was 28 weeks

  8. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR, presented in months, was defined as the number of days between the date of the first tumor assessment indicating an objective response (PR or better) through to the subsequent date of progression or death due to any cause, or where applicable date of censoring (date of first progressive disease assessment or death or date of censoring - date of the first objective response result + 1/30.4). Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the method by Klein and Moeschberger (1997) with log-log transformation.

    Measured: Day 1 of cycle 1 up to the end of study visit (where each cycle was 28 days); median treatment duration in Part 1 was 11.43 weeks and in Part 2 was 28 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion6 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion6 Oct 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02939183
Sponsor's protocol ID
20160104
Acronym
INTREPID-1
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
18 Oct 2016
Last updated
26 Sep 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Immediate Release (IR) Formulation, Gastro-Retentive (GR) Formulation and Dexamethasone in people with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, run by Amgen at 20 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in United States, Australia, Canada, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose-Limiting Toxcity (DLT) (time frame: Day 1 to day 28 of cycle 1, where each cycle was 28 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in