XerostomiaLEONIDAS-2NCT02941276
A Trial Looking at Treating Dry Mouth After Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
A study testing Active Electrostimulator device in people with Xerostomia and Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by University College, London.
Trial summary
This trial is looking at using an intra-oral electrostimulating device for the management of radiotherapy-induced dry mouth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Xerostomia, Head and Neck Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Active Electrostimulator device
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be at least 18 years old
- To have received more than 40 Gy of external beam RT for cancer in the H\&N region at least 4 months before entry into the study
- To have grade 1 or 2 of RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema
- To have a degree of minimum degree of dryness of 50mm (≥50mm) on a 100mm VAS scale (0=no dryness; 100
- =maximum dryness).
- To have demonstrable residual salivary gland function (increase in salivary flow on appropriate stimulation (e.g. chewing paraffin wax)
- To have at least one parotid gland
Who cannot join
- To have severe uncontrolled systemic disease (on the basis of the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology: ASA IV and ASA V)
- To have known allergy to materials similar to those used in the investigational product
- To wear other active implants such as cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, or hearing aids
- To have an unstimulated whole salivary flow of 0ml/15min (complete absence of unstimulated salivary flow as measured via sialometry for 15 minutes).
- To use of pilocarpine as systemic therapy
- To have grade 3 RTOG/EROTC or no resting saliva (sialometry = 0mL/1.5 min)
- To have no parotid glands
About this study
Official title: Long-term Evaluation of the Effectiveness Of a Novel Intra-oral Electro-stimulator for the Treatment of raDiotherapy-ASsociated Dry Mouth
This trial is looking at using an intra-oral electrostimulating device for the management of radiotherapy-induced dry mouth.
Read the detailed description
Dry mouth is a common complaint of radiotherapy for cancer of the head and neck region. It is a distressing often persistent condition which can lead to longlasting oral discomfort, dental infections, diminished quality of life, social isolation and loneliness. Unfortunately, current therapies of dry mouth are often unsatisfactory, expensive and may result in adverse effects. A novel intraoral electronic device has recently been developed to treat dry mouth. The device, acting as a "salivary pacemaker", harmlessly stimulates nerves of the salivary glands and does not cause adverse side effects. The aim of this proposal is to assess the longterm effects of such a device in this population, which have yet to be investigated, to demonstrate whether its daily application is an effective method of lessening dry mouth and improving life quality. 84 individuals will be enrolled in the study to use the device for 12 months, after receiving appropriate instructions. 42 participants (out of 84) will act as controls as they will receive a sham device that will not deliver electric stimuli but only tactile stimulation (like using a chewing gum). All participants will be allowed to continue using their routine local therapy for dry mouth (e.g. artificial saliva) during the study. Each participant will keep a diary relevant to the frequency of use and potential changes in dry mouth sensation. Participants will also be asked to attend hospital appointments to measure changes in saliva production and complete questionnaires on their dry mouth and quality of life. The device has the potential to radically change current clinical practice. If the trial is successful, the use of the device will provide patients having radiation-induced dry mouth with a safe and drug-free therapeutic modality.
- Conditions
- Xerostomia, Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Active Electrostimulator device, Sham Electrostimulator device
- Medical subject headings
- Xerostomia, Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active Electrostimulator deviceDevice
Patients who will receive a fully functioning device
Sham Electrostimulator deviceDevice
Patients who will receive a device that does not release electric stimuli (but provided mechanical/tactile stimulation)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Active electrostimulator device (intra-oral active second generation Saliwell GenNarino) (Saliwell Ltd., Harutzim, Israel) Receives: Device: Active Electrostimulator device |
| Group B | Sham comparator | Sham electrostimulator device (intra-oral sham second generation Saliwell GenNarino) (Saliwell Ltd., Harutzim, Israel) Receives: Device: Sham Electrostimulator device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Improvement of subjective perception of dry mouth as measured on the Visual Analog Scale
The primary outcome is defined as the proportion of patients reporting a 30% reduction of xerostomia symptoms as evaluated through a 100mm VAS (100mm=maximum dryness).
Measured: 12 month
Secondary outcomes (5)
Salivary function
Improvement of objective salivary function as measured through 5-minutes sialometry
Measured: 12 month
Head and Neck cancer Quality of Life
Improvement in head and neck quality of life as measured on the EORTC QLQ-H\&N35
Measured: 12 month
Oral Health Quality of Life
Improvement in oral health quality of life as measured on the OH-QoL16 questionnaire
Measured: 12 month
General quality of Life
Improvement in general quality of life as measured on the SF-36 questionnaire
Measured: 12 month
Participant compliance
Evaluation of patients' tolerance in using the device by using a diary to record daily measurement.
Measured: 12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for XerostomiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dr Stefano Fedele, PhD, Principal investigator, University College, London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02941276
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11/0138
- Acronym
- LEONIDAS-2
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Evaluation of the Effectiveness Of a Novel Intra-oral Electro-stimulator for the Treatment of raDiotherapy-ASsociated Dry Mouth
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02941276
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LEONIDAS-2 / 11/0138
- Conditions
- Xerostomia, Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is looking at using an intra-oral electrostimulating device for the management of radiotherapy-induced dry mouth.
Detailed description
Dry mouth is a common complaint of radiotherapy for cancer of the head and neck region. It is a distressing often persistent condition which can lead to longlasting oral discomfort, dental infections, diminished quality of life, social isolation and loneliness. Unfortunately, current therapies of dry mouth are often unsatisfactory, expensive and may result in adverse effects. A novel intraoral electronic device has recently been developed to treat dry mouth. The device, acting as a "salivary pacemaker", harmlessly stimulates nerves of the salivary glands and does not cause adverse side effects. The aim of this proposal is to assess the longterm effects of such a device in this population, which have yet to be investigated, to demonstrate whether its daily application is an effective method of lessening dry mouth and improving life quality. 84 individuals will be enrolled in the study to use the device for 12 months, after receiving appropriate instructions. 42 participants (out of 84) will act as controls as they will receive a sham device that will not deliver electric stimuli but only tactile stimulation (like using a chewing gum). All participants will be allowed to continue using their routine local therapy for dry mouth (e.g. artificial saliva) during the study. Each participant will keep a diary relevant to the frequency of use and potential changes in dry mouth sensation. Participants will also be asked to attend hospital appointments to measure changes in saliva production and complete questionnaires on their dry mouth and quality of life. The device has the potential to radically change current clinical practice. If the trial is successful, the use of the device will provide patients having radiation-induced dry mouth with a safe and drug-free therapeutic modality.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Device: Active Electrostimulator deviceActive electrostimulator device (intra-oral active second generation Saliwell GenNarino) (Saliwell Ltd., Harutzim, Israel) |
| Group B | Sham comparator | Device: Sham Electrostimulator deviceSham electrostimulator device (intra-oral sham second generation Saliwell GenNarino) (Saliwell Ltd., Harutzim, Israel) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- To be at least 18 years old
- To have received more than 40 Gy of external beam RT for cancer in the H\&N region at least 4 months before entry into the study
- To have grade 1 or 2 of RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema
- To have a degree of minimum degree of dryness of 50mm (≥50mm) on a 100mm VAS scale (0=no dryness; 100
- =maximum dryness).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- To have severe uncontrolled systemic disease (on the basis of the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology: ASA IV and ASA V)
- To have known allergy to materials similar to those used in the investigational product
- To wear other active implants such as cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, or hearing aids
- To have an unstimulated whole salivary flow of 0ml/15min (complete absence of unstimulated salivary flow as measured via sialometry for 15 minutes).
- To use of pilocarpine as systemic therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active Electrostimulator devicePatients who will receive a fully functioning device | Device | Group A |
| Sham Electrostimulator devicePatients who will receive a device that does not release electric stimuli (but provided mechanical/tactile stimulation) | Device | Group B |
Primary outcome
Improvement of subjective perception of dry mouth as measured on the Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 12 month
The primary outcome is defined as the proportion of patients reporting a 30% reduction of xerostomia symptoms as evaluated through a 100mm VAS (100mm=maximum dryness).
5 secondary outcomes
Salivary function
Time frame: 12 month
Head and Neck cancer Quality of Life
Time frame: 12 month
Oral Health Quality of Life
Time frame: 12 month
General quality of Life
Time frame: 12 month
Participant compliance
Time frame: 12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Xerostomia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Prevalence, and Immunological Characteristics of Small Fiber Neuropathy in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Sjögren's Syndrome, Small Fiber Neuropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr Stefano Fedele, PhD principal investigator
University College, London
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active Electrostimulator device in people with Xerostomia and Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by University College, London.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Improvement of subjective perception of dry mouth as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (time frame: 12 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2021.